`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Mailed: May 31, 2011
`
`Opposition No. 91197969
`
`Cisco Technology, Inc.
`
`
`v.
`
`
`Lawrence Yuan Tian
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Amy Matelski, Paralegal Specialist:
`
`Opposer’s consented motion to suspend proceeding filed
`
`
`
`May 26, 2011 is noted.
`
`
`
`Because the parties are negotiating for possible
`
`settlement of this case, proceedings herein are suspended
`
`until August 29, 2011, subject to the right of either party to
`
`request resumption at any time. See Trademark Rule 2.117(c).
`
`
`
`In the event that there is no word from either party
`
`concerning the progress of their negotiations, upon
`
`conclusion of the suspension period, proceedings shall
`
`resume August 30, 2011 without further notice or order from
`
`the Board, upon the schedule set out in opposer’s motion.
`
`In each instance, a copy of the transcript of testimony
`
`together with copies of documentary exhibits, must be served
`
`on the adverse party within thirty days after completion of
`
`the taking of testimony. Trademark Rule 2.l25.
`
`
`
`Briefs shall be filed in accordance with Trademark Rule
`
`2.128(a) and (b). An oral hearing will be set only upon
`
`request filed as provided by Trademark Rule 2.l29.
`
`If, during the suspension period, either of the parties
`
`or their attorneys should have a change of address, the
`
`Board should be so informed.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
