throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA291259
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`06/23/2009
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91190234
`Defendant
`FRATELLI RE S.P.A.
`G. MATHEW LOMBARD
`LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP
`230 PARK AVENUE, 10TH FLOOR
`NEW YORK, NY 10169
`UNITED STATES
`mail@lgtrademark.com
`Motion to Suspend for Settlement Discussions
`G. Mathew Lombard
`mlombard@lgtrademark.com
`/g mathew lombard/
`06/23/2009
`MOTION TO SUSPEND.pdf ( 3 pages )(31686 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
` Opposition No. 91190234
`
`
`Atty Ref.: 109.0903
`
`
`
` |
`
`
`
`
`
`APX ALARM SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. |
`
`
`
`
`
`
` |
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
` |
`
`
`
`
`
`
` |
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
` |
`
`
`
`
`
` |
`
`FRATELLI RE S.P.A.
`
`
` |
`
`
`
`
`
`
` |
`
`
`
`Applicant.
` |
`
` |
`
`MOTION TO SUSPEND FOR 90 DAYS
`FOR SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS WITH CONSENT
`
`For the reasons that follow, Applicant respectfully requests that the Board
`
`
`
`
`
`SUSPEND the pending opposition for 90 days to allow the parties to engage in
`
`settlement discussions.
`
`
`
`The Notice of Opposition was filed on May 13, 2009 and the Board, in an order
`
`dated May 15, 2009, set Applicant’s time to Answer on June 24, 2009. Counsel for
`
`Applicant and counsel for Opposer have been in contact and believe that this matter may
`
`be resolved between the parties without further resort to inter partes proceedings.
`
`
`
`Accordingly, on June 22, 2009, counsel of record for Opposer, Grant R. Clayton,
`
`consented to the requested extension by email.
`
`
`
`In view of the foregoing, Applicant respectfully requests that the instant
`
`proceeding be SUSPENDED for 90 days to allow the parties to engage in settlement
`
`

`
`discussions. Moreover, Applicant respectfully request that the relevant trial dates be reset
`
`accordingly at the end of the suspension period.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FRATELLI RE SPA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________
`G. Mathew Lombard
`Darren M. Geliebter
`LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`10th Floor
`New York, NY 10169
`
`Attorneys for Applicant
`
`
`
`Dated: June 23, 2009
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` I
`
` hereby certify that a true and correct copy of MOTION TO SUSPEND FOR 90 DAYS
`FOR SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS WITH CONSENT was served on counsel for Opposer at the
`following address of record, by first class mail, postage prepaid, this 23rd day of June
`2009:
`
`
`
`
`
`Grant R. Clayton
`CLAYTON, HOWARTH & CANNON, P.C.
`P.O. Box 1909
`Sandy, UT 84091
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________
`G. Mathew Lombard

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket