`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA907040
`
`Filing date:
`
`07/02/2018
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91241363
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Defendant
`The Baked Bear
`
`JEFFREY KNOLL
`JSK LAW, PLLC
`4428 E. CALLE TUBERIA
`PHOENIX, AZ 85018
`Email: jknoll@jsklawpllc.com
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Answer
`
`Jeffrey S. Knoll
`
`jknoll@jsklawpllc.com
`
`/Jeffrey S Knoll/
`
`07/02/2018
`
`Attachments
`
`ANSWER TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION.pdf(467347 bytes )
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`THE BAKED BEAR,
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`______________________________________ )
`
`Opposition No.: 91241363
`
`Serial No.: 87237126
`
`Mark:
`
`
`COOKIE MONSTERS ONLY
`
`
`
`ANSWER TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`
`
`The following is the Answer of The Baked Bear ((cid:862)Applicant(cid:863)), applicant of U.S. Trademark
`
`Application No. 87237126 (the (cid:862)Application(cid:863)) for the mark COOKIE MONSTERS ONLY ((cid:862)Applicant’s
`
`Mark(cid:863)), by and through Counsel, JSK LAW, PLLC, to the Notice of Opposition filed by Monster Energy
`
`Company, (hereinafter (cid:862)Opposer(cid:863)).
`
`1. Admitted.
`
`2. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 2 of the Notice of Opposition. Since Applicant can neither
`
`admit nor deny the paragraph as written, Applicant must deny.
`
`3. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 3 of the Notice of Opposition. Since Applicant can neither
`
`admit nor deny the paragraph as written, Applicant must deny.
`
`
`
`[1]
`
`
`
`4. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 4 of the Notice of Opposition. Since Applicant can neither
`
`admit nor deny the paragraph as written, Applicant must deny.
`
`5. Denied.
`
`6. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`claims contained in the first part of paragraph 6; namely, (cid:862)Opposer’s common law rights.(cid:863) Since
`
`Applicant can neither admit nor deny the paragraph as written, Applicant must deny. Admitted
`
`as to Opposer’s ownership of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 5,114,854.
`
`7. Admitted.
`
`8. Admitted.
`
`9. Admitted.
`
`10. Admitted.
`
`11. Admitted.
`
`12. Admitted.
`
`13. Admitted.
`
`14. Admitted.
`
`15. Admitted.
`
`16. Admitted.
`
`17. Admitted.
`
`18. Admitted.
`
`19. Admitted.
`
`20. Admitted.
`
`21. Admitted.
`
`22. Admitted.
`
`
`
`[2]
`
`
`
`23. Admitted.
`
`24. Admitted.
`
`25. Admitted.
`
`26. Admitted.
`
`27. Admitted.
`
`28. Admitted.
`
`29. Admitted.
`
`30. Admitted.
`
`31. Denied, as Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`validity of Opposer’s cited marks or registrations thereof; or Opposer’s ownership of Opposer’s
`
`cited marks.
`
`32. Denied, as Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`validity of Opposer’s cited marks or registrations thereof; Opposer’s ownership of Opposer’s
`
`cited marks; or Opposer’s exclusive right to use the registered marks in commerce.
`
`33. Applicant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`claims made in the first part of paragraph 33 of the Notice of Opposition. Since Applicant cannot
`
`admit nor deny the claims made by Opposer in the first part of paragraph 33, Applicant must
`
`deny. Applicant denies all claims and inferences in the second part of paragraph 33; namely,
`
`that (cid:862)some(cid:863) of Opposer’s marks were well established and famous long before Applicant’s filing
`
`date and alleged first use of Applicant’s Mark.
`
`34. Admitted.
`
`35. Denied.
`
`36. Denied.
`
`FURTHERMORE, Applicant sets forth the following affirmative defenses in support of its position:
`
`
`
`[3]
`
`
`
`37. Applicant’s Mark is unique and distinctive.
`
`38. The wording in Applicant’s Mark and Opposer’s marks are different.
`
`39. Applicant’s Mark is different in spelling and pronunciation.
`
`40. Applicant’s Mark and Opposer’s marks create different commercial impressions.
`
`41. Opposer’s Marks contain numerous words and/or features not present in Applicant’s Mark.
`
`42. Applicant’s Mark contains the word (cid:862)COOKIE(cid:863) not present in any of Opposer’s marks.
`
`43. Applicant’s Mark contains the work (cid:862)ONLY(cid:863) not present in any of Opposer’s marks.
`
`44. Applicant’s Mark contains the word (cid:862)MONSTERS(cid:863) not present in any of Opposer’s marks.
`
`45. (cid:862)MONSTER(cid:863) – the singular use of Applicant’s word (cid:862)MONSTERS(cid:863) is the only commonality
`
`between Applicant’s Mark and Opposer’s marks. (cid:862)MONSTER(cid:863) is a generic word.
`
`46. (cid:862)MONSTER(cid:863) is registered in numerous trademarks not owned by Petitioner.
`
`47. (cid:862)MONSTER(cid:863) is used in commerce by third parties as part of numerous trademarks not owned by
`
`Opposer.
`
`48. Applicant’s Mark and Opposer’s marks are not likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception to
`
`purchasers as to the source of Applicant’s goods or services.
`
` WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully requests that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board deny
`
`the Opposer’s opposition and allow the continued registration of U.S. Trademark Application No.
`
`87237126.
`
`Dated this 2nd day of July, 2018.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: ___/Jeffrey S. Knoll/___________
`
`Jeffrey S. Knoll, Esq., LLM
`2130 E. Kaler Dr.
`Phoenix, AZ 85020
`(602)451-7113
`jknoll@jsklawpllc.com
`Attorney for Applicant, THE BAKED BEAR
`
`
`
`
`
`[4]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`



