`ESTTA521659
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`02/14/2013
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91198117
`Defendant
`Dotcom Retail Limited
`THOMAS A POLCYN
`THOMPSON COBURN LLP
`ONE US BANK PLAZA
`ST LOUIS, MO 63101
`UNITED STATES
`tpolcyn@thompsoncoburn.com, mbraunel@thompsoncoburn.com, hal-
`shathir@thompsoncoburn.com, ipdocket@thompsoncoburn.com, hal-
`shathir@thompsoncoburn.com
`Stipulated/Consent Motion to Extend
`Matthew A. Braunel
`mbraunel@thompsoncoburn.com, hal-shathir@thompsoncoburn.com,
`ipdocket@thompsoncoburn.com, mnoelke@thompsoncoburn.com
`/s/ Matthew A. Braunel
`02/14/2013
`joint stipulation.pdf ( 3 pages )(91563 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`EBAY, INC.,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`DOTCOM RETAIL LIMITED,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`TTAB Opp. No. 91198117
`
`U.S. Serial No. 77/855,722
`
`Mark: BEAUTY BAY
`
`
`
`Opposer eBay, Inc. and Applicant Dotcom Retail Limited have jointly stipulated to the
`
`following modifications to the current scheduling order for this proceeding because of settlement
`
`Scheduled Date
`
`Stipulated Date
`
`February 17, 2013
`
`June 17, 2013
`
`February 17, 2013
`
`June 17, 2013
`
`March 19, 2013
`
`July 17, 2013
`
`May 3, 2013
`
`September 3, 2013
`
`June 16, 2013
`
`October 15, 2013
`
`July 2, 2013
`
`October 30, 2013
`
`August 16, 2013
`
`December 16, 2013
`
`August 31, 2013
`
`December 30, 2013
`
`discussions:
`
`Event
`
`Expert Disclosures Due
`
`DefendantÓu"Cogpfgf"
`Responsive Pleading Due
`
`Discovery Closes
`
`RnckpvkhhÓu"Rtgvtkcn"fkuenquwtgu"
`Due
`
`RnckpvkhhÓu"52-day Trial Period
`Ends
`
`FghgpfcpvÓu"Rtgvtkcn"
`Disclosures Due
`
`FghgpfcpvÓu"52-day Trial
`Period Ends
`
`RnckpvkhhÓu"Tgdwvvcn"
`Disclosures Due
`
`
`
`5680772
`
`
`
`
`
`RnckpvkhhÓu"37-day Rebuttal
`Period Ends
`
`
`
`September 30, 2013
`
`January 28, 2014
`
`The parties respectfully request that the Board approve their joint stipulation, which is not made
`
`for purposes of undue delay. The requested extensions will allow the parties to focus on
`
`settlement discussions without incurring potentially needless litigation costs, and there is a
`
`reasonable possibility that the requested extensions will make further proceedings unnecessary,
`
`such that judicial economy will be promoted by approval of the stipulation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Bobby A. Ghajar
`Bobby A. Ghajar
`James R. Cady
`Marcus Peterson
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
`Pittman LLP
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`(650) 233-4500
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Opposer
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Matthew A. Braunel
`Thomas A. Polcyn
`Matthew A. Braunel
`Hadi S. Al-Shathir
`Thompson Coburn LLP
`One US Bank Plaza
`St. Louis, MO 63101
`(314) 552-6000
`
`Attorneys for Applicant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5680772
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent via email this 14th day of February,
`
`2013, to the following:
`
`Bobby A. Ghajar
`James R. Cady
`Marcus Peterson
`Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1114
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Hadi S. Al-Shathir
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5680772
`
`- 3 -
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
