throbber
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
`
`HENRY J. DOTSON and VENEDA
`
`CIVIL DIVISION - ASBESTOS
`
`DOTSON, his wife,
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`GD No. 97-019688
`
`Issue No.
`
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION, et al.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Code: 012
`
`Filed on behalf of Defendant,
`ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION
`
`Counsel of record for this party:
`
`Stephen R. Mlinac, Esquire
`PA ID. #23591
`
`Anne L. Wilcox, Esquire
`PA ID. #88828
`
`Kristy L. Eiter, Esquire
`PA ID. #94118
`
`SWARTZ CAMPBELL, LLC
`Firm #765
`
`4750 US. Steel Tower
`
`600 Grant Street
`
`Pittsburgh, PA 15219
`(412) 232-9800
`
`,.,. (I,
`,
`,
`,
`icing; SI NJ JL
`
`Bl
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`

`

`IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
`CIVIL DIVISION — ASBESTOS
`
`HENRY J. DOTSON and VENEDA
`
`DOTSON, his wife,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`GD No. 97-019688
`
`v.
`
`ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION,
`
`et aI.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`AND NOW, comes ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION, a Defendant in the above-
`
`captioned matter, by and through their attorneys, Swartz Campbell, LLC, and moves this
`
`Honorable Court for summary judgment pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1035 and in support
`
`thereof avers as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiffs have filed
`
`a Complaint
`
`in
`
`this matter alleging that
`
`the
`
`Plaintiff/Husband was injured from his use and exposure to asbestos-containing products
`
`of the various Defendants during his employment as a laborer at US. Steel Duquesne
`
`Works from 1967 until 1985.
`
`2.
`
`This Defendant is a manufacturer of gloves primarily and it has been averred
`
`that said Defendant supplied certain asbestos gloves to the Plaintiff/Husband's work site.
`
`3.
`
`There is no evidence in the record ofthis matter of Plaintiff/Husband working
`
`with or around any gloves manufactured and/or supplied by Defendant, ALLIED GLOVE
`
`CORPORATION.
`
`

`

`4.
`
`Consequently, there exists no genuine issue of material fact and/or evidence
`
`indicating that the Plaintiff/Husband was exposed to any asbestos—containing product
`
`manufactured by Defendant, ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION.
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant, ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION, respectfuin requests
`
`that summary judgment be entered in its favor and that Plaintiffs' Complaint and all
`
`crossclaims against Defendant, ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION, be dismissed with
`
`prejudice.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`SWARTZ CAMPBELL, LLC
`
`By
`
`Anne L. Wilcox, Esquire
`
`Attorneys for Defendant,
`ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Anne L. Wilcox, Esquire, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing Motion for Summary Judgment has been served this
`
`.
`
`day of October,
`
`2006, by hand delivery to the following counsel of record:
`
`Holly L. Deihl, Esquire
`Goldberg, Persky & White RC.
`1030 Fifth Avenue
`
`Pittsburgh, PA 15219-6295
`
`with notice of same via electronic mail to all known defense counsel.
`
`SWARTZ CAMPBELL, LLC
`
`331%”
`
`Anne L. Wilcox, Esquire
`
`Attorneys for Defendant.
`Allied Glove Corporation
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket