throbber

`Case 3:10-cr-00435-SCC Document 2913 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 3
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`[37] Carlos E. Rodriguez Milan,
`
`Defendant
`
`Criminal No. 10-cr-435-37
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
`Re: Amendment 821
`
`The below report and recommendation relates to an initial
`determination as to the defendant’s eligibility for a sentencing
`reduction promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission
`under Part A and Part B, Subpart 1 of Amendment 821 to Policy
`Statement § 1B1.10(d).
`
`After careful review of the defendant’s presentence report,
`charging document(s), plea agreement, plea supplement, judgment,
`and statement of reasons, I recommend that:
`
`☐ The defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction based
`on the following factor(s):
`☐ A. The guidelines range that applied in the defendant’s
`case was not determined by U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(d) or
`defendant’s status as a zero-point offender under
`Chapter 4, Part A.
`☐ B. The defendant does not meet all of conditions
`specified by § 4C1.1. Specifically, one or more of the
`following criteria applies:
`☐ 1) the defendant has criminal history points from
`Chapter Four, Part A;
`☐ 2) the defendant received an adjustment under
`U.S.S.G. § 3A1.4 (Terrorism);
`☐ 3) the defendant used violence or credible threats
`of violence in connection with the offense;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`Case 3:10-cr-00435-SCC Document 2913 Filed 12/04/23 Page 2 of 3
`
`2
`
`☐ 4) the offense resulted in death or serious bodily
`injury;
`☐ 5) the offense of conviction was a sex offense;
`☐ 6) the defendant personally caused substantial
`financial hardship;
`☐ 7) the defendant possessed, received, purchased,
`transported, transferred, sold, or otherwise
`disposed of a firearm or otherwise dangerous weapon
`(or induced another participant to do so) in
`connection with the offense;
`☐ 8) the offense of conviction was covered by
`U.S.S.G. § 2H1.1 (Offenses Involving Individual
`Rights); or
`☐ 9) the defendant received an adjustment under §
`3A1.1 (Hate Crime Motivation or Vulnerable Victim)
`or § 3A1.5 (Serious Human Rights Offense).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`☐ C. The application of Amendment 821 Part A and Part B,
`subpart 1 does not have the effect of lowering the
`defendant’s applicable guideline range. See
`§ 1B1.10(a)(2)(B).
`☐ D. The defendant was originally sentenced to a term of
`imprisonment that is less than or equal to the minimum
`of the guideline range as amended by Amendment 821 Part
`A and Part B, subpart 1, and no exception for substantial
`assistance applies. See § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A).
`☐ E. The defendant was sentenced to a statutorily mandated
`minimum imprisonment term. The defendant did not comply
`with the safety valve provisions and did not receive a
`reduction of his or her imprisonment term based on a
`departure for substantial assistance or a Rule 35 motion
`subsequent to the original sentence. See § 1B1.10(c).
`
`Since a determination of ineligibility has been made, the
`matter is formally submitted to the presiding District Court Judge.
`Defense counsel, whether retained, appointed, or pro bono, has
`fourteen days to object to the initial assessment of ineligibility.
`After the fourteen day period, and in the absence of an objection
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Case 3:10-cr-00435-SCC Document 2913 Filed 12/04/23 Page 3 of 3
`
`3
`
`
`
`by defense counsel, the presiding District Court Judge may adopt
`the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and may rule on the
`motion for reduction of sentence.
`
`☒ The defendant may be eligible for a sentence reduction and
`therefore the matter is referred to a United States District
`Judge.
`
`The presiding judicial officer shall wait for the parties’
`stipulation of a sentence reduction within fourteen days. If no
`stipulation is reached within this period, the presiding judicial
`officer shall wait for the United States Probation Office, defense
`counsel, and the Government’s memoranda, which shall be filed
`within another fourteen days.
`
`
`Reasons: Defendant may be eligible under Amendment 821 Part B,
`Subpart 1 because he was sentenced as a “zero-point offender”
`given his lack of criminal history and his conduct does not appear
`to preclude the application of Amendment 821. Further, Defendant
`is currently serving a 188-month sentence and Amendment 821 would
`lower his guideline range from 188–235 months to 151–188 months.
`
`
`
`IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.
`
`In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 4th day of December, 2023.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Bruce J. McGiverin
`BRUCE J. McGIVERIN
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket