throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA685383
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`07/23/2015
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`Granted to Date
`of previous ex-
`tension
`Address
`
`Wholly Fit Inc.
`07/29/2015
`
`5000 Whitsett Ave., Suite 210
`Valley Village, CA 91607
`UNITED STATES
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`Tal Grinblat
`Lewitt, Hackman, Shapiro, Marshall & Harlan
`16633 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100
`Encino, CA 91436
`UNITED STATES
`tgrinblat@lewitthackman.com, nkanter@lewitthackman.com
`Phone:818-990-2120
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`Applicant
`
`86414362
`07/23/2015
`
`Publication date
`Opposition Peri-
`od Ends
`
`03/31/2015
`07/29/2015
`
`Guidry, Sabrina N.
`Suite C
`Baton Rouge, LA 70808
`UNITED STATES
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 041. First Use: 2009/10/05 First Use In Commerce: 2009/10/15
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Fitness boot camps; Personal fitness train-
`ing services and consultancy; Physical fitness training of individuals and groups; Providing assist-
`ance, personal training and physical fitness consultation to individuals to help them make physical fit-
`ness, strength, conditioning, and exercise improvement in their daily living
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`Other
`
`Trademark Act section 2(d)
`Insufficient use in interstate commerce to be en-
`titled to register in the U.S. Trademark Office
`
`Mark Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Application
`No.
`
`86472402
`
`Application Date
`
`12/05/2014
`
`

`
`Registration Date
`
`NONE
`
`Word Mark
`Design Mark
`
`SANDBOX FITNESS
`
`Foreign Priority
`Date
`
`NONE
`
`Description of
`Mark
`Goods/Services
`
`NONE
`
`Class 041. First use: First Use: 2014/01/01 First Use In Commerce: 2014/06/20
`Physical fitness instruction; Physical fitness training services
`
`Attachments
`
`86472402#TMSN.png( bytes )
`Notice of Opposition.pdf(297194 bytes )
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`record by First Class Mail on this date.
`
`Signature
`Name
`Date
`
`/s/ Nicholas Kanter
`Nicholas Kanter
`07/23/2015
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Opposition No.
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`)
`)
`)
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`) )
`
`) ) ) ) )
`
`Application Serial No.2 86414362
`) Mark: Sandbox Training “Small Butt
`Mighty” & Design
`Filed: October 3, 2014
`Published: March 31, 2015
`
`In the matter of:
`
`WHOLLY FIT INC.
`
`Opposer
`
`v.
`
`SABRINA N. GUIDRY
`
`Applicant
`
`WHOLLY FIT INC. (“Opposer”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws
`
`of California with a principal place of business at 5000 Whitsett Ave., Suite 210, Valley Village,
`
`CA 91607, believes it will be damaged by the issuance of a registration for the trademark shown
`
`in Application Serial No. 86414362 and hereby opposes the same.
`
`As grounds for its opposition, Opposer alleges as follows, with knowledge concerning its
`
`own acts, and on information and belief as to all other matters:
`
`1.
`
`Opposer is a fitness company based in Los Angeles, California. Opposer provides
`
`physical fitness instruction and training services under the brand SANDBOX FITNESS
`
`(hereinafter referred to as “Opposer’s Mark”). Opposer is the senior user of SANDBOX
`
`FITNESS in connection with physical fitness services in many regions of the United States,
`
`including the Western United States, Central United States, Northern United States and certain
`
`states within the Southern and Eastern United States (the “Designated Regions”)‘.
`
`‘ Opposer does not concede that it is g the senior user of its mark throughout the entire United
`States. Further, Opposer does not concede that Applicant’s “first use in commerce” date, as
`stated in Applicant’s application is correct, and expressly reserves the right to amend this Notice
`accordingly to contest Applicant’s claimed first use dates.
`
`C: \User.r|IgrinbIaIlAppDaIalLocaIIMicrasafl\ Windaws\TemparaIy Internet Fileslcrmlenl. 0uIIook\A6l<
`
`

`
`2.
`
`Opposer has used its SANDBOX FITNESS mark since at least as early as
`
`January 2014 in connection with physical fitness and training. Such use has been continuous
`
`throughout the Designated Regions.
`
`3.
`
`On October 3, 2014, Applicant SABRINA N. GUIDRY (“Applicant”) filed
`
`Application Serial No. 86414362 (the “Application”) to register the mark SANDBOX
`
`TRAINING “SMALL BUTT MIGHTY” & Design (hereinafter referred to as “Applicant’s
`
`Mark”).
`
`4.
`
`Applicant applied to register Applicant’s Mark in International Class 041 for
`
`physical fitness training services and consultancy, among other services in the fitness field.
`
`Applicant’s Application claims first use since October 2009. To Opposer’s knowledge and
`
`belief, Applicant’s use has been limited to Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
`
`COUNT I — LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`
`5.
`
`Opposer repeats and incorporates by reference its allegations in Paragraphs 1
`
`through 4 as if set forth in full herein.
`
`6.
`
`Opposer’s Mark and Applicant’s Mark are substantially similar in appearance,
`
`sound and commercial impression. There is direct overlap between the parties’ services — i.e.,
`
`fitness training and instruction/consultancy.
`
`7.
`
`Because the parties’ marks are substantially similar and the parties’ services
`
`directly overlap, there is a risk that consumers will mistake Opposer’s services for those of
`
`Applicant, and vice versa.
`
`8.
`
`Opposer is the senior user of SANDBOX FITNESS in the Designated Regions.
`
`As senior user of SANDBOX FITNESS in connection with physical fitness and training
`
`services in the Designated Regions, Opposer has superior rights in and to SANDBOX FITNESS
`
`over Applicant in the Designated Regions.
`
`9.
`
`Because Opposer is the senior user of SANDBOX FITNESS for physical fitness
`
`and training services in the Designated Regions, Opposer has the right to enjoin junior users,
`
`such as Applicant, from using confusingly similar marks, such as Applicant’s Mark, in
`
`

`
`connection with physical fitness, training and related services in the Designated Regions.
`
`10.
`
`It would be inequitable, unfair and unjust for Applicant to obtain a registration
`
`which would give Applicant a basis to claim an exclusive right to use Applicant’s Mark over
`
`Opposer’s use of Opposer’s Mark in the Designated Regions. Therefore Applicant is not entitled
`
`to registration of Applicant’s Mark on the Principal Register of the U.S. Trademark Office.
`
`COUNT II - INSUFFICIENT USE IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE TO BE
`
`ENTITLED TO REGISTER IN U.S. TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`11.
`
`Opposer repeats and incorporates by reference its allegations in Paragraphs 1
`
`through 10 as if set forth in full herein.
`
`12.
`
`Even if Applicant first used Applicant’s Mark before Opposer first used
`
`Opposer’s Mark for the subject services (which Opposer does not concede), Applicant’s use of
`
`Applicant’s Mark has been limited to Louisiana. As such, Applicant did not use Applicant’s
`
`Mark in interstate commerce. The non-use of Applicant’s Mark in interstate commerce is a
`
`ground to deny registration of Applicant’s Mark. Alternatively, Applicant’s use of Applicant’s
`
`Mark was too minimal to constitute bona fide trademark use in interstate commerce, thereby not
`
`entitling Applicant to a registration.
`
`13.
`
`Based on the foregoing, Applicant’s use of Applicant’s Mark is likely to cause
`
`confusion, mistake or deception in the minds of consumers as to the origin of Applicant’s
`
`services in violation of Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, 15, U.S.C. §1052(d), with consequent
`
`injury to Opposer and the public. In addition, Applicant’s use is insufficient to constitute use in
`
`interstate commerce. Accordingly, Applicant’s Application should be denied.
`
`

`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer requests that this opposition be sustained and that the
`
`registration of Application Serial No. 86414362 be denied.
`
`DATED: July 23, 2015
`
`LEWITT, HACKMAN, SHAPIRO,
`MARSHALL & HARLAN
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Nicholas Kanter
`Tal Grinblat, CA Bar No. 192842
`Nicholas Kanter, CA Bar No. 239436
`LEWITT, HACKMAN, SHAPIRO,
`MARSHALL & HARLAN
`16633 Ventura Boulevard, 11"‘ Floor,
`Encino, CA 91436
`(818) 990-2120 (t)
`(818) 981-4764 (1)
`tgr1nb1at@lewitthackman.com
`nkanter@lewitthackman.com
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`It is hereby certified that o11Julygqj 2015, a copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF
`
`OPPOSITION has been sent by First Class, prepaid, United States Postal Service to
`
`Sabrina N. Guidry at the address below:
`
`4836 REVERE AVE STE C
`
`BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA 70808-3191
`UNITED STATES
`
`/s/ Nicholas Kanter
`Nicholas Kanter

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket