throbber
US009693531B1
`
`a2) United States Patent
`US 9,693,531 Bl
`(10) Patent No.:
`
` Odland (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 4, 2017
`
`
`(54) MAIZE INBRED PH25S9
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`.
`
`(71) Applicant: PIONEER HI-BRED
`INTERNATIONAL,INC., Johnston,
`IA (US)
`Inventor: MN(US) Odland, CannonFalls,
`(72)
`(73) Assignee: PIONEER HI-BRED
`INTERNATIONAL,INC., Johnston,
`1A (US)
`
`(*) Notice:
`,
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`:
`.
`rec 7sab)byOda under 35
`(21) Appl. No.: 15/193,403
`(22)
`Filed:
`Jun. 27, 2016
`
`(51)
`
`Int. CL
`AOLH 5/00
`CI2N 15/82
`AOLH 5/10
`AOIH 1/02
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`CPC vee AOLH 5/10 (2013.01); AOIH 1/02.
`(2013.01); C12N 15/8241 (2013.01); C12N
`15/8243 (2013.01); C12N 15/8245 (2013.01):
`C12N 15/8247 (2013.01); C12N 15/8251
`(2013.01); C12N 15/8271 (2013.01); C12N
`15/8274 (2013.01); C12N 15/8279 (2013.01);
`C12N 15/8286 (2013.01); C12N 15/8289
`(2013.01)
`
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`
`(58) Field of Classification Search
`None
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`7,138,571 B2* 11/2006 Barker wesc AOLH 5/10
`435/412
`7,820,892 Bl
`10/2010 Noble
`8044.282 Bl
`10/2011 Smalley
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`.
`.
`.
`.
`US Plant Variety Protection Certificate No. PH12K5 for Maize
`Variety PH12K5; issued Jul. 13, 2013.
`US Plant Variety Protection Certificate No. 200800243 for Maize
`Variety PHFOD;issued Jan. 18, 2013.
`Breeding History for Maize Inbred PH25S9.
`ee
`.
`cited by examiner
`Primary Examiner — Vinod Kumar
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Pioneer Hi Bred Int’l,
`Inc.
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A novel maize variety designated PH25S9 and seed, plants
`and plant parts thereof are provided. Methods for producing
`a maize plant comprise crossing maize variety PH25S9 with
`another maizeplant are provided. Methods for producing a
`maize plant containing in its genetic material one or more
`traits introgressed into PH25S89 through backcross conver-
`sion and/or transformation, and to the maize seed, plant and
`Plant part produced thereby are provided. Hybrid maize
`seed, plants or plant parts are produced by crossing the
`variety PH25S9 or a locus conversion of PH2589 with
`another maize variety.
`
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`20 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Inari Exhibit 1107
`Inari Exhibit 1107
`Inari v. Pioneer
`Inari v. Pioneer
`
`

`

`1
`MAIZE INBRED PH2589
`
`US 9,693,531 Bl
`
`SUMMARY
`
`Processes are provided for making a maize plant contain-
`ing in its genetic material one or moretraits introgressed into
`PH25S9 through one or more of backcross conversion,
`genetic manipulation and transformation, and to the maize
`seed, plant and plant parts produced thereby. Hybrid maize
`seed, plants or plant parts produced by crossing the variety
`PH25S9 or a locus conversion of PH25S9 with another
`
`2
`certain embodiments, the plant seed growth mediais a soil
`or synthetic cultivation medium. In specific embodiments,
`BACKGROUND
`the growth medium may be comprised in a container or may,
`for example, be soil inafield.
`A plant of maize variety PH25S9 comprising an added
`There are numerous steps in the development of any
`heritable trait is provided. The heritable trait may comprise
`novel, desirable maize variety. Plant breeding begins with
`a genetic locus that is a dominantor recessive allele. In one
`the analysis and definition of problems and weaknesses of
`embodiment, a plant of maize variety PH25S9 comprising a
`the current germplasm, the establishment of program goals,
`single locus conversion in particular is provided. An added
`and the definition of specific breeding objectives. The next
`genetic locus which confers one or more traits such as, for
`step is selection of germplasm that possess the traits to meet
`example, male sterility, herbicide tolerance,
`insect resis-
`the program goals. The breeder’s goal is to combine in a
`tance, disease resistance, waxy starch, modified fatty acid
`single variety or hybrid, various desirable traits. For field
`metabolism, modified phytic acid metabolism, modified
`crops, these traits may include resistance to diseases and
`carbohydrate metabolism and modified protein metabolism
`insects, resistance to heat and drought, reducing the time to
`is provided. The trait may be, for example, conferred by a
`crop maturity, greateryield, altered fatty acid profile, abiotic
`naturally occurring maize gene introduced into the genome
`stress tolerance, improvements in compositionaltraits, and
`of the variety by backcrossing, a natural or induced muta-
`better agronomic characteristics and quality.
`tion, or a transgene introduced through genetic transforma-
`These product development processes, which lead to the
`tion techniques. When introduced through transformation, a
`final step of marketing and distribution, can take from six to
`genetic locus may comprise one or more transgenes inte-
`twelve years from the time the first cross is made until the
`grated at a single chromosomallocation.
`finished seed is delivered to the farmer for planting. There-
`An inbred maize plant of the variety designated PH25S9
`fore, development of new varieties and hybrids is a time-
`is provided, wherein a cytoplasmically-inherited trait has
`consuming process that requires precise planning, efficient
`been introduced into said inbred plant. Such cytoplasmi-
`use of resources, and a minimum of changesin direction. A
`cally-inherited traits are passed to progeny through the
`continuing goal of maize breeders is to develop stable, high
`female parent in a particular cross. An exemplary cytoplas-
`yielding maize varieties and hybrids that are agronomically
`mically-inherited trait is the male sterility trait. Cytoplas-
`sound with maximal yield over one or more different con-
`ditions and environments.
`mic-male sterility (CMS) is a pollen abortion phenomenon
`determined by the interaction between the genes in the
`cytoplasm and the nucleus. Alteration in the mitochondrial
`genomeand the lack of restorer genes in the nucleus will
`lead to pollen abortion. With either a normal cytoplasm or
`the presence of restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, the plant will
`produce pollen normally. A CMSplant can be pollinated by
`a maintainer version of the same variety, which has a normal
`cytoplasm but lacks the restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, and
`continue to be malesterile in the next generation. The male
`fertility of a CMSplantcan be restored by a restorer version
`of the same variety, which must have the restorer gene(s) in
`the nucleus. With the restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, the
`offspring of the male-sterile plant can produce normalpollen
`grains and propagate. A cytoplasmically inherited trait may
`be a naturally occurring maize trait or a trait introduced
`through genetic transformation techniques.
`A tissue culture of regenerable cells of a plant of variety
`PH25S9 is provided. The tissue culture can be capable of
`regenerating plants capable of expressing all of the physi-
`ological and morphological or phenotypic characteristics of
`maize variety are also provided.
`the variety, and of regenerating plants having substantially
`The inbred maize plant may further comprise a cytoplas-
`the same genotypeas other plants of the variety. Examples
`mic or nuclear factor capable of conferring malesterility or
`of some of the physiological and morphological character-
`otherwise preventing self-pollination, such as by self-incom-
`istics that may be assessed include characteristics related to
`patibility. Parts of the maize plant of the present invention
`yield, maturity, and kernel quality. The regenerable cells in
`are also provided, for example, pollen obtained from an
`such tissue cultures can be derived,
`for example, from
`inbred plant and an ovule of the inbred plant.
`embryos, meristematic cells, immature tassels, microspores,
`Seed of the inbred maize variety PH25S9 is provided. The
`pollen, leaves, anthers,roots, roottips, silk, flowers, kernels,
`inbred maize seed may be an essentially homogeneous
`ears, cobs, husks, or stalks, or from callus or protoplasts
`population of inbred maize seed of the variety designated
`derived from those tissues. Maize plants regenerated from
`PH25S9. Essentially homogeneous populations of inbred
`the tissue cultures of the invention, the plants having all the
`seed are generally free from substantial numbers of other
`physiological and morphological characteristics of variety
`seed. Therefore, inbred seed generally forms at least about
`PH25S9 are also provided.
`97% of the total seed. The population of inbred maize seed
`Processes are provided for producing maize seeds or
`of the invention may be particularly defined as being essen-
`
`tially free from hybrid seed. The inbred seed population may plants, which processes generally comprise crossingafirst
`be separately grownto provide an essentially homogeneous
`parent maize plant as a male or female parent with a second
`population of inbred maize plants designated PH25S9.
`parent maize plant, wherein at least one ofthefirst or second
`Compositions are provided comprising a seed of maize
`parent maize plants is a plant of the variety designated
`variety PH25S9 comprised in plant seed growth media. In
`PH25S9. These processes may be further exemplified as
`
`Provided is a novel maize, Zea mays L., variety, desig-
`nated PH25S9 and processes for making PH25S9. Seed of
`maize variety PH25S9, plants of maize variety PH25S9,
`plant parts and cells of maize variety PH25S9, and processes
`for making a maize plant that comprise crossing maize
`variety PH25S9 with another maize plant are provided. Also
`provided are maize plants having all the physiological and
`morphological characteristics of the inbred maize variety
`PH25S9.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`

`

`US 9,693,531 Bl
`
`3
`processes for preparing hybrid maize seed or plants, wherein
`a first inbred maize plant is crossed with a second maize
`plant of a different, distinct variety to provide a hybrid that
`has, as one of its parents, the inbred maize plant variety
`PH25S9.
`In these processes, crossing will result
`in the
`production of seed. The seed production occurs regardless of
`whether the seed is collected or not.
`
`In some embodiments, the first step in “crossing” com-
`prises planting, such as in pollinating proximity, seeds of a
`first and second parent maize plant, and such as, seeds of a
`first inbred maize plant and a second, distinct inbred maize
`plant. Where the plants are not in pollinating proximity,
`pollination can nevertheless be accomplishedby transferring
`a pollen or tassel bag from oneplant to the other as described
`below.
`Asecond step comprises cultivating or growing the seeds
`of said first and second parent maize plants into plants that
`bear flowers (maize bears both male flowers (tassels) and
`female flowers (silks) in separate anatomical structures on
`the sameplant).
`A third step comprises preventing self-pollination of the
`plants,
`i.e., preventing the silks of a plant from being
`fertilized by any plant of the samevariety, including the
`same plant. This can be done by emasculating the male
`flowers of the first or second parent maize plant,
`(i.e.,
`treating or manipulating the flowers so as to prevent pollen
`production, in order to produce an emasculated parent maize
`plant). Self-incompatibility systems may also be used in
`some hybrid crops for the same purpose. Self-incompatible
`plants still shed viable pollen and can pollinate plants of
`othervarieties but are incapable of pollinating themselves or
`other plants of the same variety.
`A fourth step may comprise allowing cross-pollination to
`occur between the first and second parent maize plants.
`Whenthe plants are not in pollinating proximity, this is done
`by placing a bag, usually paper or glassine, over the tassels
`of the first plant and another bag over the silks of the
`incipient ear on the secondplant. The bags are left in place
`for at least 24 hours. Since pollen is viable for less than 24
`hours, this assures that the silks are not pollinated from other
`pollen sources, that any stray pollen on thetassels of thefirst
`plant is dead, and that the only pollen transferred comes
`from thefirst plant. The pollen bag overthe tassel ofthefirst
`plant is then shaken vigorously to enhancerelease of pollen
`from the tassels, and the shoot bag is removed from thesilks
`of the incipient ear on the secondplant. Finally, the pollen
`bag is removed from thetassel of the first plant and is placed
`overthe silks of the incipient ear of the second plant, shaken
`again and left in place. Yet another step comprises harvest-
`ing the seeds from at least one of the parent maize plants.
`The harvested seed can be grown to produce a maize plant
`or hybrid maize plant.
`Also provided are maize seed and plants produced by a
`process that comprises crossing a first parent maize plant
`with a second parent maize plant, whereinat least one of the
`first or second parent maize plants is a plant of the variety
`designated PH25S9. In one embodiment of the invention,
`maize seed and plants produced by the process are first
`generation (F1) hybrid maize seed and plants produced by
`crossing an inbred in accordance with the invention with
`another, distinct inbred. Seed of an F1 hybrid maize plantis
`contemplated and an F1 hybrid maize plant and seed thereof
`are provided.
`The genetic complement of the maize plant variety des-
`ignated PH25S9 is provided. The phrase “genetic comple-
`ment” is used to refer to the aggregate of nucleotide
`sequences, the expression of which sequences defines the
`
`15
`
`20
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`4
`phenotypeof, in the present case, a maize plant, or a cell or
`tissue of that plant. A genetic complement thus represents
`the genetic make-up of an inbredcell, tissue or plant, and a
`hybrid genetic complement represents the genetic make-up
`of a hybrid cell, tissue or plant. Maize plant cells that have
`a genetic complementin accordance with the inbred maize
`plant cells disclosed herein, and plants, seeds and diploid
`plants containing such cells are provided.
`Plant genetic complements may be assessed by genetic
`marker profiles, and by the expression of phenotypic traits
`that are characteristic of the expression of the genetic
`complement, e.g., isozyme typing profiles. It is understood
`that variety PH25S9 could be identified by any of the many
`well-known techniques used for genetic profiling disclosed
`herein.
`
`In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides
`hybrid genetic complements, as represented by maize plant
`cells, tissues, plants, and seeds, formed by the combination
`of a haploid genetic complementof an inbred maize plant of
`the invention with a haploid genetic complementof a second
`maizeplant, such as, another, distinct inbred maize plant. In
`another aspect, the present invention provides a maize plant
`regenerated from a tissue culture that comprises a hybrid
`genetic complementof this invention.
`Methods of producing an inbred maize plant derived from
`the maize variety PH25S9 are provided, the method com-
`prising the steps of: (a) preparing a progeny plant derived
`from maize variety PH25S9, wherein said preparing com-
`prises crossing a plant of the maize variety PH25S9 with a
`second maize plant;
`(b) crossing the progeny plant with
`itself or a second plant to produce a seed of a progeny plant
`of a subsequent generation; (c) repeating steps (a) and (b)
`with sufficient inbreeding until a seed of an inbred maize
`plant derived from the variety PH25S9 is produced. In the
`method,
`it may be desirable to select particular plants
`resulting from step (c) for continued crossing according to
`steps (b) and (c). By selecting plants having one or more
`desirable traits, an inbred maize plant derived from the
`maize variety PH25S9 is obtained which possesses some of
`the desirable traits of maize variety PH25S9 as well as
`potentially other selected traits.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`A new and distinctive maize inbred variety designated
`PH25S9, which has been the result of years of careful
`breeding and selection in a comprehensive maize breeding
`program is provided.
`
`Definitions
`
`Maize (Zea mays) can be referred to as maize or corn.
`Certain definitions used in the specification are provided
`below. Also in the examples that follow, a numberof terms
`are used herein. In order to provide a clear and consistent
`understanding ofthe specification and claims, including the
`scope to be given such terms, the following definitions are
`provided. NOTE: ABS is in absolute terms and % MN is
`percent of the mean for the experiments in which the inbred
`or hybrid was grown. PCT designates that
`the trait
`is
`calculated as a percentage. % NOT designates the percent-
`age of plants that did not exhibit a trait. For example,
`STKLDG % NOTis the percentage of plants in a plot that
`were not stalk lodged. These designators will follow the
`descriptors to denote how the values are to be interpreted.
`Below are the descriptors used in the data tables included
`herein.
`
`

`

`US 9,693,531 Bl
`
`5
`ABIOTIC STRESS TOLERANCE: resistance to non-
`
`6
`BRLPNE=ARTIFICIAL ROOT LODGING EARLY
`
`biological sources of stress conferred by traits such as
`nitrogen utilization efficiency, altered nitrogen responsive-
`ness, drought resistance, cold, and salt resistance
`ABTSTK=ARTIFICIAL BRITTLE STALK: A count of
`
`the numberof “snapped”plants per plot following machine
`snapping. A snappedplanthasits stalk completely snapped
`at a node between the base of the plant and the node above
`the ear. Expressed as percent of plants that did not snap.
`ALLELE: Any of one or more alternative forms of a
`genetic sequence. In a diploid cell or organism, the two
`alleles of a given sequence typically occupy corresponding
`loci on a pair of homologous chromosomes.
`ALTER: The utilization of up-regulation, down-regula-
`tion, or gene silencing.
`ANTHESIS: The time of a flower’s opening.
`ANTIOXIDANT: A chemical compound or substance
`that inhibits oxidation, including but not limited to tocoph-
`erol or tocotrienols.
`
`ANT ROT=ANTHRACNOSE STALK ROT (Colletotri-
`chum graminicola): A 1
`to 9 visual rating indicating the
`resistance to Anthracnose Stalk Rot. A higherscore indicates
`a higher resistance. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`BACKCROSSING:Process in which a breeder crosses a
`
`hybrid progenyvariety back to one of the parental genotypes
`one or more times.
`
`BACKCROSS PROGENY:Progeny plants produced by
`crossing one maize line (recurrent parent) with plants of
`another maize line (donor) that comprise a desired trait or
`locus, selecting progeny plants that comprise the desired
`trait or locus, and crossing them with the recurrent parent
`one or moretimes to produce backcross progeny plants that
`comprise said trait or locus.
`BARPLT=BARREN PLANTS: Thepercent of plants per
`plot that were not barren (lack ears).
`BLUP=BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION.The
`
`BLUPvalues are determined from a mixed model analysis
`of hybrid performance observationsat various locations and
`replications. BLUP values for inbred maize plants, breeding
`values, are estimated from the same analysis using pedigree
`information.
`BORBMN=ARTIFICIAL BRITTLE STALK MEAN:
`
`The mean percentofplants not “snapped”in a plot following
`artificial selection pressure. A snapped plant has its stalk
`completely snapped at a node between the base of the plant
`and the node abovethe ear. Expressed as percent of plants
`that did not snap. A higher numberindicates better tolerance
`to brittle snapping.
`BRENGMN=BRITTLE STALK ENERGY MEAN: The
`mean amount of energy per unit area neededto artificially
`brittle snap a corn stalk. A high number indicates better
`tolerance to brittle snapping.
`BREEDING:The genetic manipulation of living organ-
`isms.
`
`BREEDING CROSS: A cross to introduce new genetic
`material into a plant for the development of a new variety.
`For example, one could cross plant A with plant B, wherein
`plant B would be genetically different from plant A. After
`the breeding cross, the resulting F1 plants could then be
`selfed or sibbed for one, two, three or more times (F1, F2,
`F3, etc.) until a new inbred variety is developed.
`BREEDING VALUE: A relative value determined by
`evaluating the progeny of the parent. For corn the progeny
`is often the Fl generation and the parent is often an inbred
`variety.
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`SEASON: Thepercent of plants not root lodged in a plot
`followingartificial selection pressure applied prior to flow-
`ering. A plant is considered root lodgedif it leans from the
`vertical axis at an approximately 30 degree angle or greater.
`Expressedas percentof plants that did not root lodge. A high
`numberindicates higher tolerance to root lodging.
`BRLPNL=ARTIFICIAL ROOT LODGING LATE SEA-
`
`lodged in a plot
`SON: The percent of plants not root
`following artificial selection pressure during grain fill. A
`plant is considered root lodged if it leans from the vertical
`axis at an approximately 30 degree angle or greater.
`Expressedas percentof plants that did not root lodge. A high
`numberindicates higher tolerance to root lodging.
`BRTSTK=BRITTLE STALKS: This is a measure of the
`stalk breakage near the time of pollination, and is an
`indication of whether a hybrid or inbred would snapor break
`near the time of flowering under severe winds. Data are
`presented as percentage of plants that did not snap. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`BRTPCN=BRITTLE STALKS: This is an estimate of the
`stalk breakage near the time of pollination, and is an
`indication of whether a hybrid or inbred would snapor break
`near the time of flowering under severe winds. Data are
`presented as percentage of plants that did not snap. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`CARBOHYDRATE: Organic compounds comprising
`carbon, oxygen and hydrogen,
`including sugars, starches
`and cellulose.
`
`CELL: Cell as used herein includes a plant cell, whether
`isolated, in tissue culture or incorporated in a plant or plant
`part.
`CLDTST=COLD TEST: The percent of plants that ger-
`minate under cold test conditions.
`
`CLN=CORN LETHAL NECROSIS: Synergistic interac-
`tion of maize chlorotic mottle virus (MCMV)in combina-
`tion with either maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV-A or
`MDMV-B)or wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV). A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to Corn Lethal Necro-
`sis. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`CMSMT=COMMON SMUT: This is the percentage of
`plants not infected with Common Smut. Data are collected
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`COMRST=COMMONRUST(Puccinia sorghi): A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to Common Rust. A
`higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`CROSS POLLINATION:Fertilization by the union of
`two gametes from different plants.
`CROSSING: The combination of genetic material by
`traditional methods such as a breeding cross or backcross,
`but also including protoplast fusion and other molecular
`biology methods of combining genetic material from two
`sources.
`
`D and D1-Dn:represents the generation of doubled hap-
`loid.
`D/D=DRYDOWN: This represents the relative rate at
`which a hybrid will reach acceptable harvest moisture
`compared to other hybrids on a 1 to 9 rating scale. A high
`score indicates a hybrid thatdriesrelatively fast while a low
`score indicates a hybrid that dries slowly.
`
`

`

`US 9,693,531 Bl
`
`15
`
`20
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`7
`DIGENG=DIGESTIBLE ENERGY:Near-infrared trans-
`mission spectroscopy, NIT, prediction of digestible energy.
`DIPERS=D/PLODIA EAR MOLD SCORES (Diplodia
`maydis and Diplodia macrospora): A 1 to 9 visual rating
`indicating the resistance to Diplodia Ear Mold. A higher
`score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected only
`when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment
`measured.
`DIPLOID PLANTPART:Refers to a plant part or cell that
`has a same diploid genotype.
`DIPROT=DIPLODIA STALK ROT SCORE: Score of
`stalk rot severity due to Diplodia (Diplodia maydis).
`Expressed as a 1 to 9 score with 9 being highly resistant.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`DRPEAR=DROPPED EARS: A measure of the number
`of dropped ears per plot and represents the percentage of
`plants that did not drop ears prior to harvest. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`D/T=DROUGHT TOLERANCE:This represents a 1 to 9
`rating for drought tolerance, and is based on data obtained
`understress conditions. A high score indicates good drought
`tolerance and a low score indicates poor droughttolerance.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`EARMLD=GENERAL EAR MOLD: Visual rating (1 to
`9 score) where a 1
`is very susceptible and a 9 is very
`resistant. This is based on overall rating for ear mold of
`mature ears without determining the specific mold organism,
`and may notbe predictive for a specific ear mold. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`EARHT=EDEARHT=EAR HEIGHT:Theear height is a
`measure fromthe groundto the highest placed developed ear
`node attachment and is measured in inches (EARHT) or
`centimeters (EDEARHT).
`EARSZ=EARSIZE: A 1 to 9 visualrating of ear size. The
`higher the rating the larger the ear size.
`EBTSTK=EARLY BRITTLE STALK: A count of the
`
`numberof “snapped”plants per plot following severe winds
`when the corn plant is experiencing very rapid vegetative
`growth in the V5-V8 stage. Expressed as percent of plants
`that did not snap. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`ECB1 LF=EUROPEAN CORN BORER FIRST GEN-
`
`FRATION LEAF FERDING (Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to preflowering leaf
`feeding by first generation European Corn Borer. A higher
`score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected only
`when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment
`measured.
`
`ECB2IT=EUROPEAN CORN BORER SECOND GEN-
`ERATION INCHES OF TUNNELING(Ostrinia nubilalis):
`Average inches of tunneling per plant in the stalk. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`ECB2SC=EUROPEAN CORN BORER SECOND GEN-
`
`ERATION (Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9 visual rating indi-
`cating post flowering degree of stalk breakage and other
`evidence of feeding by second generation European Corn
`Borer. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`ECBDPE=EUROPEAN CORN BORER DROPPED
`
`EARS(Ostrinia nubilalis): Dropped ears due to European
`Corn Borer. Percentage of plants that did not drop ears under
`
`8
`second generation European Corn Borer infestation. Data
`are collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in
`the experiment measured.
`ECBLSI-EUROPEAN CORN BORER LATE SEASON
`
`INTACT(Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9 visual rating indicat-
`ing late season intactness of the corn plant given damage
`(stalk breakage above and below the top ear) caused pri-
`marily by 2”“ and/or 3” generation ECB larval feeding
`before harvest. A higher score indicates more intact plants.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`EDANTCOLs=ANTHER COLOR: Rated on a 1
`
`to 7
`
`scale where 1 is green, 2 is yellow, 3 is pink, 5 is red, and
`7 is purple.
`EDantants=ANTHER
`
`=ANTHOCYANIN
`
`COLOR
`
`INTENSITY: A measure ofanther anthocyanin color inten-
`sity rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is absent or very weak,
`3 is weak, 5 is medium, 7 is strong, and 9 is very strong.
`Observed in the middle third of the main branch on fresh
`anthers.
`EDbarants=GLUME ANTHOCYANIN COLORATION
`
`AT BASE (WHOLE PLANT, EAR INSERTION LEVEL):
`A measure of the color intensity at the base of the glume,
`rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is absent or very weak, 3 is
`weak, 5 is medium, 7 is strong, and 9 is very strong.
`Observed in the middle third of the main branch ofthe tassel.
`EDBARCOLs=BAR GLUME COLOR INTENSITY: A
`
`measure of the bar glumecolorintensity. Bar glumeis a dark
`purple band that may occur on the bottom of a glume. Bar
`glumecolorintensity is measured on a scale of 1 to 7 where
`1 is absent, 2 is weak, 3 is medium,5 is strong, and 7 is very
`strong.
`EDBRROANTs=BRACE ROOTS ANTHOCYANIN
`
`COLORATION: A measure of the color intensity of the
`brace roots rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is absent or very
`weak, 3 is weak, 5 is medium, 7 is strong, and 9 is very
`strong. Observed when well developed and fresh brace roots
`are present on 50% ofplants.
`ANTHOCYANIN
`EDCOBAINTs=COB
`GLUME
`COLOR INTENSITY: Rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is
`
`absent or very weak, 3 is weak, 5 is medium,7 is strong, and
`9 is very strong. Anthocyanin coloration should be observed
`on the middle third of the uppermost cob, after the removal
`of some of the grains.
`EDCOBCOLs—COB COLOR:A measure ofthe intensity
`of pink or salmon coloration of the cob, rated on a 1 to 9
`scale where 1 is absent or white, 2 is light pink, 3 is pink,
`4 is medium red, 5 is red, 6 is medium red, 7 is dark red, 8
`is dark to very dark red, and 9 is present.
`EDCOBDIA=COB DIAMETER:Measured in mm.
`EDCOBICAs=COB ANTHOCYANIN COLOR INTEN-
`
`SITY: A measure of the intensity of pink or salmon color-
`ation of the cob, rated ona 1 to 9 scale where 1 is very weak,
`3 is weak, 5 is medium, 7 is strong, and 9 is very strong.
`EDEARDIA=EAR DIAMETER: Measured in mm.
`EDEARHULs=EAR HUSK LENGTH: A measure of ear
`
`husk length rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is very short, 3
`is short, 5 is medium, 7 is long, and 9 is very long.
`EDEARLNG=EAR LENGTH: Measured in mm.
`EDEARROW=NUMBER OF ROWS OF GRAIN ON
`EAR.
`
`EDEARSHAs=EAR SHAPE (TAPER): Rated on a 1 to 3
`scale where 1
`is conical, 2 is conico-cylindrical, and 3 is
`cylindrical.
`
`

`

`US 9,693,531 Bl
`
`9
`EDEARSHLs=EAR SHANK LENGTH SCALE: A mea-
`
`sure of the length of the ear shank or peduncle, rated on a 1
`to 9 scale where 1 is very short, 3 is short, 5 is medium, 7
`is long, 9 is very long.
`EDFILEANs=SHEATH ANTHOCYANIN COLOR
`INTENSITY AT FIRST
`
`LEAF STAGE: A measure of the anthocyanin color
`intensity of the sheath ofthe first leaf, rated on a 1 to 9 scale
`where 1 is absent or very weak, 3 is weak, 5 is medium, 7
`is strong, and 9 is very strong.
`EDFILECOs=FOLIAGE INTENSITY OF GREEN
`
`COLOR:A measure of the green coloration intensity in the
`leaves, rated on a 1 to 3 scale where 1 is light, 2 is medium,
`and 3 is dark.
`EDFILESHs=LEAF TIP SHAPE: An indication of the
`shape of the apex ofthe first leaf, rated on a 1 to 5 scale
`where 1 is pointed, 2 is pointed to rounded, 3 is rounded, 4
`is rounded to spatulate, and 5 is spatulate.
`EDGLUANTs=GLUME ANTHOCYANIN COLOR
`
`EXCLUDING BASE: A measure of the color intensity of
`the glume excludingthe base, rated on a 1 to 9 scale where
`1 is absent or very weak, 3 is weak, 5 is medium,7 is strong,
`and 9 is very strong. Observed in the middle third of the
`main branch of the tassel.
`EDGLUCOLs=GLUME COLOR:Rated on a 1 to 7 scale
`where 1 is green, 2 is yellow, 3 is pink, 5 is red, and 7 is
`purple.
`EDKERDOCs=DORSAL SIDE OF GRAIN COLOR:
`
`Rated on a 1 to 10 scale where 1 is white, 2 is yellowish
`white, 3 is yellow, 4 is yellow orange, 5 is orange, 6 is red
`orange, 7 is red, 8 is purple, 9 is brownish, and 10 is blue
`black. Observed in the middle third of the uppermost ear
`when well developed.
`EDKERSHAs=KERNEL SHAPE: Rated on a 1 to 3 scale
`where 1 is round, 2 is kidney-shaped, and 3 is cuneiform.
`EDKERTCOs=TOP OF GRAIN COLOR:Rated ona 1 to
`
`AND STEM:A measure of the angle formed between stem
`and leaf, rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 is very small (<5
`degrees), 3 is small (6 to 37 degrees), 5 is medium (38 to 62
`degrees), 7 is large (63 to 90 degrees), and 9 is very large
`(>90 degrees). Observed on the leafjust above the upper ear.
`FEDILEAATTs=ILEAF ATTITUDE OF ENTIRE PLANT:
`
`A measureofleaf curvature or attitude, rated on a 1 to 9 scale
`where 1
`is absent or very slightly recurved, 3 is slightly
`recurved, 5 is moderately recurved, 7 is strongly recurved,
`and 9 is very strongly recurved. Observed on the leaf just
`above the upperear.
`EDLEALNGs=LEAF LENGTH SCORE: A measure of
`leaf length rated on a 1 to 9 scale where 1 indicates<0.70 m,
`3 indicates 0.70 m to 0.80 m, 5 indicates 0.80 m to 0.90 m,
`7 indicates 0.90 m to 1 m, and 9 indicates>1.00 m.
`EDLEAWID=LEAF WIDTH OF BLADE:A measure of
`
`the average leaf width in centimeters.
`EDLELIANTs=LEAF LIMB ANTHOCYANIN COLOR
`INTENSITY OF ENTIRE PLANT: A measure of the leaf
`limb anthocyanin coloration, rated on a 1 to 9 scale with 1
`being absent or very weak, 3 being weak, 5 being medium,
`7 being strong, and 9 being very strong.
`EDNODANTS=NODES ANTHOCYANIN CO

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket