throbber
Notice of Opposition Re: Serial No. 78/207394
`
`Certificate of Mailing
`I hereby certify that this correspondence is being deposited with the United States Postal Service
`with sufiicient postage as First Class mail in an envelope addressed to: BOX-TTAB - FEE
`Commissioner for Trademarks, 2900 Crystal Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22202-3514, on February
`5, 2004
`
`
`
`Name ofP ficate: Thomas P. Philbrick
`Signature: 1 '
`
`Date ofSigning: 0 Z 4 0-S‘ 5 0%
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the matter of application Serial No. 78/207,394
`For the Trademark NX RACING in International Class 27
`
`Published in the Official Gazette on January 6, 2004
`
`02-10-2004
`
`u.s. Patent & TMOfcITM Mail RcptDt. #76
`
`Opposition No.
`Application No.: 78/207,394
`
`)
`)
`
`) )
`
`)
`)
`
`) )
`
`Nitrous Express, Inc.
`
`Opposer,
`
`v.
`
`Elegant USA, LLC
`
`)
`Applicant.
` )
`
`BOX-TTAB - FEE
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`2900 Crystal Drive
`Arlington, VA 22202-35 14
`
`02/24/2004 KSOHCHRN 00000054 73207394
`
`01 FC:6402
`
`300.00 0P
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Nitrous Express, Inc., a Texas corporation, located and doing business at 5411 Seymour
`
`Hwy, Wichita Falls, Texas. 76310 and owner of a family of “NX” marks, hereby believes that it
`
`will be damaged by registration of the intent to use application for NX RACING (“Applicant’s
`
`

`
`
`
`Notice of Opposition Re: Serial No. 78/207,394
`
`Mark”), as applied for in Application Serial No. 78/207,394 filed on January 27, 2003 by
`
`‘Applicant Elegant USA, LLC (“Applicant”).
`
`As grounds for opposition, Nitrous Express, Inc. alleges:
`
`1.
`
`Opposer develops, manufactures, and sells goods in the automotive industry,
`
`including goods for the sale of specialized equipment known as nitrous systems which may be
`
`added to the internal combustion engines of cars, trucks and motorcycles, and in particular to
`
`specialized racing vehicles of many kinds and related services. Opposer is widely recognized as
`
`a leader in the automotive industry for its creation of safe, reliable nitrous systems. As a result of
`
`the notoriety of such systems, the NX mark, associated with Opposer, has become a popular
`
`“symbol” with which racing fans seek to associate all kinds of automobile products and
`
`accessories in connection with their automobiles. Accordingly, Opposer licenses its NX mark to
`
`a very select group of third parties, including but not limited to certain wholesalers of automotive
`
`seat covers, steering wheel covers, and floor mats whose quality and reputation in the
`
`manufacture and sale of automotive, truck and motorcycle related products is well known.
`
`Opposer has expanded and developed its reputation, goodwill and brand association through
`
`careful, calculated and managed license arrangements.
`
`2.
`
`For more than seven years, Opposer alone, and through its licensees, has used NX
`
`brand as a trademark and service mark throughout the United States and the world to identify an
`
`entire line of automotive products and services. Opposer and its licensees have spent millions of
`
`dollars advertising their NX marks, and Opposer has extensively promoted and featured its NX
`
`marks with automobile products and services. As a result of such efforts, the NX mark is
`
`recognized as a designation of high quality goods and related services offered by Opposer, and
`
`Opposer has developed considerable goodwill in the mark. Opposer’s NX marks are valuable
`
`

`
`
`
`Notice of Opposition Re: Serial No. 78/207,394
`
`and respected and have quickly become famous amongst automotive professionals, racing
`
`enthusiasts/fans and the automobile industry as a whole.
`
`3.
`
`Opposer’s mark has achieved such a high degree of notoriety as to establish its
`
`brand as a symbol sold to enthusiasts in the form of “vehicle floor mats,” in interstate commerce
`
`since at least as early as November 1, 2002.
`
`4.
`
`Opposer’s interest and brand identity is evidenced by the filing of its NX (word
`
`mark) application in Class 27 (Serial No. 78/273,149, filed on July 11, 2003.)
`
`In addition,
`
`Opposer’s interest and brand identity is further evidenced by the filing of its NX (words &
`
`design mark) application in Class 27 (Serial No. 78/273,197, filed on July 11, 2003)
`
`5.
`
`Based on Opposer’s substantial interstate use of its mark in commerce and the
`
`resulting goodwill, Opposer believes that it will be damaged by the registration of Serial No.
`
`78/207,394 as it
`
`is confusingly similar in sight, sound, meaning and overall commercial
`
`impression and as it is to be used in connection with related, if not, identical goods namely,
`
`“AUTOMOBILE FLOOR MATS,” in International Class 27.
`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, Opposer alleges that Applicant filed an intent-to-use
`
`application on January 27, 2003 for the mark NX RACING (and design) which seeks registration
`
`of Opposer’s mark in connection with “AUTOMOBILE FLOOR MATS,” in International Class
`
`27.
`
`7.
`
`Upon information and belief, Opposer alleges that Applicant is well aware of
`
`Opposer’s fame within the relevant industry and filed its application in an attempt to ride on and
`
`profit from Opposer’s established goodwill.
`
`8.
`
`Applicant’s Mark is likely to be confused with and mistaken for Opposer’s NX
`
`mark as Applicant’s Mark is, as filed, virtually identical to Opposer’s NX mark.
`
`In addition,
`
`

`
`
`
`Notice of Opposition Re: Serial No. 78/207,394
`
`since the term “RACING” is disclaimed in Applicant’s application, the claimed elements of
`
`Applicant’s mark and Opposer’s mark are identical and thus confusingly similar.
`
`9.
`
`If Applicant is permitted to register Applicant’s Mark for the goods specified in
`
`the Application herein opposed, continued confusion resulting in damage and injury to Opposer
`
`will occur. Persons familiar with Opposer’s marks would be likely to perceive Applicant’s
`
`goods as associated or affiliated with or sponsored by Opposer. Such confiision inevitably
`
`would result in damage to Opposer.
`
`10.
`
`Registration of Applicant’s Mark would give Applicant prima facie evidence of
`
`the validity and ownership of Applicant’s Mark and of Applicant’s exclusive right to use
`
`Applicant’s Mark, all to the detriment of Opposer.
`
`11. As a result of Applicant’s infringing activities, Opposer and Applicant are currently
`
`involved in trademark infiingement litigation in the United States Federal District Court in the
`
`Northern District of Texas. The aforementioned case is entitled Nitrous Express, Inc. v. Elegant
`
`
`USA LLC, Civil Action #: 7:03-cv-00109. The ownership of the mark that is the subject of this
`
`Opposition is one of the issues to be decided by the federal district court litigation.
`
`12. Wherefore, Opposer prays that this Opposition be sustained and that Application
`
`Serial No. 78/207,394 be denied and refused.
`
`A duplicate copy of this Notice of Opposition is enclosed.
`
`The filing fee of $300 for this opposition is covered by the enclosed check # 1304.
`
`DATEDthis 574 dayof Réruarg ,2oo4.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Nitrous Express, Inc.
`
`

`
`
`
`Notice of Opposition Re: Serial No. 78/207,394
`
`; fig
`
`Thomas P. Phjlbrick
`John E. Russell
`
`Attorneys for Opposer
`
`ALLMARK TRADEMARK
`
`4041 Sugar Maple Drive, Suite A
`Danville, CA 94506
`Telephone: (925)648-4839
`Facsimile: (925)648-4358

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket