throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. 3935
`
`ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA6846
`
`Filing d3l3e3
`
`03/23/2004
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91154146
`
`Defendant
`Ehlke & Co., Inc.
`Ehlke & Co., Inc.
`§ 62 Massachusetts Ave.
`Lexington, MA 02420
`
`HELEN HILL MINISKER
`§ BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD
`Correspondence l
`Address
`I 1001 G STREET, NW
`; WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4597
`
`Submission
`
`Motion to Lift Suspension & Resume Proceedings
`
`Ffler's Name
`
`Helen Hill Minsker
`
`Filer's e—mail
`Signature
`
`hminsker@bannerwitcoff. com
`/Helen Hill Minskerl
`
`Attachments
`
`Geek Moti0n.pdf ( 4 pages )
`
`

`
`Attorney Docket: 6277.00001
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the Matter of Trademark Applicant:
`
`GEEK SQUAD, INC., a wholly-owned
`subsidiary of BEST BUY CO., INC.
`
`Opposer,
`
`V.
`
`GEEK HOUSECALLS, INC.
`
`Applicant.
`
`\/\/&/\/&/%\&§/9/%\/\/Q
`
`Opp. No. 91154146
`
`Serial No. 76/351,422
`Mark: GEEK HOUSECALLS & Design
`Published July 30, 2002
`
`MOTION TO LIFT SUSPENSION & RESUME PROCEEDINGS
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`2900 Crystal Drive
`Arlington, Virginia 22202-3513
`
`Sir:
`
`Applicant, Geek Housecalls, Inc. (by change of name from Ehlke & Co., Inc.) moves that
`
`the suspension order issued by the Board on December 18, 2003 be lifted and proceedings
`
`resumed. No substantive settlement discussions have occurred since the parties agreed to
`
`suspend proceedings at the end of September, 2003, notwithstanding that Applicant’s counsel
`
`has contacted Opposer’s counsel several times to try to move the matter forward. Given that
`
`almost six months have passed with no progress, Applicant has no reasonable expectation that
`
`Opposer will now enter into bona fide settlement negotiations, and sees no purpose in further
`
`delaying the proceeding. Thus, Applicant requests that the Board resume proceedings and reset
`
`the testimony periods and also, as explained below, order Opposer to respond to App1icant’s
`
`683818
`
`

`
`Attorney Docket: 6277.0000l
`
`Interrogatories and Document Requests, within 10 (ten) days of the date of the Board’s order
`
`resuming the proceedings.
`
`Opposer Should Be Ordered to Respond to Applicant’s Discovery Reguests in 10 Days
`
`Requiring Opposer to respond within ten days to Applicant’s discovery requests, which
`
`were served on August 13, 2003, is amply justified. Opposer refused to grant Applicant more
`
`than a single, two—week extension for Applicant to respond to Opposer’s discovery requests (and
`
`this was only given in exchange for granting a mutual extension of two weeks to Opposer.)
`
`However, shortly before Opposer’s responses were due on October 1, 2003 (the response
`
`deadline included the two week extension), Opposer’s counsel contacted the undersigned to
`
`indicate that Opposer needed additional time to prepare its discovery responses, and also was
`
`interested in examining possible resolution of the matter. Applicant, wishing to facilitate
`
`settlement discussions, agreed to the suspension of proceedings (and consequent extension of the
`
`deadline for Opposer’s discovery responses), even though Opposer had not been equally
`
`cooperative in dealing with Applicant’s request for additional time.
`
`Opposer is the plaintiff in the proceeding and has the burden of going forward. However,
`
`after almost six months, Opposer has neither pursued the case on the merits, nor has it attempted
`
`to resolve the case amicably. Further, Opposer has ample notice of Applicant’s intent to resume
`
`the proceeding. Given the circumstances, Opposer cannot claim hardship at having to respond to
`
`Applicant’s discovery requests within 10 days of the resumption of proceedings.
`
`683818
`
`

`
`Attorney Docket: 6277.00001
`
`For the reasons set forth above, it is respectfully requested that the proceedings be
`
`resumed and that Opposer be ordered to respond fully to all of Applicant’s outstanding discovery
`
`requests within 10 days of the date of the Board’s Order.
`
`Date:
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.
`
`Attorneys for Applicant
`
`By: elen Hi 1 Minsker
`
`1001 G Street, NW
`Suite 1100
`
`Washington, DC 20001-4597
`Telephone: 202-508-9285
`
`683818
`
`

`
`Attorney Docket: 6277.00001
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 23rd day of March, 2004, a copy of the foregoing
`MOTION TO LIFT SUSPENSION & RESUME PROCEEDINGS was served on counsel for
`
`Opposer by facsimile and by first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as followed:
`
`Rita Coyle DeMeules, Esq.
`Misti Nelc, Esq.
`Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP
`800 LaSa1le Avenue
`
`2800 LaSalle Plaza
`
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`
`
`
`683818

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket