throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA907040
`
`Filing date:
`
`07/02/2018
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91241363
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Defendant
`The Baked Bear
`
`JEFFREY KNOLL
`JSK LAW, PLLC
`4428 E. CALLE TUBERIA
`PHOENIX, AZ 85018
`Email: jknoll@jsklawpllc.com
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Answer
`
`Jeffrey S. Knoll
`
`jknoll@jsklawpllc.com
`
`/Jeffrey S Knoll/
`
`07/02/2018
`
`Attachments
`
`ANSWER TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION.pdf(467347 bytes )
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`THE BAKED BEAR,
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`______________________________________ )
`
`Opposition No.: 91241363
`
`Serial No.: 87237126
`
`Mark:
`
`
`COOKIE MONSTERS ONLY
`
`
`
`ANSWER TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`
`
`The following is the Answer of The Baked Bear ((cid:862)Applicant(cid:863)), applicant of U.S. Trademark
`
`Application No. 87237126 (the (cid:862)Application(cid:863)) for the mark COOKIE MONSTERS ONLY ((cid:862)Applicant’s
`
`Mark(cid:863)), by and through Counsel, JSK LAW, PLLC, to the Notice of Opposition filed by Monster Energy
`
`Company, (hereinafter (cid:862)Opposer(cid:863)).
`
`1. Admitted.
`
`2. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 2 of the Notice of Opposition. Since Applicant can neither
`
`admit nor deny the paragraph as written, Applicant must deny.
`
`3. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 3 of the Notice of Opposition. Since Applicant can neither
`
`admit nor deny the paragraph as written, Applicant must deny.
`
`
`
`[1]
`
`

`

`4. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 4 of the Notice of Opposition. Since Applicant can neither
`
`admit nor deny the paragraph as written, Applicant must deny.
`
`5. Denied.
`
`6. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`claims contained in the first part of paragraph 6; namely, (cid:862)Opposer’s common law rights.(cid:863) Since
`
`Applicant can neither admit nor deny the paragraph as written, Applicant must deny. Admitted
`
`as to Opposer’s ownership of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 5,114,854.
`
`7. Admitted.
`
`8. Admitted.
`
`9. Admitted.
`
`10. Admitted.
`
`11. Admitted.
`
`12. Admitted.
`
`13. Admitted.
`
`14. Admitted.
`
`15. Admitted.
`
`16. Admitted.
`
`17. Admitted.
`
`18. Admitted.
`
`19. Admitted.
`
`20. Admitted.
`
`21. Admitted.
`
`22. Admitted.
`
`
`
`[2]
`
`

`

`23. Admitted.
`
`24. Admitted.
`
`25. Admitted.
`
`26. Admitted.
`
`27. Admitted.
`
`28. Admitted.
`
`29. Admitted.
`
`30. Admitted.
`
`31. Denied, as Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`validity of Opposer’s cited marks or registrations thereof; or Opposer’s ownership of Opposer’s
`
`cited marks.
`
`32. Denied, as Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`validity of Opposer’s cited marks or registrations thereof; Opposer’s ownership of Opposer’s
`
`cited marks; or Opposer’s exclusive right to use the registered marks in commerce.
`
`33. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`claims made in the first part of paragraph 33 of the Notice of Opposition. Since Applicant cannot
`
`admit nor deny the claims made by Opposer in the first part of paragraph 33, Applicant must
`
`deny. Applicant denies all claims and inferences in the second part of paragraph 33; namely,
`
`that (cid:862)some(cid:863) of Opposer’s marks were well established and famous long before Applicant’s filing
`
`date and alleged first use of Applicant’s Mark.
`
`34. Admitted.
`
`35. Denied.
`
`36. Denied.
`
`FURTHERMORE, Applicant sets forth the following affirmative defenses in support of its position:
`
`
`
`[3]
`
`

`

`37. Applicant’s Mark is unique and distinctive.
`
`38. The wording in Applicant’s Mark and Opposer’s marks are different.
`
`39. Applicant’s Mark is different in spelling and pronunciation.
`
`40. Applicant’s Mark and Opposer’s marks create different commercial impressions.
`
`41. Opposer’s Marks contain numerous words and/or features not present in Applicant’s Mark.
`
`42. Applicant’s Mark contains the word (cid:862)COOKIE(cid:863) not present in any of Opposer’s marks.
`
`43. Applicant’s Mark contains the work (cid:862)ONLY(cid:863) not present in any of Opposer’s marks.
`
`44. Applicant’s Mark contains the word (cid:862)MONSTERS(cid:863) not present in any of Opposer’s marks.
`
`45. (cid:862)MONSTER(cid:863) – the singular use of Applicant’s word (cid:862)MONSTERS(cid:863) is the only commonality
`
`between Applicant’s Mark and Opposer’s marks. (cid:862)MONSTER(cid:863) is a generic word.
`
`46. (cid:862)MONSTER(cid:863) is registered in numerous trademarks not owned by Petitioner.
`
`47. (cid:862)MONSTER(cid:863) is used in commerce by third parties as part of numerous trademarks not owned by
`
`Opposer.
`
`48. Applicant’s Mark and Opposer’s marks are not likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception to
`
`purchasers as to the source of Applicant’s goods or services.
`
` WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully requests that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board deny
`
`the Opposer’s opposition and allow the continued registration of U.S. Trademark Application No.
`
`87237126.
`
`Dated this 2nd day of July, 2018.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: ___/Jeffrey S. Knoll/___________
`
`Jeffrey S. Knoll, Esq., LLM
`2130 E. Kaler Dr.
`Phoenix, AZ 85020
`(602)451-7113
`jknoll@jsklawpllc.com
`Attorney for Applicant, THE BAKED BEAR
`
`
`
`
`
`[4]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket