throbber
0022-534 7 /82/1274-0736$02.00
`THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
`Copyright© 1982 by The Williams & Wilkins Co.
`
`Vol. 127, April
`Printed in U.S. A.
`
`ABDOMINAL WALL ELECTROMYOGRAPHY: A NONINVASIVE
`TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE PEDIATRIC URODYNAMIC ACCURACY
`
`STEPHEN A. KOFF AND EVAN J. KASS*
`From the Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center and C. S. Mott Children's Hospital,
`Ann Arbor, Michigan
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Abdominal wall electromyography, using sticky surface patch electrodes placed on the rectus
`abdominus muscles, was used during noninvasive urodynamic studies in 60 children to detect
`straining. Straining, which usually was imperceptible to the examiner, occurred in 64 per cent of
`neurologically normal children. Urodynamics identified detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia during strain(cid:173)
`ing to void but reverted to normal when the same children voided without straining. Because the
`urodynamic findings that characterize detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia are mimicked by straining and
`other common urologic entities, the potential for misdiagnosis is great unless some assessment of
`intra-abdominal pressure is made during neurourologic testing.
`
`With the proliferation of noninvasive pediatric oriented uro(cid:173)
`dynamic techniques has come the suspicion that detrusor(cid:173)
`sphincter incoordination is a major cause of urologic dysfunc(cid:173)
`tion in children. However, because dyssynergia can be mim(cid:173)
`icked by other conditions, such as straining and uninhibited
`detrusor contractions, these conditions must be detected to
`ensure urodynamic accuracy. The usual approach in adults to
`identify straining during voiding and to confirm uninhibited
`bladder contractions during cystometry involves a rectal bal(cid:173)
`loon to measure intra-abdominal pressure. However, in children
`this technique is often incompatible with normal and natural
`micturition, especially when studies are performed while the
`patient is awake. Herein we describe a totally noninvasive
`method for assessing abdominal wall muscular activity using
`electromyography and present our experience with this tech(cid:173)
`nique in the urodynamic study of 60 children with voiding
`disturbances.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Urodynamic testing was done in 39 girls and 21 boys between
`6 months and 20 years old (mean age 9.3 years). All patients
`had symptoms of voiding dysfunction, including diurnal enu(cid:173)
`resis, precipitate micturition, incontinence and weak or inter(cid:173)
`rupted streams, and/or recurrent urinary tract infections. Ves(cid:173)
`icoureteral reflux was present in 16 children and 5 had either
`congenital (myelodysplasia) or acquired spinal cord injury.
`A standard urodynamic protocol was adopted to test sepa(cid:173)
`rately bladder filling and emptying. Urotropic drugs were
`stopped 24 hours before investigations and premedication was
`not used. Two disposable infant electrocardiogram electrodes,
`which are pre-jelled and self-adhering, are placed perianally in
`approximately the 10 and 2 o'clock positions. 1 Two similar adult
`electrocardiogram electrodes are placed on the anterior abdom(cid:173)
`inal wall over the lower rectus abdominis muscles, and a third
`reference electrode is placed on the lateral abdominal wall. In
`some older patients hair must be removed to afford better
`electrode adherence. The patient is then asked to cough, strain
`down and squeeze the perineum to confirm satisfactory elec(cid:173)
`trode placement and recording. In addition to recording abdom(cid:173)
`inal wall muscular activity, the abdominal electrodes also mon(cid:173)
`itor electrocardiogram activity, which is easily distinguished
`from the electromyographic tracing. Next, the child is in-
`
`Accepted for publication July 1, 1981.
`Read at annual meeting of American Urological Association, Boston,
`Massachusetts, May 10-14, 1981.
`* Current address: Children's Hospital National Medical Center, 111
`Michigan Ave., N. W., Washington, D. C. 20010.
`
`structed to void into the uroflowmeter, t either standing or
`sitting, with simultaneous recording of electromyographic activ(cid:173)
`ity of the abdominal and perineal muscles as well as the uroflow
`rate on a TECA TE4 multichannel recording electromyograph.:j:
`If straining, evidenced by increased abdominal wall electromy(cid:173)
`ographic activity, is noted during voiding, the child is asked to
`stop voiding and to try again to void without straining (fig. 1).
`Upon completion of the voiding study the patient is trans(cid:173)
`ferred with electrodes in place to an examining table and a lOF
`urethral catheter is inserted in the bladder. With a carbon
`dioxide cystometer§ and the recording electromyograph, com(cid:173)
`bined cystometry, and perinea! and abdominal wall electro(cid:173)
`myography is performed. To test for uninhibited contractions
`the patient is specifically instructed not to void during bladder
`filling. After completing the cystometric studies, those patients
`in whom the voiding examination was either incomplete or
`associated with straining are restudied by uroflowmetry and
`electromyography after filling the bladder with saline. At the
`conclusion of urodynamic testing each patient is anesthetized
`for cystoscopy.
`To assess the significance of increased abdominal wall elec(cid:173)
`tromyographic activity 7 children were studied simultaneously
`with a rectal balloon to monitor intra-abdominal pressures
`during urodynamic testing.
`
`RESULTS
`The surface patch electrodes were applied successfully in all
`cases and, in each instance, voluntary contraction of the peri(cid:173)
`nea! and abdominal wall muscles confirmed electrode position
`and produced an increase in the respective electromyographic
`activities. Differences in the pattern of muscular activation
`were observed during Valsalva type maneuvers (such as cough(cid:173)
`ing and bearing down), which usually produced a simultaneous
`increase in perineal and abdominal wall electromyographic
`activity compared to perineal tightening, which typically caused
`only a response in perineal electromyography. In children stud(cid:173)
`ied simultaneously with rectal balloon pressure measurements
`elevation in rectal pressure was observed in all cases whenever
`abdominal electromyography indicated activation of the ab(cid:173)
`dominal wall musculature (fig. 2).
`In tests of bladder emptying 56 of 60 children (93 per cent)
`voided successfully into the uroflowmeter on ~l occasions. Of
`23 children who voided to completion (residual urine <25 cc)
`t American Medical Systems Model N7520B, Minneapolis, Minne(cid:173)
`sota. t TECA Corp., White Plains, New York.
`§ Modern Controls, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota.
`
`736
`
`Petitioner - Avation Medical, Inc.
`Ex. 1037, p. 736
`
`

`

`

`

`

`

`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket