throbber
S242
`
`Posters / Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (2006) S121–S336
`
`Background: Peroneal palsy due to compression of the
`common peroneal nerve at the fibular head was described
`as a complication of delivery. We describe peroneal palsy
`caused by proximal nerve compression during childbirth.
`Aims of the study: ENMG and clinical study to establish
`the site of compression.
`Patient and methods: A 27-year-old woman had her sec-
`ond childbirth. The baby was large, 4500 g. The delivery
`was helped with suction. After childbirth there was a total
`left peroneal paresis. Lumbar MRI was normal. The first
`ENMG was performed 3 days after delivery. There was a
`total paresis of the left anterior tibial muscle in EMG.
`However, the motor conduction velocity of the common
`peroneal nerve was bilaterally normal between the popliteal
`space and ankle but the F-response was missing on the left
`side. The sensory response of the superficial peroneal and
`sural nerves as well as the H-reflex of the tibial nerve was
`normal on both sides. Two weeks after delivery there was
`still a total paresis of the left anterior tibial muscle but a
`few motor unit potentials were activated in the short toe
`extensor muscle. The left peroneal F-response appeared.
`3.5 weeks after delivery there were fibrillation potentials
`in the left peroneal muscles. A few motor unit potentials
`were activated. Seven weeks after delivery there still were
`fibrillations in the left peroneal, but not in the L4–L5
`paraspinal muscles. Nine months after delivery there were
`no residual signs of nerve injury of the left peroneal
`nerve.
`Conclusion: There was conduction block in the motor
`axons of the left peroneal nerve leading to a total paresis
`of the anterior tibial muscle. The site of compression was
`not near the neck of fibula. There were no signs of lumbar
`root compression in MRI or paraspinal EMG. The proba-
`ble site of acute injury was at the level of the posterior divi-
`sion of lumbosacral plexus, formed by the 4th and 5th
`lumbar roots, which has a compression-prone site on the
`iliac crest at the pelvic inlet.
`
`doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.475
`
`voiding dysfunction:
`P28.2 Non-obstructive
`psychogenic or underlying neurogenic?
`S. Malaguti, M. Spinelli, L. Zanollo
`
`Idiopathic,
`
`Niguarda Hospital, Neurourophysiology Spinal Unit, Italy
`
`Background: Since voiding dysfunction can be an
`expression of defective neurogenic control of the lower uri-
`nary tract, sacral nerve modulation by means of implanted
`devices (SNM) is one of the therapeutic options. Unfortu-
`nately, the success of treatment is unpredictable and vari-
`able. Moreover
`because
`the
`pathophysiology
`of
`functional urinary retention (UR) is still poorly under-
`stood, the careful choice of therapy is hindered, thus,
`almost as a rule, multiple treatments are tried in a stepwise
`manner on a trial nd error basis. In our experience a psy-
`
`chopathological findings (by means of Minnesota Multi-
`phase Personality Inventory MMPI2) can be recognized
`as responsible of a predictable failure of the therapy.
`Aim, materials and methods: To assess the hypothesis of
`an underlying neurogenic or prevalent psychogenic
`involvement, we performed a detailed neurophysiological
`investigation (SEP, EMG, ENG, Sacral reflexes, SSR)
`and MMPI2 in a group of 14 female patients (42 years
`mean age) (nine complete and five incomplete UR) without
`overt neurological symptoms nor a history of trauma or
`neurological disease, thus classified from diopathic before
`implanted with SNM.
`Results: Seven patients with positive results of SNM,
`had normal MMPI2 profile and alterations on neurophysi-
`ological assessment. Seven patients had negative results of
`SNM: in five patients both neurophysiology and MMPI2
`fail to detect an underlying involvement (neurogenic nor
`psychogenic);
`in one neurophysiological evaluation was
`normal with MMPI negative and in one only neurogenic
`involvement.
`Conclusions: Neurophysiological diagnostic selection
`and psychological assessment can be useful predictive fac-
`tor of SNM results. Patients with an underlying neurogenic
`alteration show better results in SNM, while patients with
`MMPI2 positive and negative neurophysiology should be
`excluded from SNM implant.
`
`doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.476
`
`P28.3 Cortical neuroplasticity in sacral neuromodulation:
`Neurophysiological evidences in long term follow up
`S. Malaguti, M. Spinelli, L. Zanollo, M. Citeri,
`J. Tarantola, T. Redaelli
`
`Niguarda Hospital, Neurourophysiology Spinal Unit, Italy
`
`Background: Neurophysiological evaluation (NPE) in
`patients addressed to sacral neuromodulation (SNM)
`revealed an undisclosed neurogenic alteration as a possible
`cause of imbalance in afferent input to cortical area. More-
`over SNM seems to act on the afferent pathway with a spe-
`cific modulating effect related to parameters of stimulation:
`an increase from 21 to 40 Hz leads to a decrease in puden-
`dal somatosensory evoked potentials (PSEPs) P40 latency
`resulting in a sort of facilitation on afferent impulse trans-
`mission suggesting a reset of the processing mechanism.
`Aim: To verify the hypothesis that the imbalance in
`afferent input can be modified by SNM leading to a neuro-
`plastic effect on neurocontrol.
`Patients and methods: From November 2001 to Septem-
`ber 2005 215 pts underwent NPE (T0): in 111 pts (51.62%)
`implanted with SNM PSEPs after 1 (T1) and 24 months
`(T2) were confronted.
`Results: In 4 pts (3.6%) implanted for idiopathic detru-
`sor overactivity, clinical efficacy never was fully achieved
`and with a slow decline in time, a return to PSEPs T0
`
`Petitioner - Avation Medical, Inc.
`Ex. 1017, p. 242
`
`

`

`Posters / Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (2006) S121–S336
`
`S243
`
`P40 was found in T2: SNM can modify the plasticity of
`neurocontrol mechanism, but need to be reinforced, per-
`haps in correlation with the underline pathophysiology of
`symptom. In 5 pts (4.5%) implanted for dysfunctional void-
`ing in whom SNM was switched off with a persistent clin-
`ical efficacy no difference in PSEPs at T1 and T2 was seen:
`if a physiological restoration is achieved with SNM, the
`effect on neurocontrol mechanism persists in a normal
`fashion.
`Conclusion: NPE shed light to the mechanism by which
`central nervous system modify its organization under
`SNM.
`
`doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.477
`
`P28.4 Role of penile sympathetic skin response in the
`neurophysiological evaluation of erectile dysfunction
`C. Valles Antun˜ a, J.M. Ferna´ndez Go´ mez, S. Escaf,
`J.L. Martı´n Benito, F. Ferna´ndez Gonza´lez
`
`Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Neurophysiolo-
`gy, Spain
`
`Introduction: Within the limits of sexual and urinary
`malfunction the sympathetic skin responses (SSR) from
`limbs have been used in the evaluation of possible auto-
`nomic malfunction in patients suffering from erectile dys-
`function (ED).
`Aims: To evaluate the role of penile SSR in the
`assessment of neurological function in males suffering from
`ED.
`Patients and methods: We studied 83 males diagnosed
`of ED. They were clinically evaluated and put to a set
`of neurophysiological tests which included nerve conduc-
`tion studies, evoked potentials, EMG, bulbocavernous
`reflex, quantitative sensory test and SSR from limbs
`and penis.
`Results: In ED patients, the percentage of SSR was con-
`siderably lower in the penis (52%) than in the hand (90%)
`or the sole (89%). We found correlation between SSR per-
`centages and the severity of ED, assessed by means of the
`International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Latency of
`SSR show a statistical association between the palm and
`the sole but not with the penis. Regarding the penis, no sig-
`nificant associations were found between the results of the
`two tests used to asses the function of C type fibers (SSR
`and Heat Pain Thresholds).
`Discussion: The simultaneous register of SSR, per-
`formed in the palm, the sole and the penis increased consid-
`erably the diagnostic efficacy of this test. The percentage of
`blockings showed to be useful as an indicator of the affec-
`tation of efferent C fibres. Despite SSR is a polysynaptic
`potential of long latency and regulated by the cerebral cor-
`tex, the results of our study make advisable to value the
`latencies of SSR in the three areas of register and especially
`in the penis, where it seems to have the higher value as
`
`marker or of alterations of anatomic via at lumbosacral
`y/or pudendal level.
`
`doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.478
`
`P28.5 Peripheral neuromodulation using surface electrode
`for treatment of overactive bladder (oab): initial experience
`F. Monti 1, M. Semenic 1, S. Siracusano 2, S. Ciciliato 2,
`G. Sau 3, G. Pizzolato 1
`
`1 University Hospital Cattinara, Department of Neurology,
`Italy
`2 University Hospital Cattinara, Department of Urology,
`Italy
`3 University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Italy
`
`Percutaneus tibial nerve stimulation is effective even if it
`requires a needle insertion. We report preliminary results of
`posterior tibial nerve neuromodulation (PTNN) using sur-
`face electrode in patients affected by overactive bladder
`(AOB). Twelve female patients (age 54.4 ± 16.0) affected
`by AOB and non-responders to antimuscarinic underwent
`TNM using surface electrode. The voiding diaries, SF-36
`and King’s health questionnaires were administered before
`starting the first week of treatment and at the end of ther-
`apy. A bipolar surface electrical stimulator was placed
`behind the medial malleolus, along the course of the pos-
`terior tibial nerve, with the cathode in proximal position
`and the anode 3 cm distally. Couple electrodes in Ag/Ag
`were used for recording, with the cathode placed over the
`abduttor hallucis muscle belly and the anode on the ten-
`don. A disk ground electrode was placed between the stim-
`ulating and recording electrodes. Electrical square-wave
`stimuli of 0.1 ms duration were utilized. The stimulus
`intensity was set in order to obtain a maximal CMAP
`(compound muscle action potential). Stimulation protocol
`was 1 stim/s for 20 min, and the stimulation was repeated
`twice every week for seven weeks for each subject. We
`observed a statistically significant reduction of voiding fre-
`quencies during night
`(2 ± 0.5 to 1.4 ± 0.5 times –
`p < 0.0001) and day (13.3 ± 1.9 to 8.9 ± 2.5 times –
`p < 0.0001). No side effects were observed. SF-36 and
`KHQ questionnaires showed a statistically significant
`improvement of QoL at the end of therapy. The use of sur-
`face electrode in PTNN seems to be a non-invasive and
`successful treatment option for AOB.
`
`doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.479
`
`P28.6 Relationship between the autonomic dysfunction of
`multiple
`system atrophy and external anal
`sphincter
`electromyography
`Han Wang
`
`Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Neurology, China
`
`Petitioner - Avation Medical, Inc.
`Ex. 1017, p. 243
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket