throbber
1
`
`
`
` Cite as: 577 U. S. ____ (2015)
`
`BREYER, J., dissenting
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
`JERRY WILLIAM CORRELL v. FLORIDA
`ON APPLICATION FOR STAY AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF
`
`
`CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
`
`
` No. 15-6551 (15A424) (Decided October 29, 2015)
`
`The application for stay of execution of sentence of death
`
`presented to JUSTICE THOMAS and by him referred to the
`Court is denied. The petition for writ of certiorari is de-
`nied.
`JUSTICE BREYER, dissenting from denial of certiorari
`and application for stay of execution.
`
`Jerry William Correll was sentenced to death on Febru-
`ary 7, 1986, and has now been incarcerated on death row
`by the State of Florida for over 29 years. Correll requests
`
`a stay of execution to allow the Court to consider his
`claims that Florida’s sentencing procedures violate the
`Sixth and Eighth Amendments and that his lengthy peri-
`od of incarceration under threat of execution constitutes
`cruel and unusual punishment.
`
`I remain convinced that the Court should consider
`whether nearly 30 years of incarceration under sentence of
`death is cruel and unusual punishment. See Lackey v.
`Texas, 514 U. S. 1045 (1995) (Stevens, J., memorandum
`respecting denial of certiorari); Knight v. Florida, 528
`U. S. 990, 993 (1999) (BREYER, J., dissenting from denial
`of certiorari); see also Glossip v. Gross, 576 U. S. ___, ___
`(2015) (BREYER, J., dissenting) (slip op., at 19–23).
`In addition, whether Florida’s sentencing procedures
`
`violate the Sixth and Eighth Amendments is now pending
`before the Court. Hurst v. Florida, No. 14–7505. In my
`view, we should hold this petition for resolution of those
`issues in Hurst.
`
`I respectfully dissent from the order of the Court to deny
`the application for stay of execution and the petition for a
`writ of certiorari.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`2
`
`
`CORRELL v. FLORIDA
`
`BREYER, J., dissenting
`
` SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting
`
`JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, dissenting from denial of stay and
`petition for writ of certiorari.
`I agree with JUSTICE BREYER that we should hold this
`
`
`petition for resolution of the issues in Hurst v. Florida, No.
`
`14–7505, now pending before the Court. I therefore re-
`spectfully dissent from the order of the Court to deny the
`petition for a writ of certiorari and the application for stay
`of execution.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket