throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA945518
`
`Filing date:
`
`01/04/2019
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91243246
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Plaintiff
`BlackBerry Limited
`
`G ROXANNE ELINGS
`DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
`1251 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, 21ST FLOOR
`NEW YORK, NY 10020
`UNITED STATES
`roxanneelings@dwt.com, emilyborich@dwt.com, orrinfalby@dwt.com,
`taneishaclarke@dwt.com, blackberry@dwt.com, koriturrubiate@dwt.com, black-
`berryrecords@dwt.com
`212-489-8230
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Motion to Compel Discovery or Disclosure
`
`Emily M. Borich
`
`roxanneelings@dwt.com, emilyborich@dwt.com, orrinfalby@dwt.com, black-
`berry@dwt.com, koriturrubiate@dwt.com, blackberryrecords@dwt.com
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`/EMB/
`
`01/04/2019
`
`Attachments
`
`Motion_to_Compel_Initial_Disclosures__Black_Cherry_.pdf(205743 bytes )
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the matter of Application Serial No. 87785877
`Mark: BLACK CHERRY
`Published in the Official Gazette on June 26, 2018
`
`
`BlackBerry Limited,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`Opposition No.: 91243246
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Xiamen Intreplus Technology Co., Ltd.,
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`OPPOSER’S MOTION TO COMPEL APPLICANT’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES
`
`In accordance with Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Section 523 of the
`
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure, Opposer BlackBerry Limited
`
`("Opposer"), by and through its counsel, hereby moves the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the
`
`"Board") for an order compelling Applicant, Xiamen Intreplus Technology Co., Ltd. (“Applicant”)
`
`to serve its Initial Disclosures. No previous request for the relief sought herein has been made.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`Opposer commenced this Action on or about August 24, 2018. The Board issued its
`
`Institution Order on August 27, 2018 setting the deadline for the parties to serve their Initial
`
`Disclosures by November 5, 2018.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`On October 10, 2018, Applicant filed what is purported to be an Answer to the Notice of
`
`Opposition. However, this pleading is clearly deficient and does not comply with various rules and
`
`procedures.
`
`The Discovery Conference was set to take place on or before November 5, 2018 and
`
`Opposer attempted in good faith to cooperate with Applicant and schedule a Board supervised
`
`conference, given the deficiencies in Applicant’s pleading. Applicant, however, has refused to
`
`cooperate and participate on the mandatory Discovery Conference. As a result, Opposer timely file
`
`a Motion for Sanctions on or about November 26, 2018, which Applicant has now conceded due to
`
`its failure to timely oppose same.
`
`Additionally, Applicant has now failed to timely serve its Initial Disclosure and Opposer
`
`brings this motion for an order compelling Applicant’s compliance.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The provisions of Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to the mandatory
`
`Initial Disclosures and Discovery Conference are applicable to Board proceedings, as noted in the
`
`TBMP. See 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(a)(1), 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(a)(2)(ii), 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(a)(2)(iv), and
`
`37 C.F.R. § 2.120(a)(3). Each party involved in a Board proceeding is obligated to make Initial
`
`Disclosures, by the deadline set in the Institution Order, or otherwise extended. Id.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Accordingly, a party failing to make Initial Disclosures may be subject to a motion to
`
`compel, and ultimately, a motion for discovery sanctions. 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(f)(1).
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer respectfully requests that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`
`grant Opposer’s motion.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`January 4, 2019
`
`DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
`
`_____/G. Roxanne Elings/____________
`By: G. Roxanne Elings
`
`Emily M. Borich
`1251 Avenue of the Americas
`21st Floor
`New York, New York 10020
`(212) 489-8230
`Attorneys for Opposer BlackBerry Limited
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON THIS 4TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019, A TRUE AND
`I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON THIS 4TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019, A TRUE AND
`COMPLETE COPY OF THE FOREGOING OPPOSER’S MOTION TO COMPEL
`COMPLETE COPY OF THE FOREGOING OPPOSER’S MOTION TO COMPEL
`APPLICANT’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES HAS BEEN SERVED UPON APPLICANT BY
`APPLICANT’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES HAS BEEN SERVED UPON APPLICANT BY
`DELIVERING THE SAME VIA EMAIL TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
`DELIVERING THE SAME VIA EMAIL TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
`SUNNYIPR@163.COM
`SUNNYIPR@163.COM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/EMB/
`
`/EMB/
`EMILY M. BORICH
`EMILY M. BORICH
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket