TTAB
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the matter of trademark application Serial No. 77/689,769
`For the mark: TRILOBITE
`Published in the Official Gazette on August 18, 2009
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`))
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`)L
`
`
`
`Peter Turdin, Jr. (AKA Peter Bradley)
`
`Opposer
`
`v.
`
`Trilobite, Ltd.
`Applicant
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Peter Turdin Jr. (A.k.a. Peter Bradley), a U.S. Citizen and Resident of the State of
`
`Connecticut, having a place of business at Suite #8, 76 Bellevue Avenue, Bristol, Connecticut
`
`06010 (hereinafter “Opposer”) believes that he will be damaged by the registration of the
`
`trademark TRILOBITE as shown in Application Serial No. 77/689,769 filed on March 12,
`
`2009 for “audio recording and production,” in International Class 41, (hereinafter
`
`“Applicant’s Services”), and hereby opposes same.
`
`The specific grounds for opposition are as follows:
`10/2112009 SHILSONI 00000007 ?7689?69
`
`01 FC:640E
`
`300.00 0?
`
`1
`
`Hllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`10-16-2009
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the matter of trademark application Serial No. 77/689,769
`For the mark: TRILOBITE
`Published in the Official Gazette on August 18, 2009
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`))
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`)L
`
`
`
`Peter Turdin, Jr. (AKA Peter Bradley)
`
`Opposer
`
`v.
`
`Trilobite, Ltd.
`Applicant
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Peter Turdin Jr. (A.k.a. Peter Bradley), a U.S. Citizen and Resident of the State of
`
`Connecticut, having a place of business at Suite #8, 76 Bellevue Avenue, Bristol, Connecticut
`
`06010 (hereinafter “Opposer”) believes that he will be damaged by the registration of the
`
`trademark TRILOBITE as shown in Application Serial No. 77/689,769 filed on March 12,
`
`2009 for “audio recording and production,” in International Class 41, (hereinafter
`
`“Applicant’s Services”), and hereby opposes same.
`
`The specific grounds for opposition are as follows:
`10/2112009 SHILSONI 00000007 ?7689?69
`
`01 FC:640E
`
`300.00 0?
`
`1
`
`Hllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`10-16-2009
`
`
`
`On or about March 12, 2009, Applicant, Trilobite, Ltd., a corporation organized
`
`under the laws of the State of Georgia and having its place of business at 2811
`
`Kersdale Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44124, filed an application in the U.S. Patent and
`
`Trademark Office, Serial No. 77/689,769, seeking registration on the Principal
`
`Register of the trademark TRILOBITE for “audio recording and production,” in
`
`International Class 41.
`
`Applicant seeks to register TRILOBITE for “audio recording and production,” in
`
`International Class 41, as evidenced by the publication of said mark in the Ofiicial
`
`Gazette of August 18, 2009.
`
`Opposer is the owner of United States Trademark Application Serial No.
`
`77/706,923 for TRILOBITE PICTURES for “motion picture film production and
`
`animation services,” in International Class 41.
`
`Since as early as January of 2000, Opposer has used its TRILOBITE PICTURES
`
`mark for his services, namely, “motion picture film production and animation
`
`services,” in International Class 41.
`
`Since as early as January of 2000, Opposer has used his TRILOBITE PICTURES
`
`
`
`mark for his services, namely, “motion picture film production and animation
`
`services,” in International Class 41. in interstate commerce.
`
`Opposer has continuously used his Trademark in the United States for Opposer’s
`
`Services namely, “motion picture film production and animation services,” in
`
`International Class 41.
`
`Applicant never was entitled to appropriate or apply to register the designation
`
`TRILOBITE for Applicant’s Services which are set forth in Application Serial No.
`
`77689769 because Applicant only used TRILOBITE as a trade name and not a
`
`trademark or service mark.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant has made only a token use of the mark
`
`TRILOBITE for the services listed in its application, namely, “audio recording and
`
`production” and not actual meaningful commercial use.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant was a dissolved entity in the State of
`
`Georgia effective May 16, 2008 and was still dissolved as of the time of filing its
`
`application on March 12, 2009. (See Exhibit A)
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant is not the owner of the trademark shown in
`
`application Serial No. 77/689,769 since Applicant did not exist as the legal entity it
`
`
`
`purported itself to be at the time of filing and therefore, Applicant did not have the
`
`right to file the application since Applicant did not exist at the time of filing,
`
`therefore the application is void ab initio. (See Exhibit A)
`
`11.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant is not the true owner of the purported
`
`trademark shown in application Serial No. 77/689,769 and Applicant did not own
`
`the purported trademark TRILOBITE as of the date of filing.
`
`12.
`
`Opposer will be damaged by the use and registration of TRILOBITE by Applicant
`
`for Applicant’s Services because persons in the trade and the public will
`
`mistakenly assume that Applicant’s Services are associated, endorsed by, affiliated
`
`with, or in some other way related to or sponsored by Opposer, to the detriment of
`
`Opposer. As such Applicant’s mark is not entitled to registration.
`
`13.
`
`Registration of TRILOBITE is barred by the provisions of the Lanham Act because
`
`Applicant’s mark consists of or comprises a mark which so resembles a mark or
`
`trade name previously used in the United States by another and not abandoned, as
`
`to be likely, when used on or in connection with Applicant’s Services, to cause
`
`confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or
`
`association of the Applicant and the Applicant’s Services with the Opposer and the
`
`Opposer’s services, or alternatively, to cause dilution of Opposer’s Trademark.
`
`
`
`14.
`
`Opposer’s Trademark TRILOBITE PICTURES and Applicant’s alleged mark
`
`TRILOBITE are identical in sight, sound, connotation and commercial impression.
`
`15.
`
`Opposer would be injured by the granting to Applicant of a Certificate of
`
`Registration for the mark TRILOBITE because Applicant would obtain thereby at
`
`least a prima facie exclusive right to use such mark. Such registration would be a
`
`source of damage and injury to Opposer and Opposer’s clients.
`
`16.
`
`The statutory fee of three hundred dollars ($300) is enclosed herewith.
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer prays that this Opposition be sustained and that the registration
`
`sought in Application Serial No. 77/689,769 be denied.
`
`Dated: October 16, 2009
`
`Respectfiilly submitted,
`
`By
`
`3/
`
`\
`
`L
`
`z
`
`Julianne B. Bochinski
`
`"
`
`'
`
`l(.\_._g N
`
`—
`
`.) \
`
`Attorney for Opposer
`Law Office of Julianne B. Bochinski
`
`PO Box 2723
`
`Westport, CT 06880
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on October 16, 2009 she caused a true and correct copy
`of the foregoing NOTICE OF OPPOSITION to be served upon Applicant by First Class Mail.
`Postage pre-paid, at the following address:
`
`George F. Voinovich
`Brennan, Manna & Diamond
`Attn: IP Docket
`
`75 East Market Street
`Akron OH 44308
`
`Dated: October 16,2009
`
`~\_‘
`
`‘L/La O"
`5
`,0; '~
`By Julianne B. Bochinski
`
`I
`
`>
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`In re Application of: Trilobite, Ltd..
`
`Serial No.: 77/689,769
`
`Mailing Date: October 16, 2009
`
`Mark: TRILOBITE
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks:
`Box: TTAB
`P.O. Box 1451
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
`
`I hereby certify that the following attached correspondence comprising:
`
`--——-Notice of Opposition
`
`—————Fee of $300
`
`-———Acknowledgement post card
`
`Is being deposited with the United States Postal Service as “First Class Mail postage” prepaid in an
`envelope addressed to: Commissioner for Trademarks, BOX: TTAB, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA
`22313-1451 on October 16, 2009.
`
`‘I
`
`2
`
`4’
`L
`
`Julianne B. Bochinski, Esq.
`
`
`
`
`October 16 2009
`
`(Date of Deposit)
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
