`
`
`
`No. 17-204
`In the
`Supreme Court of the United States
`
`
`
`IN RE APPLE IPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION,
`
`APPLE INC.,
` Petitioner,
`
`v.
`ROBERT PEPPER, ET AL.,
`
`
` Respondents.
`
`
`
`
`ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES
`COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
`
`
`
`JOINT APPENDIX
`
`
`
`Counsel for Respondents
`Counsel for Petitioner
`DANIEL M. WALL
`DAVID C. FREDERICK
` Counsel of Record
` Counsel of Record
`CHRISTOPHER YATES
`KELLOGG, HANSEN, TODD,
`SADIK HUSENY
` FIGEL & FREDERICK,
`AARON T. CHIU
` P.L.L.C.
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`1615 M Street, NW
`505 Montgomery Street
`Suite 400
`Suite 2000
`Washington, DC 20036
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(202) 326-7900
`(415) 391-0600
`dfrederick@
`dan.wall@lw.com
` kellogghansen.com
`J. SCOTT BALLENGER
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`555 11th Street, NW
`Suite 1000
`Washington, DC 20004
`(202) 637-2200
`
`
`PETITION FOR CERTIORARI FILED AUGUST 2, 2017
`CERTIORARI GRANTED JUNE 18, 2018
`
`
`
`i
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
`Circuit Relevant Docket Entries: In re:
`Apple iPhone Antitrust Litig.; Pepper v.
`Apple Inc., No. 14-15000 ................................. JA-1
`
`
`the
`for
`United States District Court
`Northern District of California Relevant
`Docket Entries: In re: Apple iPhone
`Antitrust Litig.; Pepper v. Apple Inc.,
`4:11-cv-06714-YGR ....................................... JA-10
`
`
`Amended Consolidated Class Action
`Complaint, In re Apple iPhone Antitrust
`Litig., No. 11-cv-06714-YGR (N.D. Cal.
`filed Sept. 28, 2012), ECF No. 81 ................. JA-34
`
`
`Defendant Apple’s Notice of Motion and
`Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended
`Consolidated Class Action Complaint, In
`re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litig., No. 11-
`cv-06714-YGR (N.D. Cal. filed Nov. 2,
`2012), ECF No. 88 (excerpts)........................ JA-66
`
`
`Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Opposition to Defendant
`Apple’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended
`Consolidated Complaint, In re Apple &
`AT&TM Antitrust Litig., No. 11-cv-
`06714-YGR (N.D. Cal. filed Dec. 7, 2012),
`ECF No. 99 (excerpts) ................................... JA-71
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ii
`TABLE OF CONTENTS—Continued
`
`Page
`
`in Support of Defendant Apple’s
`Reply
`Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended
`Consolidated Complaint, In re Apple
`iPhone Antitrust Litig., No. C 11-cv-
`06714-YGR (N.D. Cal. filed Dec. 21,
`2012), ECF No. 103 (excerpts) ...................... JA-74
`
`
`the
`for
`United States District Court
`California
`Northern
`District
`of
`Transcript of Proceedings held Mar. 5,
`2013, In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litig.,
`No. 11-cv-06714-YGR (N.D. Cal. Apr. 3,
`2013), ECF No. 107 (excerpts) ...................... JA-78
`
`
`Order of the United States District Court for
`the Northern District of California
`Granting Apple’s Motion to Dismiss
`Amended Consolidated Complaint, In re
`Apple iPhone Antitrust Litig., No. 11-cv-
`06714-YGR, 2013 WL 6253147 (N.D. Cal.
`Aug. 15, 2013), ECF No. 108 ........................ JA-84
`
`
`Defendant Apple’s Notice of Motion and
`Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second
`Amended Complaint; Memorandum of
`Points and Authorities in Support, In re
`Apple iPhone Antitrust Litig., No. C 11-
`cv-06714-YGR (N.D. Cal. filed Sept. 30,
`2013), ECF No. 115 (excerpts) .................... JA-121
`
`
`
`
`
`iii
`TABLE OF CONTENTS—Continued
`
`Page
`
`Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Opposition to Defendant
`Apple’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’
`Second
`Amended
`Consolidated
`Complaint, In re Apple iPhone Antitrust
`Litig., No. C 11-cv-06714-YGR (N.D. Cal.
`filed Oct. 15, 2013), ECF No. 116
`(excerpts) ..................................................... JA-127
`
`
`in Support of
`Defendant Apple’s Reply
`Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second
`Amended Complaint, In re Apple iPhone
`Antitrust Litig., No. C 11-cv-06714-YGR
`(N.D. Cal. filed Oct. 22, 2013), ECF No.
`118 (excerpts) .............................................. JA-132
`
`
`the
`for
`United States District Court
`California
`Northern
`District
`of
`Transcript of Proceedings held Nov. 5,
`2013, In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litig.,
`No. 11-cv-06714-YGR (N.D. Cal. Nov. 25,
`2013), ECF No. 123 (excerpts) .................... JA-137
`
`
`
`
`ITEMS PREVIOUSLY REPRODUCED
`
`
`In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 26.1, the
`following items have been omitted in printing this
`joint appendix because they appear on the following
`pages of the appendix to the Petition for a Writ of
`Certiorari (Aug. 2, 2017)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iv
`TABLE OF CONTENTS—Continued
`
`Page
`
`Opinion of the United States Court of
`Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Pepper v.
`Apple Inc. (In re Apple iPhone Antitrust
`Litig.), 846 F.3d 313 (9th Cir. 2017) .................. 1a
`
`
`Order of the United States District Court for
`the Northern District of California
`Granting Apple’s Motion to Dismiss
`Second Amended Complaint with
`Prejudice, In re Apple iPhone Antitrust
`Litig., No. 11-cv-06714-YGR, 2013 WL
`6253147 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2013) ..................... 23a
`
`
`Order of the United States Court of Appeals
`for the Ninth Circuit denying petition for
`rehearing and rehearing en banc, Pepper
`v. Apple Inc.
`(In re Apple
`iPhone
`Antitrust Litig.), No. 14-15000 (9th Cir.
`May 4, 2017) ...................................................... 38a
`
`
`Second Amended Complaint, In re Apple
`iPhone Antitrust Litig., No. 11-cv-06714-
`YGR (N.D. Cal. filed Sept. 5, 2013) .................. 40a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-1
`RELEVANT DOCKET ENTRIES
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
`Case No. 14-15000
`
`# Docket Text
`
`Date
`Filed
`01/02/2014
`
`AND
`CAUSE
`1 DOCKETED
`ENTERED APPEARANCES OF
`COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The
`schedule
`is
`set as
`follows:
`Mediation Questionnaire due on
`01/09/2014. Transcript ordered by
`01/30/2014.
`Transcript
`due
`03/03/2014. Appellants Edward
`W. Hayter, Robert Pepper,
`Stephen H. Schwartz and Eric
`Terrell
`opening
`brief
`due
`04/10/2014. Appellee Apple, Inc.
`answering brief due 05/12/2014.
`Appellant’s optional reply brief is
`due 14 days after service of the
`answering brief. [8921930] (RT)
`[Entered: 01/02/2014 09:24 AM]
`* * *
`7 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief
`and excerpts of record for review.
`Submitted by Appellants Edward
`W. Hayter, Robert Pepper,
`Stephen H. Schwartz and Eric
`Terrell.
`Date
`of
`service:
`05/12/2014.
`[9092295]
`(Rickert,
`Rachele)
`[Entered: 05/12/2014
`
`05/12/2014
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-2
`05:16 PM]
`8 Filed clerk order: The opening
`brief [7] submitted by Edward W.
`Hayter, Robert Pepper
`and
`Stephen H. Schwartz is filed.
`Within 7 days of the filing of this
`order, filer is ordered to file 7
`copies of the brief in paper format,
`accompanied
`by
`certification,
`attached to the end of each copy of
`the brief,
`that
`the brief
`is
`identical to the version submitted
`electronically. Cover color: blue.
`The paper copies shall be printed
`from the PDF version of the brief
`created from the word processing
`application, not from PACER or
`Appellate ECF. The Court has
`reviewed the excerpts of record [7]
`submitted by Edward W. Hayter,
`Robert Pepper and Stephen H.
`Schwartz. Within 7 days of this
`order, filer is ordered to file 4
`copies of the excerpts in paper
`format, with a white cover. The
`paper copies must be
`in the
`format described in 9th Circuit
`Rule 30-1.6.
`[9093179]
`(WWP)
`[Entered: 05/13/2014 11:43 AM]
`9 Filed Appellants Edward W.
`Hayter, Robert Pepper, Stephen
`H. Schwartz and Eric Terrell
`paper copies of excerpts of record
`
`05/13/2014
`
`05/16/2014
`
`
`
`
`
`[9098732]
`05/16/2014
`
`JA-3
`in 2 volume(s).
`[7]
`(WWP)
`[Entered:
`11:21 AM]
`copies of
`05/16/2014 10 Received 7 paper
`Opening brief [7] filed by Edward
`W. Hayter, et al. [9099246] (SD)
`[Entered: 05/16/2014 02:13 PM]
`* * *
`07/11/2014 15 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief
`and supplemental excerpts of
`record for review. Submitted by
`Appellee Apple, Inc.. Date of
`service: 07/11/2014.
`[9166529]
`(Wall,
`Daniel)
`[Entered:
`07/11/2014 04:41 PM]
`16 Filed (ECF) Appellee Apple, Inc.
`Motion to take judicial notice of.
`Date
`of
`service: 07/11/2014.
`[9166553] (Wall, Daniel) [Entered:
`07/11/2014 04:47 PM]
`07/14/2014 17 Filed clerk order: The answering
`brief [15] submitted by Apple, Inc.
`is filed. Within 7 days of the filing
`of this order, filer is ordered to file
`7 copies of the brief in paper
`format,
`accompanied
`by
`certification, attached to the end
`of each copy of the brief, that the
`brief is identical to the version
`submitted electronically. Cover
`color: red. The paper copies shall
`be printed from the PDF version
`
`7/11/2014
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-4
`of the brief created from the word
`processing application, not from
`PACER or Appellate ECF. The
`Court
`has
`reviewed
`the
`supplemental excerpts of record
`[15] submitted by Apple, Inc..
`Within 7 days of this order, filer is
`ordered to file 4 copies of the
`excerpts in paper format, with a
`white cover. The paper copies
`must be in the format described in
`9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [9167135]
`(WWP)
`[Entered:
`07/14/2014
`10:38 AM]
`copies of
`07/14/2014 18 Received 7 paper
`Answering brief
`[15]
`filed by
`Apple,
`Inc..
`[9168197]
`(SD)
`[Entered: 07/14/2014 03:44 PM]
`07/14/2014 19 Filed Appellee Apple, Inc. paper
`copies of excerpts of record [15] in
`1 volume.
`[9168688]
`(WWP)
`[Entered: 07/15/2014 07:12 AM]
`* * *
`08/25/2014 22 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for
`review. Submitted by Appellants
`Edward W. Hayter, Robert
`Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz and
`Eric Terrell. Date of service:
`08/25/2014.
`[9218285]
`(Rickert,
`Rachele)
`[Entered: 08/25/2014
`04:43 PM]
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-5
`08/25/2014 23 Filed (ECF) Appellants Edward
`W. Hayter, Robert Pepper,
`Stephen H. Schwartz and Eric
`Terrell response opposing motion
`(,motion to take judicial notice).
`Date
`of
`service: 08/25/2014.
`[9218303]
`(Rickert, Rachele)
`[Entered: 08/25/2014 04:47 PM]
`08/28/2014 24 Filed clerk order: The reply brief
`[22] submitted by Edward W.
`Hayter, Robert Pepper, Stephen
`H. Schwartz and Eric Terrell is
`filed. Within 7 days of the filing of
`this order, filer is ordered to file 7
`copies of the brief in paper format,
`accompanied
`by
`certification,
`attached to the end of each copy of
`the brief,
`that
`the brief
`is
`identical to the version submitted
`electronically. Cover color: gray.
`The paper copies shall be printed
`from the PDF version of the brief
`created from the word processing
`application, not from PACER or
`Appellate ECF. [9222326] (WWP)
`[Entered: 08/28/2014 10:37 AM]
`09/02/2014 25 Received 7 paper copies of Reply
`brief [22] filed by Edward W.
`Hayter,et al.
`[9225407]
`(SD)
`[Entered: 09/02/2014 11:10 AM]
`09/02/2014 26 Filed (ECF) Appellee Apple, Inc.
`reply to response (,motion to take
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-6
`judicial notice, ). Date of service:
`09/02/2014.
`[9226064]
`(Wall,
`Daniel)
`[Entered:
`09/02/2014
`04:02 PM]
`* * *
`02/10/2016 31 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO
`A.
`WALLACE
`TASHIMA,
`WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and
`ROBERT W. GETTLEMAN.
`[9861584]
`(TLH)
`[Entered:
`02/10/2016 02:54 PM]
`order
`(A. WALLACE
`01/12/2017 32 Filed
`TASHIMA,
`WILLIAM
`A.
`FLETCHER and ROBERT W.
`GETTLEMAN) Appellee Apple,
`Inc.’s motion to take
`judicial
`notice dated July 11, 2014, is
`DENIED.
`[10263236]
`(PH)
`[Entered: 01/12/2017 09:08 AM]
`01/12/2017 33 FILED OPINION (A. WALLACE
`TASHIMA,
`WILLIAM
`A.
`FLETCHER and ROBERT W.
`GETTLEMAN) REVERSED AND
`REMANDED. Judge: AWT
`,
`Judge: WAF Authoring, Judge:
`RWG . FILED AND ENTERED
`JUDGMENT.
`[10263240]
`(PH)
`[Entered: 01/12/2017 09:12 AM]
`* * *
`01/26/2017 35 Filed (ECF) Appellee Apple Inc.
`petition for panel rehearing and
`petition for rehearing en banc
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-7
`(from 01/12/2017 opinion). Date of
`service: 01/26/2017.
`[10282274]
`[14-15000]
`(Wall,
`Daniel)
`[Entered: 01/26/2017 06:24 PM]
`order
`(A. WALLACE
`02/07/2017 36 Filed
`TASHIMA,
`WILLIAM
`A.
`FLETCHER and ROBERT W.
`GETTLEMAN):
`Plaintiffs-
`Appellants are directed to file a
`response to Apple’s Petition for
`Rehearing and Rehearing En
`Banc filed with this court on
`January 26, 2017. The response
`shall not exceed fifteen pages or
`4200 words, and shall be filed
`within 21 days of the date of this
`order. [10304859] (AF) [Entered:
`02/07/2017 08:25 AM]
`* * *
`02/28/2017 38 Filed (ECF) Appellants Edward
`W. Hayter, Robert Pepper,
`Stephen H. Schwartz and Eric
`Terrell response to Combo PFR
`Panel and En Banc (ECF Filing) ,
`Combo PFR Panel and En Banc
`(ECF Filing) for panel and en
`banc rehearing. Date of service:
`02/28/2017. [10336910].--[COURT
`ENTERED FILING to correct
`entry
`[37].]
`(SLM)
`[Entered:
`02/28/2017 03:07 PM]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-8
`(A. WALLACE
`order
`05/04/2017 39 Filed
`WILLIAM
`A.
`TASHIMA,
`FLETCHER and ROBERT W.
`GETTLEMAN): The panel has
`voted unanimously to deny the
`petition
`for
`rehearing. Judge
`Fletcher has voted to deny the
`petition for rehearing en banc,
`and
`Judges
`Tashima
`and
`Gettleman so recommend. The
`full court has been advised of the
`petition for rehearing en banc and
`no
`judge of
`the
`court has
`requested a vote on whether to
`rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.
`App. P. 35. The petition
`for
`rehearing and the petition for
`rehearing en banc, filed January
`26,
`2017,
`are
`DENIED.
`[10421696]
`(AF)
`[Entered:
`05/04/2017 09:59 AM]
`* * *
`08/08/2017 41 Supreme Court Case Info
`Case number: 17-204
`Filed on: 08/02/2017
`Cert Petition Action 1: Pending
`[10537109]
`(RR)
`[Entered:
`08/08/2017 12:51 PM]
`06/20/2018 42 Supreme Court Case Info
`Case number: 17-204
`Filed on: 08/02/2017
`Cert Petition Action 1: Granted,
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-9
`06/18/2018
`. The motion of ACT The App
`Association for leave to file a brief
`as amicus curiae is granted. The
`motion of Washington Legal
`Foundation for leave to file a brief
`as amicus curiae
`is granted.
`[10916131]
`(RR)
`[Entered:
`06/20/2018 02:55 PM]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-10
`RELEVANT DOCKET ENTRIES
`
`U.S. District Court
`for the Northern District of California
`Case No. 4:11-cv-06714-YGR
`
`# Docket Text
`
`Date
`Filed
`12/29/2011
`
`1 COMPLAINT against Apple Inc.
`( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number
`34611068684.). Filed byRobert
`Pepper, Edward W. Hayter,
`Harry
`Bass,
`Stephen H.
`Schwartz.
`(Attachments: # 1
`Summons)(ga, COURT STAFF)
`(Filed on 12/29/2011) (Additional
`attachment(s)
`added
`on
`1/11/2016: # 2 Summons issued
`Correction of Attachment 1)
`(kc, COURT STAFF). (Entered:
`12/29/2011)
`* * *
`filed by
`03/02/2012 14 MOTION to Dismiss
`Apple Inc.. Motion Hearing set for
`4/16/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom
`9, 19th Floor, San Francisco
`before Hon.
`James Ware.
`Responses due by 3/16/2012.
`Replies
`due
`by
`3/23/2012.
`(Attachments: # 1 Proposed
`Order)(Yates, Christopher) (Filed
`on 3/2/2012) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-11
`
`* * *
`03/16/2012 23 RESPONSE (re 14 MOTION to
`Dismiss ) Plaintiffs’ Opposition to
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to
`filed byHarry Bass,
`Dismiss
`Edward W. Hayter, Robert
`Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz.
`(Rickert, Rachele)
`(Filed
`on
`3/16/2012) (Entered: 03/16/2012)
`03/16/2012 24 Declaration of Rachele R. Rickert
`in Support of 23 Opposition/
`Response to Motion Declaration of
`Rachele R. Rickert in Support of
`Plantiffs’ Opposition to Defendant
`Apple Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss
`filed byHarry Bass, Edward W.
`Hayter, Robert Pepper, Stephen
`H.
`Schwartz.
`(Related
`)
`document(s)
`23
`(Rickert,
`Rachele)
`(Filed on 3/16/2012)
`(Entered: 03/16/2012)
`CASE
`VACATING
`03/20/2012 25 ORDER
`MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
`CONSOLIDATING
`CASES;
`DENYING
`MOTION
`TO
`DISMISS AS MOOT, Cases
`associated., Motions terminated:
`(14
`in
`3:11-cv-06714-JW)
`MOTION to Dismiss
`filed by
`Apple Inc.. Signed by Judge
`James Ware on 3/20/12.
`(sis,
`COURT
`STAFF)
`(Filed
`on
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-12
`3/20/2012) (Entered: 03/20/2012)
`CLASS
`03/21/2012 26 CONSOLIDATED
`ACTION COMPLAINT against
`Apple Inc. DEMAND FOR JURY
`TRIAL. Filed by Edward W.
`Hayter, Robert Pepper, Harry
`Bass, Stephen H. Schwartz, Eric
`Terrell, James Blackwell, Crystal
`Boykin. (Rickert, Rachele) (Filed
`on
`3/21/2012) Modified
`on
`3/22/2012 (far, COURT STAFF).
`(Entered: 03/21/2012)
`to Appoint Lead
`03/26/2012 27 MOTION
`Plaintiff and Lead Counsel Notice
`of Motion and Motion
`for
`Appointment of Interim Class
`Counsel; Memorandum of Points
`and Authorities filed by Harry
`Bass, Edward W. Hayter, Robert
`Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz.
`Motion Hearing set for 5/21/2012
`09:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th
`Floor, San Francisco before Hon.
`James Ware. Responses due by
`4/9/2012.
`Replies
`due
`by
`4/16/2012.
`(Attachments: # 1
`Proposed Order)(Rickert, Rachele)
`(Filed on 3/26/2012)
`(Entered:
`03/26/2012)
`03/26/2012 28 Declaration of Rachele R. Rickert
`in Support of 27 MOTION to
`Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-13
`Counsel Notice of Motion and
`Motion for Appointment of Interim
`Class Counsel; Memorandum of
`Points and Authorities
`filed
`byHarry Bass, Edward W.
`Hayter, Robert Pepper, Stephen
`H. Schwartz. (Attachments: # 1
`Exhibit Exhibits A-B, # 2 Exhibit
`Exhibits C-F, # 3 Certificate/Proof
`of Service)(Related document(s)
`27 ) (Rickert, Rachele) (Filed on
`3/26/2012) (Entered: 03/26/2012)
`* * *
`04/09/2012 34 ORDER by Judge James Ware
`granting 27 Motion to Appoint
`Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel
`(jwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on
`4/9/2012) (Entered: 04/09/2012)
`* * *
`04/16/2012 36 Administrative Motion to File
`Under Seal Defendant Apple Inc.’s
`Motion
`to Dismiss Plaintiffs’
`Consolidated Complaint filed by
`Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1
`Declaration
`in Support, # 2
`Proposed
`Order)(Yates,
`Christopher) (Filed on 4/16/2012)
`(Entered: 04/16/2012)
`Dismiss
`04/16/2012 37 MOTION
`to
`[REDACTED] filed by Apple Inc..
`Motion Hearing set for 6/11/2012
`09:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-14
`Floor, San Francisco before Hon.
`James Ware. Responses due by
`4/30/2012. Replies
`due
`by
`5/7/2012.
`(Yates, Christopher)
`(Filed on 4/16/2012)
`(Entered:
`04/16/2012)
`in
`04/16/2012 38 Declaration of Eddy Cue
`to
`Support of 37 MOTION
`Dismiss
`[REDACTED]
`filed
`byApple
`Inc..
`(Related
`)
`document(s)
`37
`(Yates,
`Christopher) (Filed on 4/16/2012)
`(Entered: 04/16/2012)
`04/16/2012 39 Declaration of Shari Ross Lahlou
`in Support of 37 MOTION to
`Dismiss
`[REDACTED]
`filed
`byApple
`Inc..
`(Related
`)
`document(s)
`37
`(Yates,
`Christopher) (Filed on 4/16/2012)
`(Entered: 04/16/2012)
`04/16/2012 40 Proposed Order re 37 MOTION to
`Dismiss [REDACTED] by Apple
`Inc.. (Yates, Christopher) (Filed
`on
`4/16/2012)
`(Entered:
`04/16/2012)
`04/25/2012 41 ORDER by Judge James Ware
`granting
`36
`Administrative
`Motion to File Under Seal (tdm,
`COURT
`STAFF)
`(Filed
`on
`4/25/2012) (Entered: 04/25/2012)
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-15
`04/25/2012 42 DOCUMENT E-FILED UNDER
`SEAL
`re
`41 Order
`on
`Administrative Motion to File
`Under Seal Defendant Apple Inc.’s
`Motion
`to Dismiss Plaintiffs’
`Consolidated Complaint by Apple
`Inc..
`(Attachments:
`#
`1
`Declaration of Eddy Cue
`In
`Support)(Yates,
`Christopher)
`(Filed on 4/25/2012)
`(Entered:
`04/25/2012)
`05/07/2012 43 Administrative Motion to File
`Under Seal Plaintiffs’ Notice of
`Motion
`and
`Administrative
`Motion
`to File Under Seal
`[Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 And
`79-5(d)]
`filed by Harry Bass,
`James Blackwell, Crystal Boykin,
`Edward W. Hayter, Robert
`Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz,
`Eric Terrell. (Rickert, Rachele)
`(Filed on 5/7/2012)
`(Entered:
`05/07/2012)
`43
`(re
`05/07/2012 44 RESPONSE
`Administrative Motion to File
`Under Seal Plaintiffs’ Notice of
`Motion
`and
`Administrative
`Motion
`to File Under Seal
`[Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 And
`79-5(d)]
`)
`[REDACTED]
`filed
`byHarry Bass, James Blackwell,
`Crystal Boykin, Edward W.
`Hayter, Robert Pepper, Stephen
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-16
`Schwartz, Eric Terrell.
`H.
`(Rickert, Rachele)
`(Filed
`on
`5/7/2012) (Entered: 05/07/2012)
`05/07/2012 45 Declaration of Rachele R. Rickert
`in Support of 44 Opposition/
`Response to Motion, Declaration
`of Rachele R. Rickert In Support
`of Plaintiffs’ Opposition To
`Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to
`Dismiss
`the
`Consolidated
`filed
`Complaint
`[REDACTED]
`byHarry Bass, James Blackwell,
`Crystal Boykin, Edward W.
`Hayter, Robert Pepper, Stephen
`H.
`Schwartz, Eric Terrell.
`(Related
`document(s)
`44
`)
`(Rickert, Rachele)
`(Filed
`on
`5/7/2012) (Entered: 05/07/2012)
`* * *
`43
`(re
`05/14/2012 47 RESPONSE
`Administrative Motion to File
`Under Seal Plaintiffs’ Notice of
`Motion
`and
`Administrative
`Motion
`to File Under Seal
`[Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 And
`79-5(d)]
`)
`filed byApple Inc..
`(Yates, Christopher)
`(Filed on
`5/14/2012) (Entered: 05/14/2012)
`05/14/2012 48 MOTION to Compel Arbitration
`of Claims filed by Apple Inc..
`Motion Hearing set for 6/18/2012
`09:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-17
`Floor, San Francisco before Hon.
`James Ware. Responses due by
`5/29/2012. Replies
`due
`by
`6/5/2012.
`(Attachments: # 1
`Exhibit
`1,
`#
`2 Proposed
`Order)(Yates, Christopher) (Filed
`on
`5/14/2012)
`(Entered:
`05/14/2012)
`* * *
`43
`re
`Order
`05/15/2012 50 Proposed
`Administrative Motion to File
`Under Seal Plaintiffs’ Notice of
`Motion
`and
`Administrative
`Motion
`to File Under Seal
`[Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 And
`79-5(d)] by Apple Inc.. (Yates,
`Christopher) (Filed on 5/15/2012)
`(Entered: 05/15/2012)
`* * *
`05/16/2012 52 ORDER
`PLAINTIFFS’
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL by Judge
`James Ware
`granting
`43
`Administrative Motion to File
`Under Seal. Signed by Judge
`James Ware on May 16, 2012.
`(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on
`5/16/2012) (Entered: 05/16/2012)
`* * *
`05/18/2012 56 Administrative Motion to File
`Under Seal the Reply in Support
`
`GRANTING
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-18
`of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’
`Second Amended Complaint filed
`by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1
`Proposed
`Order)(Yates,
`Christopher) (Filed on 5/18/2012)
`(Entered: 05/18/2012)
`to
`05/18/2012 57 REPLY
`(re 37 MOTION
`Dismiss
`[REDACTED]
`)
`filed
`byApple Inc.. (Yates, Christopher)
`(Filed on 5/18/2012)
`(Entered:
`05/18/2012)
`GRANTING
`05/22/2012 58 ORDER
`DEFENDANT APPLE
`INC.S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`FILE UNDER SEAL signed by
`Judge James Ware granting 56
`Administrative Motion to File
`Under Seal.
`(wsn, COURT
`STAFF)
`(Filed on 5/22/2012)
`(Entered: 05/22/2012)
`05/22/2012 59 DOCUMENT E-FILED UNDER
`SEAL
`re
`58 Order
`on
`Administrative Motion to File
`Under Seal Defendant Apple Inc.’s
`Reply in Support of its Motion to
`Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated
`Complaint by Apple Inc.. (Yates,
`Christopher) (Filed on 5/22/2012)
`(Entered: 05/22/2012)
`* * *
`05/29/2012 61 RESPONSE (re 48 MOTION to
`Compel Arbitration of Claims )
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-19
`James
`filed
`byHarry Bass,
`Boykin,
`Blackwell,
`Crystal
`Edward W. Hayter, Robert
`Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz,
`Eric Terrell. (Rifkin, Mark) (Filed
`on
`5/29/2012)
`(Entered:
`05/29/2012)
`05/29/2012 62 Declaration of Mark C. Rifkin in
`Support
`of
`61 Opposition/
`Response to Motion Declaration of
`Mark C. Rifkin In Support of
`Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Apple’s
`to Compel Arbitration
`Motion
`filed
`byHarry Bass,
`James
`Blackwell,
`Crystal
`Boykin,
`Edward W. Hayter, Robert
`Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz,
`Eric
`Terrell.
`
`(Related
`document(s) 61 ) (Rifkin, Mark)
`(Filed on 5/29/2012)
`(Entered:
`05/29/2012)
`05/29/2012 63 Declaration of Simon J. Wilkie,
`PH.D.
`in
`Support
`of
`61
`Opposition/Response
`to Motion
`Expert Declaration of Simon J.
`Wilkie, PH.D. filed byHarry Bass,
`James Blackwell, Crystal Boykin,
`Edward W. Hayter, Robert
`Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz,
`Eric Terrell. (Related document(s)
`61 ) (Rifkin, Mark) (Filed on
`5/29/2012) (Entered: 05/29/2012)
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-20
`of Michael A.
`05/29/2012 64 Declaration
`Williams, PH.D. in Support of 61
`Opposition/Response
`to Motion
`Expert Declaration of Michael A.
`Williams, PH.D. filed byHarry
`Bass, James Blackwell, Crystal
`Boykin, Edward W. Hayter,
`Robert Pepper, Stephen H.
`Schwartz, Eric Terrell. (Related
`document(s) 61 ) (Rifkin, Mark)
`(Filed on 5/29/2012)
`(Entered:
`05/29/2012)
`to
`06/05/2012 65 REPLY
`(re 48 MOTION
`Compel Arbitration of Claims )
`filed
`byApple
`Inc..
`(Yates,
`Christopher) (Filed on 6/5/2012)
`(Entered: 06/05/2012)
`to File
`06/08/2012 66 MOTION
`for Leave
`Plaintiffs’ Civil L.R. 7-3 Motion
`For Permission To File A Sur-
`Reply Brief On Apple
`Inc.’s
`Motion To Compel Arbitration
`[ECF No. 48] filed by Harry Bass,
`James Blackwell, Crystal Boykin,
`Edward W. Hayter, Robert
`Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz,
`Eric Terrell. (Attachments: # 1
`Proposed Order [Proposed] Order
`Granting Plaintiffs’ Civil L.R. 7-3
`Motion For Permission To File A
`Sur-Reply Brief On Apple Inc.’s
`Motion To Compel Arbitration
`[ECF No. 48])(Rickert, Rachele)
`
`
`
`
`
`(Entered:
`
`JA-21
`(Filed on 6/8/2012)
`06/08/2012)
`06/08/2012 67 Declaration of Mark C. Rifkin in
`Support of 66 MOTION for Leave
`to File Plaintiffs’ Civil L.R. 7-3
`Motion For Permission To File A
`Sur-Reply Brief On Apple Inc.’s
`Motion To Compel Arbitration
`[ECF No. 48] Declaration of Mark
`C. Rifkin In Support of Plaintiffs’
`Civil L.R. 7-3 Motion For
`Permission To File A Sur-Reply
`Brief On Apple Inc.’s Motion to
`Compel Arbitration [ECF No. 48]
`filed
`byHarry Bass,
`James
`Blackwell,
`Crystal
`Boykin,
`Edward W. Hayter, Robert
`Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz,
`Eric Terrell. (Related document(s)
`66 ) (Rickert, Rachele) (Filed on
`6/8/2012) (Entered: 06/08/2012)
`06/12/2012 68 RESPONSE (re 66 MOTION for
`Leave to File Plaintiffs’ Civil L.R.
`7-3 Motion For Permission To File
`A Sur-Reply Brief On Apple Inc.’s
`Motion To Compel Arbitration
`[ECF No. 48] ) filed byApple Inc..
`(Yates, Christopher)
`(Filed on
`6/12/2012) (Entered: 06/12/2012)
`06/15/2012 69 OBJECTIONS
`to
`re
`67
`Declaration
`in Support,,
`62
`Declaration
`in
`Support,
`in
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-22
`connection with Apple’s Motion to
`Compel Arbitration by Apple Inc..
`(Yates, Christopher)
`(Filed on
`6/15/2012) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
`06/18/2012 70 Minute Entry: Motion Hearing
`held on 6/18/2012 before Chief
`Judge
`James Ware
`re
`48
`MOTION to Compel; and 37
`MOTION to Dismiss. (Date Filed:
`6/18/2012). (Court Reporter Jim
`Yeomans.) (wsn, COURT STAFF)
`(Date Filed: 6/18/2012) (Entered:
`06/18/2012)
`06/21/2012 71 Transcript of Proceedings held on
`06/18/12, before Judge James
`Ware. Court Reporter/Transcriber
`James
`Yeomans,
`Telephone
`number
`(415) 863-5179. Per
`General Order No. 59 and
`Judicial Conference policy, this
`transcript may be viewed only at
`the Clerks Office public terminal
`or may be purchased through the
`Court Reporter/Transcriber until
`the deadline for the Release of
`Transcript Restriction.After that
`date it may be obtained through
`PACER. Any Notice of Intent to
`Request Redaction, if required, is
`due no later than 5 business days
`from date of this filing. Release of
`Transcript Restriction set
`for
`9/19/2012. (jjy, COURT STAFF)
`
`
`
`
`
`(Entered:
`
`JA-23
`(Filed on 6/21/2012)
`06/21/2012)
`to File
`07/02/2012 72 MOTION
`for Leave
`Plaintiffs’ L.R. 7-3 Motion For
`Persmission
`To
`File
`A
`Supplemental Brief On Apple
`Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss [ECF
`No. 37] And Motion to Compel
`Arbitration [ECF No. 48] filed by
`Harry Bass, James Blackwell,
`Crystal Boykin, Edward W.
`Hayter, Robert Pepper, Stephen
`H.
`Schwartz, Eric Terrell.
`(Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order
`[Proposed]
`Order
`Granting
`Plaintiffs’ Civil L.R. 7-3 Motion
`For Permission To File A
`Supplemental Brief On Apple
`Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No.
`37] And Motion To Compel
`Arbitration [ECF No. 48])(Rifkin,
`Mark)
`(Filed
`on
`7/2/2012)
`(Entered: 07/02/2012)
`07/02/2012 73 Declaration of Mark C. Rifkin in
`Support of 72 MOTION for Leave
`to File Plaintiffs’ L.R. 7-3 Motion
`For Persmission To File A
`Supplemental Brief On Apple
`Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss [ECF
`No. 37] And Motion to Compel
`Arbitration [ECF No. 48] filed
`byHarry Bass, James Blackwell,
`Crystal Boykin, Edward W.
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-24
`Hayter, Robert Pepper, Stephen
`H.
`Schwartz, Eric Terrell.
`(Related document(s) 72 ) (Rifkin,
`Mark)
`(Filed
`on
`7/2/2012)
`(Entered: 07/02/2012)
`07/06/2012 74 RESPONSE (re 72 MOTION for
`Leave to File Plaintiffs’ L.R. 7-3
`Motion For Persmission To File A
`Supplemental Brief On Apple
`Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss [ECF
`No. 37] And Motion to Compel
`Arbitration [ECF No. 48] ) filed
`byApple Inc.. (Yates, Christopher)
`(Filed on 7/6/2012)
`(Entered:
`07/06/2012)
`07/11/2012 75 ORDER by Judge James Ware
`granting in part and denying in
`part 37 Motion
`to Dismiss;
`denying 48 Motion to Compel;
`finding as moot 66 Motion for
`Leave to File; denying 72 Motion
`for Leave to File (jwlc2, COURT
`STAFF)
`(Filed on 7/11/2012)
`(Entered: 07/11/2012)
`* * *
`09/28/2012 81 AMENDED
`CONSOLIDATED
`CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT;
`JURY TRIAL against Apple Inc..
`Filed byCrystal Boykin, Robert
`Pepper, Edward W. Hayter,
`James Blackwell, Harry Bass,
`Eric
`Terrell,
`Stephen H.
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-25
`(Rickert, Rachele)
`Schwartz.
`(Filed on 9/28/2012) Modified on
`10/1/2012 (cpS, COURT STAFF).
`(Entered: 09/28/2012)
`* * *
`11/02/2012 87 MOTION to Relate Case and
`[Proposed] Order filed by Apple
`Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed
`Order) (Yates, Christopher) (Filed
`on
`11/2/2012) Modified
`on
`11/5/2012 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
`(Entered: 11/02/2012)
`and
`11/02/2012 88 MOTION
`to Dismiss
`[Proposed] Order filed by Apple
`Inc. Motion Hearing set
`for
`12/18/2012 02:00 PM before Hon.
`Yvonne
`Gonzalez
`Rogers.
`Responses due by 11/16/2012.
`Replies
`due
`by
`11/26/2012.
`(Attachments: # 1 Proposed
`Order)(Wall, Daniel) (Filed on
`11/2/2012) Modified on 11/5/2012
`(cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered:
`11/02/2012)
`11/02/2012 89 Request for Judicial Notice re 88
`MOTION to Dismiss filed byApple
`Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1,
`#
`2
`Exhibit
`2)(Related
`document(s) 88 ) (Wall, Daniel)
`(Filed on 11/2/2012)
`(Entered:
`11/02/2012)
`* * *
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-26
`12/07/2012 99 RESPONSE (re 88 MOTION to
`Dismiss
`)
`PLAINTIFFS
`MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
`AND
`AUTHORITIES
`IN
`OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
`APPLES MOTION TO DISMISS
`THE
`AMENDED
`CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT
`filed
`byHarry Bass,
`James
`Blackwell,
`Crystal
`Boykin,
`Edward W. Hayter, Robert
`Pepper, Stephen H. Schwartz,
`Eric Terrell. (Schmidt, Alexander)
`(Filed on 12/7/2012)
`(Entered:
`12/07/2012)
`12/07/2012 100 Declaration of Michael Liskow in
`Support
`of
`99 Opposition/
`Response to Motion, filed byHarry
`Bass, James Blackwell, Crystal
`Boykin, Edward W. Hayter,
`Robert Pepper, Stephen H.
`Schwartz,
`Eric
`Terrell.
`(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2
`Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4
`Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Related
`document
`(s) 99
`)
`(Liskow,
`Michael)
`(Filed on 12/7/2012)
`(Entered: 12/07/2012)
`12/10/2012 101 Minute Entry:
`Initial Case
`Management Conference held on
`12/10/2012
`before
`Yvonne
`Gonzalez Rogers
`(Date Filed:
`12/10/2012).
`Further
`Case
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-27
`Management Conference set for
`12/17/2012
`02:00
`PM
`in
`Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland.
`(Court
`Reporter
`Raynee
`Mercado.) (fs, COURT STAFF)
`(Date Filed: 12/10/2012) (Entered:
`12/10/2012)
`* * *
`12/18/2012 102 Transcript of Proceedings held on
`December 10, 2012, before Judge
`Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Court
`Reporter Raynee H. Mercado,
`CSR, Telephone number 510-451-
`7530,
`raynee_mercado@cand.
`uscourts.gov,
`rayneeh@
`hotmail.com. Per General Order
`No. 59 and Judicial Conference
`policy, this transcript may be
`viewed only at the Clerks Office
`public
`terminal or may be
`purchased
`through
`the Court
`Reporter until the deadline for
`the Release
`of
`Transcript
`Restriction.After that date it may
`be obtained through PACER. Any
`Notice of
`Intent
`to Request
`Redaction, if required, is due no
`later than 5 business days from
`date of this
`filing. Redaction
`Request due 1/8/2013. Redacted
`Transcript Deadline
`set
`for
`1/18/2013. Release of Transcript
`Restriction set
`for 3/18/2013.
`(rhm)
`(Filed
`on 12/18/2012)
`
`
`
`
`
`JA-28
`(Entered: 12/18/2012)
`to
`12/21/2012 103 REPLY
`(re 88 MOTION
`Dismiss
`)
`filed byApple Inc..
`(Huseny,
`Sadik)
`(Filed
`on
`12/21/2012) (Entered: 12/21/2012)
`* * *
`03/05/2013 106 Minute Entry: Motion Hearing
`held and submitted on 3/5/2013
`before Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`(Date Filed: 3/5/2013) re 88
`MOTION to Dismiss
`filed by
`Apple
`Inc..
`(Court Reporter
`Raynee Mercado.) (fs, COURT
`STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/5/2013)
`(Entered: 03/13/2013)
`04/03/2013 107 Transcript of Proceedings held on
`March 5, 2013, before Judge
`Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Court
`Reporter Raynee H. Mercado,
`CSR, Telephone number 510-
`451-7530, rayneeh@hotmail.com,
`raynee_mercado@cand.uscourts.g
`ov. Per General Order No. 59 and
`Judicial Conference policy, this
`transcript may be viewed only at
`the Clerks Office public terminal
`or may be purchased through
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
