`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mailed: May 25, 2016
`
`Opposition No. 91226612 (Parent)
`Opposition No. 91226614
`
`CenturyLink, Inc., CenturyLink Intellectual
`Property LLC
`
`
`v.
`
`Pay Tel Communications, Inc.
`
`
`
`Lalita Greene, Paralegal Specialist:
`
`On May 17, 2016, Opposer filed a motion, with Applicant’s consent to
`
`consolidate Opposition No. 91226612 and Opposition No. 91226614. The Board
`
`notes initially that applicant has filed its answer in each proceeding for which
`
`consolidation is sought. See TBMP § 511.
`
`The Board may consolidate pending cases that involve common questions of
`
`law or fact. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a); see also, Regatta Sport Ltd. v. Telux-Pioneer
`
`Inc., 20 USPQ2d 1154 (TTAB 1991) and Estate of Biro v. Bic Corp., 18 USPQ2d
`
`1382 (TTAB 1991). Inasmuch as the parties to the respective proceedings are the
`
`same and the proceedings involve common questions of law or fact, the Board finds
`
`that consolidation of the above-referenced proceedings is appropriate. Consolidation
`
`will avoid duplication of effort concerning the factual issues and will thereby avoid
`
`unnecessary costs and delays.
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91226612
`
`
`In view thereof, Opposer’s motion to consolidate is hereby granted.
`
`Opposition No. 91226612 and Opposition No. 91226614 are hereby consolidated and
`
`may be presented on the same record and briefs. The record will be maintained in
`
`Opposition No. 91226612 as the “parent” case. The parties should no longer file
`
`separate papers in connection with each proceeding, but file only a single copy of
`
`each paper in the parent case. Each paper filed should bear the numbers of all
`
`consolidated proceedings in ascending order, and the parent case should be
`
`designated as the parent case by following it with: “(parent),” as in the case caption
`
`set forth above.
`
`Consolidated cases do not lose their separate identity because of
`
`consolidation. Each proceeding retains its separate character and requires entry of
`
`a separate judgment. The decision on the consolidated cases shall take into account
`
`any differences in the issues raised by the respective pleadings and a copy of the
`
`final decision shall be placed in each proceeding file. See Wright & Miller, Federal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Practice and Procedure: Civil §2382 (1971).
`
`Trial dates remain as previously set.
`
`2
`
` .
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91226612
`Opposition No. 91226612
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`



