throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mailed: May 13, 2017
`
`Opposition No. 91232578
`
`Amazon Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`v.
`
`Taizhou Linkedin Trading Company Limited
`dba Home Furnishing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nicole Thier, Paralegal Specialist:
`
`
`On May 12, 2017, Applicant's attorney filed a request to withdraw as Applicant's
`
`counsel of record in this proceeding.1 The request to withdraw as counsel is in
`
`compliance with the requirements of Trademark Rules 2.19(b) and Patent and
`
`Trademark Rule 11.116, and is accordingly granted. The law firm of Raj Abhyanker PC
`
`no longer represents Applicant in this proceeding.
`
`In view of the withdrawal of Applicant's counsel, and in accordance with standard
`
`Board practice, proceedings are suspended, and Applicant is allowed until thirty days
`
`from the mailing date of this order to appoint new counsel, or to file a paper stating that
`
`Applicant chooses to represent itself. If Applicant files no response, the Board may issue
`
`an order to show cause why default judgment should not be entered against Applicant
`
`based on Applicant's apparent loss of interest in the proceeding.
`
`Proceedings are otherwise suspended pending response to this order.
`
`1 A copy of the request to withdraw is placed in the application involved in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Opposition No. 91232578
`
`
`The parties will be notified by the Board when proceedings are resumed, and dates
`
`will be reset, as appropriate.
`
`A copy of this order has been sent to all persons listed below.
`
`cc:
`
`TAIZHOU LINKEDIN TRADING COMPANY LIMITED
`DBA HOME FURNISHING
`GAOTIAN VILLAGE, JINQING TOWN
`LUQIAO, TAIZHOU
`CHINA
`
`RUTH K KHALSA
`RAJ ABHYANKER PC
`1580 WEST E CAMINO REAL
`SUITE 9
`MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040
`
`JAMES F STRUTHERS
`RICHARD LAW GROUP INC
`8411 PRESTON ROAD
`SUITE 890
`DALLAS, TX 75225
`
`Information regarding legal representation
`
`While Patent and Trademark Rule 11.14 permits any person to represent itself,
`
`it is strongly advisable for a person who is not acquainted with the technicalities of
`
`the procedural and substantive law involved in inter partes proceedings before the
`
`Board to secure the services of an attorney who is familiar with such matters. The
`
`Patent and Trademark Office cannot aid in the selection of an attorney. See TBMP §
`
`114.02.
`
`Trademark Rules 2.119(a) and (b) require that every submission filed in a
`
`proceeding before the Board must be served upon the other party or parties, and
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Opposition No. 91232578
`
`proper proof of such service must be made before the submission will be considered
`
`by the Board. Accordingly, all submissions filed in this proceeding must be
`
`accompanied by a statement, signed by the attorney or other authorized
`
`representative, attached to or appearing on the original submission when filed,
`
`clearly stating the date and manner in which service was made, the name of each
`
`party or person upon whom service was made, and the email address or address.
`
`See TBMP § 113.03. Service must be made by email unless otherwise stipulated, or
`
`unless the filing party has satisfied the requirements for another method of service
`
`as set forth in Trademark Rule 2.119(b). The statement will be accepted as prima
`
`facie proof of service, must be signed and dated, and should take the form of a
`
`Certificate of Service as follows:
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing (insert title of
`submission) has been served on (insert name of opposing counsel or party) by
`forwarding said copy on (insert date of mailing), via email (or insert other
`appropriate method of delivery) to: (set out name, address, and email address
`of opposing counsel or party).
`
`Signature______________________________
`Date___________________________________
`
`Submissions in Board proceedings must be made via ESTTA, the Electronic
`
`System for Trademark Trials and Appeals, and must be in compliance with
`
`Trademark Rules 2.126(a) and (b). See TBMP § 110.01. The ESTTA user manual,
`
`ESTTA forms, and instructions for their use are at http://estta.uspto.gov/.
`
`It is recommended that any pro se party be familiar with the latest edition of
`
`Chapter 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which includes the Trademark Rules
`
`of Practice. Parties should also be familiar with the Trademark Trial and Appeal
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Opposition No. 91232578
`
`Board Manual of Procedure (TBMP), available at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-
`
`application-process/trademark-trial-and-appeal-board-ttab, the TTABVUE system
`
`for
`
`viewing
`
`the
`
`record
`
`for
`
`all Board
`
`proceedings,
`
`available
`
`at
`
`http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/, and the Standard Protective Order, available at
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-application-process/appealing-trademark-
`
`decisions/standard-documents-and-guidelines-0.
`
`Strict compliance with the Trademark Rules of Practice, and where applicable
`
`the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is required of all parties, whether or not they
`
`are represented by counsel. McDermott v. San Francisco Women’s Motorcycle
`
`Contingent, 81 USPQ2d 1212, n.2 (TTAB 2006), aff’d unpub’d, 240 Fed. Appx.865
`
`(Fed. Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1109 (2008).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket