throbber
US010165747B1
`
`United States Patent
`US 10,165,747 Bl
`(10) Patent No.
`(12)
`Jines et al.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Jan. 1, 2019
`
`
`(54) MAIZE INBRED PH41VW
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`(71) Applicant: PIONEER HI-BRED
`INTERNATIONAL,INC., Johnston,
`IA (US)
`
`(72)
`
`.
`Inventors: Michael Phillip Jines, Fishers, IN
`(US); Leah ViesselmannStirling,
`Spring Valley, IL (US)
`
`(73) Assignee: PIONEER HI-BRED
`INTERNATIONAL, INC.IA (US)
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`US.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`US PVP Certificate No. 201200313 for Maize Inbred PH1D84,
`issued Jun. 25, 2014.
`US PVP Certificate No. 201200309 for Maize Inbred PHI8FC,
`issued Jun. 25, 2014.
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/924,680 for Maize Ilybrid K13M624, filed Mar.
`19, 2018.
`US. Appl. No. 15/924,492 for Maize Hybrid X08MS566,filed Mar.
`19, 2018.
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/924,498 for Maize Hybrid KO8M656,filed Mar.
`19, 2018.
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/924,319 for Maize Hybrid X13M693, filed Mar.
`19, 2018.
`Breeding History for PH41VW,dated Oct. 9, 2018.
`.
`.
`* cited by examiner
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 15/924,333
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Mar. 19, 2018
`
`Primary Examiner — Medina A Tbrahim
`
`ABSTRACT
`(67)
`Anovel maize variety designated PH41VWandseed,plants
`and plant parts thereof are provided. Methods for producing
`a maize plant comprise crossing maize variety PH41VW
`with another maize plant are provided. Methods for produc-
`ing a maize plant containing in its genetic material one or
`more traits introgressed into PH41VW through backcross
`conversion and/or transformation, and to the maize seed,
`plant and plant part produced thereby are provided. Hybrid
`maize seed, plants or plant parts are produced by crossing
`the variety PH41VW or a locus conversion of PH41VW
`with another maize variety.
`
`(2018.01)
`(2018.01)
`
`(51)
`
`(56)
`
`Int. Cl.
`AOIH 5/10
`AOIH 6/46
`(52) U.S. CL
`CPC voce AOIH 5/10 (2013.01); AOLH 6/46
`.
`.
`.
`(2018.05)
`(58) Field of Classification Search
`.
`None .
`See application file for complete search history.
`.
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`8,592,667 BIL
`8,759,636 Bl
`9,549,515 BI*
`
`11/2013 Carlone
`6/2014 Smalley
`1/2017 Grote wos AOILH 5/10
`
`20 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Inari Exhibit 1059
`Inari Exhibit 1059
`Inari v. Pioneer
`Inari v. Pioneer
`
`

`

`US 10,165,747 Bl
`
`2
`the growth medium may be comprised in a container or may,
`for example, be soil in a field.
`Maize variety PH41VW comprising an added heritable
`trait is provided. The heritable trait may comprise a genetic
`locus that
`is a dominant or recessive allele. In certain
`
`1
`MAIZE INBRED PH41VW
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`There are numerous steps in the development of any
`novel, desirable maize variety. Plant breeding begins with
`the analysis and definition of problems and weaknesses of
`the current germplasm, the establishment of program goals,
`and the definition of specific breeding objectives. The next
`step is selection of germplasm that possess the traits to meet
`the program goals. The breeder’s goal is to combine in a
`single variety or hybrid, various desirable traits. For field
`crops, these traits may include resistance to diseases and
`insects, resistance to heat and drought, reducing the time to
`crop maturity, greateryield, altered fatty acid profile, abiotic
`stress tolerance, improvements in compositionaltraits, and
`better agronomic characteristics and quality.
`These product development processes, which lead to the
`final step of marketing and distribution, can take from six to
`twelve years from the time the first cross is made until the
`finished seed is delivered to the farmer for planting. There-
`fore, development of new varieties and hybrids is a time-
`consuming process. A continuing goal of maize breeders is
`to develop stable, high yielding maize varieties and hybrids
`that are agronomically sound with maximal yield over one
`or more different conditions and environments.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`Provided is a novel maize, Zea mays L., variety, desig-
`nated PH41VW andprocesses for making PH41VW. Seed
`of maize variety PH41VW, plants of maize variety
`PH41VW,plant parts and cells of maize variety PH41VW,
`and to processes for making a maize plant that comprise
`crossing maize variety PH41 VW with another maize plant
`are provided. Also provided are maize plants having all the
`physiological and morphological characteristics of the
`inbred maize variety PH41VW.
`Processes are provided for making a maize plant contain-
`ing in its genetic material one or moretraits introgressed into
`PH41VW through one or more of backcross conversion,
`genetic manipulation and transformation, and to the maize
`seed, plant and plant parts produced thereby. Hybrid maize
`seed, plants or plant parts produced by crossing the variety
`PH41VWor a locus conversion of PH41VW with another
`
`embodiments, a plant of maize variety PH41 VW comprising
`a single locus conversion is provided. The locus conversion
`may be one which confers one or more traits such as, for
`example, male sterility, herbicide tolerance,
`insect resis-
`tance, disease resistance (including, for example) bacterial,
`fungal, nematode or viral disease, waxy starch, modified
`fatty acid metabolism, modified phytic acid metabolism,
`modified carbohydrate metabolism and modified protein
`metabolism is provided. The trait may be, for example,
`conferred by a naturally occurring maize gene introduced
`into the genomeof the variety by backcrossing, a natural or
`induced mutation, or a transgene introduced through genetic
`transformation techniques. When introduced through trans-
`formation, a genetic locus may comprise one or more
`transgenes integrated at a single chromosomallocation.
`An inbred maize plant of the variety designated PH41 VW
`is provided, wherein a cytoplasmically-inherited trait has
`been introduced into the inbred plant. Such cytoplasmically-
`inherited traits are passed to progeny through the female
`parent in a particular cross. An exemplary cytoplasmically-
`inherited trait is the male sterility trait. Cytoplasmic-male
`sterility (CMS)is a pollen abortion phenomenon determined
`by the interaction between the genes in the cytoplasm and
`the nucleus. Alteration in the mitochondrial genomeand the
`lack of restorer genes in the nucleus will lead to pollen
`abortion. With either a normal cytoplasm or the presence of
`restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, the plant will produce pollen
`normally. A CMSplant can be pollinated by a maintainer
`version of the same variety, which has a normal cytoplasm
`but lacks the restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, and continues
`to be male sterile in the next generation.
`The male fertility of a CMS plant can be restored by a
`restorer version of the same variety, which must have the
`restorer gene(s) in the nucleus. With the restorer gene(s) in
`the nucleus,
`the offspring of the male-sterile plant can
`produce normalpollen grains and propagate. A cytoplasmi-
`cally inherited trait may be a naturally occurring maize trait
`or a trait introduced through genetic transformation tech-
`niques.
`A tissue culture of regenerable cells of a plant of variety
`PH41VW is provided. The tissue culture can be capable of
`maize variety are also provided.
`regenerating plants capable of expressing all of the physi-
`The inbred. maize plant may further comprise a cytoplas-
`ological and morphological or phenotypic characteristics of
`mic or nuclear factor capable of conferring malesterility or
`the variety, and of regenerating plants having substantially
`otherwise preventing self-pollination, such as by self-incom-
`the same genotypeas other plants of the variety. Examples
`patibility. Parts of the maize plant described herein are also
`of some of the physiological and morphological character-
`provided, for example, pollen obtained from an inbred plant
`istics that may be assessed include characteristics related to
`and an ovule of the inbred plant.
`yield, maturity, and kernel quality. The regenerable cells in
`Seed of the inbred maize variety PH41VW is provided.
`such tissue cultures can be derived,
`for example, from
`The inbred maize seed may bean essentially homogeneous
`embryos, meristematic cells, immature tassels, microspores,
`population of inbred maize seed of the variety designated
`pollen, leaves, anthers,roots, roottips, silk, flowers, kernels,
`PH41VW.Essentially homogeneous populations of inbred
`ears, cobs, husks, or stalks, or from callus or protoplasts
`seed are generally free from substantial numbers of other
`derived from those tissues. Maize plants regenerated from
`seed. Therefore, inbred seed generally forms at least about
`the tissue cultures, and plants having all the physiological
`97% of the total seed. The population of inbred maize seed
`and morphological characteristics of variety PH41VW are
`may beparticularly defined as being essentially free from
`also provided.
`hybrid seed. The inbred seed population may be separately
`Processes are provided for producing maize seeds or
`grown to provide an essentially homogeneous population of
`
`inbred maize plants designated PH41VW. plants, which processes generally comprise crossingafirst
`Compositions are provided comprising a seed of maize
`parent maize plant as a male or female parent with a second
`variety PH41VW comprised in plant seed growth media. In
`parent maize plant, wherein at least one ofthefirst or second
`certain embodiments, the plant seed growth mediais a soil
`parent maize plants is a plant of the variety designated
`or synthetic cultivation medium. In specific embodiments,
`PH41VW. These processes may be further exemplified as
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`

`

`US 10,165,747 Bl
`
`3
`processes for preparing hybrid maize seed or plants, wherein
`a first inbred maize plant is crossed with a second maize
`plant of a different, distinct variety to provide a hybrid that
`has, as one of its parents, the inbred maize plant variety
`PH41VW.In these processes, crossing will result in the
`production of seed. The seed production occurs regardless of
`whether the seed is collected or not.
`
`In some embodiments, the first step in “crossing” com-
`prises planting, preferably in pollinating proximity, seeds of
`a first and second parent maize plant, and preferably, seeds
`of a first inbred maize plant and a second, distinct inbred
`maize plant. Where the plants are not in pollinating prox-
`imity, pollination can nevertheless be accomplished by
`transferring a pollen or tassel bag from oneplantto the other
`as described below. A second step comprises cultivating or
`growing the seeds of said first and second parent maize
`plants into plants that bear flowers (maize bears both male
`flowers (tassels) and female flowers (silks)
`in separate
`anatomical structures on the sameplant).
`A third step comprises preventing self-pollination of the
`plants,
`i.e., preventing the silks of a plant from being
`fertilized by any plant of the samevariety, including the
`same plant. This can be done by emasculating the male
`flowers of the first or second parent maize plant,
`(i.e.,
`treating or manipulating the flowers so as to prevent pollen
`production, in order to produce an emasculated parent maize
`plant). Self-incompatibility systems may also be used in
`some hybrid crops for the same purpose. Self-incompatible
`plants still shed viable pollen and can pollinate plants of
`othervarieties but are incapable of pollinating themselves or
`other plants of the same variety.
`A fourth step may comprise allowing cross-pollination to
`occur between the first and second parent maize plants.
`Whentheplants are not in pollinating proximity, this is done
`by placing a bag, usually paper or glassine, over the tassels
`of the first plant and another bag over the silks of the
`incipient ear on the secondplant. The bags are left in place
`for at least 24 hours. Since pollen is viable for less than 24
`hours, this assures thatthe silks are not pollinated from other
`pollen sources, that any stray pollen onthe tassels ofthefirst
`plant is dead, and that the only pollen transferred comes
`from thefirst plant. The pollen bag overthe tassel ofthefirst
`plant is then shaken vigorously to enhancerelease of pollen
`from the tassels, and the shoot bag is removedfrom thesilks
`of the incipient ear on the secondplant. Finally, the pollen
`bag is removed from thetassel of the first plant andis placed
`overthe silks of the incipient ear of the second plant, shaken
`again and left in place. Yet another step comprises harvest-
`ing the seeds from at least one of the parent maize plants.
`The harvested seed can be grown to produce a maize plant
`or hybrid maize plant.
`Also provided are maize seed and plants produced by a
`process that comprises crossing a first parent maize plant
`with a second parent maize plant, whereinat least one of the
`first or second parent maize plants is a plant of the variety
`designated PH41VW. In one embodiment, maize seed and
`plants produced by the process are first generation (F1)
`hybrid maize seed and plants produced by crossing an inbred
`with another, distinct plant such as another inbred. Seed of
`an F1 hybrid maize plant is contemplated and an F1 hybrid
`maize plant and seed thereof are provided.
`The genetic complement of the maize plant variety des-
`ignated PH41VWis provided. The phrase “genetic comple-
`ment” is used to refer to the aggregate of nucleotide
`sequences, the expression of which sequences defines the
`phenotype of, in the present case, a maize plant, or a cell or
`tissue of that plant. A genetic complement thus represents
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`the genetic make-up of an inbredcell, tissue or plant, and a
`hybrid genetic complementrepresents the genetic make-up
`of a hybrid cell, tissue or plant. Maize plant cells that have
`a genetic complement in accordance with the inbred maize
`plant cells disclosed herein, and plants, seeds and diploid
`plants containing such cells are provided.
`Plant genetic complements may be assessed by genetic
`markerprofiles, and by the expression of phenotypic traits
`that are characteristic of the expression of the genetic
`complement, e.g., isozyme typing profiles. It is understood
`that variety PH41 VW could beidentified by any of the many
`well-known techniques used for genetic profiling disclosed
`herein.
`In still yet another aspect, hybrid genetic complements are
`provided, as represented by maizeplantcells, tissues, plants,
`and seeds, formed by the combination of a haploid genetic
`complementof an inbred maize plant disclosed herein with
`a haploid genetic complement of a second maize plant, such
`as, another, distinct inbred maize plant. In another aspect, a
`maize plant regenerated from a tissue culture that comprises
`a hybrid genetic complement of the inbred maize plant
`disclosed herein.
`Methods of producing an inbred maize plant derived from
`the maize variety PH41VW are provided, the method com-
`prising the steps of: (a) preparing a progeny plant derived
`from maize variety PH41VW, wherein said preparing com-
`prises crossing a plant of the maize variety PH41 VW with
`a second maize plant; (b) crossing the progeny plant with
`itself or a second plant to produce a seed ofa progenyplant
`of a subsequent generation; (c) repeating steps (a) and (b)
`with sufficient inbreeding until a seed of an inbred maize
`plant derived from the variety PH41VW is produced.In the
`method,
`it may be desirable to select particular plants
`resulting from step (c) for continued crossing according to
`steps (b) and (c). By selecting plants having one or more
`desirable traits, an inbred maize plant derived from the
`maize variety PH41VW is obtained which possesses some
`of the desirable traits of maize variety PH41VWas well as
`potentially other selected traits.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`A new and distinctive maize inbred variety designated
`PH41VW, which has been the result of years of careful
`breeding and selection in a comprehensive maize breeding
`program is provided.
`Definitions
`
`Maize (Zea mays) can be referred to as maize or corn.
`Certain definitions used in the specification are provided
`below. Also in the examples that follow, a numberof terms
`are used herein. In order to provide a clear and consistent
`understanding ofthe specification and claims, including the
`scope to be given such terms, the following definitions are
`provided. NOTE: ABS is in absolute terms and % MN is
`percent of the mean for the experiments in which the inbred
`or hybrid was grown. PCT designates that
`the trait
`is
`calculated as a percentage. % NOT designates the percent-
`age of plants that did not exhibit a trait. For example,
`STKLDG % NOTis the percentage of plants in a plot that
`were not stalk lodged. These designators will follow the
`descriptors to denote how the values are to be interpreted.
`Below are the descriptors used in the data tables included
`herein.
`ABIOTIC STRESS TOLERANCE: resistance to non-
`
`biological sources of stress conferred by traits such as
`nitrogen utilization efficiency, altered nitrogen responsive-
`ness, drought resistance, cold, and salt resistance
`
`

`

`US 10,165,747 Bl
`
`5
`ABTSTK=ARTIFICIAL BRITTLE STALK: A count of
`the numberof “snapped”plants per plot following machine
`snapping. A snapped planthasits stalk completely snapped
`at a node between the base of the plant and the node above
`the ear. Expressed as percent of plants that did not snap.
`ALLELE: Any of one or more alternative forms of a
`genetic sequence. In a diploid cell or organism, the two
`alleles of a given sequence typically occupy corresponding
`loci on a pair of homologous chromosomes.
`ALTER: The utilization of up-regulation, down-regula-
`tion, or gene silencing.
`ANTHESIS: The time of a flower’s opening.
`ANTIOXIDANT: A chemical compound or substance
`that inhibits oxidation, including but not limited to tocoph-
`erol or tocotrienols.
`ANT ROT=ANTHRACNOSE STALK ROT (Colletotri-
`chum graminicola): A 1
`to 9 visual rating indicating the
`resistance to Anthracnose Stalk Rot. A higher score indicates
`a higher resistance. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`BACKCROSSING:Process in which a breeder crosses a
`
`hybrid progenyvariety back to one of the parental genotypes
`one or more times.
`
`BACKCROSS PROGENY:Progeny plants produced by
`crossing one maize line (recurrent parent) with plants of
`another maize line (donor) that comprise a desired trait or
`locus, selecting progeny plants that comprise the desired
`trait or locus, and crossing them with the recurrent parent
`one or more times to produce backcross progeny plants that
`comprise said trait or locus.
`BARPLT=BARREN PLANTS: Thepercent of plants per
`plot that were not barren (lack ears).
`BLUP=BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION.The
`
`BLUPvalues are determined from a mixed model analysis
`of hybrid performance observations at various locations and
`replications. BLUPvalues for inbred maize plants, breeding
`values, are estimated from the same analysis using pedigree
`information.
`BORBMN=ARTIFICIAL BRITTLE STALK MEAN:
`
`The mean percentofplants not “snapped”in a plot following
`artificial selection pressure. A snapped plant has its stalk
`completely snapped at a node between the base ofthe plant
`and the node abovethe ear. Expressed as percent of plants
`that did not snap. A higher numberindicates better tolerance
`to brittle snapping.
`BRENGMN=BRITTLE STALK ENERGY MEAN: The
`mean amount of energy per unit area neededto artificially
`brittle snap a corn stalk. A high number indicates better
`tolerance to brittle snapping.
`BREEDING:The genetic manipulation of living organ-
`isms.
`
`BREEDING CROSS: A cross to introduce new genetic
`material into a plant for the development of a new variety.
`For example, one could cross plant A with plant B, wherein
`plant B would be genetically different from plant A. After
`the breeding cross, the resulting F1 plants could then be
`selfed or sibbed for one, two, three or more times (F1, F2,
`F3, etc.) until a new inbred variety is developed.
`BREEDING VALUE: A relative value determined by
`evaluating the progeny of the parent. For corn the progeny
`is often the F1 generation and the parent is often an inbred
`variety.
`BRLPNE=ARTIFICIAL ROOT LODGING EARLY
`
`SEASON:Thepercent of plants not root lodged in a plot
`followingartificial selection pressure applied prior to flow-
`ering. A plant is considered root lodged if it leans from the
`vertical axis at an approximately 30 degree angle or greater.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`Expressedas percentof plants that did not root lodge. A high
`numberindicates higher tolerance to root lodging.
`BRLPNL=ARTIFICIAL ROOT LODGING LATE SEA-
`
`lodged in a plot
`SON: The percent of plants not root
`following artificial selection pressure during grain fill. A
`plant is considered root lodged if it leans from the vertical
`axis at an approximately 30 degree angle or greater.
`Expressedas percentof plants that did not root lodge. A high
`numberindicates higher tolerance to root lodging.
`BRTSTK=BRITTILE STALKS: This is a measure of the
`
`stalk breakage near the time of pollination, and is an
`indication of whether a hybrid or inbred would snapor break
`near the time of flowering under severe winds. Data are
`presented as percentage of plants that did not snap. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`BRTPCN=BRITTLE STALKS: This is an estimate of the
`
`stalk breakage near the time of pollination, and is an
`indication of whether a hybrid or inbred would snapor break
`near the time of flowering under severe winds. Data are
`presented as percentage of plants that did not snap. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`CARBOHYDRATE: Organic compounds comprising
`carbon, oxygen and hydrogen,
`including sugars, starches
`and cellulose.
`
`CELL: Cell as used herein includes a plant cell, whether
`isolated, in tissue culture or incorporated in a plant or plant
`part.
`CLDTST=COLD TEST: The percent of plants that ger-
`minate under cold test conditions.
`
`CLN=CORN LETHAL NECROSIS: Synergistic interac-
`tion of maize chlorotic mottle virus (MCMV)in combina-
`tion with either maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV-A or
`MDMV-B)or wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV). A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to Corn Lethal Necro-
`sis. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`CMSMT=COMMON SMUT: This is the percentage of
`plants not infected with Common Smut. Data are collected
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`
`COMRST=COMMONRUST(Puccinia sorghi): A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to Common Rust. A
`higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`CROSS POLLINATION:Fertilization by the union of
`two gametes from different plants.
`CROSSING: The combination of genetic material by
`traditional methods such as a breeding cross or backcross,
`but also including protoplast fusion and other molecular
`biology methods of combining genetic material from two
`sources.
`
`D and D1-Dn:represents the generation of doubled hap-
`loid.
`
`D/D=DRYDOWN: This represents the relative rate at
`which a hybrid will reach acceptable harvest moisture
`compared to other hybrids on a 1 to 9 rating scale. A high
`score indicates a hybrid that dries relatively fast while a low
`score indicates a hybrid that dries slowly.
`DIGENG=DIGESTIBLE ENERGY:Near-infrared trans-
`
`mission spectroscopy, NIT, prediction of digestible energy.
`DIPERS=D/PLODI4 EAR MOLD SCORES (Diplodia
`maydis and Diplodia macrospora): A 1 to 9 visual rating
`indicating the resistance to Diplodia Ear Mold. A higher
`
`
`
`

`

`US 10,165,747 Bl
`
`7
`score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected only
`when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment
`measured.
`
`DIPLOID PLANT PART:Refersto a plantpart or cell that
`has a same diploid genotype.
`DIPROT=DIPLODIA STALK ROT SCORE: Score of
`
`stalk rot severity due to Diplodia (Diplodia maydis).
`Expressed as a 1 to 9 score with 9 being highly resistant.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`DRPEAR=DROPPED EARS: A measure of the number
`
`of dropped ears per plot and represents the percentage of
`plants that did not drop ears prior to harvest.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`D/T=DROUGHTTOLERANCE:‘This represents a 1 to 9
`rating for drought tolerance, and is based on data obtained
`understress conditions. A high score indicates good drought
`tolerance and a low score indicates poor droughttolerance.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`EARMLD=GENERAL EAR MOLD: Visual rating (1 to
`9 score) where a 1
`is very susceptible and a 9 is very
`resistant. This is based on overall rating for ear mold of
`mature ears without determining the specific mold organism,
`and may notbe predictive for a specific ear mold. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`EARHT=EDEARHT=EAR HEIGHT:Theear height is a
`measure from the groundto the highest placed developed ear
`node attachment and is measured in inches (EARHT) or
`centimeters (EDEARHT).
`EARSZ=EARSIZE: A 1 to 9 visualrating of ear size. The
`higher the rating the larger the ear size.
`EBTSTK=EARLY BRITTLE STALK: A count of the
`
`numberof “snapped”plants per plot following severe winds
`when the corn plant is experiencing very rapid vegetative
`growth in the V5-V8 stage. Expressed as percent of plants
`that did not snap.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`ECB1LF=EUROPEAN CORN BORER FIRST GEN-
`
`ERATION LEAF FEEDING(Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to preflowering leaf
`feeding by first generation European Corn Borer. A higher
`score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected only
`when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment
`measured.
`
`
`ECB2IT=EUROPEAN CORN BORER SECOND GEN-
`
`ERATION INCHES OF TUNNELING(Ostrinia nubilalis):
`Average inches of tunneling per plant in the stalk. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`ECB2SC=EUROPEAN CORN BORER SECOND GEN-
`
`ERATION (Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9 visual rating indi-
`cating post flowering degree of stalk breakage and other
`evidence of feeding by second generation European Corn
`Borer. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`ECBDPE=EUROPEAN CORN BORER DROPPED
`
`EARS(Ostrinia nubilalis). Dropped ears due to European
`Corn Borer. Percentage of plants that did not drop ears under
`second generation European Corn Borer infestation. Data
`are collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in
`the experiment measured.
`
`
`
`8
`ECBLSI=EUROPEAN CORN BORER LATE SEASON
`
`INTACT(Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9 visual rating indicat-
`ing late season intactness of the corn plant given damage
`(stalk breakage above and below the top ear) caused pri-
`marily by 2”” and/or 3” generation ECB larval feeding
`before harvest. A higher score indicates more intact plants.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`EDANTCOLs=ANTHER COLOR: Rated on a 1
`
`to 7
`
`is green, 2 is yellow, 3 is pink, 5 is red, and
`
`scale where 1
`7 is purple.
`EDantants=ANTHER
`
`=ANTHOCYANIN
`
`COLOR
`
`25
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`INTENSITY: A measure of anther anthocyanin color inten-
`sity rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is absent or very weak,
`3 is weak, 5 is medium, 7 is strong, and 9 is very strong.
`Observed in the middle third of the main branch on fresh
`anthers.
`EDbarants=GLUME ANTHOCYANIN COLORATION
`AT BASE (WHOLE PLANT, EAR INSERTION LEVEL):
`A measure of the color intensity at the base of the glume,
`rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is absent or very weak, 3 is
`weak, 5 is medium, 7 is strong, and 9 is very strong.
`Observed in the middlethird of the main branch ofthe tassel.
`EDBARCOLs=BAR GLUME COLOR INTENSITY: A
`
`measure of the bar glumecolorintensity. Bar glumeis a dark
`purple band that may occur on the bottom of a glume. Bar
`glumecolorintensity is measured on a scale of 1 to 7 where
`1 is absent, 2 is weak, 3 is medium,5 is strong, and 7 is very
`strong.
`EDBRROANTs=BRACE ROOTS ANTHOCYANIN
`
`COLORATION: A measure of the color intensity of the
`brace roots rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is absent or very
`weak, 3 is weak, 5 is medium, 7 is strong, and 9 is very
`strong. Observed when well developed and fresh brace roots
`are present on 50% ofplants.
` ANTHOCYANIN
`EDCOBAINTs=COB
`GLUME
`COLOR INTENSITY: Rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is
`absent or very weak, 3 is weak, 5 is medium,7 is strong, and
`9 is very strong. Anthocyanin coloration should be observed
`on the middle third of the uppermost cob, after the removal
`of some of the grains.
`EDCOBCOLs=COB COLOR:A measureof the intensity
`of pink or salmon coloration of the cob, rated on a 1 to 9
`scale where 1 is absent or white, 2 is light pink, 3 is pink,
`4 is medium red, 5 is red, 6 is medium red, 7 is dark red, 8
`is dark to very dark red, and 9 is present.
`EDCOBDIA=COB DIAMETER: Measured in mm.
`EDCOBICAs=COB ANTHOCYANIN COLOR INTEN-
`
`SITY: A measure of the intensity of pink or salmon color-
`ation of the cob, rated ona 1 to 9 scale where 1 is very weak,
`3 is weak, 5 is medium, 7 is strong, and 9 is very strong.
`EDEARDIA=EAR DIAMETER: Measured in mm.
`EDEARHULs=EAR HUSK LENGTH:A measure of ear
`husk length rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is very short, 3
`is short, 5 is medium, 7 is long, and 9 is very long.
`EDEARLNG=EAR LENGTH: Measured in mm.
`EDEARROW=NUMBER OF ROWS OF GRAIN ON
`EAR.
`
`EDEARSHAs=EAR SHAPE (TAPER): Rated on a 1 to 3
`scale where 1 is conical, 2 is conico-cylindrical, and 3 is
`cylindrical.
`EDEARSHLs=EAR SHANK LENGTH SCALE: A mea-
`
`sure of the length of the ear shank or peduncle, rated on a 1
`to 9 scale where 1 is very short, 3 is short, 5 is medium, 7
`is long, 9 is very long.
`EDFILEANs=SHEATH ANTHOCYANIN COLOR
`INTENSITY AT FIRST LEAF STAGE: A measure of the
`
`

`

`US 10,165,747 Bl
`
`9
`anthocyanin color intensity of the sheath of the first leaf,
`rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is absent or very weak, 3 is
`weak, 5 is medium,7 is strong, and 9 is very strong.
`EDFILECOs=FOLIAGE INTENSITY OF GREEN
`
`COLOR:A measure of the green coloration intensity in the
`leaves, rated on a 1 to 3 scale where 1 is light, 2 is medium,
`and 3 is dark.
`EDFILESHs=LEAF TIP SHAPE: An indication of the
`
`shape of the apex ofthe first leaf, rated on a 1 to 5 scale
`where 1 is pointed, 2 is pointed to rounded, 3 is rounded, 4
`is rounded to spatulate, and 5 is spatulate.
`EDGLUANTs=GLUME ANTHOCYANIN COLOR
`
`EXCLUDING BASE: A measure of the color intensity of
`the glume excludingthe base, rated on a 1 to 9 scale where
`1 is absent or very weak, 3 is weak, 5 is medium,7 is strong,
`and 9 is very strong. Observed in the middle third of the
`main branch of the tassel.
`EDGLUCOLs=GLUME COLOR:Rated on a 1 to 7 scale
`
`where 1 is green, 2 is yellow, 3 is pink, 5 is red, and 7 is
`purple.
`EDKERDOCs=DORSAL SIDE OF GRAIN COLOR:
`
`Rated on a 1 to 10 scale where 1 is white, 2 is yellowish
`white, 3 is yellow, 4 is yellow orange, 5 is orange, 6 is red
`orange, 7 is red, 8 is purple, 9 is brownish, and 10 is blue
`black. Observed in the middle third of the uppermost ear
`when well developed.
`EDKERSHAs=KERNEL SHAPE: Rated on a 1 to 3 scale
`
`where 1 is round, 2 is kidney-shaped, and 3 is cuneiform.
`EDKERTCOs=TOP OF GRAIN COLOR:Rated ona 1 to
`
`10
`EDSHEAANTs=SHEATH ANTHOCYANIN COLOR
`INTENSITY: Rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is absent or
`
`very weak, 3 is weak, 5 is medium,7 is strong, and 9 is very
`strong.
`EDSLKAINTs=SILK
`
`=ANTHOCYANIN
`
`COLOR
`
`INTENSITY: A measure of the color intensity of the silks,
`rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is absent or very weak, 3 is
`weak, 5 is medium,7 is strong, and 9 is very strong.
`EDSTLANTs=INTERNODE ANTHOCYANIN COLOR
`
`INTENSITY: A measure of anthocyanin coloration of nodes,
`rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is absent or very weak, 3 is
`weak, 5 is medium, 7 is strong, and 9 is very strong.
`Observed just above the insertion point of the peduncle of
`the upper ear.
`EDTA1 RYATs=TASSEL LATERAL BRANCH CURVA-
`‘TURE: Rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 indicates absent or
`
`very slightly recurved (<5 degrees), 3 indicates slightly
`recurved (6 to 37 degrees), 5 indicates moderately recurved
`(38 to 62 degrees), 7 indicates strongly recurved (63 to 90
`degrees), and 9 indicates very strongly recurved (>90
`degrees). Observed on the second branch from the bottom of
`the tassel.
`EDTA1 RYBRs=NUMBER OF PRIMARY LATERAL
`TASSEL BRANCHES: Rated on a 1
`to 9 scale where 1
`indicates absent or very few (<4 branches), 3 indicates few
`(4 to 10), 5 indicate

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket