`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mailed: September 9, 2014
`
`Opposition No. 91216231
`
`Duke University
`
`v.
`
`The District Joint Venture, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`VV
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Eric McWilliams, Supervisory Paralegal:
`
`
`The Board notes the consented motion filed by plaintiff on August 15,
`
`2014 to extend all dates, including the discovery conference deadline, for the
`
`parties to pursue settlement.
`
`While the Board is liberal in granting extensions of time to
`
`accommodate settlement, after an answer has been filed, the Board is
`
`unlikely to find good cause for a motion, even upon consent or stipulation, to
`
`extend the deadline for the parties to conduct the required discovery
`
`conference when the basis for the motion is the existence of settlement
`
`discussions. See TBMP § 509.01(a); Boston Red Sox Baseball Club LP v.
`
`Chaveriat, 87 USPQ2d 1767, 1767 n.1 (TTAB 2008) (“It is unlikely the Board
`
`will find good cause for a motion to extend or suspend for settlement if the
`
`motion is filed after answer but prior to the discovery conference, precisely
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91216231
`
`because the discovery conference itself provides an opportunity to discuss
`
`settlement.”).
`
`Inasmuch as the motion to suspend/extend was filed after the answer,
`
`but prior to the parties’ discovery conference deadline, the Board does not
`
`find good cause to suspend/extend. Accordingly, said motion is denied. The
`
`parties are expected to proceed to conduct the required discovery conference
`
`without delay.
`
`Disclosure, discovery and trial dates remain as previously set in
`
`defendant’s motion filed in June 16, 2014.
`
`
`
`2



