'
`
`;FRDM : SQLIIARNCHIK.
`
`IE Kyle
`
`_
`
`7
`
`F‘HU;NE NO.
`
`:
`
`1 41256 375
`
`1318
`
`. 29 22223 11:SBRM P2
`
`J
`
`uh
`
`1
`l
`
`Docket No. AMB-TMOPP1
`Serial No. 76/354,425
`
`IN THE Uwmao S'rA"T.=3s PATENT AND TRADEMARK Omce
`BEFog:~: ma TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`A‘
`‘
`'
`In re Opposition of:
`Applicant:
`American Tomahawk Company LLC.
`Serial No.:
`76/354,425 ’
`‘
`*
`Mark:
`NEXT GENERATION RANGER TOMAHAWK
`Published in the Oflicial Gazétte on June 25, 2002
`
`«v
`BOX TTAB-FEE
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`2900 Crystal Drive
`Arlington, VA 22202-3513
`
`Sir:
`
`TRANS.l\:*IITTAL orZWOTICE or orposmou
`WITH DEPOSIT;ACC_OUNT AUTHORIZATION
`=
`-
`Attachocl for filing in the galbox‘/e~identifi:ed matter" are the following:
`
`‘.”':“E*’!"t“'
`
`’
`~
`Notice ofOppositilolnl
`Transmittal Letter in triplicate _._V
`Via Certificate of Express Mailing
`Motion to Suspend Proceedings vgith a copyof complaint
`Return receipt postcard .
`‘
`
`me filing flee of $300; should be éharged to Deposit Account No. 19-0065. Two
`Zlcapies cfthis letter are enclosedfor;chargingpurposes. Ike Commissioner is hereby authorized
`Eta;charge any underpayment offlees asiobiatedwith this communication or credit any averpaymem‘
`[_t_o Deposit Account 1947065.
`‘
`’-
`'
`
`Re-speotfully submitted,
`
`
`
`= can Kyle
`Phone No.:
`Fax No.:;
`Address:
`
`406-37531317
`406-375-1318
`Sallwanchik, Lloyd & Saliwanchik ,.
`PO. Box 2274
`.
`Hamilton, MT 598404274
`
`'
`
`,
`
`=1
`
`-
`
`}zc:4céis::e‘¢l‘fr.oln.<
`
`/Z5131s>atexamsamPM[EasternDaylightTime]
`
`

`
`F-(‘RUM i‘ SFILILJRNCHIK. JE Kale
`
`PHCEINE N0.
`
`2
`
`1 406 375 1318
`
`Jun. 9 2283 11:59PM P3
`
`2.
`
`Docket No. AMB-TMOPPI
`Serial No. 76/354,425
`
`CERTIFIEATE OF MXXLING BY EXPRESS MAIL (37 CFR 1.10)
`
`Express Mail No.2 EU57§894586US "
`—-
`Date of Deposit: O§/16/2002
`I hereby certify that this is being dieposited with the United States Postal Service “Express Mail Post
`Office to Addresses” service undér 37 CPR 1.10 on the date indicated above and is addressed to: Commissioner for
`Trademarks, 2900 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202-3513.
`
`Tank.
`Name of Person
`
`ling Paper
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`FROM :
`
`SQLIUQNCHIK. JE Kyle
`
`PHONE ND.
`
`1
`
`1 486 375 1318
`
`Jun. 89 2283 11!S9RM P4
`
`IN me UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK Omcza
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Opposition No.:
`
`) )
`
`)
`)
`
`) )
`
`é
`
`AMBASSADOR MA.NUPAc11jR1Nc;, LLC.
`Opposer,
`'
`’
`
`‘V
`v.
`AMERICAN TOMAHAWK Comzmw, LLC
`Applicant,
`j
`
`Morrow Féa SUSPENSION op Paocasnmas
`
`Opposer, byits attorney, herebymoves, pursuantto TrademarkRule2.1 17(a), forsuspension
`of the Qpposition of Application No. 76/354,425 for NEXT GENERATION
`
`-
`
`1
`
`As grounds in support of{his motion, Opposerasserts that the panics are involved in a‘ci\_r.i1
`V-‘ action which may be dispositive of the present proceeding. A copy ofthe COMPLAINT AND
`DEMAND FORJURY TRIAL,CauseNo. CV 02-l29~M—DWM filed in the Unites StatesDistrict’ -
`% e.CQurt for the District of Montana, Missoula Division is enclosed. Opposcr respeptfizlly requests’
`
`.
`
`.
`
`V;
`
`I:
`
`.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`AMBASSADOR MANUFACTUB.1NG_, ~LLt:' '
`
`.
`
`'
`
`
`
`/¢/£&a/ /4; 926mg”,
`
`,=Rece1§e‘ainme 1 as375 13 3;»are/9/on-03:45PMgsastémbayngntTime]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`-
`
`gffiom : Sq-NRNCHIK’ JE K918
`
`VPHQNE Na.
`
`:
`
`1 4296 375 1318
`
`Jun. a9b221a3 12:BPM P5
`
`
`
`\6'=:‘b<:'. -4chLn4:ustov-~
`
`_
`
`L.
`CAREY & M'.E1SMBR,OPL,LPA
`225 W. Broadwa - PO. Box 8659
`.Missoula, MT 8 80743659
`1
`Telephone: (406) 728-0011
`ArroRNsYFORPLAm'rm=s_,
`
`‘
`
`"
`
`‘
`
`§ V 1' 5 ‘.“-S.__,.'‘'__#- 3‘; '_—'v"A‘."
`
`25;?“ ,.~*.__s;g
`‘
`_
`
`‘
`
`‘:_~A~—,.‘,E.
`BY‘
`
`A
`
`V‘
`
`IN
`.
`
`sures DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT. OF MONTANA
`MISSOULA DIVISION
`
`.
`
`«
`
`OcameNo. ~awm
`
`' COMPLAINTAND DEMAND.
`FOR-..]URY TRIAL
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`
`
`lo VICTOR HAYS and sUs}$N HAYS,_:
`' d/b/a AMBASSADOR
`11 MANUI-*AcTOR1NG,-LL65,
`
`‘
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`PRISCO d/lb/a AMERICAN
`1%
`.-TAOMAHAWK COMPANY, ROBERT
`:15 . HUMMELBAUGI-I d/b/a SURVIVAL
`. SI-IE IHsYs'rEMs,auaKgVzN
`O6= SCHLOSSBERG d/b/a
`_BLA.DEFORUMS.COM,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`‘
`
`«
`
`7
`
`“
`COMB NOW the‘1=1ainrs££s;v:cTqzi Hugs and sum: Hus d/b/a Ambassadér '
`_
`; ?;Mé.,fiufacnu-ing, LLC, by and thfough their éittomeys, CAREY & Maxsmmz, PLLP, gums '_
`21;:
`Iheir cause ofaction against ANDY PRISCO d/b/a/ AMERICAN TOMAHAWK COMPANY,
`22 _;I{,oBER'i"HU1vMaL23AUGI~: d/b/a,/;SILY1niVIVAL
`SYSTEMS, and KEVIN Scmossnme
`23 = dfblal BLADE FORUMS, claim and axiege as fonows:
`'
`.24
`—
`«
`Pggigs
`.
`1.‘
`:25:
`Plaintiffs, Victor Hays émd Sussin Hays, are andataflfimesrelevant-tothig ».
`. 26 f H<:1ion were residents of Sandexé County, Montana.
`2.
`Defendant Andy Prisca, d/b/a American Tomahawk Company, is and atall
`
`27
`
`.
`
`O
`
`1
`
`1
`
`V
`
`.
`
`“
`
`s
`Rob/IPLAEITAIQDDENLANDFORJURYTRIAL
`"Receivedfmm<14 63751318>at6i9i03 3:03:45 PM [Eastern Daylightfime]
`
`
`-2-8 V
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`__
`
`
`
`. es relevant to this action, was a company incorporated under the laws ofthe State of ‘
`
`"
`
`1f
`
`-.
`
`*
`
`:
`
`.
`
`1.
`
`-A
`
`%
`
`"
`
`

`
`
`
`§FR'l;3M : SFILIIJRNCHIK, JE Kgie
`
`PHONE N0.
`
`:
`
`1 486 375 1318
`
`Jun. 89 2833 12:86PM P6
`
`|-—I
`
`
`
`~LaJ',l‘~'J.»--~0\o_,_o¢'\IO\U:4:noN
`
`
`
`;..111’s
`
`New Jersey, having its principal place of business in the State of New Jersey and entering
`into a contract for materials to be furnished in the State of Montana. Defendant Andy
`
`Prisco is and at all times relevant to this action, was engaged in the business of
`commissioning and contracting ‘for
`design, manufacturing and selling of commercial
`and military tactical toolsi including the Next Generation Ranger Series Tomahawk and
`Vietnam Tactical Tomahawk, which are the subject ofthis action.
`3.
`Dcfendantliobert I-Iumnzielbaugh, d/b/a Survival Sheath Systems, is and‘at
`all times relevant to this action, was a company incorporated under the laws ofthe State,-
`‘ ofllifashington, having its Vprincipal place ofbusiness in the State ofWashington and _
`1
`entering into contracts for marlccting and agency in the State of Montana. Defendant
`Robert Hummelbaugh is
`atkali times; relevant to this action, was engaged in the
`~ business of designing and marketing commercial tactical tools, including the Next.
`Generation Ranger Series Toirxahawk, which is the subject ofthis action.
`
`~
`
`-
`
`-A
`
`Defendant Kevin Schlossberg, d/b/a Bladeforurns.com, is and at all times
`4.
`relevant to this action, was a cornpany intiorporated under the laws ofthe State ofF1orida,
`having its principal place ofbusiness. in
`State oi‘Florida and entering into contracts for
`
`membcrship into his forums with subscribers in the State of Montana. Defendant Keviri
`
`A
`
`1 Schlossbcrg is and at all times relevant to this action, was engaged in the business of
`
`soliciting and contracting memberships for subscribers into his web-forums which
`j ‘discussed the tactical tool and cutlery industry and tactical tools, including the Next
`'.Generation Ranger Series Tomahawk and _Vietnam Tactical Tomahawk, which are the
`‘subject of this action.
`
`Q Q EISDICTIQE AND VEE [1 E
`The jurisdiction ofthis Court isahased upon diversity under 28 U.S.C‘ §
`5.
`- :§=l332(a) and 1l32(c), on the grounds thatthe amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00 '
`exclusive of interest and costs, and the parties are of diverse citizenship.
`6.
`Venue is proper in the District ofMontana under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a)(2).‘ ‘
`
`A
`
`-»
`
`.1
`
`i.
`
`'
`.
`"
`if MPLAJNT AND DEMAND 1-‘on JURY 'l‘R.iAL
`Receivetlfm1n< 1 4
`375 1318> M19103 3:03:45PM[EasternDaylightTime]
`
`
`
`'
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`
`5
`T
`;FfI§EElM : SPILILJFJNCHIK.
`
`IE Kyle
`
`.-
`
`_
`
`-
`PHUEFE N0‘
`
`_
`'
`
`1 ‘Q5 375 1318
`
`_
`:
`“Tm 89 M53 12 Q1
`
`PM P?
`
`This Court has porsonaljurisdiction over the Defendants pursuant to the
`7.
`1
`2 Montana 1ong~arm statiltc, Rule 4B,:Mont. R; Civ. P.
`
`3
`4
`
`‘
`‘ST TE ENT OF THE CLAIM
`On or around July 1, 2601, Robert I-Iummelbaugh d/b/a Survival Sheath
`
`8.
`
`V
`
`4:
`
`«
`
`.
`,
`j
`its durability.
`On July 21, 2001 Robert. Hummelbaugh contracted with Vic Hays and ’
`_ .
`10.
`.
`'.Arrlb:lssador Manufacturing to act as an a“gezlt on theirjoinr behalfin order to find-a‘
`iretarier for the tomahawk which the}; desiglled togather.
`'
`11.
`Acting on beh§l1;f,oAfZhi1nse1fg.nd Ambassador Manufacturing, Robert V
`cofitaotcd the American Tomahawk Company (ATC) and its president Andy Prison in late‘
`July regarding the possibility or‘ marketing rand retailing the tomahawk.
`
`V
`
`»
`
`Acting outside tlié soope ofhis agency arrangement with Ambassador; ’
`12.
`Robert sold the exclusive righto ofthe tomafgawk to Andy Prisca and ATC.
`13.
`on"August 7, 2001: Alldy Frisco, acting as President ofArc, exlenderrall
`‘offer to Ambassador Manufaotllrizlg and Rob/ért via email which would pay Robert
`, .: :“"":.l:I\.§_
`royalty fees for completing the v’9?‘%action with ATC arld included an order of'50‘ ,.
`with a 20%" down payment bésed on the designs Robert and Ambassador
`‘-submlnea to ATC.
`‘
`’
`'
`
`,
`
`'
`
`V
`
`'
`
`- 2'1
`22
`23
`
`24
`25 :
`26..
`
`2
`
`Subsequently, Andy’ Prisca orally; extended his initial order to include ,a
`14.
`Total of84 tomahawks based on thodesigns suorxfined by"Robert and Ambassador with, '_ A
`‘elusive manufacturing rights given to Ambassador.
`
`V 7
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`_ -.
`
`
`-._.»'-‘*54i=
`
`Cojf ILAlNrrAl~lDDBMANDFoRmR.Yl*R1Al;
`llecellell’rllim£ 4 ll E325 1318> at619103 3:03:45PM[EasternDaylightTime}
`
`’
`
`i
`
`'
`
`3
`
`_
`
`

`
`
`
`%hROM 1
`
`SRLILJRNCHIK. JE Kyle
`
`PHDHE ND.
`
`=
`
`.1 495 375 1313
`
`Jun. as 2ae3 12:21PM P8
`
`l
`2
`3
`
`On Septernber 6, 2001:, Andy Prisca wrote to Ambassador claiming a
`15.
`proprietary interest in the blade ‘casing and synthetic handle system that had been
`developed exclusively Ambassadbr for the tomahawk.
`
`'
`
`1.
`
`‘t.‘
`
`‘
`
`*
`
`.
`
`1
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`I
`
`_
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`I
`
`On December 14, 2001; Andy Prisco, breached his contract with
`16.
`4
`5 Ambassador Manufacturing by terminating their exclusive right to manufacture ATC’s
`6
`tools, including the Next Generation R/anger Series Tomahawk and the Vietnam Tactical
`7 Tomahawk.
`.- 1'.
`17.
`Subsequently: Andy Priscg, acting as President ofATC, conspired with1
`Schlossberg ofBladeforumscom to publicly slander and defame Ambassador
`Manufacturing using the web~forum maintained by Schlossberg and fiequented by
`members ofthe world-wide cutlery and tactical tool industries.
`FIRST CAUSE or ACTION - - Pmsco
`‘I (BREACH OF HVIPLIED CQVENAN'I__' OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR
`18.
`Plaintiffs re~alle"ge and incorporate byreference the allegations contained
`in Paragraphs 1 through 17 above.
`1
`19.
`Defendant Andy Prisco, Id/b/afAmerican Tomahawk Company, contracted,‘ -1
`rnarketed and retailed tactical tools designed and manufactured by Ambassador
`l\/Ianufacturing including the Ne-lid: Generafioia Ranger Series Tomahawk and the Vietnam
`jjactical Tomahawk.
`i
`e
`_
`20.
`Defendant Andy Priscoewed honesty in fact and the observance of
`'.
`.
`Ii-jeasonable commercial standards offairdealingin the tactical tool trade when he, __
`‘contracted with Ambassador Manufacturin‘g to_;design the Next Generation Ranger Series '.
`gomahawk and the Vietnam ‘Tactical Tomahawk.
`21.
`Defendant Andy Prisca owed honesty in am and the observance of
`rjasonable commercial standards oft'air...deaIingb_in the trade when he contracted with .
`bassador Manufacturing to manufacture the Next Generation Ranger Series '
`T flmahawk’and the Vietnam Tactical Tomahawk.
`22.
`Andy Frisco breached the implied covenant ofgood faith and fair dealing
`he did not deal honestly in fact with Ambassador Manufacturing or observe
`
`bwh
`
`eon LAINT AND DEMAND roe my TRIAL
`
`'
`
`4 '
`
`Receivedfrom < 1 11116 V'_E751318> at619103 3:03:45 PM [EasternDaylightTime]
`
`

`
`
`
`gggom : SRLINRNCHIK. JE Kale
`
`V
`
`PHDEJE “ll
`
`;
`
`l
`1 495 375
`
`1318
`
`. as 2ea3«12:a2PM P9
`
`J’
`
`””
`
`1
`2
`
`3
`4
`
`2
`
`reasonable commercial standards offair dealing Within the tactical tool and cutlery
`industry
`
`23
`damages
`
`As a result ofthe breach, V1c and Sue ‘Hays suffered substantial monetary
`
`5
`L’ _ 6
`'7'.
`8. .
`.
`.
`
`9
`
`The breachresulting in tghe damages suffered by Vic and Sue Hays occurred
`24.
`because ofthe acts, omissions‘ and commissions ofthe Defendant as alleged in this
`cornplaint.
`A
`l
`H
`'
`SECOND CAUSE at Agxlorg ~— Hmmtaavan
`OF EVIPLIED COVENANT OEGO
`on FAITH AND mm DEALING).
`l’1aintifi‘s re-allege.and incégrporate by reference the allegations eontained in.
`25.
`Paragraphs 1 through 24 above.
`Q
`.1.
`26.
`Defendant Robert Hummelbéaugh, d/bfa Survival Sheath Systems,
`-'
`contracted with Ambassador Manufactxuixig to represent their interests in finding a ‘l
`retailer who would market tactical tools designed and manufactured by Ambassador ‘ ' A
`fM,a.x'1ufacturing including the
`Cieneration Ranger Series Tomahawk.
`1
`27.
`Defendant Robert Hurmnelbaugh owed honesty in fact and the observance
`ofreasonable commercial standards offair dealing in the trade when he contracted with
`{ambassador Manufacturing to find ‘a retailernand marketerefor the Next Generation
`19 gkanger Series Tomahawk.
`‘ A
`1
`
`32
`V
`
`l
`I
`
`*
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`_ _ _-
`
`_
`
`
`
`|
`
`As a result ofthe breach, Vie and Sue Hays suffered substantial monetary
`,_ 29
`24
`.
`T
`x
`._
`1 ages
`25
`The breach resulting in the damages sufiered by Vic and Sue Hays ‘Z’ .
`'30‘.
`‘
`' 26:
`27'‘ be atzseofthe acts, omissions and cornmissions ofthe Defendant as alleged in this
`28?.
`‘Co fplaint.
`‘‘
`
`.
`
`. Zoo _LAINT AND DEMAND FOR mm mm.
`'
`Receivedlrsms14l63€5l318>at6!9I03 3:05:45PM[EasternDaylightTime]
`
`;
`
`so
`
`

`
`
`
`gr-‘ROM : SRLIURNCHIK, JE Kyle
`
`i
`
`V,
`
`.
`
`*'
`PHnr~3E NO.
`
`:
`
`1 486 375
`
`1318
`
`Jun.
`
`:39 2Laxz13V12:a2PM Pie
`
`E3
`
`1
`2
`(DECEIT)
`
`A
`
`.
`
`V
`
`:
`
`1*-,
`
`Plaintiffs regallege and incorporate by reference the allegations contained in
`31.
`3
`4 Paragraphs 1 through 30 idbove.
`L
`T
`T
`5
`32.
`Defendant Prisdo willfully deceived Vie and Sue ‘Hays with the intent to.
`6 ‘induce them to’ alter their gfigsitionol to their injury when he made 21 promise without any .
`7 -intention ofperforming it.
`4
`j
`'
`I
`s
`’ 33.
`Defendant Priéco willfulli deceived Viczand Sue Hays with the intent to ‘
`' " :9‘
`to alter their positidn to their injury when he suggested as fact that which.
`was not true when he did not believe it to; be true.
`.
`_
`34.
`As a result oftlie deceit, Vii: and Sue Hays suffered substantial economic
`* d3mases-
`L.
`V
`.
`H
`i
`35.
`The deceit resullifigiglin the deimages suffered by Vic and Sue Hays occurred‘ 3'
`. because ofthe acts, omissiousandiconimiseions ofthe Defendant as alleged in this
`complaint.
`‘
`'
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`V
`
`1
`FQURTH CAUSE OF g;'CTIOu 4; HUMMELBAUQH
`..
`1 3:
`in
`(DEC/EIEIT)
`V
`T
`173: A’
`Plaintiffs re-allege alndincorporate by reference the allegations contained in -
`36.,
`18
`19~ ffiaragraphs I through 35 above.
`2;
`I
`.
`V
`__
`37.
`_ Defendant Hununelbaiigh willfiilly deceived Vic and Sue Hays‘with 1
`
`.
`
`’
`é _
`,. i‘
`
`
`
`deceived Vic aiad Sue Hays with the
`Defendant Hummelbfiaugh
`38.
`23
`i item; to induce them to alter their posilion to their injury when he suggested as fact that
`24
`25 _'4
`was not true when he did not believe ‘it to be true.
`26 ;
`39.
`As a result ofthe deceit, Vic and Site Hays suflered substantial economie
`27
`ages.
`28_.
`
`d_
`/// ’ J
`
`'3CO‘1.:LA'Il\lTANDDEMANDFORJURYTRIAL
`I Receivedfrom£1 lllfi :75 mm:was 3:03:45PM[EasternDaylightTime] ,
`
`_
`
`. 5-‘.
`
`

`
`
`
`geom : SFILILJRNCHIK, JE Kyla
`
`»
`
`_
`
`>
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`‘PHONE ND.
`
`1
`.
`. 1 4:35 375 13 8
`
`J
`
`. n9 2eo3e12:o3PM P11
`:
`
`un
`
`the damages suffered by Vic and Sue Hays occurred
`The decen-resulting
`because ofthe acts, onnssions and commissions ofthe Defendant as alleged in this -
`complaint.
`
`2
`3
`
`mm cAIisE or ACTION - Pmsco
`V
`4
`5 -
`
`: 6
`I 7 _
`1
`8
`9‘;
`10
`
`'
`
`}3‘
`
`»
`
`Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate by reference the allegations contained in
`41.
`l”ara,graphs 1 through 40 rise
`V
`J
`
`v
`H
`‘ '42.
`Ambassadorilflanufactuz-ijiig maintained information including a forrnula;
`compilation, program, device, tnethod, technique or process that derives
`independent economic value; actual or plgtential, fiom not being generally known to,
`t not being readily ascertainable by properl-means by, other persons who can obtain
`economic value from its disclosure or uses. V
`43.
`Defendant Prison inisapprogiriated trade secrets when he used Ambassador
`I Manufaciuring’s trade secret witliout the express consent by Ambassador.
`44.
`As a result ol‘the:misappropr;iafion oftrade secrets, Vic and Sue Hays;
`11‘
`e suffered substantial economic deznsges.
`1
`V.
`45.
`The misappropriation oftrade:,secrets resulting in the damages suffered-’by V
`I
`18%. Vic and Sue Hays occurred becauseofthe ails, omissions and commissions ofthe
`19 ’ Defendant as alleged in this complaint.
`5
`20
`SIXTH CAUSE oFgo'1T1oN .. Hn_a_s_m;gi;:‘LBAUGH
`,2}
`(TRADE :SECRB7ITS ~ Misnppropriation)
`4.6.
`i‘
`22
`Plaintiffs re-allege"and incox-poraie by reference the allegations contained in.
`23 ;___' I through 45 above ll
`*
`V
`K
`i
`24.
`47.
`Ambassador Manufacturing maintained infomiation including a formula,
`7
`I
`25,; -
`compilation, program, device, nietbodfirechxiiclgue or process that derives
`“
`Q6.
`--' icleypyendent economic value, actual or potential; from not being generally known to, and I
`,l 27,
`n it being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain
`'
`-. 28' e nomic value firom its disclosure or uses.
`
`«
`
`’
`
`
`
`.L_Ansx'r AND DEMAND son JURY TRIAL
`‘V ‘Loo
`Recsivedfrdm <
`lo 375 1318 > at619103 3:03:45PM [Eastern Daylight Time)
`
`
`
`'
`
`' 7
`
`.
`
`

`
`
`
`'fROM : SFILILIRNCHIK, JE Kyle
`
`T
`
`1.
`
`I
`
`PHONE NU.
`
`.
`.
`
`,1 486 see 131
`
`3
`
`J
`
`um
`
`. as 21393 12:n3PM P12
`
`Defendsnt,Hunnnclba;g1gl1 misappropriated trade secrets when he sold
`48.
`V
`I
`2 Ambassador Manufacturingfs trade iecret without the express consent by Ambassador.
`3
`49.
`As a result ofthe misappropriation oftrade secrets, Vic and Sue Hays
`4
`suffered substantial econoniie damages. A
`5
`50.
`The misapproptiafion trade seciéets resulting in the damages suffered‘by
`6 Vic and Sue Hays oocurfetlbecanse ofithe acts, omissions and cornmissions of
`
`4
`
`_
`
`-
`
`.
`
`»
`
`.1"
`~;,,
`
`.
`
`i
`'
`-A ;,
`
`~
`
`V
`
`SEXENTH CAU:§E on A‘c1_1_oN —~ Pmsco
`"
`é(LIBEL).
`7
`
`_
`
`51.
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`_
`A
`
`Plaintiffs re-allege end incorporate by reference the allegations contained in
`1 Th1f0U.gh50 aboye._ A.
`1
`V
`.
`l
`I
`Defendant Prison propagateci libel when he, acting as‘President ofATC,-
`.
`ii"; 14- ,'
`‘ psrticipated in the B1adeforurns.co"_m web forum writing false and unprivileged
`_
`‘-‘publication by writing, printing, pictur'e, or%other‘fixed representation to the eye which
`exposed Ambassador Manufactgring and Site and Vic Hays to hatred, contempt, ridicule,
`jot obloquy which caused the Heys end theitibusinesslto be shunned or avoided by.
`? "members ofthe tactical tool, outlets-land machine shop indnstries.
`A
`A
`53.
`As a result ofthe'li_l§el, Vic and';Sue Hays and Ambassador Manufacturing
`snffered substantial economic loss;
`A
`19‘
`I
`-
`54.
`Thelibel resulting the damages suffered by Vic and Sue Hays occuxredg ‘
`20.
`-21 Q ‘._:E§:ause ofthe acts, omissions anddeonimissions ofthe Defendant as allegedin this ..
`~} 3-,'''=:’isi.-,}3.;‘5''='-3:':3‘5
`"'43
`22
`ofnplatnt
`.
`*
`T
`~
`f N
`t
`
`23
`
`EIGHTH clmsnoon ACTI:QN —— Hmmtnwen
`'
`:(LYBEE)'
`V
`.
`.
`
`Plaintiffs re-allege and incoxporatelby reference the allegations contained in i
`’ 55.
`-
`A 25.
`25 P jeégi-aphs 1 through 54 above.
`V
`_
`’
`27 .
`56.
`Defendant I-Iummelbaugh propagated libel when be, acting as President of ‘
`28
`ival Sheath Systems, participated in the Blade'forums.com web forum writing false
`
`.
`
`A
`
`,
`
`3go_
`.
`Receivedfront? 1 406
`
`LAINTANDDEMAND son my TRIAL
`5.1318>at619103 3:03:45PM[EasternDaylightTime)
`
`’
`
`
`
`___s
`
`,
`
`i
`
`'
`
`

`
`
`
`imam : SRLILJRNCHIK, JE Kyle
`
`i
`
`L
`
`__
`
`=
`
`1
`PHONE N0‘
`'9‘
`
`;
`
`‘
`1 4% 375
`
`1318
`
`»
`
`Jun. as 2a3*12:a4PM P13
`A
`
`
`
`and “nPriVi1€8ed P11b1i¢3l$iQfl by W?l1‘iH8, Printing, picture, or other fixed representation to
`the eye which exposed Ambassador;Mannfi1cturing and Sue "and Vic Hays to hatred,
`contempt, ridicule, or obloquyrwhich; caused the Hays and their business to be shunned or
`avoided by members ofthe tactical tool and cutlery industry.
`I
`57.
`As a result:<;E\ftl1elibel,{7
`V
`ic and Sue Hays and Ambassador Manufacturing
`‘suffered substantial eeonoririicloss.
`‘
`’
`A
`:
`_
`58.
`The libel resulting in the damages suffered by Vic and Sue Hays occurred '
`because ofthe acts, omissions and/comrnissions ofthe Defendant as alleged inthis
`'7‘cb‘i"nj$liiintL
`'
`
`i
`
`Plaintiffs re-alleggerand iiicoziporate by reference the allegations contained _
`59.
`Paragraphs 1 through 58 above: ; I
`f
`'
`l
`60.
`Defendant Schlossberg bested and propagated libel when he, acting as
`{resident ofBladeforums.corh,"r_naintained
`participated in the Bladeforums.cott1.web' '_ N
`hiforum Writing false and unprivilegctl publictifion by writing, iarintinggpicture, or other
`_“i:i‘:-ted representationto the eye txrhich exposes!Ambasseclor Manufacturing and Sue and
`Vic Hays to hatred, contempt,
`or oblbquy svhich caused the Hays and their
`igbfisiness to be shunned or avoidedby"members ofthe tactical téol and cutlery industries.
`61.
`As a result ofthe libel, Vic and S3ie:Hays and Ambassador Manufactirrlng
`
`'
`
`V’
`
`'
`
`init
`c
`
`the_¢i_atnagcs:suffered.by Vic and Sue Haysoccurred
`The libel resulting
`62.
`trust: ofthe acts, omissions and ceminissionsthe Defendent-as alleged in
`q
`i
`.
`V
`T
`i
`ll
`TENTH CAUSE OF Ac%rIoN -- P12
`
`
`.
`;(S »~AN1)ER)'
`
`Plaintiffs re~—allege and incorporate by reference the allegations contained in ‘
`I-F‘ i‘s 2; §‘3
`
`Ft?*3-U)
`
`

`
`
`
`: PHn}§E NU.
`
`:
`
`.1435 375 1318
`
`Jun.
`
`239 2a:z13,12:va4PM P14
`
`64.
`
`Defendant Prisoo propagated libel when he, acting as President ofATC,
`
`65.
`
`As a result of ghe sIander:Vic and Sue Hays and Ambassador
`sufi“efed substantialeeonomic loss.
`
`ELEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION —..Hummmr.swcn
`e
`1,:
`(SLA;NDER)
`:
`_
`
`'
`
`Plaintiffs re-allege and bimrporate by reference the allegations contained in‘:
`67.
`e‘f:P.aragr»aphs 1 through 66 above;
`«I
`k”
`68.
`Defendant Hummel»beqgh:pro};a’gated libel when he, acting as President} of
`
`and Vic Hays and Ambassadoji
`‘
`A
`_
`. 20: "‘j1\/Iahufaeturing in respect to their pgofession,Ategde and bizsiness, by imputing them
`:21 V
`disqualification in those resiaegte whiehjtheir occupatioopeculiarly r,eqxzjired..an_.ci" Z
`22
`something with referencezto theiri_prot:ession, trade and business that had a
`V
`23 .
`tendency to lessen profit.
`I
`—
`1
`I
`24 '
`69.
`As a result ofthe slander. Vxeand Sue Haye and Ambassador
`25
`ufaeturmg suffered substanttal economic
`$6
`70.
`The slander resulting in ihe damages suffered by Vic and Sue Hays
`
`.,
`
`
`
`I
`
`.
`
`-. co:
`
`ZLAINT AND DEMAND FOR may TRIAL
`
`,_.
`
`Receivedfrom< 1 406 1318 > atW03 3:03:45 PM [Eastern DaylightTime}
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`EFRUM :
`
`snL1unNcHn<, JE Kala
`
`-
`PHD"? "‘°-
`
`;-:
`
`1 45‘? 375
`
`1313
`
`Jun. 89 2BB3.12:BSF‘M P15
`
`1
`
`"V"
`
`TWE-LFTH CAESE OF ACTION - SCHLOSSBER .
`z
`=
`7-‘
`(SLANDER)
`
`Plaintiffs zjrallcge andfincorporate by réferencelthc allegations contained in
`71.
`l’a;*agz‘aphs '1 through 70. above.
`L
`72.
`Defendant Sphlossberg jigropagatedwlibjel when he; acting as President of"
`Bladeforumssom, maintained arid participated in the Bladefomths.coin web forum -
`1
`writing false and unprivileged publicalipn which directly injured Sue and Vic Hays and
`\'A1fi_liassador Manufacmringin respect tip their prpfassion, trade and business, byimputing
`diéqualificatiori in those reépccts which their
`occupation peculiarly rcquireda 4‘
`
`‘ ’“‘
`
`'
`
`_
`
`75.
`
`'
`The slander resmting; in the damages suffered by Vic and‘Sua Hays b
`74.
`ioccurred because ofthe acts, omissions andicommissions ofthe Defendantas a-llcged in =
`1
`this complaint.
`,
`»
`V
`b
`1
`THIRTEENTH cwsa or (mom -- Pmsco *
`17 3
`V
`(A:l‘~l':I‘I_~TZI‘R:IIST:— Restraiili ofTrade)
`18
`Plaintiffs re-allege igicorporiiie byreference time aHegations‘.co_nta.imNd.ii1_
`19
`1 through 74 above. A.
`.
`A‘:
`i
`I
`I
`i
`20
`Defendant Frisco, Wlif¢n=he breaciiéd themanufacturing contract with,‘
`76.
`L:
`.21».
`':_;‘bassador, restrained Ambassadqf Manzifactxii-ing.’é trade or commerce pursuant to 15‘
`22
`éfs*;c. § 1.
`A
`1
`V
`23
`77.
`As a result ofthe reshaint got‘trade,:Vic and Silt: Hays and Ambassador
`24
`i
`suffered substantial econcimic losa:
`:
`in
`_
`25.
`The restraint oftrade resiilting in thé; damages sufiered by Vic and Sue -
`78. _
`26;
`‘ 27 , Ha ficcurred because ofthe acts, OIIIISSIOIIS and commissions of the Defendant as
`237 allé ea in thispomplaint.
`
`i
`
`-i
`
`'
`
`-
`
`'
`
`
`
`§ tiece:v§drram<14de3
`
`> at619103 3:03:45PM[EasternDaylightTime]
`
`‘T
`
`fin...
`
`

`
`
`
`'.ER<oM : SRLILJRNCHIK. JE Kale
`
`».
`
`;
`‘
`
`I
`
`_
`
`:PHDt‘tE ND.
`
`1
`
`.
`-
`
`,1 435 375 1
`
`318
`
`V
`
`J n. as 2oa3T12:va5PM P16
`”
`,
`
`,6
`
`1
`2
`
`FOI-IRTEENTH CAUSE or Acrro -——PRIsc
`_
`t
`_
`_
`T
`gcxvn. CONSPI
`CY)
`
`:
`
`Plaintiffs‘to—a11ego andgincoxporoto by reference the allegations oontaified in
`79.
`3
`4 Paragraphs 1 through 74' above.
`'
`5
`80.
`Defendant Iirisco, togetfter with Robert I-Iummelbaugh and Kevin
`6
`Schlossberg, collaborativoly ptanned ind acconiplishcdfia course‘ ofaction which damogod ,
`7 Ambassador Manufacturiné‘2i~nd Sue
`Vic Hays when they breached the impficd
`‘V’
`8
`.
`.1
`.
`'
`—
`‘_
`covonant ofgood faith andfflairnidealing and slanderod their good name.
`“:93: "
`*
`81.
`As a result oi’:-the oivil coogpiraoy, Vio atxd Sue Hays and;Ambassador V
`_
`10 Manufacturing suffered substafitial oconémic loss.
`‘
`Q
`1}
`82.
`The civil conspjtacfy rosultingjn the damages suffered by Vic and Size I-Iay:s.
`$2? occuzjred because ofthe acts, omissions and commissions ofthe Dcfendant as allegod
`A thiib‘ complaint.
`
`'
`
`i
`
`-
`
`FIFTEENTI-I AtUSE?OF AC'fiON .. HUMMELB van
`11”?
`
`
`;
`(CIVIIECONSPIIIACY)
`.
`1 3
`Plaintiffs re-a11egeTantli11:cot;pc:rateby roforénoo the allegations contained in
`83.
`'
`1
`17 ;_fi3arag1'aphs I through 82 above.
`k_
`»
`’
`1
`.
`.
`13
`~_
`84.
`Defendant Humméxbaughgogetxaex with Andy Prisoo and Kevin V
`19 ifiohlossberg, collaboratively plax1gz§edortd;aco6mplishod srcourse ofaction
`
`datnfagodi
`
`As a result ofthe civfffconsptracyff Vic ind Sue Hays and-Ambassador
`85.
`22
`attufacturing suztfored substantial leooxiomic loos.
`.
`V
`23
`86.
`The civil conspiracy roéultingvin 1:11? damages guffered by Vic and Sue Hays
`24
`because ofthe acts, om.issio1'1s _stx1d oomfiiissions ofme Defendant as alleged‘
`'
`2-5‘
`26;_ £1a{f%c521omp1aint.
`V ‘
`W
`A
`27
`Q///‘
`23 _///
`
`,
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`l—;RUM : SRLILJRNCHIK. JE K315
`
`_pHgfiE No,
`is. =-
`
`A:
`
`1 426 375 1313
`
`Jun. a9 2223 12:86PM P1?
`
`1
`2
`
`‘L
`SIXTEENTH csiiss or ACTI T N .- s F
`V
`A
`1 (gym CONSPIRACY) CHLOSSB RC
`
`i
`7%
`
`E
`
`Plaintiffs-re—a1legc andiincoxporste by reference the allegations contained in
`87.
`3
`4 Paragraphsl through Sfiébol/e. T
`V
`’
`5
`-
`A
`
`6
`
`‘ As a result oléthe civil cozglspix-acy, ‘Aha Sue Hays a.nd”Ambassa(:lorI
`9:: L" 3
`_ Manufacturing suffered subé’t:_:z:7.ntialecon'ur:n1icloss.’ ‘
`90.
`The civil consfiifdcy rcsultifig in the damages suffercd by Vic and Sue Hays
`occurred because ofthe acts, omissionsaxid commissions ofthe Dcfcndaot as alleged in
`Complaint.
`l
`3
`3'
`
`A;
`
`~
`
`“
`
`%
`
`-
`
`%
`
`SEVENTEENTH CAUSE or ACTION - — pmscg 5
`.(;s_m:AcH 04E.CONTRACT)v
`
`Plaintiffs re-alleg€éui2d inoorpératecby refcrence the allegations containcgl;.i1j.
`91.
`16%
`17\% i:l’arézgx‘aphs 1 through 90 above.:
`.
`,
`1
`l.
`I
`T
`1
`V
`l
`A
`I
`'
`18
`92.
`Defendant Andy Frisco, djbxax lkmericarxiromahawk Company, breaclzcd
`19
`oral contract with Ambassadogiill/§snufactu:3g;ing,when he gsrogrxised Vic ancl Sue I-I.'2‘:§’.)8."a .
`
`.
`
`&
`'
`
`
`
`93. Asa result ofthe breach;
`‘24 ' ditrfoges.
`The breach resulting suffered by Vic and Sue Hays occprbr¢d.»f_:_.
`--
`'
`94.
`ofthe.acts, emission and commissions asljalleged in this Complaint. '
`
`and“Sue Hays suffered substantial mofiotaty; %
`
`.r_:*
`
`'
`
`
`
`A
`
`'_
`
`x ‘
`
`'
`
`327
`28 .
`
`///_
`
`’ co i,AmT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`_‘Recelvedfrlam€l406 Ell‘-l318>atmama 3:03:45 PM [EasternDaylightTime]
`
`
`
`l
`
`.
`
`13 .
`
`I
`
`H
`
`.
`
`

`
`
`
`: SRLIURNCHIK, JE K918
`
`'
`
`,
`
`-2
`PHONE ND‘
`
`i
`
`;
`
`1 495?‘
`
`375 1315‘
`
`V
`
`Jun. 29 23x33 12:86PM P18
`
`i
`
`EiG_HTEENTfi CAUSE or ACTION — rmsco
`Plaintiffs ifgéllege incorporate by referencedhc allegations mntaiged in
`95.
`Paragraphs 1 through 94 aib6ye._ '
`,
`»
`i
`96.
`Defendant Andy Ppiscoiéd/5/a Aniericim Tomahawk Company,
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`Plaintifiis re—aIIééé and ificorfziorate by referénce the allegations containéd
`98.
`>
`3:Pa.r:ag‘raphs 1 through 97 abnvefl
`A_
`.
`»
`J
`i
`‘A
`l
`4
`99.
`Defendant Andy:Prisr;o,
`.;}.Inericax1:f*I‘omahawk Coznpany, appliedfor
`federal registration ofthe tradcrixiark Viétnaz;,'I‘actical Tomahawk (U.S. Application’ ‘
`A
`17
`13 *3éériaz No. 75/355,795) knowingi‘§;’1if;i.\_7ic andéiaé Hays have} rights to age that mark in 3
`
`E
`
`'.C:ox\}1I_i;A;1:2~4T AND DEMANDFOR JURY TRIAL
`‘
`;Receivedfrom£14663}‘1318>atM91033:03:45PM[EasternDaylightTime]
`L
`i
`
`_
`
`.
`
`14
`
`.'
`
`‘
`
`~
`
`

`
`
`
`: SFILILJRNCHIK. JE Kyle
`
`PHUNENU :
`
`425 3?s 1313
`
`Jun. aé 2223 ;‘12:@?F‘M P19
`
`an)
`
`1'5)
`
`c)
`
`d) ‘
`
`2 E)
`
`I)
`
`compénsatoifir damages and pimitive dainages En their
`Emmy ofjudgrnent
`f-5W0! 513
`éiifzount Wafgranteci by thefevidence zit trial;
`Entry Ofjuflgmeng for Liompénségdry damages and puifitixfe daxzfages
`favor for
`present filturefinancial damages.
`1‘
`Entry ofjudgnié-‘nt for cdmpensafory damages and punftive damages in their
`favor for
`preséht §Ifd«fiIh1re pain elmdsufferixig.
`1
`I
`.
`1
`4‘
`Entryof awmdgigp§ropric’:t“_o1-ship to all designs; includingNexii
`Generation
`Séries ‘::['omahawl§ and Vietnam Tactiéal Tomahawk.
`Entry ofjudgifient-deg1ari:§g,U.s, Traden§gark Intent-to—Usc Applicafion’
`Serial No. 75/3:54;3425.lvoid‘3unde: é5:u.s.c. Section .1051 based on faise ’
`statements in {1‘1eTappIic¢ati_m;.
`'
`v
`H
`V
`‘
`J
`.
`;
`.
`Entry ofjudgxiéitt .dec1mfi,c;;U.S. Trademark Intent—to~Use"AppIicaIib:n.
`Serial No. 75/3;5§"F,7'§5 voidgfigder 3'5 U~:S.C. Sgction 1051 based on faisg:
`statements in ’£fie:=app1ica.t;ion.
`Such other and fix/{that relief the Court Tde.ém;s just and proper.
`g)
`DATED this S”""*day of-3955?, 2.Qo2.~:.
`
`their
`
`‘
`
`1
`
`‘
`
` %
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5 .
`'6
`7
`8
`9%
`
`I
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`I
`
`18
`19
`
`23
`-,
`<
`24. _ -:;<;
`..
`
`25.;
`
`.
`
`E 25.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Victor}-lays
`”‘PLA’~‘-“'”F=F"
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`5 _
`
`.
`
`;
`’
`
`'
`
`.~
`
`:
`~
`‘
`CAREY &:M.sIsIvnaR,PLL1=
`1
`225 W. Broadway o P.O. Box ‘S65.-9
`» Mi5sou1a.,.MT 5980’7~86S9
`’
`b
`'1:e1ephone:(406)’728-0011
`.A:m'oR1~rEYs FORPLAINIIFFS‘
`
`-:
`
`H.
`
`F
`
`
`
`;_'1§_ L
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`I
`
`'
`
`-u
`
`fi.Am1ANDDE1~AANDFoRJLrRY1zu.é;L ,
`_Re§ei§e;1ffom< 1.106375
`> at6I9!033:03:45PM[EasternDaylightTime]
`_
`
`

`
` 5
`
`3?
`‘z
`
`inbm : SRLIUQNCHIK, JE Kgle
`
`',
`
`’PHD§§ ND.
`
`:
`
`1 4ée 375 1313;
`
`Jun. as 22193 '”12:raaPM P25
`
`'7:
`
`’.
`L
`‘C2;xREY&MEISMEIi PLLP
`235 W~Br0adway-’P.o.‘Boxs559wA
`Nfissoula, MT-5980"7~8659
`_ Eelephone: (405) 728-0011
`TTORNEYS FOR Pmmmps ~
`
`‘
`
`..
`
`'
`
`3m«um‘‘-
`
`.
`’
`
`~;esu'~“
`
`1 2 3 4
`
`5 ¢
`5
`
`7 3 9
`
`
`
` .._
`
`jeceivéafromé1406375131$ate:91o3a;o5:45Pmlaaszemnayngnmmq
`
`

`
` H
`
`2-"3
`
`‘FROM : SFILILJRNCHIK. JE Kyle
`
`'
`
`PHONE N0._ :
`
`.‘1 45 375 1318
`
`Jun. 59 2883 "'11:S8RM P1
`
`A1,.
`
`,ml
`
`.5‘
`
`‘ J
`
`t5Acé:Mu_E CCSVER SHEET
`
`SALlWANCH!K,__L.LOYD 8: SALIWANCHIK, P.C.
`,
`~ -
`’ A Pgofessional Association
`2
`-127 Wegt Main Street, Suite E
`‘
`P.O. Box‘2274
`Hamiltéfgn. MT. 593494274
`
`*~‘
`
`,
`
`.»a.~.
`
`.—;Telephone (406) 375-1317‘
`/Facsimile (406) 375-1318 ‘
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`,
`
`.7
`
`1-
`
`;~
`
`«
`
`T
`
`.
`
`-'
`;
`z’
`'
`°
`_
`The iufonrmtian contained in thisfackiinile mesafagz is z‘mended_onIyf6r thepersonal and confidential use ofthe
`designated recipient? named below... «This massagg may be an artormvycliem‘ cammunicatiorn, and as“ such is
`privileged and ca.rgfidentIaL [film gender nfmls mgsgage is not the intended recipient or an agent resppzzsibte-for
`delivering it to the Intendedrecipieiii,you arehzrebfnolljiedtlzatyauIiavéreceivedthis documentin error, andthat
`any review, dissemirzatlon, distribiuibn, qr cqpying: of this message is strictly prohibited Ifyau reé-eivzd this
`. communication in error, please natifyus fmmejdiatebg-by-teléphone zmdretum the originalmessage by mdil. Tlzafik
`
`_.
`
`»
`
`rz.
`.-u
`
`*
`
`
`TO: Letricia Harrison
`’ "
`1
`FAX N0.: 1-703-746-7107 V
`':coMPANv: Trademark Trial 55¢: Appeal l?:;3érd '
`FROM: Jean Kyle
`.
`~-
`l
`_
`éyumeea or-‘ PAGES (lNcLut$:}~xs COVEé SHEET)? 20.:
`‘:‘I:i_A.TE: June 9, 2003
`- 1.
`If you do not receive all pia§es—or if t_ransmisSiovi'_is not legible, call the
`sender at (406) 375-1317. Q
`~
`’
`"
`.
`._
`,
`‘
`%%lLlBJECTIMESSAGE:
`
`
`
`A
`
`»E,_.
`
`Thank you for your asslstanéé this mfifiér.
`3%
`
`~”_:llecell!ed.fr.tlm<140ll E51318>at6l9l033:03:45PM[EaslelnDayllghtTime] VA
`
`»