throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA496411
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`09/25/2012
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`91205769
`Defendant
`RPM Sports Limited
`BRIAN P GREGG
`MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK
`100 PINE STREET, PO BOX 1166
`HARRISBURG, PA 17108-1166
`UNITED STATES
`trademarks@mwn.com,bgregg@mwn.com
`Answer
`Brian P. Gregg
`trademarks@mwn.com,bgregg@mwn.com,uspto@raineslaw.com
`/Brian P. Gregg/
`09/25/2012
`A3053228.PDF ( 4 pages )(11484 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`

`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In the Matter of:
`Trademark Application Serial No.:
`
`Filed:
`
`Trademark:
`
`International Class:
`
`Published in The Official Gazette:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`79/096,476
`
`March 30, 2011
`
`POWERSPIN
`
`028
`
`February 21, 2012
`
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`Opposition No. 91205769
`
`
`FILED ELECTRONICALLY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc.,
`Opposer
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RPM Sports Limited,
`Applicant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attn: BOX TTAB, NO FEE
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLICANT'S ANSWER TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`1.
`
`Admitted, with qualification. By way of qualification, Applicant admits only
`
`that records of the TESS contain the information alleged in Paragraph 1 of the Notice of
`
`Opposition.
`
`2.
`
`Denied. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 2 of the Notice of Opposition, and the same are
`
`therefore denied.
`
`

`
`3.
`
`Denied. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 3 of the Notice of Opposition, and the same are
`
`therefore denied.
`
`4.
`
`Denied. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 4 of the Notice of Opposition, and the same are
`
`therefore denied.
`
`5.
`
`Denied. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 5 of the Notice of Opposition, and the same are
`
`therefore denied.
`
`6.
`
`Denied. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 6 of the Notice of Opposition, and the same are
`
`therefore denied.
`
`7.
`
`Denied. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 7 of the Notice of Opposition, and the same are
`
`therefore denied.
`
`8.
`
`Admitted in part and denied in part. Applicant admits that it has filed an
`
`application for the POWERSPIN mark on the date and for the goods identified in Paragraph 8 of
`
`the Notice of Opposition. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the averments regarding any rights of Opposer to a family of SPIN marks
`
`as alleged in Paragraph 8 of the Notice of Opposition, and the same are therefore denied.
`
`9.
`
`Denied. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the averments of Paragraph 9 of the Notice of Opposition, and the same are
`
`therefore denied.
`
`10.
`
`Denied.
`
`11.
`
`Denied.
`
`12.
`
`Denied.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`13.
`
`Denied.
`
`14.
`
`Denied.
`
`15.
`
`Admitted.
`
`16.
`
`Admitted.
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`First Defense
`
`17.
`
`Opposer's Notice of Opposition fails to state a claim upon which relief can be
`
`granted.
`
`Second Defense
`
`18.
`
`There is no likelihood of confusion between the marks used by Applicant and
`
`Opposer.
`
`WHEREFORE, Applicant RPM Sports Limited demands that the opposition of Opposer
`
`Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. be dismissed with prejudice.
`
`McNEES WALLACE & NURICK LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian P. Gregg
`Harvey Freedenberg
`Brian P. Gregg
`100 Pine Street, P. O. Box 1166
`Harrisburg, PA 17108-1166
`(717) 232-8000
`
`Attorneys for Applicant
`RPM Sports Limited
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 25, 2012
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on this date a true and correct copy of the Answer
`
`to Notice of Opposition was electronically mailed to uspto@raineslaw.com and a courtesy
`
`hard copy was mailed via First Class Mail to:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Konrad K. Gatien
`Raines Feldman LLP
`9720 Wilshire Blvd., Fifth Floor
`Beverly Hills, California 90212
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian P. Gregg
`Brian P. Gregg
`Of Counsel for Applicant
`RPM Sports Limited
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 25, 2012
`
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket