throbber
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
`
`
`
`CIVIL DIVISION ASBESTOS
`
`G.D. 15-017928
`
`Code: 012
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE
`ALL ATI DOCUMENTS, ALL IHF
`DOCUMENTS AND RELATED
`DEPOSITIONS
`
`Filed On Behalf Of Defendant:
`FOSECO, INC.
`
`Counsel of Record for this party:
`
`TERRY A. SCHROCK, ESQUIRE
`PA I.D. No. 87336
`
`MARON MARVEL BRADLEY
`ANDERSON & TARDY LLC
`The Landmarks Building
`Suite 250
`100 West Station Square Drive
`Pittsburgh, PA 15219
`(412) 281-5560
`
`
`))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
`
`
`)
`
`
`PATRICIA JACOBS, Executrix of the
`Estate of GEORGE R. JACOBS,
`deceased, and PATRICIA JACOBS, in
`her own right,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
` vs.
`
`FOSECO INC., et. al.,
`
`
` Defendants.
`
`

`

`IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
`
`
`PATRICIA JACOBS, Executrix of the
`Estate of GEORGE R. JACOBS,
`deceased, and PATRICIA JACOBS, in
`her own right,
`
`
`CIVIL DIVISION ASBESTOS
`
`G.D. 15-017928
`
`Code: 012
`
`
`)))))))))
`
`
`)
`)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
` vs.
`
`FOSECO INC., et. al.,
`
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ALL ATI DOCUMENTS, ALL IHF DOCUMENTS
`AND RELATED DEPOSITIONS
`
`AND NOW, comes Defendant FOSECO, INC., by its attorneys, Maron Marvel Bradley
`
`Anderson & Tardy LLC, and moves this Court in Limine for an order excluding all Asbestos
`Textile Institute (“ATI”) documents, all Industrial Health Foundation (“IHF”) documents and
`related deposition testimony from being introduced into evidence against Defendant Foseco, Inc. for
`the following reasons:
`Plaintiff claims that Plaintiff-Decedent contracted an asbestos-related disease as a
`1.
`result of exposure to Defendant’s asbestos-containing products.
`Plaintiff has included in the exhibit list documents pertaining to activities of IHF and
`2.
`
`ATI.
`
`Foseco, Inc. has never belonged to ATI, nor did it ever belong to IHF.
`3.
`Because Foseco, Inc. was never a member of ATI or IHF, these documents are
`4.
`inadmissible to show purported knowledge on Defendant’s part of the hazards, if any, associated
`with asbestos-containing product.
`Unless Plaintiff can show that Foseco, Inc. received or had actual knowledge of the
`5.
`contents of any these documents, these documents should be inadmissible to show notice of the
`alleged dangers of asbestos with respect to the Defendant in the above-captioned lawsuit.
`6. The ATI documents and the IHF documents, even if relevant to Plaintiff’s claims
`against Defendant, nevertheless would result in unfair prejudice to Defendant and must be
`
`

`

`excluded, as the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury
`substantially outweighs any potential probative value.
` Introducing the ATI documents or the IHF documents against Defendant would
`7.
`cause the jury to assume that Defendant possessed knowledge of the information contained
`therein. Unless Plaintiff can show in their lawsuit that Foseco, Inc. received or had actual
`knowledge of the documents, Defendant would be prejudiced by the admission of the documents
`and denied its right to a fair trial in each such case.
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant Foseco, Inc. moves that this Honorable Court exclude any and all
`evidence of punitive damages against Foseco, Inc. and dismiss the punitive damages claim against
`it.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MARON MARVEL BRADLEY
`ANDERSON & TARDY LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Terry A. Schrock
`
`(electronically filed)
`Terry A. Schrock, Esquire
`Pa. I.D. 87336
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Foseco Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXLUDE ALL ATI DOCUMENTS, ALL IHF DOCUMENTS
`AND RELATED DEPOSITIONS was served upon Plaintiff’s counsel, addressed as follows via
`first class mail, and all other counsel of record were notified of filing of the same, via electronic
`mail, this 7th day of November, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cori J. Kapusta, Esquire
`Goldberg, Persky & White, PC
`11 Stanwix Street, Suite 1800
`Pittsburgh, PA 15222
`
`By: /s/ (electronically filed)
` Terry A. Schrock, Esquire
`
`

`

`IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
`
`CIVIL DIVISION ASBESTOS
`
`
`G.D. 10-016022
`
`
`Code: 012
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`)))))))))))
`
`
`
`KAREN S. KITTLE, Executrix of the
`Estate of TERRY M. KITTLE, deceased,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` vs.
`
`FOSECO INC., et. al.,
`
`
` Defendants.
`
`ORDER OF COURT
`
`AND NOW, to-wit, this
`
` day of ________________ 20____, upon consideration of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`this MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ALL ATI DOCUMENTS, ALL IHF
`
`DOCUMENTS AND RELATED DEPOSITIONS, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that
`
`said Motion which has been filed on behalf of the Defendant, FOSECO, INC., is hereby
`
`__________________________.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY THE COURT:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` J.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket