throbber
NATURE VOL. 224 DECEMBER 27 1969
`
`1307
`
`Institutes of Health, US National Science Foundat.ion a nu
`the Cooley's Anemia Foundat,ion.
`
`J . FUHR
`C. NATTA
`P.A. MARKS
`A.BANK
`
`Department e,f Medicine,
`Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons,
`New York.
`Rec~ivcd Aw;ust 11 ; re\'ised October 2, 1969.
`
`' Weatherall, D. J'.. The Thalaa.,aemia S 1/1ldronie8 (Blackwell, Oxford, JY65).
`' Hurka., E., and Marks, P. A., Nature, 199, 706 (1963).
`• B ank, A., and ~£arks, P. A. , .T. Clin. Invest., 45, 330 (1966).
`• Clegg, J. B. Weatherall , D. J., Na·Nakorn , S., and W.isi, P., !Yat1tre, 220,
`604 (1068).
`~ :Fuhr, J. E., London, I. ;r., and Grayzel , A. I., Proc. US 1Ya.t. Acad. S ci.,
`63, 129 (1969).
`• Nomura, M., and Lowry, C., P>·oc. US Nat . A cad. Sri., 58, 9 ,16 (1967).
`'Bishop, J., Biochim. Biophys. Acta.,119, 130 (1966).
`
`cule arc not reveale u in the electron m icrographs, t his
`part has been omitted from the model.
`Fig. 3a represents a single I-'- + L chain protomeric unit,
`with three numbered cysteino residues available for d i•
`sulphide bridge formation. The numbering, which nm;;
`from the N-tenninus, is that used previously•, but ,
`because the model represents t h o folded polypep tidf•
`chains , the linear sequence of bridges shown h er e need
`not correspond to that in tho extended ch a in. In Fig. :3b
`a pair of these units hav e been assembled through bridges
`2 and 4 to form a dirneric subunit, leaving two cyst eine
`residues 3 available for bridging t o identical n eighbouring
`units, generating the cyclic structure of the I gM molemtle,
`Fig. 3c. It is this latter view of t h e rnolec11le which w,•
`believe corresponds t o images of t he type seen in Fig. l b.
`The brancrung referred to in Fig. le occurs at a flexibk(cid:173)
`"hinge" region a ssociated with bridge 2, as representc-d
`in the model in F ig. 3d.
`Each of the ten I-'-+ L chain pro tornor uni ts carries a
`single antigen-binding site, situated at the out ermost tip
`of the units ananged radially in the I gM molecule. This
`positioning follows from electron micrographs of Ig:M
`antibody molecules cross-linking two bacterial flagella,
`as seen, for example , in F ig. 2a . When, however, IgM
`molecules are seen in profile attached along a s ingl<"
`bacterial flagellum, they a re "staple" -like in appearanc,i•
`(Fig. 2b). Similar forrns of IgM ,m tibo<lies have oe.ell
`seen at t a ched to fragments of erythronyte membran e 18.
`
`Conformation of the Free and Antigen(cid:173)
`bound lgM Antibody Molecules
`THE two major classes of antibody molecule, I g G and
`IgM 1
`• have muleuul~r w,:,igh~1:; of Hi0,000 a ml ll00,000,
`respectively. They are composed of heavy and lig ht
`polypeptide chains. In IgiVI each heav y (1-1-)
`chain, molecular weight 70,000, is linked by
`a disu lphide bridge to a light (L) chain,
`molecular weight 23,000, and is proba bly
`linke<l by three further bridges to other p.
`chains•-10.
`A model accounting for the flexible Y •
`s haped structure of IgG seen in the electron
`mieroseope has already been d escribed 11 , 12,
`and we now propose a m od el for the Ig:M
`antibody consistent both wit h the appeara n ce
`of free and antigen-bound molecules in elec(cid:173)
`tron micrographs and with
`t,ho av ailable
`chemical data . W o ha ve exa mined I g:M p re-
`parations from a variety of mammals and
`from the chicken a nd dogfish, and complexes
`o f Salmon ella flagella with antiflagella IgM
`from several of these species 13 • 14. All speci(cid:173)
`m e ns were negatively s t ained with col.cl 2
`per cent sodium phosphotungstatc (pH 7·3)
`on holey carbon films'• and dried at 4° C.
`The ~tellate appearance of the free IgM
`molecule (Fig. la) is somewhat varia b le.
`SomC't-imos we find molecules display ing the
`sim ple symmetry of that s hown in I<'ig . l b.
`Svehag and h is collea.gues16 •1 7 have publish ed
`g ood pictures of this t y pe, which they in(cid:173)
`t,erpret as arising from five cyclically linked
`s ubunits. \Ve a grne with t his interpretation ,
`but believe that the Ig:M molecule consists of
`two similar halves which in this view are
`s uperimposed. The arms are about 25 A wide 1'
`a nd 100 A lon g ; the Jess well defined central
`region of the molec ule is a pproxima tely 100 A
`acr oss. Fig. le sh ows examples display ing a
`rnor e commonlv encountered feat ure :
`in
`ea ch , one or m o~e of the radial units appea rs
`branch ed .into t wo, an d in on e ease all five
`a rms a re branched. The length of the
`branched sections of t,ho arms is 55-70 A.
`"\Ve suggest t hat the points a t which the
`a rms branch are flexible regions of the
`molecule wher e
`t wo heavy polypcpt;ide
`ch ains in each subunit are joined. This
`feature is embodied
`in the m odel sh own
`i n Fig. a.
`Because the details of t he
`material present, at, the centre of the m ole-
`
`(t
`
`c
`
`1.:r.-11.i"'-·~~·.11
`
`( iv)
`(ii)
`(iii)
`( i)
`F ig. l. Electron micrographs of free Jgjl,I molecules. a . IgM preparation isola te<! from
`the scrum of mice carry ing plasma cell tumour MOPC 104E (generously provider! Jn·
`Dr A. J . Munro). b and c, Selected individual IgM molecules; CiHiv) as a ; (v) isolated
`from dogfish scrum. The har represents 250 A.
`
`© 1969 Nature Publishing Group
`
`

`

`1308
`
`a
`
`NATURE VOL. 224 DECEMBER 27 1969
`
`constmctPd by linking each dimeric subun_it (F ig. :]b) to
`the next but one on either side.
`The Y-shaped appeara nce and variable confonnation
`of the IgM subunit seen
`in the electron mirrosr ope
`
`(I)
`
`(Ill)
`
`(ii)
`
`(i\')
`
`b
`Fig. 2. Electron micrographl! of IgM antibody molecules bound to
`Salmon,,Ua flagella.
`a, J)og6sll antibody cross-linking two flagella;
`b: (I) and (II) dogllah, (ill) sheep and (iv) rabbit antlbodiee, each
`attached to a single flagellum. The bar l'epresents 250 )..
`
`The reduced maximum dimension of molecules in the
`staple form is evident when Figs. 2a and b are compared.
`This appearance can be explained if several of the radial
`units have folded at a flexible hinge region to resemble
`the legs of a table, thus making possible the attachment
`of a ll , or most of, the terminal binding sites to antigenic
`determinants on the surface of a single flagellum. This
`folded conformation, represented by the model in ):<'ig. 3d,
`is confirmed by the fact that the perimeters of the staples
`have the approximate length, 300 A, of the extended
`IgM molecule. In Fig. 3d the legs are folded only at the
`hinge region near bridge 2 already postulated as their
`branch point. In some staples, however, the cross-bar is
`only 100 A long, with uprights of comparable length.
`These uprights would be formed from entire 100 A arms,
`with the central 100 A disk in pro.file forming tho cross(cid:173)
`bar. Thus, in addition to the flexible regions at the
`branched points of the arms, hinging can also occur in
`those regions of the heavy chains linked to neighbours
`by bridge 3.
`In addition to those already mentioned, the following
`known features of the I gM molecule are consistent w-ith
`our model: (1) The interhea.vy-ehain disulphide bridges
`a.re symmetrical•.
`(2) Reductive cleavage of a single
`bridge to each heavy chain yields dimeric subunits with
`a structure corresponding to t hat seen in Fig. 3b9 •19 •
`(:1) Enzymatic cleavage of IgM preparations yields••-22
`(a) an Fab fragment, with a molecular weight of 45,000,
`having a single antigen-binding site, and composed of an
`L chain and part of a heavy chain carrying no inter(cid:173)
`heavy-cha.in bridge; (b) an (Fab"), fragment, of molecular
`weight 120,000, carrying two antigen-binding sites; bridgo
`2 links the halves of this dimeric fragment, which arises
`from cleavage between bridges 2 and 3; (o) a fragment,
`Fe, of molecular weight 300,000, carrying no L chains 0r
`antigen-binding sites;
`this is the central disk of tho
`IgM molecule, composed of the ten C terminal ends of
`the µ chains linked cyclically by bridges 3 and 4.
`An alternative symmetrical IgM model fulfilling the
`chemical requirements but not immediately reconcilable
`with tho structure seen in the electron microscope can bo
`
`Fig. 3. Schematic mod els of the IgM molecule and il s snlJunils. "· A
`single µ+ 1.. chain protomeric unit ; 2, 3 and 4 are cystcinc re~idues
`available for interchain dll!ttlphide bridge formation: the L chain and
`disulphide bridge 1 linking it to the heavy (µ ) chain lie between the
`antigen b inding site (B) and cystelne residue 2. h, A dimer fonned by
`linki1;g two protomers through bridges 2 and 4.
`r , Model showing
`how firn of the dimerlc units shown In b linked cyc!icall~' through
`disulph ide bridges 3 are lU!!!Cmbled in the lgl\I molecule. d, l\Iodel
`inoorporating the features shown In c bu t with the subunits opened to
`demonstrate the proposed fl exibility about a " hinge" region asso(cid:173)
`ciated with bridge 2. The resull,ing branched appearance matches t hr.t
`in r crl.nln eled -ron mlcrograph.s.
`
`Fii,. -!.
`lllodcl of IgM a ntibody houud to a particul:\lc antigen. p hoto(cid:173)
`graphed in profile so as w simulate the "staple" appp,ararn:e in miC'ro~
`gr-,.phs of the t ype seen in F ig. 2b.
`
`© 1969 Nature Publishing Group
`
`

`

`NATURE VOL. 224 DECEMBER 27 1969
`
`resemble those of IgG11 •12. Such flexibility in antibodies
`must facilitate multipoint attachment.
`The altered
`stabilized conformation in the bound IgM molecule may
`be that w hich is recognized by, and activates, the first
`component of complement, leading to phagocytosis and
`mernbrnne lysis.
`Finally, the similarity of mammalian and dogfish IgM
`an1,ibodies is of interest, suggesting that t he features
`described were present in the common ancestor of the
`dogfish and onrselves.
`
`A. FEINSTEIN
`E.A.MUNN
`
`ARC Institute of Animal Phys iology ,
`Babra ham,
`Cambridge.
`ltcc·cive<l Sept.ember l 5; revised October 29. 1060.
`' I.lull. Wo,ld H ealth Omo.nization, 30, 447 (1964).
`• Pain. ii. Fl. , Biochim. Bioph11s. Acta, 94, 183 (1965).
`• Rmall, l'. A .. a11<l La.nun, M. E ., Bfr,r.hemistrv, 6, 259 (1966).
`• ~1ontgomer.v, 1-'. C., Dorrington, K. ;r., and Rockey, J . H ., Biochemistry, 8.
`1247 (1969).
`• Miller, I<'., and Metzger, II., J. Biol. Chem., 240, 3325 (1965).
`• Lamm, M. E., and Small, P . A., BiocltFmistry, 5, 267 (1966).
`' Suzuki, T., and Dontsch, H.F., J. Rio!. Chem., 242, 2725 (1967).
`• ~farchalonis, J., am! Edelman, G. J.I., Science, 154, 1567 (1966).
`• lleale, D., and F einstein, A., Biochem. J ., 112, 187 (1969).
`10 :\lillcr, F. , and Metzger, H., J. B iol. Chem., 240, 4740 (1965).
`11 Feinstein , A., and Rowe, A. J ., Nature, 205, 147 (1965).
`"Valentine, R. C., and Green, N. l\f., J. Mol. Biol., 27, 615 (1967).
`"I-'cinsteln, A., and Munn, E. A., J. Physiol., 186, 64P (]966).
`"Feinstein, A., a nd Munn, E. A., P roc. Seve,uh Int. Cong. Biochmn., Tokyo,
`982 (rn67J.
`"Huxley, H. E .. nnd Zubay, G., J. M ol. Biol., 2, 10 (1960).
`"Svehag, S.-E., Chesebro, .8., a nd Bloth, R., Science, 158, 933 (1967).
`"Chcsubro, ]3., llloth, B., and Svehag, S.-K, J. Ezp. M ed., 127, 399 (1968).
`" H umphrey, .T. H ., and Do urmashkin, R. R., in Comple,nent (ed it. by
`Wo lstenholme. (I.E. W., :i.mt Knight, J.), 175 (Churcl,il!, J,ondon, 1965) .
`... J\lorrls, J . E ., 1.mtl Inman, 11·. P ., [111,1m,inochemi8lry, 7 , 285'1 (1968).
`" Onouc, J., K ishimoto, T., and Ymnamura, Y ., .f. Immunol., 100, 238
`(1008).
`"Miller , F., and Jfot,,ger, 11., J. Biol. Chem. , 241, 1732 (1966).
`"Dorrin;.ton, K. J., an d )iihncscu, C., Immunochemistry (in t he prC$S).
`
`Multiple Forms of Monoamine Oxidase
`in the Developing Brain
`MuoH a ttention has recently been centred on the biosyn(cid:173)
`thosis and m etabolism of the catecholamines and indole(cid:173)
`a lky lamines. Because the enzyme mono1:1.mine oxidase
`(deaminating), EC
`(monoarnine : 0 2 oxidoreductase
`1.4.:l.4) is involved in the m etabolism of both these classes
`o f biogenic amines, and because of our interest in develop(cid:173)
`m ent'•' we were prompted to investigate the nature of
`this enzyme and especially its activity in developing
`brain and other tissues of the maturing organism.
`Several investigators have suggested that there might
`be multiple forms (isoenzymes) of monoamine oxidase
`(J.VIAO), based on indirect evidence derived from multiple
`substrate and inhibitor studies 3 - 7• There are even some
`r eports of attempts to isolate the pure enzyme which
`also suggest the possibility of the existence of one or more
`multi ple forms of MAO (refs. 8-13). As a means of
`approaching this problem, we attempted to look at any
`differences in MAO(s ) there m ight be between embryonic
`and adult bro.in.
`We used 16 da.y old embryo and adult New Hampshire
`red hens. After the appropriate tissue h ad been homo(cid:173)
`genized, the monoamine oxidase was solubili:r.cd by sonic
`oscillation14 for 30, 60 or 120 min, partially purified by
`ammonium s ulphate precipitat ion and then subjected t o
`polyacry lamide gel electrophoresis. In some oases, the
`enzyme was solubilized by h omogenization of the tissue
`with 15 per cent 'Lubrol'. The general methods and
`techniriues of gel electrophoresis used were those d escribed
`
`1309
`
`by Davis 15. The gel concentration wus 7·25 p er cont and a
`Tris glycine buffer at pH 8·3 was used. The rwming time
`of the electrophoresis was 2 h at 4° C with current at 4·5
`mA per tube. Monoamine oxidase activity was revealed
`by the appearance of plll'ple coloured bands after incuba(cid:173)
`tion with a nitroblun tetrazolium s ubstrate staining solu(cid:173)
`tion. Tyro.mine, kynuramine, benzylamine• or trypt(cid:173)
`amine 1 • was used as substrate. All substrates were used
`in excess. Monoamine oxidase activity was a lso d eterm(cid:173)
`ined by the spectr ophotometric method o f Weissbach et al.
`with ky nurami ne as substrate".
`
`C
`R
`A
`J<' ig. 1. Gel electrophoretic patterns or chick brain munoamine oxid11se.
`A, 16 day embryo; B, 1 day old chick ; C. :,dnlt. Arrows point to
`bands discUBSed in text. Arrow labelled rn ind icates the dye marker.
`The anode is at the bottom of the tube wh ile t-h• cathode is at the top.
`
`The results of acrylamide gel electrophoresis of em (cid:173)
`bryonic, newborn a nd adult chick brains stained for
`monoaminc oxidase activity, with benzylamine as sub(cid:173)
`strate, are sh own in Fig. l. The slow m oving MAO band
`which is always obtained from embryonic brain is com(cid:173)
`p letely absent from the pattern d erived from the adult
`brain. lt is also apparent t hat the newborn chick brain
`has a pattern similar to that of the embryonic brain. At.
`least five bands with monoarnino oxidase activity a re
`common to both adult and infant bra in. Our preliminary
`r esults indicate that t hese same MAO hand patterns a re
`obtained whether the tissue is disrupted by homogen iza(cid:173)
`t ion followed by sonication or d isrupted by homogeniza(cid:173)
`t ion with a non-ionic d etergent. The data obtained after
`sonication for 120 min were the same a s those a fter 30 min.
`These result s arc in accord with the statement by Kim
`and D 'Iorio that either method of solubilizing the enzyme
`results in similar p atterns of MAO active bands.
`Similar patterns of the multiple forms of MAO arc
`obtained if tyramine or k ynuramine is used as substrate
`of the enzyme, alth ough there seem to be quantitative
`differences in t he relative intensities of t he various bands.
`It should be pointed out, however, that when chick brain
`MAO patterns, from embryo as well as adult, were d eterm(cid:173)
`ined on acrylamide gel using tryptamino as substrate,
`no bands could be observed. This is in contrast t,o rat
`brain, where we and others 18 liavn obser ved that trypt(cid:173)
`amine as well as the other substrates mentioned earlier
`can readily serve as substrate for the multiple forms of
`the em:ymc .
`
`© 1969 Nature Publishing Group
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket