`ESTTA442422
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`11/22/2011
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91188397
`Plaintiff
`Bayer HealthCare LLC
`DAVID BEEMAN
`PATTISHALL McAULIFFE NEWBURY ET AL
`311 SOURTH WACKER DRIVE
`CHICAGO, IL 60606
`UNITED STATES
`rig@pattishall.com, pb@pattishall.com, stl@pattishall.com, lrb@pattishall.com
`Stipulated/Consent Motion to Extend
`David Beeman
`jnw@pattishall.com, pb@pattishall.com, dmb@pattishall.com,
`lrb@pattishall.com
`/David Beeman/
`11/22/2011
`Consented Motion Opp No 91188397.PDF ( 4 pages )(30548 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In the Matter of Application Serial No. 77-454,816: NEODIAGNOSTIX
`Published in the Official Gazette of September 16, 2008
`
`Opp. No. 91188397
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NEODIAGNOSTIX, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CONSENTED MOTION TO EXTEND REMAINING
`
`DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND TRIAL PERIODS
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Trademark Rule 2.120(a)(2) and the Board's October 6, 2011 Order, Opposer,
`
`with Applicant's consent, requests that the Board extend the remaining discovery deadlines and
`
`trial periods by thirty (30) days to allow the parties to discuss settlement and conclude discovery.
`
`The parties are engaged in settlement negotiations and, pending the outcome of these
`
`negotiations, may require discovery to follow-up on recently conducted depositions. In support
`
`of this request, the parties state as follows:
`
`1.
`
`On September 26, 2011, Opposer, with Applicant's consent, filed a Consented
`
`Motion to Extend Remaining Discovery Deadlines and Trial Periods to allow the parties to
`
`negotiate settlement and complete potential discovery. The Board granted the motion on
`
`October 6, 2011, and extended the remaining discovery deadlines through November 26, 2011.
`
`2.
`
`Opposer deposed Applicant's Rule 30(b)(6) designee on August 9, 2011.
`
`Applicant deposed Opposer's Rule 30(b)(6) designee on August 10, 2011. The parties also have
`
`exchanged written discovery and produced documents.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`After the depositions, the parties renewed settlement negotiations. To this end,
`
`the parties are have prepared and are reviewing a written agreement that could resolve all
`
`remaining issues in dispute.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`Currently, fact discovery closes on November 26, 2011.
`
`The parties now require additional time to conduct settlement negotiations and,
`
`pending the outcome of the discussions, complete any remaining discovery in this proceeding.
`
`6.
`
`On March 20, 2009, the parties submitted a Stipulated Motion to Forgo Initial
`
`Disclosures and Modify Discovery Dates. In the motion, the parties requested the Board permit
`
`them to make expert disclosures and conduct expert discovery after fact discovery closes, in the
`
`event that fact discovery revealed that expert discovery was unnecessary in the case. The parties
`
`proposed a discovery timeline consisting of a date for fact discovery to close, followed by a due
`
`date for expert disclosures, and concluding with a date for expert discovery to close.
`
`7.
`
`On March 25, 2009, the Board approved the modified discovery dates.
`
`Subsequently, on October 6, 2011, the Board reset the discovery dates and rescheduled the
`
`expert disclosure date prior to the close of fact discovery.
`
`8.
`
`Consistent with the Board's order of March 25, 2009, the parties respectfully
`
`request that the expert disclosure deadline be rescheduled until after the close of fact discovery.
`
`9.
`
`Counsel for Applicant consented to this request in an e-mail to counsel for
`
`Opposer on November 21, 2011.
`
`10.
`
`To allow the parties to complete necessary discovery, and consistent with the
`
`Board’s prior orders, the parties now respectfully request that the remaining deadlines and trial
`
`periods be extended by thirty (30) days as follows:
`
`Fact Discovery Closes:
`Expert Discovery Closes:
`
`December 26, 2011
`January 25, 2012
`
`
`
`Plaintiff’s Pretrial Disclosures Due:
`Plaintiff’s 30-day Trial Period Ends:
`Defendant’s Pretrial Disclosures Due:
`Defendant’s 30-day Trial Period Ends:
`Plaintiff’s Rebuttal Disclosures Due:
`Plaintiff’s 15-day Rebuttal Period Ends:
`
`
`March 10, 2012
`April 24, 2012
`May 9, 2012
`June 23, 2012
`July 8, 2012
`August 7, 2012
`
`
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Opposer respectfully requests that the Board grant this
`
`consented motion and reset the discovery deadlines and trial periods to the dates set forth above.
`
`PATTISHALL, McAULIFFE, NEWBURY,
`
` HILLIARD & GERALDSON LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`By
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/David Beeman /
`Joseph N. Welch, II
`Phillip Barengolts
`David Beeman
`311 South Wacker Drive
`Suite 5000
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`(312) 554-8000
`
`Attorneys for Opposer Bayer HealthCare LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 22, 2011
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing CONSENTED MOTION TO EXTEND
`
`REMAINING DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND TRIAL PERIODS was served upon Sherry
`
`H. Flax, Saul Ewing LLP, 500 E. Pratt Street, Suite 900, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-3170, via
`
`electronic mail at the address SFlax@saul.com, by agreement of the parties, on November 22,
`
`2011.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/David Beeman/
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
`
`
`I hereby certify that this CONSENTED MOTION TO EXTEND REMAINING
`
`DISCOVERY DEADLINES AND TRIAL PERIODS is being electronically transmitted to the
`
`Patent and Trademark Office on November 22, 2011.
`
`
`
`/David Beeman/



