throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA755980
`07/01/2016
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`
`Almendras del Sol, S.A.
`
`Granted to Date
`of previous ex-
`tension
`
`Address
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`07/03/2016
`
`C/ Charles Darwin, 13
`Elche, 03203
`SPAIN
`
`Louis Smoller
`Savur Threadgold LLP
`40 Exchange Place #1900
`New York, NY 10005
`UNITED STATES
`LS@savurlaw.com Phone:646-475-2515
`
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`
`86562949
`
`Publication date
`
`01/05/2016
`
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`
`Applicant
`
`07/01/2016
`
`Waymouth Farms, Inc.
`5300 Boone Ave N
`New Hope, MN 55428
`UNITED STATES
`
`Opposition Peri-
`od Ends
`
`07/03/2016
`
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 029. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Food products, namely, nut-based and
`seed-based snack foods consisting primarily of sunflower seeds and almonds
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d)
`
`Dilution by blurring
`
`Dilution by tarnishment
`
`Fraud on the USPTO
`
`Trademark Act Sections 2 and 43(c)
`
`Trademark Act Sections 2 and 43(c)
`
`In re Bose Corp., 580 F.3d 1240, 91 USPQ2d
`1938 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
`
`Mark Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Application/ Registra-
`tion No.
`
`Registration Date
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`
`Application Date
`
`NONE
`
`

`
`Word Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`SUN ALMONDS
`
`Distribution and sale of almond nuts
`
`Attachments
`
`NOO SunAlmonds TTAB 2016-07-01 FINAL.pdf(185515 bytes )
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`record by First Class Mail on this date.
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`Signature
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`/Louis Smoller/
`
`Louis Smoller
`
`07/01/2016
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Opposition No. _____________
`Serial No. 86562949
`Mark: SUNALMOND
`Filing Date: March 13, 2015
`Publication Date: January 5, 2016
`
`
`
`ALMENDRAS DEL SOL, S.A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WAYMOUTH FARMS, INC.:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`:
`:
`:
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Almendras Del Sol, S.A. (“Almendras”), a public limited company organized under the
`
`
`
`
`
`laws of the country of Spain, located at C/ Charles Darwin, 13 Elche, 03203 Spain, believes that
`
`it will be damaged by the registration of the SUNALMOND trademark in International Class 29
`
`(“Applicant’s Mark”) as shown in application Serial No. 86562949 (the “Application”), filed by
`
`applicant Waymouth Farms, Inc. (“Applicant”), a corporation organized under the laws of
`
`Minnesota with a mailing address of 5300 Boone Ave. N., New Hope, Minnesota 55428, and
`
`hereby opposes the same and requests that registration of Applicant’s Mark be refused.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The grounds for Almendras’ opposition are as follows:
`
`Introduction
`
`Almendras has timely filed this notice of opposition.
`
`Since 1946, Almendras has worked tirelessly developing and commercializing
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`their business, which is predominantly centered around the distribution, processing, and
`
`wholesaling of almond nuts, among other things, under the mark “SUN ALMONDS” (the
`
`“Mark”). Almendras operates and/or has accounts in over forty (40) countries throughout the
`
`

`
`world and owns numerous trademark registrations throughout the world in and to the Mark,
`
`including, without limitation, within the European Union (No: 012811014), Switzerland (No.
`
`1217871), Egypt (No. 1217871), Lebanon (No. 159427), Saudi Arabia (Nos. 1435022616,
`
`1435022617, 1435022618), and Tunisia (No. 1217871), and pending applications in the United
`
`Arab Emirates (Nos. 218877, 218878, 218879), Algeria (No. 143114), and Iraq (No. 67795).
`
`3.
`
`Almendras has been operating under the Mark, now and at all relevant times in
`
`the past, throughout the United States, for the commercial distribution, processing, purchasing,
`
`and wholesaling of almond nuts, among other things, since at least 2012 for the purchasing of
`
`almonds from other providers and since at least 2014 for the commercial sale, distribution, and
`
`wholesaling of almond nuts to consumers in the marketplace. Almendras has continuously and
`
`uninterruptedly used the Mark in commerce since that time
`
`4.
`
`Through extensive common law uses of the Mark, Almendras has created a
`
`widespread distinctive and overarching brand that consumers have become accustomed to
`
`seeing, and which consumers recognize as products and/or services originating from Almendras.
`
`5.
`
`Almendras has devoted substantial and considerable resources, time, and effort to
`
`develop, market, and promote the Mark in order to create a common source identifier for the
`
`goods and/or services Almendras offers under the Mark. Such efforts have generated over eight
`
`million two hundred thousand dollars ($8,200,000.00) U.S.D. in goods sold by Almendras under
`
`the Mark in the United States in 2014 and 2015 alone.
`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant is a commercial producer of snack foods,
`
`many of which are nut based.
`
`Applicant’s Knowledge of Almendras Use of the Mark
`Prior to Applicant filing the Application
`
`
`

`
`7.
`
`Between March 4-8, 2015, Almendras representatives attended the Natural
`
`Products Expo West Exhibition held in Anaheim, California (“Expo West 2015”), which is an
`
`industry trade show centered around natural food products.
`
`8.
`
`At Expo West 2015, Almendras’ representatives in attendance were introduced to
`
`a representative of Applicant, and the parties discussed Almendras supplying Applicant with
`
`almond nuts for Applicant’s own internal uses. See, Exhibit A.
`
`9.
`
`Upon information and belief, Almendras presently believes the foregoing is the
`
`first contact between the parties, but such contact may have occurred earlier.
`
`10.
`
`The parties continued their conversation via e-mail, with Almendras sending
`
`Applicant pricing sheets, among other information. See, Exhibit A.
`
`11.
`
`On March 13, 2015, notwithstanding Almendras rights in and to the Mark, which
`
`Applicant was fully and directly aware of based on at least the preceding, Applicant filed an
`
`intent to use application to register a derivation of the Mark, merely omitting the “S” from the
`
`end of “SUN ALMONDS”, in International Class 29 for uses in connection with: Food products,
`
`namely, nut-based and seed-based snack foods consisting primarily of sunflower seeds and
`
`almonds.
`
`Argument
`
`12.
`
`The goods set forth in the Application are the same, similar, complementary,
`
`related to, and/or have the same nature as the goods and/or services marketed by Almendras
`
`under the Mark, that being predominantly the sale of almond nut food products.
`
`13.
`
`Applicant’s advertising and use of Applicant’s Mark, as contemplated in the
`
`Application, will inevitably reach the same consumers that Almendras currently engages in
`
`business with and targets through Almendras uses of the Mark. Likewise, snack products, such
`
`

`
`as nuts and nut-based snacks, are sold in the same distribution and trade channels and the parties’
`
`respective offerings will inevitably be presented or sold side-by-side with one another.
`
`14.
`
`Applicant’s Mark, as contemplated by the application, shares the identical
`
`element “SUNALMOND” with the Mark. The Application merely omits the “S” from the Mark.
`
`Thus, Applicant’s sought for mark is substantially similar in sight, sound, connotation, meaning,
`
`and overall commercial impression to the Mark.
`
`15.
`
`Consumers, upon seeing Applicant’s Mark used in connection with Applicant’s
`
`goods and/or services, are likely to mistakenly believe that Applicant’s Mark, and the goods
`
`and/or services provided in connection therewith, originated from or are connected with,
`
`sponsored by, associated with, or licensed or approved by Almendras, thereby creating a
`
`likelihood of confusion between Almendras and Applicants’ goods and/or services.
`
`16.
`
`As such, Applicant’s Mark is confusingly similar to Almendras’ Mark, and
`
`therefore, if Applicant’s Mark were allowed to register for the goods listed in International Class
`
`29 as set forth in the Application, such registration would likely cause confusion, mistake, or
`
`deception among consumers concerning the origin, source or sponsorship of Applicant’s
`
`products in violation of the Lanham Act and other similar trade practices and competition laws.
`
`17.
`
`Likewise, there is no issue of priority. Almendras has been using the Mark in
`
`commerce within the United States prior to Applicant, including, without limitation, through
`
`contacting Applicant to solicit sales prior to Applicant’s filing date of March 13, 2015.
`
`Almendras’ uses, both actual and constructive, cover goods and/or services that are identical or
`
`closely related to the goods identified in the Application.
`
`

`
`18.
`
`If Applicant’s Mark is allowed to register, the confusion between the Mark and
`
`Applicant’s Mark would result in irreparable damage and injury to both Almendras and to the
`
`public.
`
`19.
`
`In addition, should the quality of Applicant’s goods and/or services be lacking,
`
`Applicant’s use of Applicant’s Mark may also tarnish the Mark, resulting in further harm to
`
`Almendras’ reputation in the marketplace.
`
`20.
`
`In light of the foregoing, especially where Almendras has priority based on prior
`
`uses in commerce in connection with the commercial distribution, processing, purchasing, and
`
`wholesaling of almond nuts, among other things, and the fact that Applicant’s goods are of the
`
`same nature and purpose and specifically target the precise market, distribution, and trade
`
`channels occupied by Almendras’ use of the Mark, Almendras believes that any use by
`
`Applicant of Applicant’s Mark, or confusingly similar derivation thereof, is likely to cause
`
`confusion, mistake, or deception to purchasers in that they are purchasing Almendras’ goods
`
`and/or services.
`
`21.
`
`Accordingly, Almendras will be damaged by the registration of Applicant’s Mark
`
`because such registration gives Applicant prima facie evidence of ownership of and the exclusive
`
`right to use Applicant’s Mark that is confusingly similar to Almendras previously-used and not-
`
`abandoned “SUN ALMONDS” Mark, in derogation of Almendras rights. As such, Applicant’s
`
`Mark is unregisterable under 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d).
`
`22.
`
`Furthermore, since Applicant’s “SUNALMOND” application not just strongly
`
`resembles, but is nearly exactly the same as Almendras “SUN ALMONDS” Mark, Applicant’s
`
`uses are likely to dilute the strength of the Mark by blurring or tarnishing and/or by reducing the
`
`distinctive quality, uniqueness, good image, and/or prestige that consumers have come to expect
`
`

`
`of the distinctive and famous “SUN ALMONDS” mark as used by Almendras. Accordingly,
`
`Applicant is in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c).
`
`23.
`
`Lastly, the Application includes a verification and declaration by Applicant (via
`
`Applicant’s President Mr. Gerard S. Knight) that “The signatory believes that to the best of the
`
`signatory's knowledge and belief, no other person has the right to use the mark in commerce,
`
`either in the identical form or in such near resemblance as to be likely, when used on or in
`
`connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion or mistake, or to
`
`deceive. The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by
`
`fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001, and that such willful false
`
`statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or any registration resulting
`
`therefrom, declares that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and all statements
`
`made on information and belief are believed to be true.” Such declaration is required pursuant to
`
`15 U.S.C. § 1051(b).
`
`24.
`
`Since Applicant had, at the time of declaration, clear and actual knowledge of
`
`Almendras use of the Mark, Almendras asserts that Applicant’s declaration pursuant to 15
`
`U.S.C. § 1051(b) is a knowingly false misrepresentation of fact and constitutes a fraud on the
`
`USPTO, as an attempt to procure a trademark without sufficient rights. The timing of Almendras
`
`meeting with Applicant at Expo West 2015 and Applicant filing for Applicant’s Mark
`
`approximately one (1) week later strongly supports this conclusion.
`
`25.
`
`Accordingly, Applicant’s Application should be voided for fraud on the USPTO.
`
`Conclusion
`
`26.
`
`Overall, Almendras will continue to be irreparably damaged by registration of
`
`Applicant’s confusingly similar mark which will likely cause confusion, mistake, or deceive
`
`

`
`purchasers in the marketplace, where purchasers would believe that the goods and/or services
`
`mentioned in the Application are legitimately connected with, sponsored by, or approved by
`
`Almendras. Deficiencies or faults in the quality of Applicant’s products are likely to reflect
`
`negatively upon, tarnish, and seriously injure the reputation Almendras has established for its
`
`good and/or services marketed under the Mark. This confusion is likely to result in loss of
`
`revenues to Almendras and damage to its reputation, among other things, and on this basis,
`
`Almendras opposes registration of Applicant’s Mark.
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer, Almendras respectfully requests:
`
`a.
`
`The registration sought by Applicant, as shown in Application Serial Number
`
`
`
`
`
`86562949 be refused and that this Notice of Opposition be sustained;
`
`
`
`b.
`
`That Almendras be awarded any attorney’s fees or costs to which they may be
`
`entitled under law; and
`
`
`
`c.
`
`Any other relief that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board deems just and
`
`proper under the circumstances.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 1, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Louis Smoller
`Attorney for Almendras Del Sol, S.A.
`Savur Threadgold LLP
`40 Exchange Place # 1900
`New York, New York 10005
`Tel. (646) 475-2515
`Email: LS@savurlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Opposition No. _____________
`Serial No. 86562949
`Mark: SUNALMOND
`Filing Date: March 13, 2015
`Publication Date: January 5, 2016
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`:
`:
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`ALMENDRAS DEL SOL, S.A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WAYMOUTH FARMS, INC.:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing Notice of Opposition has
`been served on the Owner of Record and correspondent for Applicant, Waymouth Farms, Inc. as
`listed on the website for the United States Patent and Trademark Office by U.S.P.S. Certified
`Mail Return Receipt Requested and via email on July 1, 2016 to:
`
`Waymouth Farms, Inc.
`5300 Boone Ave. N.
`New Hope, Minnesota 55428
`Email: gsknight@waymouth.com
`
`Dated: July 1, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Louis Smoller
`Attorney for Almendras Del Sol, S.A.
`Savur Threadgold LLP
`40 Exchange Place # 1900
`New York, New York 10005
`Tel. (646) 475-2515
`Email: LS@savurlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`De: Ramón Gambín Romero [mailto:rgambin@sunalmonds.com]
`Enviado el: lunes, 16 de marzo de 2015 13:52
`Para: gcarmes@waymouth.com
`CC: lgambin@sunalmonds.com
`Asunto: EXPO WEST - SUN ALMONDS SPAIN
`
`
`Dear Mr. Carmes,
`
`
`Let me introduce myself, I´m Ramon Gambin and I work on the company Sun Almonds in Spain.
`
`
`Last week I was visiting your booth at the Expo West Exhibition and your colleague Nick give me your
`contact details.
`Please let me make as recap, an introduction of our company:
` We are crackers of almonds, as well as processors. We are located in Elche (Alicante) Spain, in a
`modern building with the latest technology in almond selection and processing
` We are in the almond business since 1946, so we have a good knowledge and experience in this field.
` Please kindly note the list of items that we produce and can offer you:
` SPANISH ALMONDS CONVENTIONAL AND ORGANIC
` All varieties and sizes available in the market: Largueta, Ferragnes, Valencia, Marcona…We can offer
`you natural, blanched and roasted.
` CALIFORNIAN ALMONDS
` All varieties and all sizes available in the market. We can offer you natural, blanched, roasted and
`processed products.
` PROCESSED ALMONDS
` Slices, Slivered, Splits, Diced and meal. We can offer them natural, blanched and roasted in any size that
`you request.
` One of the guidelines of our company is the Quality of the products that we offer. We are IFS and BRC
`certified, therefore we are really concerned about this matter and we keep good standards of quality.
` Apart from that, we offer flexibility to our customer, we know that it is important to be able to adapt
`orders and products to our customers’ needs and we proceed this way as per their requests, proving
`also personalized service.
` This is our website: www.sunalmonds.com, just in case you would like to check more information about
`us.
`Please kindly find below a list of offers with the items that I can offer you:
`CONVENTIONAL SPANISH ALMONDS:
`Natural Conventional Marconas 27/30 AOL…………………………………………5.00$ x lb
`Blanched Conventional Marconas 27/30………………………………………………6.00$ x lb
`Unselected Natural Conventional Valencias (max 1% bitter)……………….4.10 $ x lb
`Blanched Unselected Conventional Valencias (max 1% bitter)……………..5.10$ x lb
`
`
`PROCESSED ALMONDS CONVENTIONAL (USA ORIGIN)
`Blanched Sliced Almonds…………………………….5.05$ x lb
`Blanched Slivered Almonds………………………….5.05$ x lb
`Blanched Diced Almonds………………………………4.90$ x lb
`Natural Diced Almonds………………………………...4.50$ x lb
`Blanched Almond Meal………………………………..4.80$ x lb
`
`
`Natural Almond Meal……………………………………4.35$ x lb
`
`

`
`
`
`
`NATUAL AND PROCESSED ALMONDS ORGANIC (SPAIN ORIGIN)
`Natual Selected Valencias Organic 27/30………………………………………………5.65$ x lb
`Blanched Sliced Almonds…………………………….6.40$ x lb
`Blanched Slivered Almonds………………………….6.40$ x lb
`Blanched Diced Almonds………………………………6.30$ x lb
`Natural Diced Almonds………………………………...6.10$ x lb
`Blanched Almond Meal………………………………..6.05$ x lb
`
`
`Natural Almond Meal………………………………….5.95$ x lb
`
`
`
`CIF USA
`CARTONS/ BAGS OR BIG BAGS
`PROMPT SHIPMENT FROM SPAIN
`FULL CONTAINER LOAD
`OFFER VALID TODAY
`
`
`Mr. Carmes, please kindly check my offers and let me know if you have any doubt or question and I will
`be pleased to reply you.
`
`
`Looking forward to hearing from you.
`
`
`Thanks and best regards
`
`
`Ramón Gambin Romero
`International Sales
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Almendras del Sol, S.A.
`Elche Parque Empresarial
`C/ Charles Darwin, 13-15
`03203 Elche (Alicante)
`Spain
`Tel./ Phone: (+34) 965 68 53 60
`Fax: (+34) 965 68 39 68
`Móvil/ Cell: (+34) 664 247 703
`Skype: ramonsunalmonds
`
`

`
`Website: www.sunalmonds.com
`
`
`
`----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`CONFIDENTIALITY AND DATA PROTECTION---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`----------------------------------The possible information this document could contain, related to personal data, is
`protected by the Spanish Data Protection Act (LOPD) 15/99, which obliges the recipient not to use such
`information for aims which are not strictly for the original intended purpose. In addition, the absolute confidentiality
`and exclusivity, forbids any user to disclose, copy, distribute or exercise any related action to its content, either
`personal data or other information, that is considered, in any case, CONFIDENTIAL. If you have received this e-
`mail in error, please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage mechanism.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket