`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mailed: September 19, 2014
`
`Opposition No. 91211574
`
`Duke University
`
`v.
`
`New Directions for Young Adults, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`nmt
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board:
`
`On August 12, 2014, applicant filed a proposed amendment to its
`
`application Serial No. 85805505, with opposer's consent.
`
`Applicant’s amendment seeks to amend its mark by changing the drawing
`
`to add the words “DIRECTION THERAPY” always in close proximity to the
`
`mark.
`
`Applicant’s amendment failed to include a substitute drawing. See
`
`Trademark Rules 2.52 and 2.54, 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.52 and 2.54 and Trademark
`
`Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) §807.15. Such an amendment may
`
`only be accepted if it does not comprise a material alteration of the mark.
`
`The modified mark must contain what is the essence of the original
`
`mark, and the new form must create the impression of being essentially the
`
`same mark. The general test of whether an alteration is material is whether
`
`the mark would have to be republished after the alteration in order to fairly
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91211574
`
`present the mark for purposes of opposition. If one mark is sufficiently
`
`different from another mark as to require republication, it would be
`
`tantamount to a new mark appropriate for a new application. In re Hacot-
`
`Colombier, 105 F.3d 616, 620, 41 USPQ2d 1523, 1526 (Fed. Cir. 1997),
`
`quoting Visa International Service Association v. Life-Code Systems, Inc., 220
`
`USPQ 740,743-44 (TTAB 1983).
`
`Here, the addition of the words “DIRECTION THERAPY” to
`
`applicant’s mark creates a different commercial impression, and this is an
`
`impermissible material alteration of the mark. See In re Who? Vision
`
`Systems, Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1211 (TTAB 2000) (proposed amendment from
`
`“TACILESENSE” to “TACTILESENSE” found to be material alteration).
`
`Accordingly, applicant’s proposed amendment to its mark is denied.
`
`Applicant is allowed thirty days from the mailing date of this order to
`
`provide a renewed amendment which complies with the above criteria, failing
`
`which proceedings will resume and trial dates will be reset.
`
`Proceedings are otherwise suspended.
`
`
`
`
`
`2



