throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA255102
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`12/15/2008
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`Granted to Date
`of previous
`extension
`Address
`
`JuanPGarciabueno
`12/14/2008
`
`180 Mace St.Suite A4
`Chula Vista, CA 91911
`UNITED STATES
`
`Attorney
`information
`
`Justin R. Young
`DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED
`160 North Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60606
`UNITED STATES
`tmlaw@dineff.com Phone:312 338 1000
`Applicant Information
`
`77278809
`12/15/2008
`
`Application No
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`Applicant
`
`Publication date
`Opposition
`Period Ends
`ROMERO MARQUEZ, GUSTAVO
`VALLE DE SANTANA 213
`TLAJOMULCO DE ZU?IGA, 45640
`MEXICO
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`06/17/2008
`12/14/2008
`
`Class 033. First Use: 2008/01/01 First Use In Commerce: 2008/01/01
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Tequila
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`False suggestion of a connection
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`Torres v. Cantine Torresella S.r.l.Fraud
`
`Trademark Act section 2(a)
`Trademark Act section 2(d)
`808 F.2d 46, 1 USPQ2d 1483 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
`
`Marks Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Application/
`Registration No.
`Registration Date
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`Application Date
`
`NONE
`
`

`
`Design Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`U.S. Application/
`Registration No.
`Registration Date
`Word Mark
`Goods/Services
`
`Tequila
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`AMORCITO
`Tequila
`
`Application Date
`
`NONE
`
`Attachments
`
`Drawing - b&w.jpg
`opposition amorcito.pdf ( 7 pages )(203569 bytes )
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`record by First Class Mail on this date.
`
`Signature
`Name
`Date
`
`/justinryoung/
`Justin R. Young
`12/15/2008
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the matter of application Serial No. 77/278809
`For the mark AMORCITO & BOTTLE HEART DESIGN
`
`Published in the "Official Gazette" of June 17, 2008
`
`Juan Pablo Garciabueno,
`
`Opposer,
`
`V.
`
`Gustavo Romero Marquez
`
`Applicant,
` )
`
`\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/\_/
`
`Opposition No.
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`
`2900 Crystal Drive
`Arlington, Virginia 22202-3513
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Juan Pablo Garciabueno, (hereinafter referred to as “Opposer”), a Mexican citizen,
`
`having its principal place of business at 180 Mace St., Suite A4, Chula Vista, CA 91911,
`
`United States of America, believes that he will be damaged by the registration of the mark
`
`“AMORCITO & BOTTLE HEART DESIGN”, shown in Serial Number 77/278809 in Class
`
`33, and hereby opposes same in accordance with 15 U.S.C. § 1063 and 37 C.F.R. § 2.101.
`
`

`
`As grounds for the opposition, Opposer alleges as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Applicant seeks to register “AMORCITO & BOTTLE HEART DESIGN” as a
`
`trademark for “tequila” in International Class 33, as evidenced by the publication of said mark
`
`in the Ojficial Gazette of the June 17, 2008 issue.
`
`2.
`
`Applicant’s Application No. 77/278809 for the mark “AMORCITO & BOTTLE
`
`HEART DESIGN” was filed on September 13, 2007 under Section l(b), which contained a
`
`Declaration that stated in part that the signatory “believes applicant to be entitled to use such
`
`mark in commerce;
`
`to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm,
`
`corporation, or association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical
`
`form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely, when used on or in
`
`connection with the goods/services of such other person,
`
`to cause confusion, or to cause
`
`mistake, or to deceive.”
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, on September 13, 2007 Applicant was fully aware of
`
`Opposer’s prior trademark rights, as Applicant and Opposer had been engaged in negotiations
`
`involving the commercialization of tequila under Opposer’s marks “AMORCITO” and
`
`“BOTTLE HEART DESIGN”. Accordingly, the allegations set forth in the Declaration that
`
`accompanied the Application No. 77/278809 were fraudulent allegations made with the intent
`
`of deceiving the Patent and Trademark Office into accepting the application.
`
`4.
`
`Applicant filed an Amendment to Allege Use on April 4, 2008, which contained a
`
`statement that the mark “AMORCITO & BOTTLE HEART DESIGN” “was first used by the
`
`Applicant, or Applicant's related company,
`
`licensee, or predecessor in interest at least as
`
`early as 01/01/2008, and first used in commerce at least as early as 01/01/2008, and is now in
`
`use in such commerce.”
`
`

`
`5.
`
`Upon information and belief the mark “AMORCITO & BOTTLE HEART
`
`DESIGN” was not in use by Applicant, its predecessor in title or any licensee of Applicant for
`
`tequila. Accordingly, the above—identified statements contained in the Amendment to Allege
`
`Use, together with the accompanying declaration, were fraudulent allegations made with the
`
`intent of deceiving the Patent and Trademark Office into accepting the application.
`
`6.
`
`On the basis of the actions pleaded in the preceding paragraphs, Applicant has
`
`committed fraud against the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in violation of 15 U.S.C.
`
`§l064(3).
`
`7.
`
`Opposer manufactures, markets and sells “tequila” and other related goods and
`
`services, and has done so for many years. Opposer has been using the mark “BOTTLE
`
`HEART DESIGN”, as shown in Exhibit “A”, since at least as early as November 2006 in
`
`Mexico and May 2007 in the United States. Moreover, Opposer has been using the mark
`
`“AMORCITO” since at least as early as February 2007 in Mexico and holds the Mexican
`
`Registration No. 979590 for same mark, which was granted on April 10, 2007.
`
`8.
`
`There is no issue as to priority. The filing date of Applicant’s mark and the alleged
`
`first use date in commerce of Applicant’s mark are subsequent to the first use date of
`
`Opposer’s mark “BOTTLE HEART DESIGN”, and subsequent to the introduction and use of
`
`Opposer’s mark to the marketplace and the purchasing public.
`
`9.
`
`Applicant’s application to register the mark “AMORCITO & BOTTLE HEART
`
`DESIGN” is Without Opposer’s consent or permission.
`
`

`
`10. The mark “AMORCITO & BOTTLE HEART DESIGN” that Applicant seeks to
`
`register so closely resembles Opposer’s mark “BOTTLE HEART DESIGN” in appearance,
`
`sound, and meaning that the use and registration thereof is likely to create the same overall
`
`impression on consumers and to cause confusion, mistake, and deception as to the source or
`
`origin of Applicant’s goods and will
`
`injure and damage Opposer and the goodwill and
`
`reputation symbolized by the Opposer’s mark.
`
`ll. Applicant’s goods are identical to Opposer’s goods that the public is likely to be
`
`confused,
`
`to be deceived, and to assume erroneously that Applicant’s goods are those of
`
`Opposer, or that Applicant is in some way connected or affiliated with, or sponsored by
`
`Opposer, all to Opposer’s irreparable damage.
`
`12. Applicant’s mark “AMORCITO & BOTTLE HEART DESIGN” will be marketed
`
`and sold to the same consumers and through the same trade channels than Opposer’s mark
`
`“BOTTLE HEART DESIGN”,
`
`therefore,
`
`is likely to cause confusion or mistake, or to
`
`deceive, within the meaning of Section §2(d) of the Trademark Act.
`
`13. Applicant’s mark “AMORCITO & BOTTLE HEART DESIGN” so closely
`
`resembles Opposer’s mark “BOTTLE HEART DESIGN” that it is deceptive in that it falsely
`
`suggests a connection with or approval by Opposer, in violation of Section §2(a) of the
`
`Trademark Act. Indeed, Applicant’s mark points uniquely to Opposer, and purchasers will
`
`assume that goods offered under Applicant’s alleged mark are connected with or approved by
`
`Opposer.
`
`14.
`
`If Applicant is permitted to use and register its mark for its goods, as specified in
`
`the application herein opposed, confusion resulting in damage and injury to Opposer will
`
`likely occur.
`
`

`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer respectfully requests that this opposition be sustained and that
`
`Application Serial No. 77/278809 be refused, and for such other and further relief as the
`
`Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks shall deem proper and required by the Principals of
`
`Equity and Good Conscience.
`
`Juan Pablo Garciabueno
`
`By and through its attorney
`
`
`
`Justin R. Young
`DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED
`
`160 N. Wacker
`
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Phone (312) 338- 1000
`
`Facsimile (312) 338-1500
`tmlaw@dineff.com
`
`Dated: December 15, 2008
`
`

`
`EXHIBIT “A”
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF OPPOSITION was served on
`
`this date December 16, 2008 upon Applicant’s Attorney of Record at its address of record by
`
`First—Class mail, postage prepaid, as follows:
`
`Mr. Alejandro Malacara
`82 Chapel Hill Cir
`San Antonio, TX 78240-3903
`
`
`
`Justin R. Young
`DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED
`
`160 N. Wacker Drive .
`
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`(312) 338 -1000

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket