throbber
o
`\
`
`IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
`ASBESTOS
`
`RICHARD F. WEBER, an individual, CIVIL ACTION-ASBESTOS
`
`Plaintiff,
`GD No. 2012-4355
`VS.
`GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., etal. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND
`SHORT FORM ANSWER,
`Defendants. NEW MATTER, NEW MATTER
`PURSUANT TO RULE 2252(D) AND
`
`REPLY TO ALL CROSS CLAIMS
`
`Filed on behalf of:
`Graybar Electric Company, Inc.
`
`v,
`R = > Counsel of Record for this Party:
`W
`] o o o )
`= B 2= Amy J. Coco, Esquire
`Se o =i PA Atty, I.D. No. 73416
`Lok T
`E% D5 .
`& §oF
`M
`
`WEINHEIMER, SCHADEL & HABER
`Firm No. 090 :
`602 Law and Finance Building
`429 Fourth Avenue
`Pittsburgh, PA 15219-1503
`412.765.3399
`lidate Check
`OPS$ANKAL
`JURY TRIAL DEMANBEDs:17:25
`
`GD-12-804355
`
`{00160309.D0OC:1}
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
`‘ ASBESTOS ,
`
`. CIVIL ACTION-ASBESTOS
`RICHARD F. WEBER, -
`GD No. 2012-4355
`Plaintiff,
`
`VS.
`
`al.
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`%
`
`GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.,et )
`)
`
`)
`
`Defendants )
`)
`
`)
`
`)
`
`ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND SHORT FORM ANSWER,
`NEW MATTER, NEW MATTER ‘
`PURSUANT TO RULE 2252(D) AND REPLY TO ALIL CROSS CLAIMS
`
`Graybar Electric Company, Inc., by its undersignéd attorneys, who hereby enters their
`appearances, hereby answers Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursua{nt to the jprovisions of paragraph 3(b)
`of the Order for Master Pleadings in Asbestos Cases.
`
`After a reasonable investigation, Graybar Electric Company, Inc., denies knowledge or
`information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the identity averments contained in the
`Complaint and therefore denies the averments and demanEdS strict proof thereof at trial. Insofar
`as the averments pertain to Graybar Electric Compalfly, Inc., | Graybar states that it is a
`corporation organized and existed under the laws of the:State of New York, with its principal
`place of business in St. Louis, Missouri. It is specifically denied|that Plaintiff was exposed to
`any asbéstos-containing product sold or distributed by Graybar Electric Combany, Inc. and strict
`
`proof'is demanded at trial.
`
`{00160309.D0OC:1}
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NEW MATTER
`
`1.
`
`Graybar Electric Company, Inc. incorporatés the Defendants' Master New Matter
`
`pursuant to paragraph 3 (e) of the Order to Master Pleadings) in Asbestos Cases in the
`
`Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.
`2.
`manner other than that for which they were intended.
`3. Plaintiffs are guilty to contributory negligence,
`Graybar Electric Company, Inc., was in any way negligent, Grayb
`Plaintiffs is barred because Plaintiffs' negligence is greater than the
`Defendants, against whom recovery is sought. |
`4. Plaintiffs assumed the risk, if any, of the injuries ¢
`assumption of the risk bars plaintiffs' action.
`5. Plaintiffs claims are barred by the applicable statutes
`and/or by the doctrine of laches, waiver, and/or estoppel.
`6. Any exposure of plaintiffs to Graybar pro&ucts, if 2
`insufficient to establish a reasonable degree of probabilify that its
`injuries. |
`
`NEW MATTER PURSUANT TO RULE 2
`
`The asbestos products of Graybar Electric Company;, Inc., if any, were used in a
`
`and without admitting that
`ar avers that recovery by the
`
`combined negligence of the
`
`r damages, if any, and such
`
`of limitations and/or repose,
`
`iny, was so minimal as to be
`
`products caused the claimed
`
`252(D)
`
`7. Graybar hereby cross-claims against all other
`defendants, incorporating herein all factual averments of plaintiffs
`
`asserted herein only for purposes of this cross-claim, and avers tha
`
`defendants and additional
`' complaint, not admitted but
`
`if there is liability at all, it is
`
`some or all of the other defendants and additional defendants that are either solely liable to
`
`{00160309.DOC: 1}
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plaintiffs, jointly and severally, or liability to the defendant, Graybar Electric Company, Inc., for
`
`contribution or indemnity.
`WHEREFORE, defendant Graybar Electric Compahy Inc. respectfully requests judgment
`in its favor and against plaintiffs and all other parties to this action.
`
`REPLY OF DEFENDANT GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
`COMPANY. INC. TO ALL CROSS-CLAIMS
`
`8. Defendant Graybar Electric Company, Inc. specifically denies all cross-claims
`now or later averred against it and asserts that it is not liable to plaintiffs, any other additional
`defendants who are now or will be parties to this action.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`WEINHEIMER, SCHADEL & HABER
`
`Amy Jf(0co, Esquire
`PA Attg. 1.D. 73416
`
`602 Law & Finance Building
`429 Fourth Avenue
`
`Pittsburgh, PA 1521971503
`412-765-3399
`
`{00160309.D0C:1}
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the within ENTRY OF
`APPEARANCE AND SHORT FORM ANSWER, NEW MATTER] NEW MATTER
`PURSUANT TO RULE 2252(D) AND REPLY TO ALL CROSS CLAIMS has been served
`upon the following via First Class Mail postage pre-paid or email on June 25, 2012:
`Peter T. Paladino, Jr., Esquire
`GOLDBERG PERSKY & WHITE PC
`1030 First Avenue
`Pittsburgh, PA 15219-6295
`(Counsel for Plaintiffs)
`
`All Counsel of Record
`(Via Email)
`
`WEINHEIMER, SCHADEL & HABER, P.C.
`
`Amy J. Coco;, Esquire
`Pa. Atty. LD 73416
`
`602 Law and Finance Building
`429 Fourth Avenue
`“Pittsburgh, PA 15219-1503
`
`{00160309.D0C:1}
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket