throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mailed: May 25, 2016
`
`Opposition No. 91226612 (Parent)
`Opposition No. 91226614
`
`CenturyLink, Inc., CenturyLink Intellectual
`Property LLC
`
`
`v.
`
`Pay Tel Communications, Inc.
`
`
`
`Lalita Greene, Paralegal Specialist:
`
`On May 17, 2016, Opposer filed a motion, with Applicant’s consent to
`
`consolidate Opposition No. 91226612 and Opposition No. 91226614. The Board
`
`notes initially that applicant has filed its answer in each proceeding for which
`
`consolidation is sought. See TBMP § 511.
`
`The Board may consolidate pending cases that involve common questions of
`
`law or fact. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a); see also, Regatta Sport Ltd. v. Telux-Pioneer
`
`Inc., 20 USPQ2d 1154 (TTAB 1991) and Estate of Biro v. Bic Corp., 18 USPQ2d
`
`1382 (TTAB 1991). Inasmuch as the parties to the respective proceedings are the
`
`same and the proceedings involve common questions of law or fact, the Board finds
`
`that consolidation of the above-referenced proceedings is appropriate. Consolidation
`
`will avoid duplication of effort concerning the factual issues and will thereby avoid
`
`unnecessary costs and delays.
`
`
`
`

`

`Opposition No. 91226612
`
`
`In view thereof, Opposer’s motion to consolidate is hereby granted.
`
`Opposition No. 91226612 and Opposition No. 91226614 are hereby consolidated and
`
`may be presented on the same record and briefs. The record will be maintained in
`
`Opposition No. 91226612 as the “parent” case. The parties should no longer file
`
`separate papers in connection with each proceeding, but file only a single copy of
`
`each paper in the parent case. Each paper filed should bear the numbers of all
`
`consolidated proceedings in ascending order, and the parent case should be
`
`designated as the parent case by following it with: “(parent),” as in the case caption
`
`set forth above.
`
`Consolidated cases do not lose their separate identity because of
`
`consolidation. Each proceeding retains its separate character and requires entry of
`
`a separate judgment. The decision on the consolidated cases shall take into account
`
`any differences in the issues raised by the respective pleadings and a copy of the
`
`final decision shall be placed in each proceeding file. See Wright & Miller, Federal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Practice and Procedure: Civil §2382 (1971).
`
`Trial dates remain as previously set.
`
`2
`
` .
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Opposition No. 91226612
`Opposition No. 91226612
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket