throbber
;jj:;
`
`*
`
` ‘tit;
`
`/ /w
`
`’
`
`TRADEMARKS
`Atty. Docket No. 32895-29
`
`55;
`ffifi
`$553.?
`§f,"{f;.
`
`2:3‘
`
`'
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE
`TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Opposition No.:
`
`Serial No.: 76/355,349
`
`Mark: BOSS IN ALABAMA
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Hugo Boss AG,
`Opposer,
`
`v.
`
`Gary E. Hoovestal,
`Applicant.
`
`BOX TTAB
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`2900 Crystal Drive
`Arlington, Virginia 22201-3513
`09/17/2003 KBIBBOIIS 00000001 76355349
`
`°‘ '°‘.“°3
`
`3°°'°° ‘'9
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`T’ Iiximxixmxl\muu\\||m\uuu\
`
`o9_o3_2oo3
`pm“ .. momm mu Rcptov. am
`
`W
`
`Hugo Boss AG, a joint stock company organized under the laws of the Federal Republic
`
`of Germany, having a place of business at Dieselstrasse 12 D-72555, Metzingen, Federal
`
`Republic of Germany (“Opposer” or “Hugo Boss”), believes it will be damaged and injured by
`
`the registration of the mark BOSS IN ALABAMA for “entertainment services, namely,
`
`conducting awards programs to recognize achievement
`
`in the field of sporting events” in
`
`International Class 41, as shown in Application Serial No. 76/355,349, filed on January 3, 2002
`
`by Gary E. Hoovestal (hereinafter “Applicant”), and published on January 21, 2003 at page TM
`
`557 of the Official Gazettefor Trademarks.
`
`Opposer alleges, solely for the purpose of this proceeding, as grounds for opposition, the
`
`following:
`
`WASHINGTON 36961 9vl
`
`

`
`I
`
`1. Opposer is the owner of the following U.S. registrations and applications for the word
`
`»..,.£
`ggj-mark BOSS: United States Registration Nos. 1,023,305, 1,429,737, 1,472,180, 1,512,402,
`1‘;
`
`1,594,226, 1,933,326, 2,303,080, 2,429,018, 2,436,050, 2,517,600 and 2,543,152;
`
`and
`
`Application Serial Nos. 74/323,654, 76/300,389 and 76/343,767.
`
`2. Opposer is also the owner of U.S. registrations and applications for BOSS HUGO
`
`BOSS, HUGO BOSS and many other marks containing BOSS. A complete list of all of
`
`Opposer’s U.S. registrations and applications is set forth below:
`
`Marks
`
`BOSS
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS GOLF
`
`HUGO BOSS
`
`HUGO BOSS
`
`HUGO BOSS
`
`HUGO BOSS
`
`HUGO BOSS
`
`HUGO BOSS
`
`HUGO BOSS
`BOSS HUGO BOSS
`
`BOSS HUGO BOSS
`
`BOSS HUGO BOSS
`
`BOSS HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`BOSS HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`BOSS HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`BOSS HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`BOSS HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`HUGO BOSS GOLF
`
`HUGO HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`HUGO HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`
`WASHINGTON 36961 9V1
`
`Registration Nos.
`
`1,023,305
`
`1,429,737
`
`1,472,180
`1,512,402
`
`1,594,226
`
`1,933,326
`
`2,303,080
`
`2,429,018
`
`2,436,050
`
`2,517,600
`
`2,543,152
`
`2,654,602
`
`1,499,728
`
`1,515,181
`
`1,594,225
`
`1,624,938
`
`2,242,539
`
`2,256,567
`
`2,419,483
`
`1,531,899
`
`1,614,935
`2,508,270
`
`2,399,198
`
`2,590,289
`
`2,564,832
`2,698,987
`
`2,712,748
`
`2,560,780
`
`1,852,434
`1,853,427
`
`

`
`I
`
`HUGO HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`HUGO HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`HUGO HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`HUGO HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`HUGO HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`HUGO HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`HUGO HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`HUGO HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`LADY BOSS
`
`BOSS CREATION HUGO BOSS PARIS &
`
`Design
`BALDESSARINI HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`BALDESSARINI HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`
`Marks
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS
`
`BOSS HUGO BOSS
`
`BOSS HUGO BOSS
`
`BOSS HUGO BOSS
`BOSS HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`BOSS HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`BOSS HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`BOSS AMERICA
`
`BOSS WOMAN
`
`HUGO HUGO BOSS
`
`HUGO HUGO BOSS WOMAN
`
`LADY BOSS
`
`BALDESSARINI HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`BALDESSARINI HUGO BOSS (Stylized)
`
`1,853,630
`1,860,740
`1,864,791
`1,865,732
`1,873,861
`1,891,134
`2,031,802
`2,447,282
`1,214,960
`
`1,373,892
`
`1,928,978
`2,450,392
`
`Application Nos.
`
`74/323,654
`
`76/300,389
`
`76/343,767
`
`76/367,198
`
`75/385,178
`
`76/300,390
`
`76/300,391
`76/343,768
`76/435,640
`76/501,849
`74/346,232
`
`76/435,252
`
`76/344,981
`
`76/453,253
`
`74/346,230
`
`76/343,769
`76/416,301
`
`3. The family of BOSS marks consisting of the registrations and applications listed
`
`above in paragraphs 1 and 2 as well as additional marks used by Opposer to which it has
`
`common law rights are referred to hereinafter collectively as the “BOSS Marks.”
`
`4. Opposer also owns numerous registrations for the BOSS Marks throughout the world.
`
`WASHINGTON 3696l9v1
`
`

`
`E’
`
`I
`
`r
`‘
`E1?
`
`‘x
`u
`
`‘r
`
`if;
`:
`
`3
`
`,.4
`
`5. Opposer’s numerous U.S.
`
`trademark registrations and applications for the BOSS
`
`1
`
`Marks cover clothing and vast range of other products and services including, but not limited to:
`
`2'?if:v
`
`retail store services, model vehicles, video games, jewelry, watches, CD5, tobacco products,
`
`stationery and desk items, leather goods, clocks, sports equipment, golf clubs, eyeglasses, towels
`
`and linens, mugs, shoes, personal care products, accessories, skin care products, sunglasses and
`
`luggage, among other premium quality consumer oriented products. Of note, Opposer produces
`
`a line ofj eans called ALABAMA JEANS. See attached exhibit.
`
`6. Opposer is one of the foremost designers, manufacturers and retailers of high-end
`
`fashions and related products in the United States and throughout the world. For over 30 years,
`
`since at least as early as 1970, Opposer, itself, has designed, manufactured, sold, distributed and
`
`marketed high-end fashion wear and related products in the United States under the BOSS
`
`Marks. Opposer and its predecessor(s)-in-interest have used some or all of the BOSS Marks in
`
`interstate commerce in the United States for more than 114 years.
`
`7. The BOSS Marks are used prominently in advertising and on promotional materials,
`
`on promotional items, at promotional events, such as award programs, sporting and media
`
`events, on displays at retail stores, and on business stationery and business cards.
`
`8.
`
`It is very common for fashion houses to license their trademarks for use on or in
`
`connection with a broad range of goods and services,
`
`in addition to clothing and fashion
`
`accessories.
`
`It
`
`is also common for fashion houses to expand use of their trademarks in
`
`connection with media events such as awards programs, sporting programs, charity events and
`
`the like.
`
`WASHINGTON 36961 9vl
`
`

`
`‘F
`
`9. Thus, the fashion industry is closely tied to events such as those of Applicant, and
`
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`.
`.3-'5-‘}f«
`pg consumers are accustomed to seeing designers names used in connection with such events.
`Eris?
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Therefore, consumers who come across Applicant’s use of its alleged mark in connection with its
`
`awards programs will undoubtedly make an association between Applicant’s services and
`
`Opposer, and are likely to believe that Opposer is associated with or a sponsor of such events, all
`
`of which will cause damage and injury to Opposer.
`
`10.
`
`Since 1972, Hugo Boss has devoted a substantial part of its advertising and
`
`promotional efforts to the sponsorship of sporting events, tournaments and teams in the United
`
`States and Europe, including many in motor sports events, among them: the British Fomiula One
`
`Team McLaren (motor sports), Penske Racing Team, U.S. CART Series (motor sports),
`
`Kitzbuehl Alpine Rally (motor sports), Stewart Racing, Fonnula One (motor sports), German
`
`Touring Car Masters Championship with AMG (motor sports), Linde Gennan Masters (golf),
`
`Cannes Open (golf), French Open (golf), European Masters (golf), Gennan Masters (golf),
`
`Mercedes German Masters (golf), German Open (golf), Volvo PGA Championship (England)
`
`(golf), Volvo Scandinavian Masters (Sweden) (golf), Volvo Masters (Spain) (golf), Volvo China
`
`Tour (golf), Asian Classic/Johrmie Walker Classic (golf), Desert Classic (Dubai) (golf), Volvo
`
`Masters (Malaysia) (golf), Volvo Masters of Thailand (golf), Volvo Asian Matchplay (golf),
`
`Hugo Boss Foursomes (golf), Ryder Cup (golf), Davis Cup (tennis), World Championship, New
`
`York Masters (tennis), Ebel European Masters (tennis), Ebel U.S. Pro Indoors (tennis), Ebel
`
`Classic Lausanne (tennis), Lipton Key Biscayne (tennis), Indian Wells (tennis), French Open
`
`(tennis), Porsche Grand Prix (tennis), German Open, Mercedes Cup (tennis), Compaq Grand
`
`Slam Cup (Munich) (tennis), Monte Carlo Open (tennis), and Kremlin Cup (tennis), and the
`
`Hahnenkamm Race (Austria) (skiing). At these events, the BOSS Marks have been prominently
`
`WASHINGTON 3696l9vl
`
`

`
`displayed on billboards, on signs, on sports equipment and on clothing worn by the athletes and
`
`" «Hr
`3. ..f»
`;;j_j_? officials.
`
`11.
`
`Since 1977, Hugo Boss has devoted considerable advertising funds to sponsor top
`
`individual competitors in various sporting competitions, including Ayrton Senna (motor sports),
`
`Niki Lauda (motor sports), Alain Prost (motor sports), Millie Miglia (motor sports), Mika
`
`Hakkinen (motor sports), Phil Michelson (golf), Serveriano Ballesteros (golf), Isiah Thomas
`
`(basketball), Stephon Marbury (basketball), Mark Davis (golf), Steve Webster (golf), Gary
`
`Evans (golf), Matt Kuchar (golf), David Gossett (golf), Garrett Willis (golf), Sven Struver (golf),
`
`Zhang Lian Wie (golf), Rudi Sailer (golf), Thorsten Gideon (golf), Darren Clarke (golf), Thomas
`
`Gogele (golf), Stephen Allan (golf), Morton Backhausen (golf), Retief Goosen (golf), Adam
`
`Scott (golf), Bjorn Dunderbeck (windsurfing), Pirmin Zurbriggen (skiing), and windsurfing
`
`teams, including the German Olympic Surf Team. These athletes have endorsed Hugo Boss in
`
`return by promoting the BOSS Marks at their respective sporting events.
`
`12.
`
`Hugo Boss has also devoted considerable advertising funds for endorsements of
`
`Hugo Boss clothing by top athletes, such as Bjorn Borg (five time Wimbledon tennis champion)
`
`and Jurgen Hingsen (world-record holder and Olympic Silver Medalist in the decathlon), as well
`
`as Vitali Klitschko (holder of the European and Intercontinental boxing titles, as well as a WBO
`
`World Champion) and Wladimir Klitschko (European and WBA Intercontinental Champion for
`
`boxing and gold medal boxing winner at the Olympic games in Atlanta in 1996). These athletes
`
`wear and promote Hugo Boss products.
`
`13.
`
`Hugo Boss is also a sponsor of the arts and thus the BOSS Marks have been
`
`prominently displayed at events including the Hugo Boss Prize Exhibition and the Frank 0.
`
`WASHINGTON 36961 9vl
`
`

`
`
`
`the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam.
`
`In addition, in 1996, the prestigious Hugo Boss Prize was
`
`established in conjunction with the Guggenheim Museum.
`
`14.
`
`Since at least as early as 1996, Hugo Boss has been heavily involved in and
`
`expended hundreds of thousands of dollars in advertising and promotional efforts associated with
`
`widely publicized U.S. award events such as the Oscars, the Emmys and the Academy Awards.
`
`As is custom, when asked who is wearing which designers at such awards shows, Hugo Boss is
`
`often the choice among stars. For example, Nicholas Cage, John Travolta, Jim Carrey, Brad Pitt,
`
`James Gandolfini, Michael Chiklis, Haley Joel Osment, Richard Famsworth, Wes Bentley, LL
`
`Cool J and Chris Klein all have worn Hugo Boss clothing to these events.
`
`15.
`
`In 1985, clothing bearing the BOSS Marks appeared in the popular movie “Rocky
`
`IV.” The home video cassette of “Rocky IV,” which is readily available in video rental stores
`
`and homes across the United States, shows Sylvester Stallone, wearing a sweatshirt bearing on of
`
`the BOSS Marks.
`
`16.
`
`Hugo Boss products have appeared in several additional movies and television
`
`series. For example, actors in the movies “Ali”, starring Will Smith, “Charlie’s Angels”, and
`
`“Driven”, starring Sylvester Stallone, and in the television series “Miami Vice” and “L.A. Law”
`
`are regularly shown wearing Hugo Boss products. Hugo Boss was even identified in the series
`
`credits. Thus, the BOSS Marks have been seen and are widely recognized by millions of people
`
`in the United States and around the world.
`
`WASHINGTON 36961 9vl
`
`

`
`,
`1‘
`
`_
`1
`
`r :-
`9' 'Jr
`..
`l~ -3.
`5.
`'.
`
`.4
`
`ll’
`\.
`
`17.
`
`Since 1983, Hugo Boss has regularly advertised its products in prominent and
`
`widely distributed United States magazines and newspapers such as The New York Times
`;§;i3,.
`
`Magazine, the Los Angeles Times, Esquire, G. Q., Interview, Vanity Fair, Women ’s Wear Daily,
`
`WMagazine, Harper ’s, Vogue, DNR, In Style, Men ’s Health and Elle.
`
`18.
`
`Hugo Boss’s products are also advertised on the Internet, on the Hugo Boss
`
`website at <<www.hugoboss.com>>, on television, in movies, and on billboard advertisements.
`
`19.
`
`Opposer’s fashion and related products are extremely popular worldwide and
`
`Hugo Boss has sold many millions of dollars of product bearing the BOSS Marks.
`
`20.
`
`Over
`
`the years, and as a result of Opposer’s substantial advertising and
`
`promotional efforts, prominent and continuous use of the BOSS Marks, and the extensive critical
`
`review and acclaim Hugo Boss has received for its products, Hugo Boss has become widely
`
`recognized to the purchasing public as the source of products bearing the BOSS Marks. The
`
`BOSS Marks are widely recognized by Hugo Boss’ customers and the purchasing public as
`
`being associated with Hugo Boss high quality goods and have become synonymous with the
`
`goodwill and reputation of Hugo Boss.
`
`21.
`
`By virtue of this extensive use and advertising, the BOSS Marks have become
`
`and are famous.
`
`22.
`
`Applicant
`
`filed Application Serial No. 76/355,349 for
`
`the mark BOSS IN
`
`ALABAMA for “entertainment services, namely, conducting awards programs to recognize
`
`achievement in the field of sporting events” in International Class 41, on January 3, 2002, based
`
`WASHINGTON 36961 9vl
`
`

`
`I o
`
`n an intent to use the mark in U.S. commerce. This application was published for opposition,
`
`but according to the PTO records, no amendment to allege use has been filed.
`
`23.
`
`Applicant’s mark is confusingly similar to Opposer’s mark, which has been in use
`
`in connection with its products since at least as early as 1889.
`
`24.
`
`Applicant’s use of its alleged mark is calculated to trade off Opposer’s goodwill
`
`in its BOSS Marks.
`
`25.
`
`Upon information and belief, Opposer’s goods and services and Applicant’s
`
`services are likely to be offered, sold and used by the same class of purchasers.
`
`26.
`
`Upon information and belief, Opposer’s goods and services and Applicant’s
`
`services are likely to be offered and/or promoted or sold in the same channels of commerce.
`
`27.
`
`Opposer believes and alleges that Applicant’s alleged mark, when applied to the
`
`services in Application Serial No. 76/355,349, is likely to cause confusion or mistake or to
`
`deceive, and will deceive and mislead the trade and the purchasing public into believing that
`
`Applicant’s services are sponsored, approved or endorsed by Opposer, or that Applicant is
`
`authorized, licensed or controlled by Opposer, or that Applicant is a division or subsidiary of, or
`
`in some way related to Opposer.
`
`28.
`
`Applicant’s alleged mark “so resembles a mark registered in the Patent and
`
`Trademark Office, or a mark .
`
`.
`
`. previously used in the United States and not abandoned, as to
`
`be likely, when applied to the goods of the applicant, to cause confilsion, or to cause mistake, or
`
`to deceive.” l5 U.S.C. § lO52(d).
`
`WASHINGTON 36961 9v]
`
`;
`r:~
`sn .4
`rm
`_y.«J.
`».
`'-4'
`.. ,.f
`
`- ,. t:.r "
`1‘ 1:.’
`
`,9
`
`

`
`
`
`29.
`
`If Applicant is permitted to register its alleged mark captioned above, confusion
`
`in trade resulting in damage and injury to Opposer would be caused and would result by reason
`
`if of the confusingly similar nature of Applicant’s alleged mark and Opposer’s BOSS Marks.
`
`Furthermore, any misrepresentation, objection or fault found with Applicant’s services promoted
`
`under its alleged mark would necessarily reflect on and seriously injure the reputation that
`
`Opposer has established through its long and continuous use of its BOSS Marks.
`
`30.
`
`For the reasons set forth in the foregoing paragraphs, Applicant is not entitled to
`
`register its alleged mark and the application should be denied in accordance with Section 2(d) of
`
`the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § l052(d).
`
`3l.
`
`Opposer’s famous BOSS Marks became famous well prior to January 3, 2002, the
`
`filing date of Applicant’s application. Opposer’s BOSS Marks are therefore entitled to a high
`
`degree and wide zone of protection.
`
`If Applicant’s alleged mark is allowed to register, such
`
`registration will dilute the distinctive‘ quality of Opposer’s famous BOSS Marks.
`
`32.
`
`If Applicant is granted the registration herein opposed, it would thereby obtain at
`
`least a prima facie exclusive right to the use of its alleged mark. Such registration would be a
`
`source of further damage and injury to Opposer.
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer prays that Application Serial No. 76/355,349 be rejected, and
`
`that registration of Applicant’s alleged mark shown and specified therein be refused and denied,
`
`and that this Opposition be sustained in favor of Opposer.
`
`Opposer hereby gives notice under Rule 2.l22(d) of the Trademark Rules of Practice that
`
`at hearing and in any appeal on this opposition proceeding, it will rely on Opposer’s United
`
`WASHINGTON 369619v1
`
`10
`
`

`
`E
`
`:
`
`v».
`V...4r
`
`"iv.
`.
`
`.7.
`
`‘y
`{'1
`
`0
`
`E33: States registrations and applications as referenced above as evidence in support of this Notice of
`
`Opposition.
`
`fié*
`
`A duplicate copy of this Notice of Opposition and a check for $300 for the requisite
`
`government filing fee are enclosed herewith. Please deduct any additional fees due from Deposit
`
`1
`
`Account 03-3370.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`L0
`
`
`
`Pamela T. Church
`
`Cathy J. Futrowsky
`Lisa W. Rosaya
`COUDERT BROTHERS LLP
`
`1627 I Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20006-4007
`Tel: (202) 775-5100
`Fax: (202) 775-1168
`
`Date: September 3, 2003
`
`Attorneys for Opposer
`
`WASHINGTON 369619v1
`
`1 1
`
`

`
`
`
`See larger image and
`other views
`
`Colors:
`
`0 BI
`
`WASHINGTON 362038vl
`
`
`
`'
`
`'
`
`oi
`
`BOSS Hugo.Boss Alabama Basic Jean '
`
`eLUXURY
`
`'
`
`Select Buying Options:
`Price:
`
`$115.00
`
`Addtoweddin Re is
`Don't have one?
`We'll set one up for you.
`
`See pricing chart
`
`Men's Sizes:
`v I
`‘ First Select Size
`See merchant's sizing charts
`
`en Se ec Co °r 3 Men‘;
`I
`sizes:
`V
`I-———----—---:-I
`See merchant's sizing charts
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[———“““j
`
`Availability: Usually ships in 2 to 3 business days. Shipping of
`some selections may vary. See product availability chart
`..........................................................4..
`.
`.__...
`__...
`.__
`__-_
`.................................._.
`Product Description:
`The relaxed, timeless cool of denim, without sacrificing fit or
`quality. Not too tight or too loose, the perfect jean for everyday
`style. Made with BOSS attitude and appeal, finished with a logo
`on the coin pocket and a handsome black leather and metal
`patch on the back waistband.
`
`0 Classic 5-pocket cut
`
`100°/o cotton, with metal rivets on pockets
`
`o
`
`Zip front
`
` REA9‘! TO BUY?
`
`
`
`
`
`ng
`
`;x fa
`
`V

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket