throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL & APPEAL BOARD
`
`LEO STOLLER
`CENTRAL MFG. CO.
`
`Opposition No.:
`
`91170957
`
`7115 W. North Avenue #272
`
`Mark:
`
`STEALTH
`
`Oak Park, IL. 60302
`
`vs.
`
`Opposer,
`
`Application No.:
`
`75/718,440
`
`HEPA CORPORATION
`
`3071 E. Coronado Street
`
`Filed:
`
`June 1, 1999
`
`International Class: 011
`
`Anaheim, CA 92806
`
`Applicant.
`
`Box TTAB/NO FEE
`
`Published:
`
`November 9, 2004
`
`APPLICANT’S REPLY AND OPPOSITION TO
`
`“OPPOSER’S PRELIMINARY RESPONSE TO APPLlCANT’S MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`AND FOR lNSTRUCTIONS”
`
`It may be that Opposer’s misnamed Preliminary Response, etc.
`
`is a
`
`request for an extension of time to respond to App|icant’s Motion for Summary
`
`Judgment in that on page 2 in the WHEREFORE paragraph Opposer seeks 30
`
`days from whenever the Board decides AppIicant’s Motions to Strike and to
`
`Dismiss and Motion for a More Definite Statement to respond to App|icant’s
`
`Motion for Summary Judgment. Applicant opposes this possible request for an
`
`extension of time to respond as yet another delaying tactic by this notorious
`
`abuser of TTAB proceedings. The Board has itself noted Opposer’s abusive and
`
`dilatory tactics. See Board's Sanctions Order of July 14, 2006, e.g. Footnote 2,
`
`against Leo Stoller.
`
`T
`
`1
`
`08-10-2006
`U.S. Patent & TMOfc/TM Mail Rcpt Dt. # :1.
`
`
`
`

`
`Or it may be that Opposer is asking the Board to confirm that it has no
`
`obligation to respond because proceedings were ispo facto suspended when the
`
`first two motions were filed and thus before the Summary Judgment motion was
`
`filed. Opposer seems to assume this but why file any response in that case?
`
`Or it may more likely be that Opposer has no response and has simply
`
`failed to respond on the merits to Applicant's Motion for Summary Judgment.
`
`Wherefore, granting of the Applicant's Motion for Summary Judgment is
`
`requested.
`
`Date:
`
`8 '6 iOLo
`
`
`
`(818) 952-3414
`(818) 952-3420
`
`Telephone No.
`Facsimile No.
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
`I, Louis J. Bachand, hereby certify that on August 8, 2006, the foregoing
`correspondence is being deposited with the United States Postal Service as first
`class mail, with sufficient postage fully prepaid thereon, in an envelope
`addressed to:
`
`TTAB/NO FEE
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`P.O. Box 1451
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I, Louis J. Bachand, hereby certify that on August 8, 2006, the foregoing
`correspondence was deposited with the United States Postal Service as first
`class mail, with sufficient postage fully prepaid thereon, in an envelope
`addressed to and served upon:
`
`Leo Stoller
`President
`
`Central Mfg. Co.
`7115 W. North I
`
`-
`
`’
`
`Oak Park, I
`
`6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket