throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mailed: November 30, 2006
`
`Opposition No. 91161747
`Opposition No. 91163495
`
`P. C. Richard & Son Long
`Island Corp
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cheryl Goodman, Interlocutory Attorney:
`
`SnoWizard Holdings, Inc.
`
`This case now comes up on opposer’s motion to compel,
`
`
`
`filed July 25, 2006 and resubmitted on August 10, 2006 and
`
`applicant’s request, filed August 9, 2006 and August 26,
`
`2006 that the motion not be considered due to it failing to
`
`comply with the Trademark Rules.1 These matters have been
`
`briefed by the parties.
`
`
`
`With regard to the question of whether opposer has
`
`complied with the Trademark Rules regarding length of the
`
`brief and font size, while the Board agrees with applicant
`
`that the originally filed motion to compel was over long,
`
`the Board finds that the resubmitted brief is in compliance
`
`with the Rules. Therefore, the Board will consider the
`
`motion to compel. Additionally, the Board will consider
`
`applicant’s alternative preliminary response to the motion,
`
`
`1 Opposer’s motion to suspend proceedings is moot.
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`filed in the alternative, and no further submissions from
`
`the parties will be required.
`
`
`
`First, to the extent that opposer is seeking documents
`
`through the interrogatories, opposer’s motion to compel is
`
`denied as it is inappropriate to propound a request for
`
`production of documents through interrogatories.
`
`
`
`Second to the extent that opposer seeks written
`
`responses with regard to its document requests, opposer’s
`
`motion to compel is denied as it is inappropriate to
`
`propound an interrogatory request through a request for
`
`production.
`
`Third, to obviate any confidentiality concerns with
`
`regard to any of the responsive documents or any
`
`interrogatory responses, the Board is imposing its
`
`standardized protective agreement on the parties. The
`
`provisions of the attached agreement now bind the parties.2
`
`Accordingly, in view of the imposition of the
`
`standardized protective agreement, applicant’s
`
`confidentiality objections are overruled.3
`
`Fourth, the Board finds opposer’s interrogatory and
`
`document requests relevant, and therefore, to the extent
`
`
`2 As the parties can see from the terms of the protective
`agreement, they are free to agree to modifications or seek
`modifications by motion to the Board. If the parties wish the
`terms of the protective agreement to extend beyond the conclusion
`of this proceeding, the parties should sign the agreement and
`file a copy thereof with the Board.
`
`2
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`that applicant has objected on the basis of relevance, these
`
`objections are overruled.
`
`Turning first to the interrogatories, the Board finds
`
`the following:
`
`Interrogatory No. 8
`
`
`
`
`The identification of documents with regard to an
`
`interrogatory request is neither privileged nor
`
`confidential. Opposer’s motion to compel is granted to the
`
`extent that applicant should provide more detailed
`
`information about the search conducted in 2000 or 2001 and
`
`its form (e.g., search report, company/individual that
`
`conducted the search). The parties are advised that with
`
`regard to a trademark search, comments or opinions of
`
`attorneys would not be discoverable regarding the search,
`
`unless waived. TBMP Section 414.
`
`Interrogatory No. 11
`
`In its motion to compel, opposer has modified this
`
`interrogatory, in view of applicant’s initial response. In
`
`view thereof, opposer’s motion to compel is granted to the
`
`extent that applicant should provide the dollar amount spent
`
`since January 2001 in paying in-house employees for work
`
`involving advertising and promotional expenses.
`
`Interrogatory No. 12
`
`
`3 Customer names and customer lists remain confidential and are
`not discoverable even under the protective agreement. See TBMP
`Section 414.
`
`3
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`Answering interrogatories often requires the party to
`
`identify written documents. The Board does not find this
`
`interrogatory request unduly burdensome. In view thereof,
`
`opposer’s motion to compel a better response to this
`
`interrogatory is granted to the extent that applicant should
`
`identify specific documents containing applicant’s mark.
`
`Interrogatory No. 16
`
`In view of the imposition of the standardized
`
`protective agreement, applicant’s objection to this
`
`interrogatory is overruled. Accordingly, opposer’s motion
`
`to compel a better response to this interrogatory is
`
`granted.
`
`Interrogatory No. 20
`
`The date and identity of an individual who conducted a
`
`search or investigation on behalf of applicant of its
`
`adoption, use, or registrations of its trademarks, service
`
`mark or trade name is discoverable and is not privileged. On
`
`the other hand, comments or opinions of attorneys would not
`
`be discoverable regarding the search or investigation,
`
`unless waived.
`
`In view thereof, opposer’s motion to compel is granted
`
`to the extent that applicant must provide a better response
`
`by identifying the date a search or investigation was
`
`conducted as well as the individual who conducted the search
`
`or investigation. Additionally, if the finding of the
`
`4
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`search is not in the nature of a comment or opinion of an
`
`attorney, this information must be included in the
`
`supplemental response.
`
`Interrogatory No. 26
`
`This interrogatory essentially seeks a privilege log
`
`for any withheld documents from the request for production.
`
`The Board does not find this interrogatory request unduly
`
`burdensome nor does the Board find that this information is
`
`protected by privilege. In view thereof, opposer’s motion
`
`to compel is granted as to this interrogatory request.
`
`Interrogatory No. 27
`
`
`
`The identity of the individuals who participated in the
`
`preparation of responses to these interrogatories is
`
`relevant and not privileged, and applicant has not supported
`
`its objection of undue burden. In view thereof, opposer’s
`
`motion to compel is granted with regard to this request.
`
`
`
`
`
`Interrogatory No. 29
`
`Opposer’s motion to compel is granted to the extent
`
`that applicant should specify the dates in which it has used
`
`the trade channels: “place of business, telephone and the
`
`Internet” for “distributing” its services.
`
`
`
`
`
`Interrogatory No. 30
`
`Applicant’s objection of undue burden is unsupported
`
`and the Board finds this request relevant. In view thereof,
`
`5
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`opposer’s motion to compel a better response to this
`
`interrogatory is granted.
`
`
`
`Interrogatory No. 31
`
`The Board does not find this interrogatory request
`
`unduly burdensome nor does the Board find that this
`
`information is protected by privilege. In view thereof,
`
`opposer’s motion to compel is granted as to this
`
`interrogatory request.
`
`Request for Production of Documents
`
`The Board finds the following with regard to the disputed
`
`requests for production:
`
`Request No. 4
`
`Search reports are discoverable, while the comments or
`
`opinions of an attorney with regard to a search are
`
`privileged and not discoverable, unless waived. In view
`
`thereof, opposer’s motion to compel is granted with regard
`
`to this document request.
`
`Request No. 11 and 43
`
`In addition to these requests being duplicative, the
`
`Board finds that opposer’s document requests seeking “all
`
`documents which applicant intends to rely on in connection
`
`with this proceeding” or “all documents you plan to rely on
`
`in this proceeding” as the equivalent of a request for
`
`identification of trial evidence prior to trial and
`
`improper. In view thereof, opposer’s motion to compel is
`
`6
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`denied as to these requests. See Time Warner Entertainment
`
`Co. v. Jones, 65 USPQ2d 1650, 1656 (TTAB 2002) (“It is
`
`settled that a party in a Board proceeding generally has no
`
`obligation to identify its fact witnesses or other trial
`
`evidence prior to trial.”)
`
` Request Nos. 16 and 33
`
`The Board finds these requests improper to the extent
`
`that these requests seek customer names and customer lists.
`
`See TBMP Section 414. Moreover, with regard to document
`
`request no. 16, the Board finds the wording “all material
`
`forwarded to customers” vague and with regard to document
`
`request no. 33, the Board finds the wording “all documents
`
`and tangible things concerning customers” vague and
`
`overbroad. In view thereof, opposer’s motion to compel is
`
`denied as to these document requests.
`
`Request Nos. 19 and 22, 23 and 24
`
`Inasmuch as opposer has modified these document
`
`requests to seek a representative sample of advertisements,
`
`promotional and marketing material, the Board does not find
`
`these requests unduly burdensome. TBMP Section 414. To the
`
`extent that applicant has not produced all documents
`
`responsive to these requests, opposer’s motion to compel is
`
`granted. If applicant has produced all responsive documents
`
`with regard to these requests (from each year of use),
`
`applicant should so state in writing.
`
`7
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`Document Request No. 25
`
`
`
`The Board is unclear what is meant by the term
`
`“ultimate consumer.” To the extent this request seeks
`
`documents which identify applicant’s customers, opposer’s
`
`motion to compel is denied. To the extent that this request
`
`is not duplicative of Document Request nos. 19, 22, 23 and
`
`24 in that it seeks advertising and promotional material,
`
`opposer’s motion to compel is granted such that applicant
`
`shall provide a representative sample of such documents. If
`
`applicant has provided all responsive documents with regard
`
`to this request, applicant should so state in writing.
`
`Document Request No. 31
`
`Applicant has not supported its objection of undue
`
`burden with regard to this request. In view thereof,
`
`opposer’s motion to compel is granted with regard to this
`
`request.
`
`Document Request No. 34
`
`
`
`Documents regarding the classes of purchasers of
`
`applicant’s services is discoverable and applicant has not
`
`supported its objection that this document request is unduly
`
`burdensome. See TBMP Section 414. In view thereof,
`
`opposer’s motion to compel is granted as to this request.
`
`
`
`Document Request no. 35
`
`To the extent that applicant has not produced all
`
`documents responsive to this request, opposer’s motion to
`
`8
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`compel is granted. The Board notes that applicant states
`
`that the mark is used in conjunction with shaved ice
`
`products related supplies and services but it is unclear
`
`whether applicant produced any responsive documents with
`
`respect to these services. If applicant has produced all
`
`responsive documents with regard to this request (from each
`
`year of use) including those responsive documents used in
`
`conjunction with shaved ice products related supplies and
`
`services, applicant should so state in writing.
`
`Document Request No. 37
`
`Applicant has not supported its objection that this
`
`proposed request is unduly burdensome. The geographic
`
`location where applicant has promoted or sold its services
`
`is discoverable. See TBMP Section 414. In view thereof,
`
`opposer’s motion to compel is granted with respect to this
`
`request.
`
`Document Request No. 38
`
`
`
`Annual sales information is discoverable. TBMP Section
`
`414. In view thereof, opposer’s motion to compel is granted
`
`with respect to this request.
`
`
`
`Document Request No. 46 and 47
`
`These requests appear to be duplicative requests asking
`
`for the same documents. Inasmuch as the burden of obtaining
`
`these documents is the same for both parties and the
`
`documents are equally accessible to both parties on the
`
`9
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`Office’s website, opposer’s motion to compel is denied as
`
`to this request.
`
`
`
`In summary, opposer’s motion to compel is granted to
`
`the extent indicated above with respect to Interrogatory
`
`Nos. 8, 11, 12, 16, 20, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31 and Document
`
`Request nos. 4, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 31, 34, 35 37 and 38 and
`
`denied with respect to Document Request nos. 11, 16, 33, 43,
`
`46 and 47.
`
`Applicant is allowed until THIRTY DAYS from the mailing
`
`date of this order to supplement its interrogatory responses
`
`and to produce responsive documents as set forth above.
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposer’s motion to extend is granted.
`
`Proceedings are resumed. Dates are reset as follows:
`
`D ISC O V ER Y PER IO D TO C LO SE:
`
`30-day testim ony period for party in position of plaintiff
`to close:
`
`30-day testim ony period for party in position of defendant
`to close:
`
`15-day rebuttal testim ony period for party in position of
`plaintiff to close:
`
`
`
`C LO SED
`
`M arch 1, 2007
`
`A pril 30, 2007
`
`June 14, 2007
`
`
`
`In each instance, a copy of the transcript of testimony
`
`together with copies of documentary exhibits, must be served
`
`on the adverse party within thirty days after completion of
`
`the taking of testimony. Trademark Rule 2.l25.
`
`10
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`Briefs shall be filed in accordance with Trademark
`
`Rules 2.128(a) and (b). An oral hearing will be set only
`
`upon request filed as provided by Trademark Rule 2.l29.
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`
`
`PROVISIONS FOR PROTECTING CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION
`REVEALED DURING BOARD PROCEEDING
`
`Information disclosed by any party or non-party witness
`
`during this proceeding may be considered confidential, a
`
`trade secret, or commercially sensitive by a party or
`
`witness. To preserve the confidentiality of the information
`
`so disclosed, the Board hereby orders that the parties be
`
`bound by the provisions within. As used in this order, the
`
`term "information" covers both oral testimony and
`
`documentary material.
`
`TERMS OF ORDER
`
`1) Classes of Protected Information.
`
`The Rules of Practice in Trademark Cases provide that
`
`all inter partes proceeding files, as well as the involved
`
`registration and application files, are open to public
`
`inspection. The terms of this order are not to be used to
`
`undermine public access to files. When appropriate,
`
`however, a party or witness, on its own or through its
`
`attorney, may seek to protect the confidentiality of
`
`information by employing one of the following designations.
`
`Confidential — Material to be shielded by the Board
`
`from public access.
`
`Highly Confidential — Material to be shielded by the
`
`Board from public access and subject to agreed restrictions
`
`12
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`on access even as to the parties and/or their attorneys.
`
`Trade Secret/Commercially Sensitive — Material to be
`
`shielded by the Board from public access, restricted from
`
`any access by the parties, and available for review by
`
`outside counsel for the parties and, subject to the
`
`provisions of paragraph 4 and 5, by independent experts or
`
`consultants for the parties.
`
`2) Information Not to Be Designated as Protected.
`
`Information may not be designated as subject to any
`
`form of protection if it (a) is, or becomes, public
`
`knowledge, as shown by publicly available writings, other
`
`than through violation of the terms of this document; (b) is
`
`acquired by a non-designating party or non-party witness
`
`from a third party lawfully possessing such information and
`
`having no obligation to the owner of the information; (c)
`
`was lawfully possessed by a non-designating party or
`
`nonparty witness prior to the opening of discovery in this
`
`proceeding, and for which there is written evidence of the
`
`lawful possession; (d) is disclosed by a non-designating
`
`party or non-party witness legally compelled to disclose the
`
`information; or (e) is disclosed by a non-designating party
`
`with the approval of the designating party.
`
`3) Access to Protected Information.
`
`The provisions of this order regarding access to
`
`protected information are subject to modification by written
`
`13
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`agreement of the parties or their attorneys, or by motion
`
`filed with and approved by the Board.
`
`Judges, attorneys, and other employees of the Board are
`
`bound to honor the parties’ designations of information as
`
`protected but are not required to sign forms acknowledging
`
`the terms and existence of this order. Court reporters,
`
`stenographers, video technicians or others who may be
`
`employed by the parties or their attorneys to perform
`
`services incidental to this proceeding will be bound only to
`
`the extent that the parties or their attorneys make it a
`
`condition of employment or obtain agreements from such
`
`individuals, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph
`
`4.
`
`Parties are defined as including individuals, officers of
`
`corporations, partners of partnerships, and management
`
`employees of any type of business organization.
`
`(cid:129) Attorneys for parties are defined as including in-house
`
`counsel and outside counsel, including support staff
`
`operating under counsel’s direction, such as paralegals
`
`or legal assistants, secretaries, and any other employees
`
`or independent contractors operating under counsel’s
`
`instruction.
`
`(cid:129) Independent experts or consultants include individuals
`
`retained by a party for purposes related to prosecution
`
`or defense of the proceeding but who are not otherwise
`
`14
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`employees of either the party or its attorneys.
`
`(cid:129) Non-party witnesses include any individuals to be deposed
`
`during discovery or trial, whether willingly or under
`
`subpoena issued by a court of competent jurisdiction over
`
`the witness.
`
`Parties and their attorneys shall have access to
`
`information designated as confidential or highly
`
`confidential, subject to any agreed exceptions.
`
`Outside counsel, but not in-house counsel, shall have
`
`access to information designated as trade
`
`secret/commercially sensitive.
`
`Independent experts or consultants, non-party
`
`witnesses, and any other individual not otherwise
`
`specifically covered by the terms of this order may be
`
`afforded access to confidential or highly confidential
`
`information in accordance with the terms that follow in
`
`paragraph 4. Further, independent experts or consultants
`
`may have access to trade secret/commercially sensitive
`
`information if such access is agreed to by the parties or
`
`ordered by the Board, in accordance with the terms that
`
`follow in paragraph 4 and 5.
`
`4) Disclosure to Any Individual.
`
`Prior to disclosure of protected information by any
`
`party or its attorney to any individual not already provided
`
`access to such information by the terms of this order, the
`
`15
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`individual shall be informed of the existence of this order
`
`and provided with a copy to read. The individual will then
`
`be required to certify in writing that the order has been
`
`read and understood and that the terms shall be binding on
`
`the individual. No individual shall receive any protected
`
`information until the party or attorney proposing to
`
`disclose the information has received the signed
`
`certification from the individual. A form for such
`
`certification is attached to this order. The party or
`
`attorney receiving the completed form shall retain the
`
`original.
`
`5) Disclosure to Independent Experts or Consultants.
`
`In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph 4,
`
`any party or attorney proposing to share disclosed
`
`information with an independent expert or consultant must
`
`also notify the party which designated the information as
`
`protected. Notification must be personally served or
`
`forwarded by certified mail, return receipt requested, and
`
`shall provide notice of the name, address, occupation and
`
`professional background of the expert or independent
`
`consultant.
`
`The party or its attorney receiving the notice shall
`
`have ten (10) business days to object to disclosure to the
`
`expert or independent consultant. If objection is made,
`
`then the parties must negotiate the issue before raising the
`
`16
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`issue before the Board. If the parties are unable to settle
`
`their dispute, then it shall be the obligation of the party
`
`or attorney proposing disclosure to bring the matter before
`
`the Board with an explanation of the need for disclosure and
`
`a report on the efforts the parties have made to settle
`
`their dispute. The party objecting to disclosure will be
`
`expected to respond with its arguments against disclosure or
`
`its objections will be deemed waived.
`
`6) Responses to Written Discovery.
`
`Responses to interrogatories under Federal Rule 33 and
`
`requests for admissions under Federal Rule 36, and which the
`
`responding party reasonably believes to contain protected
`
`information shall be prominently stamped or marked with the
`
`appropriate designation from paragraph 1. Any inadvertent
`
`disclosure without appropriate designation shall be remedied
`
`as soon as the disclosing party learns of its error, by
`
`informing all adverse parties, in writing, of the error.
`
`The parties should inform the Board only if necessary
`
`because of the filing of protected information not in
`
`accordance with the provisions of paragraph 12.
`
`7) Production of Documents.
`
`If a party responds to requests for production under
`
`Federal Rule 34 by making copies and forwarding the copies
`
`to the inquiring party, then the copies shall be prominently
`
`stamped or marked, as necessary, with the appropriate
`
`17
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`designation from paragraph 1. If the responding party makes
`
`documents available for inspection and copying by the
`
`inquiring party, all documents shall be considered protected
`
`during the course of inspection. After the inquiring party
`
`informs the responding party what documents are to be
`
`copied, the responding party will be responsible for
`
`prominently stamping or marking the copies with the
`
`appropriate designation from paragraph 1. Any inadvertent
`
`disclosure without appropriate designation shall be remedied
`
`as soon as the disclosing party learns of its error, by
`
`informing all adverse parties, in writing, of the error.
`
`The parties should inform the Board only if necessary
`
`because of the filing of protected information not in
`
`accordance with the provisions of paragraph 12.
`
`8) Depositions.
`
`Protected documents produced during a discovery
`
`deposition, or offered into evidence during a testimony
`
`deposition shall be orally noted as such by the producing or
`
`offering party at the outset of any discussion of the
`
`document or information contained in the document. In
`
`addition, the documents must be prominently stamped or
`
`marked with the appropriate designation.
`
`During discussion of any non-documentary protected
`
`information, the interested party shall make oral note of
`
`the protected nature of the information.
`
`18
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`The transcript of any deposition and all exhibits or
`
`attachments shall be considered protected for 30 days
`
`following the date of service of the transcript by the party
`
`that took the deposition. During that 30-day period, either
`
`party may designate the portions of the transcript, and any
`
`specific exhibits or attachments that are to be treated as
`
`protected, by electing the appropriate designation from
`
`paragraph 1. Appropriate stampings or markings should be
`
`made during this time. If no such designations are made,
`
`then the entire transcript and exhibits will be considered
`
`unprotected.
`
`9) Filing Notices of Reliance.
`
`When a party or its attorney files a notice of reliance
`
`during the party’s testimony period, the party or attorney
`
`is bound to honor designations made by the adverse party or
`
`attorney, or non-party witness, who disclosed the
`
`information, so as to maintain the protected status of the
`
`information.
`
`10) Briefs.
`
`When filing briefs, memoranda, or declarations in
`
`support of a motion, or briefs at final hearing, the
`
`portions of these filings that discuss protected
`
`information, whether information of the filing party, or any
`
`adverse party, or any non-party witness, should be redacted.
`
`19
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`The rule of reasonableness for redaction is discussed in
`
`paragraph 12 of this order.
`
`11) Handling of Protected Information.
`
`Disclosure of information protected under the terms of
`
`this order is intended only to facilitate the prosecution or
`
`defense of this case. The recipient of any protected
`
`information disclosed in accordance with the terms of this
`
`order is obligated to maintain the confidentiality of the
`
`information and shall exercise reasonable care in handling,
`
`storing, using or disseminating the information.
`
`12) Redaction; Filing Material With the Board.
`
`When a party or attorney must file protected
`
`information with the Board, or a brief that discusses such
`
`information, the protected information or portion of the
`
`brief discussing the same should be redacted from the
`
`remainder. A rule of reasonableness should dictate how
`
`redaction is effected.
`
`Redaction can entail merely covering a portion of a
`
`page of material when it is copied in anticipation of filing
`
`but can also entail the more extreme measure of simply
`
`filing the entire page under seal as one that contains
`
`primarily confidential material. If only a sentence or
`
`short paragraph of a page of material is confidential,
`
`covering that material when the page is copied would be
`
`appropriate. In contrast, if most of the material on the
`
`20
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`page is confidential, then filing the entire page under seal
`
`would be more reasonable, even if some small quantity of
`
`non-confidential material is then withheld from the public
`
`record. Likewise, when a multi-page document is in issue,
`
`reasonableness would dictate that redaction of the portions
`
`or pages containing confidential material be effected when
`
`only some small number of pages contain such material. In
`
`contrast, if almost every page of the document contains some
`
`confidential material, it may be more reasonable to simply
`
`submit the entire document under seal. Occasions when a
`
`whole document or brief must be submitted under seal should
`
`be very rare.
`
`Protected information, and pleadings, briefs or
`
`memoranda that reproduce, discuss or paraphrase such
`
`information, shall be filed with the Board under seal. The
`
`envelopes or containers shall be prominently stamped or
`
`marked with a legend in substantially the following form:
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`This envelope contains documents or information that are
`subject to a protective order or agreement. The
`confidentiality of the material is to be maintained and the
`envelope is not to be opened, or the contents revealed to
`any individual, except by order of the Board.
`
`13) Acceptance of Information; Inadvertent Disclosure.
`
`Acceptance by a party or its attorney of information
`
`disclosed under designation as protected shall not
`
`constitute an admission that the information is, in fact,
`
`21
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`entitled to protection. Inadvertent disclosure of
`
`information which the disclosing party intended to designate
`
`as protected shall not constitute waiver of any right to
`
`claim the information as protected upon discovery of the
`
`error.
`
`14) Challenges to Designations of Information as
`Protected.
`
`If the parties or their attorneys disagree as to
`
`whether certain information should be protected, they are
`
`obligated to negotiate in good faith regarding the
`
`designation by the disclosing party. If the parties are
`
`unable to resolve their differences, the party challenging
`
`the designation may make a motion before the Board seeking a
`
`determination of the status of the information.
`
`A challenge to the designation of information as
`
`protected must be made substantially contemporaneous with
`
`the designation, or as soon as practicable after the basis
`
`for challenge is known. When a challenge is made long after
`
`a designation of information as protected, the challenging
`
`party will be expected to show why it could not have made
`
`the challenge at an earlier time.
`
`The party designating information as protected will,
`
`when its designation is timely challenged, bear the ultimate
`
`burden of proving that the information should be protected.
`
`15) Board’s Jurisdiction; Handling of Materials After
`Termination.
`
`22
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`The Board’s jurisdiction over the parties and their
`
`attorneys ends when this proceeding is terminated. A
`
`proceeding is terminated only after a final order is entered
`
`and either all appellate proceedings have been resolved or
`
`the time for filing an appeal has passed without filing of
`
`any appeal.
`
`The parties may agree that archival copies of evidence
`
`and briefs may be retained, subject to compliance with
`
`agreed safeguards. Otherwise, within 30 days after the
`
`final termination of this proceeding, the parties and their
`
`attorneys shall return to each disclosing party the
`
`protected information disclosed during the proceeding, and
`
`shall include any briefs, memoranda, summaries, and the
`
`like, which discuss or in any way refer to such information.
`
`In the alternative, the disclosing party or its attorney may
`
`make a written request that such materials be destroyed
`
`rather than returned.
`
`16) Other Rights of the Parties and Attorneys.
`
`This order shall not preclude the parties or their
`
`attorneys from making any applicable claims of privilege
`
`during discovery or at trial. Nor shall the order preclude
`
`the filing of any motion with the Board for relief from a
`
`particular provision of this order or for additional
`
`protections not provided by this order.
`
`The foregoing provisions are hereby entered as an order
`
`23
`
`

`
`Opposition No. 91161747 and 91163495
`
`of the Board, and shall be effective upon the mailing date
`
`indicated above.
`
`
`
`.oOo.
`
`24

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket