IN THE UNITED STATES
`
`°7'°8'2°°3
`U.S. Patent & TMOfclTM Mail Rcpt D\. #22
`
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Illllllll"!Ill”lllllllfllllllllllllllllllllllll!
`
`SCHERING-PLOUGH HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS
`
`V.
`
`Mitchell Swartz
`
`Opposition No. 91155965
`
`Serial N0. 76388837
`
`June 29, 2003
`
`Preliminary Response to Opposition by
`Schering-Plough Healthcare Products
`
`Now comes Dr. Mitchell Swartz,
`
`for BUG-SUN TECHNOLOGIES, with the
`
`following reasons given for this pleading.
`
`Schering-Plough‘s opposition is unjust and unfair.
`
`1. Dr. Swartz was the first to use the derivative of the mark, SUN-BUG, and
`
`thereafter BUG-SUN TECHNOLOGIES. This is shown in Exhibit 1 (attached).
`
`2. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products is not damaged by the present mark.
`
`3. On information and belief, some of Schering-Plough Healthcare Products
`
`statements in their Opposition are not accurate.
`
`
`
`°7'°8'2°°3
`U.S. Patent & TMOfclTM Mail Rcpt D\. #22
`
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Illllllll"!Ill”lllllllfllllllllllllllllllllllll!
`
`SCHERING-PLOUGH HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS
`
`V.
`
`Mitchell Swartz
`
`Opposition No. 91155965
`
`Serial N0. 76388837
`
`June 29, 2003
`
`Preliminary Response to Opposition by
`Schering-Plough Healthcare Products
`
`Now comes Dr. Mitchell Swartz,
`
`for BUG-SUN TECHNOLOGIES, with the
`
`following reasons given for this pleading.
`
`Schering-Plough‘s opposition is unjust and unfair.
`
`1. Dr. Swartz was the first to use the derivative of the mark, SUN-BUG, and
`
`thereafter BUG-SUN TECHNOLOGIES. This is shown in Exhibit 1 (attached).
`
`2. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products is not damaged by the present mark.
`
`3. On information and belief, some of Schering-Plough Healthcare Products
`
`statements in their Opposition are not accurate.
`
`
`
`
`
`;.
`
`4. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products has not used good faith conduct.
`
`5. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products has a history of harassing, and usurping
`technology from, Dr. Swartz.
`The above—action was filed immediately after, and in
`
`response to, Dr. Swartz filing of a Petition for Certiorari against the Opposer regarding
`ongoing litigation involving Opposer usurping Dr. Swartz's technology and brand
`name [Exhibit 1 (attached)].
`
`6. Dr. Swartz reserves the right to provide additional reasons to oppose after
`consultation with counsel.
`
`7. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that any pro se litigant is entitled to less
`
`stringent standards [US Rep volume 404, pages 520-521 (1972)].
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Mitchell Swartz,%ro se
`
`P.O. Box 81135
`
`Wellesley Hills, MA 02481
`
`Certificate Of Mailing
`
`I hereby certify that this correspondence will be deposited with the United States
`Postal Service by First Class Mail, postage pre aid, in an envelope addressed to
`"Clerk, Trademark Trial And Appeal Boar
`Arlington, VA 22202-3513" on the date below
`{I
`
`June 29, 2003
`
`M.
`
`. Swartz
`
`Certificate Of Service
`
`I hereby certify that a copy of this correspondence has been sent by First Class
`Mail, postage prepaid, in an envelope addressed to Schering Plough Healthcare
`Product's counsel Attorney David Kera, Maier & Neustadt, PC, 1940 Duke Street,
`Alexandria, VA 22314 4 S
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`..z:ma.u:m..CF72_.:m.Q<.E.Q24..c:m-z:m..MOO?EUDOJA>903
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`\n\osmium
`
`\
`
`§w»\.§v.&&E
`
`\\
`' \
`
`....
`
`
`
`.\\\\\\\%\\§«§\.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.ODm-ZDmm.N:m»$mgm.wfims%:dQEOozfimwaxmbavaa
`
`
`
`
`
`mmofimsoorcooonEtumoctofimxEBEtomtonom.5
`
`._
`
`
`
`
`
`5%»@832Em_._.:oEo_omcammczbmzflmmtmm33_.
`
`
`
`
`
`Omo95Eon.8mu:E_E£owe?m.%.§m-w§_>3»
`
`
`
`
`
`AWVEE>63:oEQ_owfiopauzmflmtmam.._D.ODm-Z3m
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`55080333.uucmzcohtom.3360mEo>c_Ntmksm.5
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`mzoomhoofi..m.$:tmmmmofimsn.582:go958
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Emfiofimwb:mu:oUm.Eoo:83?388%m.8Bu:2:
`
`
`
`mocowmEooUcm.3::..€:_&mc%:Sm-w:o_826
`
`
`
`
`
`Aomovcomcsom:2canmfitomflopm£2o>:_
`
`
`
`
`
`.355mm»::w:_.m_o.>uoma_m2@305.._3
`
`
`
`
`
`bfifimcoamfi.C§o3.m~33¢SOm-:Om.:>W
`
`
`
`
`
`was:omE_om.22soc..;m:oE,€Encsomwas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wcemm..,,625303zwzoi.32wascoEo__om.32.was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.w.wsmtmmmmufimznODm-ZLD_m2:£5nowoman
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`R55Em?ufiow8cwsoiwu_.m:.:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IODO._n_
`
`kxw‘
`
`§§z.v\»Eek
`
`
`
`zswwwamosmium.O.Dm.-Z.3mSEE8Some35%Ntwkm.5cancofiomom22M9.£:.$m32£:.5mgmSficooE3zwsofiEnsosozvfim
`
`w.5,“3522osmiumas.3E.£.£mmgram.5
`
`
`
`298czbm....Qmzmocomafiom£2
`
`magE£9»82o:_m-z.:mof85aseesaw£2
`
`
`
`
`
`£305:E§>m._m:E>%ESou“
`
`
`
`
`
`omsmomswo>6u8m_mo:az:o.E._ODm-,ZDmES.
`
`.:omE__ow£29Stem;Q..3Bow0.8
`
`
`
`
`
`umsmuoauozoofl3:om§Eo,EM0Dm-_ZDmwait
`
`
`
`gm:m._.2tE5~.ooom.x:moflwcmmvmEEm__mo>8somehow:2.
`
`
`
`
`
`zzwwonm
`
`
`..3®DO.E§..sz_:$.o:.m8m:wc__,._22:EadsmazgmS
`
`
`
`
`UDm.-Z_Dmmowcano~£mo:,mE2.m>mcwsoflammo£5E.
`
`
`
`._.m_m:§>€EHOSHO
`
`
`
`.35.83.atvwzfim93
`
`
`
`.38ScEm:3:338.wzmE.»...Som.__wwwas3.83swsoi
`
`.E.a:_05asz:§.o:m%
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`£033$03088:0mfionnwsoi.uE:.53.mE..._monEmo._..
`
`
`
`9owmcfic£m_:mEE82:goufiomEn53EmEEooEQ8
`
`
`
`$909838.SF.39:..wEm8w.muE>T>..5m.€E$.53cums
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`moummogm5.53%.5,doqovmcoovan$3.5cancon:vmmmm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`awfioan:ocm.~E£:_mvqomcan2mC8wE.550was:oumE...£EE:oEm.w<dwsofi.8flmtoawfimamBsvofi
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES
`
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SCHERING—PLOUGH HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS
`
`V.
`
`Mitchell Swartz
`
`Opposition No. 91155965
`
`Serial No. 76388837
`
`June 29, 2003
`
`Motion to Enter Opposition Late
`
`Now comes Dr. Mitchell Swartz,
`
`for BUG-SUN TECHNOLOGIES, with the
`
`following reasons given for this reasonable Motion.
`
`1. The filing of the Response to their Opposition was missed inadvertently and
`
`unintentionally.
`
`2. Furthermore, Dr. Swartz informed Ms. Latricia Harrison, Legal Assistant of his
`
`opposition, and was not aware a further answer was required at this time.
`
`3. Dr. Swartz has been unable to find counsel at this time to answer the Opposition.
`
`The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that any pro se litigant is entitled to less stringent
`standards [U.S. Rep volume 404, pages 520-521 (1972)].
`
`4. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products has not used good conduct.
`
`
`
`
`
`=3
`
`5. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products never sent to copy of the complaint to Dr.
`Swartz. Ms. Latricia Harrison, Legal Assistant to the Board, did send a facimile copy,
`however, a complete scan-legible copy was again requested, but so far not received.
`
`6. On information and belief, Schering-Plough Healthcare Products has had
`
`opportunity to extend their own time to meet the deadline.
`
`For the above reasons, it is requested that this reasonable Motion be allowed.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`8
`
`Mitchell Swartz, pro se
`P.O. Box 81135
`
`Wellesley Hills, MA 02481
`
`Certificate Of Mailing
`
`I hereby certify that this correspondence will be deposited with the United
`States Postal Service by First Class Mail, postage prepaid,
`in an envelope
`addressed to
`"Clerk, Trademark Trial And Appeal Board
`Arlington, VA 22202-3513" on the date below
`
`June 29, 2003
`
`/1£§
`MR. Swartz
`
`Certificate Of Service
`I hereby certify that a copy of this correspondence has been sent by First Class
`Mail, postage prepaid, in an envelope addressed to Schering Plou h Healthcare
`Product's counsel Attorney David Kera, Maier & Neustadt, PC, 194 Duke Street,
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`
`
`
`
`»“’I”)’I’cM’>
`
`lllllllllllllllllIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`07-08-2003
`us, Patent 3. TMOfclTM Mail Raptor, #22
`
`June 29, 2003
`
`P.O. BOX 81 13 5
`Wellesley Hills, MA USA 02481-000116
`
`(781) 237-3625
`
`Office of the Clerk
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES
`
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`ON APPEAL
`
`SCHERING—PLOUGH HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS
`V.
`
`DR MITCHELL SWARTZ
`
`Opposition No. 91155965
`
`Serial N0. 76388837
`
`To Whom it does Concern:
`
`Attached are the following.
`
`Preliminary Response to Opposition by Schering-Plough Healthcare Products
`Motion to Enter Opposition Late
`
`Response to Motion for Default
`
`If anything else is required, please let me know at your earliest convenience.
`Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/fQz$§..
`
`Mitchell Swartz, MD, SCD
`
`cc: Attorney David Kera, Maier 8: Neustadt, PC,
`1940 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`
`
`i
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES
`
`PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SCHERING-PLOUGH HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS
`
`V.
`
`Mitchell Swartz
`
`Opposition No. 91155965
`
`Serial No. 76388837
`
`Iune 29, 2003
`
`Response to Motion for Default
`
`Now comes Dr. Mitchell Swartz,
`
`for BUG-SUN TECHNOLOGIES, with the
`
`following reasons given for this pleading.
`
`Schering-Plough Healthcare Products’ action/ motion is unjust and unfair.
`
`1. The filing of this Response to the opposition was missed inadvertently and
`
`unintentionally.
`
`2. Dr. Swartz informed Ms. Latricia Harrison, Legal. Assistant of his opposition, and
`
`was not aware a further answer was required at this time.
`
`3. Dr. Swartz has been unable to find counsel at this time.
`
`4. On information and belief, Schering-Plough Healthcare Products had opportunity
`
`to extend their own deadline.
`
`5. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products has not used good faith conduct [Exhibit 1
`
`(attached)] .
`
`
`
`
`
`6. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that any pro se litigant is entitled to less
`stringent standards [U.S. Rep volume 404, pages 520-521 (1972)].
`
`For the above reasons, it is requested that Schering-Plough Healthcare Products's
`self—serving unreasonable Motion be denied.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Mitchell Swartz, pro se
`P.O. Box 81135
`
`Wellesley Hills, MA 02481
`
`Certificate Of Mailing
`
`I hereby certify that this correspondence will be deposited with the United States
`Postal Service by First Class Mail, postage prepaid, in an envelope addressed to
`"Clerk, Trademark Trial And Appeal Boar
`Arlington, VA 22202-3513" on the date below
`
`June 29, 2003
`
`/«K
`M.R. Swartz
`
`Certificate Of Service
`
`I hereby certify that a copy of this correspondence has been sent by First Class
`Mail, postage prepaid, in an envelope addressed to Schering Plou h I-lealthcare
`Product's counsel Attorney David Kera, Maier & Neustadt, PC, 194 Duke Street,
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`
`June 29, 2003
`
`AZ?
`
`M.R. Swartz
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`..z:ma.U:m..C872,,:m_n<2Q24..u:m-z:m..MODEE0304;>>OE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`o:m-z:m
`
`
`
`\\\\\§‘».§<\.
`..s»..»
`§..\\%§\\\\\~m§.\
`
`..38:22
`
`wcoEo_owwamc__._mm
`
`:omE_ow
`
`:2
`
`WWgm,»M\.
`.\s§s\\\\\
`
`.‘\‘\,»\
`
`
`
`
`
`Amfmv/M>65:oEQ_omfionmwzm5.53mQQ.ODm-Z,Dm
`
`
`
`mmofimzgM50009Stemuc_:o.€mv_wasEtontoaom..5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.0Dm-Z,Dmm.Nfim.$m.5wfimsmcwacgootamUfiwfloctfi
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`53»mean:0.5_..:oE£om9.5mfizwmambcflma3::
`
`
`
`
`
`cosumwofiRawmocmfizofiom._aEc.aomEo>£Ntmfim.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Emfiofiwm.D:m::£u_m:oo5%.?E85,.mSmwoo:2:
`
`
`
`mocmwmaoowas52.:m:_.,:£mc:.§m,m:£E96
`
`
`
`AOmU.Vaomczom52vanmczfim«wonwE3o>E
`
`
`
`
`
`..2o&-€&..fioctmmmmmfimsn,So»of:....o9,38
`
`
`
`b.££mcommu.~b§.o:nu5:3EomsmowQ5
`
`
`
`
`
`wactammmmfimzp©D_m-ZD.m2:$2.:noEmma
`
`3
`
`.,.w55Em:2:cc8$35$83.:
`
`
`
`éowcsofimwsoi42wascoEo_om.m§,was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mew:omE_ow£2.65unwsofimoEucsomcan
`
`
`
`.038m“3&5.3o>:ou%2smsoi..G/W
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Owu05£038mm:b._E£owe?m.:%:£m-w:o_.39,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I030.E
`
`
`
`moammopmNtmfimgm.docowmqoo93$9:05com:ummmm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`flmtfimfiEaBsnofidwmxummn:o:aEE,.E_mwcomcan
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m_mC2mE$60was.:owmES.«E.m:oEwv<fimsoi.B
`
`
`
`
`
`.comc.:om£28c:.5m.._.Q3EomEm
`
`IODOJQ
`
`\.
`o:m-z:w..U.Dm_-ZDmBEEB82935%Nfim>»mQCcan:oE3om£2zsmwosm
`
`Stem22itemgQSficooE3zwsoiEncouozwoi
`
`S.“338..E©Dm-ZDmE5voE.o,_.._EE.EtmmQQ
`
`
`
`
`
`9.53RafiE5mooomxzcofimomovasE£ao>m..commzom:2.
`
`
`
`
`
`..mEouo._meow.8::8mEuEm2wm%E-...§m€:_.5.6%mag
`
`
`
`
`
`2owacmfi.mME..§mE3.2%Weofiom:3£32wEE.ooEwe
`
`zamwoa
`
`&;
`
`.m\o:o.E5.?za#&6%:%m9mgaé55Esd:m3.z:m9
`
`
`
`mowcmsomsmosmfiowmxm£...w30~m..33£5Cm
`
`M.m_m:E>%E.$50
`
`553£83ofioEomEo:£3055:558.mK..EmnEw2..
`
`
`
`um:.63H8wfimzmPa
`
`43.3805BEz.:§.o:m
`
`
`
`
`
`.383:EU2:33mama..38.Emfiwntwwm:23.5$.55
`
`
`
`H32353>$3OD.m-Z..D.mafimobfimcomzzom£2
`
`
`
`
`
`éwzofi.:33»m..m:_E>€E.30..“
`
`
`
`
`
`mmsmuon33902m_:o__§Eot:ODm-Z3mEH
`
`
`
`
`
`Joan§..~..5m.gomzmocomczom£2
`
`
`
`omzmoonnufioofiE.co:aE..£EODm-ZDmof.
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
