throbber
/lTl‘—“=i%
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the Matter of:
`
`Trademark Application Serial No. 7815 5146
`Filed: August 16, 2002
`Mark: VISIONMARK
`
`Published in the Official Gazette: December 9, 2003
`
`Trademark Application Serial No. 7815 5156
`Filed: August 16, 2002
`Mark: VISIONMARK and Design
`Published in the Official Gazette: December 2, 2003
`
`Trademark Application Serial No. 781 55 157
`Filed: August 16, 2002
`Mark: VISIONMARK and Design
`Published in the Official Gazette: December 2, 2003
`
`cenruncm OFMNLIMG
`am this
`.r
`.'~ ,r dance ls _being
`mdwwglytin mm°§iai§é'i=$sm some as
`“mm”°‘”’ """:J?f‘r“.a°.5'.‘.'.’r'u‘33?no. non
`
`addressed to:
`
`AIIXIUIVA 22313-1451.011 0
`
`Visionmark, Inc.,
`
`VisionMark,
`
`Opposer,
`
`Opposition No. 91 160099
`
`Preliminary Response to
`Applicant's Motion for
`Summary Judgment, Stipulating
`to Suspension of Proceedings
`
`Applicant.
`
`Preliminary Response to Applicant's Motion for Summary
`Judgment, Stipulating to Suspension of Proceedings
`
`On December 27, 2004, Applicant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in the
`
`Instant Proceedings. The Motion includes a request, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.127(d), that the
`
`Board suspend all proceedings unrelated to this Motion, including the currently set testimony
`
`periods, pending resolution of the Motion. Opposer stipulates to this request for suspension of
`
`the proceedings, and further requests that the proceedings be suspended effective December 27,
`
`Hllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`U.s, p
`
`1 2-30-2004
`
`auent & TMOfC/TM Mail Rcpt D1. #7
`
`

`
`Trademark Opposition No. 91 160099
`Preliminary Response to Applicant's Motion for Summary Judgment,
`Stipulating to Suspension of Proceedings
`Page 2
`
`2004, to preserve intact Opposer's testimony period, previously scheduled to begin on December
`
`28, 2004.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
`
`Attorneys for Opposer
`
`‘
`By
`Kimberly Gambrel
`
`“‘/
`
`One Dayton Centre
`One South Main Street, Suite 1300
`
`Dayton, OH 45402-2023
`
`Telephone: (937) 449-6437
`Facsimile: (937)449-6405
`E-mail: kimberly.gambrel@dinslaw.com
`
`

`
`Trademark Opposition No. 91 160099
`Preliminary Response to Applicant's Motion for Summary Judgment,
`Stipulating to Suspension of Proceedings
`Page 3
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Preliminary
`
`Response to Applicant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Stipulating to Suspension of
`
`Proceedings, was served upon Applicant by first class mail, postage pre-paid, addressed to:
`
`Diane L. Madenci, Esq., Sean D. Garrison, Esq. and Christopher T. Pierson, Esq., Lewis and
`
`Roca LLP, One South Church Avenue, Suite 700, Tucson, Arizona 85701, on this 28th day of
`
`December 2004.
`
`. ( W
`
`Kimberly Gambre

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket