throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA943362
`12/21/2018
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`
`Ecolab USA Inc.
`
`Granted to Date
`of previous ex-
`tension
`
`Address
`
`12/23/2018
`
`1 Ecolab Place
`St. Paul, MN 55102
`UNITED STATES
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`Scott W. Johnston
`Merchant & Gould P.C
`P.O. Box 2910
`Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910
`UNITED STATES
`ggolla@merchantgould.com, aavery@merchantgould.com, dockm-
`pls@merchantgould.com, sjohnston@merchantgould.com, slindemei-
`er@merchantgould.com
`612-332-5300
`
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No
`
`79223349
`
`Publication date
`
`06/26/2018
`
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`
`International Re-
`gistration No.
`
`Applicant
`
`12/21/2018
`
`1380798
`
`Nanogate SE
`Zum Schacht 3
`66287 Quierschied
`FED REP GERMANY
`
`Opposition Peri-
`od Ends
`
`International Re-
`gistration Date
`
`12/23/2018
`
`10/26/2017
`
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 001. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: chemical preparations for use in industry;
`chemical spray preparations for stretching shoes; Chemical preparations for use in industry, namely,
`chemical compositions for use in waterproofing shoes
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d)
`
`Mark Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`

`

`U.S. Registration
`No.
`
`1510625
`
`Registration Date
`
`11/01/1988
`
`Application Date
`
`03/23/1988
`
`Foreign Priority
`Date
`
`NONE
`
`Word Mark
`
`Design Mark
`
`Description of
`Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`EMPIRE
`
`NONE
`
`Class 003. First use: First Use: 1987/10/00 First Use In Commerce: 1987/10/00
`OUTDOOR CLEANING PREPARATION FOR COMMERCIAL AND INSTITU-
`TIONAL USE IN CLEANING CONCRETE AND DRIVEWAYS
`
`Attachments
`
`2018 12 21 Notice of Opposition EMPIRE 79223349.pdf(146178 bytes )
`
`Signature
`
`/gcg/
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`Gregory C. Golla
`
`12/21/2018
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ecolab USA Inc.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`Nanogate SE,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Opposition No._________________
`
`Mark: EMPIRE and Design
`
`Serial No.: 79223349
`
`Filing Date: Oct. 26, 2017
`
`Publication Date: Jun. 26, 2018
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Ecolab USA Inc. and its related companies (hereinafter “Opposer” or “Ecolab”), a
`
`Delaware corporation, located at 1 Ecolab Place, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102, believes it will be
`
`damaged by the registration of the mark shown in Application Serial No. 79223349, filed
`
`October 26, 2017, by Nanogate SE (hereinafter “Applicant”), and hereby opposes registration of
`
`the mark. The grounds for opposition are as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Applicant’s mark published for opposition on June 26, 2018 and Opposer extended
`
`the time to oppose until December 23, 2018. This Notice of Opposition is timely filed.
`
`2.
`
`Applicant is seeking to register the mark EMPIRE and Design in connection with
`
`“chemical preparations for use in industry; chemical spray preparations for stretching shoes;
`
`Chemical preparations for use in industry, namely, chemical compositions for use in
`
`waterproofing shoes” in International Class 1 and “shoe dyes; mordant dyes; dyestuffs” in
`
`International Class 2 and “shoe black; shoe wax; shoe cream; shoe polish; shoe polish applicators
`
`containing shoe polish; cleaning preparations for shoes; bleaching preparations for shoes for
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`household purposes” in International Class 3. Opposer is opposing the goods in International
`
`Class 1.
`
`3.
`
`Ecolab is the leading global developer and marketer of premium cleaning,
`
`sanitizing, chemical preparations and waste related products and services for a variety of
`
`markets, including but not limited to the commercial, industry and institutional healthcare
`
`markets.
`
`4.
`
`Since at least 1987, Ecolab has been using the trademark EMPIRE to identify and
`
`promote its Outdoor cleaning preparation for commercial and institutional use in cleaning
`
`concrete and driveways.
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Ecolab USA Inc., owns the following incontestable registration for its EMPIRE
`
`mark (collectively along with the common law usage referred to herein as "Opposer's EMPIRE
`
`Mark"):
`
`Mark/Name
`
`Status/Key Dates
`
`Full Goods/Services
`
`App. No./Reg.
`No.
`RN: 1510625
`SN: 73718366
`
`
`EMPIRE
`
`
`Renewed November 1, 2018
`(Int'l Class: 03)
`Int'l Class: 03
`outdoor cleaning
`First Use: October, 1987
`preparation for
`Filed: March 23, 1988
`commercial and
`Registered: November 1,
`institutional use in
`1988
`cleaning concrete and
`Last Renewal: November 1,
`driveways
`2018
`
`Current printouts of information from the electronic database records of the USPTO showing the
`
`current status and title of the registration is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`
`
`6.
`
`The registration listed in the above table have not been canceled, are valid, and
`
`are now in full force and effect.
`
`7.
`
`Registration 1510625 is incontestable under Section 15 of the Lanham Act, 15
`
`U.S.C. § 1065. Consequently, this registration is conclusive evidence of the validity of the
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`registered mark and of the registration of the mark, of Opposer's ownership of the mark, and of
`
`Opposer's exclusive right to use the registered marks in commerce under Section 33 of the
`
`Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1115.
`
`8.
`
`Opposer has advertised and promoted Opposer's EMPIRE Mark continuously and
`
`extensively, and made substantial sales of products and services under said mark. As a result of
`
`such continuous use and promotion, Opposer's EMPIRE Mark has developed and represents
`
`valuable goodwill inuring to the benefit of Opposer.
`
`9.
`
`There is no issue of priority concerning Application Serial No. 79223349 since
`
`Opposer used and registered Opposer's EMPIRE Mark prior to Applicant’s October 26, 2017,
`
`filing date. Opposer adopted and commenced use of Opposer’s EMPIRE Mark as a trademark
`
`long before Applicant adopted or used the EMPIRE mark. Opposer’s usage of the term EMPIRE
`
`as a trademark commenced at least as early as 1987, thiry years prior to the filing date of
`
`Applicant’s application for its EMPIRE mark. Opposer therefore has priority over Applicant
`
`with respect to the marks at issue.
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, Applicant had knowledge of the fact that Opposer
`
`used the term EMPIRE as a trademark and/or had constructive knowledge of Opposer’s
`
`EMPIRE registration before it adopted the EMPIRE mark.
`
`11.
`
`Applicant’s EMPIRE mark is confusingly and deceptively similar to Opposer’s
`
`previously used and duly registered EMPIRE Mark.
`
`12.
`
`Applicant’s EMPIRE mark is similar in sight, sound and commercial impression
`
`to Opposer’s EMPIRE Mark.
`
`13.
`
`Applicant’s alleged goods/services are closely related to Opposer’s goods/services
`
`marketed and sold by Opposer in connection with Opposer's EMPIRE Mark. Applicant’s
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`goods/services overlap with Opposer’s business in the industry area. Both Applicant’s goods
`
`and Opposer’s goods and services relate generally to chemical preparations.
`
`14.
`
`Upon information and belief, Opposer’s goods/services and Applicant’s
`
`goods/services are promoted in the same channels of trade to the same consumers or class of
`
`consumers.
`
`
`
`15.
`
`Due to the similarity between Applicant’s claimed mark, EMPIRE, and Opposer’s
`
`previously used and registered EMPIRE Mark, the closely related nature of the goods and
`
`services of the respective parties, customers and potential customers are likely to believe that
`
`Applicant’s goods/services originate from Opposer, resulting in a likelihood of confusion in the
`
`marketplace, and damage to Opposer.
`
`
`
`16.
`
`The use and registration by Applicant of the mark EMPIRE for Applicant’s
`
`goods/services is likely to cause confusion or to cause mistake or deception in the trade, and
`
`among purchasers and potential purchasers, with Opposer’s previously used and registered
`
`EMPIRE Mark, again resulting in damage to Opposer.
`
`
`
`17.
`
`Because of the closely related nature of the goods and services of the parties, and
`
`the similarity of the marks, use and registration of the term EMPIRE by Applicant is likely to
`
`cause confusion, mistake, or deception that Applicant’s goods/services are those of Opposer, or
`
`are otherwise endorsed, sponsored, or approved by Opposer for use with Opposer’s
`
`goods/services causing further damage to Opposer.
`
`
`
`18.
`
`Registration of the mark shown in Application Serial No. 79223349 will result in
`
`damage to Opposer under the provisions of Section 2 of the U.S. Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C.
`
`Section 1052, pursuant to the allegations stated above.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer asks that its opposition to this application be sustained and that
`
`registration of the term EMPIRE for the services set forth therein be refused.
`
`
`
`Please direct all correspondence to:
`
`Scott W. Johnston
`MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
`P.O. Box 2910
`Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910
`
`Opposer herein appoints John A. Clifford, Reg. No. 30,247; Gregory C. Golla; Andrew S.
`
`Ehard; Scott W. Johnston, Reg. No. 39,721; Danielle I. Mattessich; Christopher J. Schulte;
`
`William D. Schultz, and all other attorneys of the firm of Merchant & Gould P.C., its attorneys to
`
`transact all business in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office relating to this matter with full
`
`power of substitution.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: December 21, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`ECOLAB USA INC.
`By its Attorneys,
`
`
`Scott W. Johnston
`Gregory Golla
`MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
`80 South Eighth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-2215
`(612) 332-5300
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Generated on: This page was generated by TSDR on 2018-12-21 14:10:39 EST
`
`Mark: EMPIRE
`
`US Serial Number: 73718366
`
`US Registration
`Number:
`
`1510625
`
`Register: Principal
`
`Mark Type: Trademark
`
`Status: The registration has been renewed.
`
`Status Date: Apr. 12, 2018
`
`Publication Date: Aug. 09, 1988
`

`
`Mark Literal
`Elements:
`
`EMPIRE
`
`Standard Character
`Claim:
`
`No
`
`Application Filing
`Date:
`
`Mar. 23, 1988
`
`Registration Date: Nov. 01, 1988
`
`Mark Information
`
`Mark Drawing
`Type:
`
`1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S)
`
`Goods and Services
`
`Note: The following symbols indicate that the registrant/owner has amended the goods/services:
`
`Brackets [..] indicate deleted goods/services;
`Double parenthesis ((..)) identify any goods/services not claimed in a Section 15 affidavit of incontestability; and
`Asterisks *..* identify additional (new) wording in the goods/services.
`
`For: OUTDOOR CLEANING PREPARATION FOR COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL USE IN CLEANING CONCRETE AND
`DRIVEWAYS
`
`International
`Class(es):
`
`003 - Primary Class
`
`Class Status: ACTIVE
`
`Basis: 1(a)
`
`First Use: Oct. 1987
`
`U.S Class(es): 052
`
`Use in Commerce: Oct. 1987
`
`Basis Information (Case Level)
`
`Filed Use: Yes
`
`Filed ITU: No
`
`Filed 44D: No
`
`Filed 44E: No
`
`Filed 66A: No
`
`Currently Use: Yes
`
`Currently ITU: No
`
`Currently 44D: No
`
`Currently 44E: No
`
`Currently 66A: No
`
`Amended Use: No
`
`Amended ITU: No
`
`Amended 44D: No
`
`Amended 44E: No
`
`Filed No Basis: No
`
`Currently No Basis: No
`
`Current Owner(s) Information
`
`

`

`Owner Name: ECOLAB USA INC.
`
`Owner Address: 1 ECOLAB PLACE
`ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
`UNITED STATES
`
`Legal Entity Type: CORPORATION
`
`State or Country
`Where Organized:
`
`DELAWARE
`
`Attorney/Correspondence Information
`
`Attorney of Record - None
`
`Correspondent
`
`Correspondent
`Name/Address:
`
`Sarah A. Lockner
`Ecolab USA Inc.
`1 ECOLAB PLACE
`ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
`UNITED STATES
`
`Correspondent e-
`mail:
`
`USTM@ecolab.com
`
`Correspondent e-
`mail Authorized:
`
`Yes
`
`Domestic Representative - Not Found
`
`Prosecution History
`
`Date
`
`Description
`
`Apr. 12, 2018
`
`NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
`
`Apr. 12, 2018
`
`REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)
`
`Apr. 12, 2018
`
`REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED
`
`Apr. 11, 2018
`
`CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
`
`Mar. 29, 2018
`
`TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
`
`Mar. 29, 2018
`
`TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
`
`Feb. 15, 2012
`
`AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
`
`Jul. 14, 2008
`
`CASE FILE IN TICRS
`
`Jan. 18, 2008
`
`REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)
`
`Jan. 18, 2008
`
`REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED
`
`Jan. 17, 2008
`
`ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
`
`Jan. 15, 2008
`
`TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
`
`Jan. 15, 2008
`
`APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
`
`Jan. 15, 2008
`
`TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
`
`Mar. 24, 1994
`
`REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
`
`Nov. 09, 1993
`
`REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
`
`Nov. 01, 1988
`
`REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`Aug. 09, 1988
`
`PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION
`
`Jul. 08, 1988
`
`NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
`
`Jun. 08, 1988
`
`APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`May 20, 1988
`
`EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
`
`May 19, 1988
`
`ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
`
`Maintenance Filings or Post Registration Information
`
`Affidavit of
`Continued Use:
`
`Affidavit of
`Incontestability:
`
`Section 8 - Accepted
`
`Section 15 - Accepted
`
`Renewal Date: Nov. 01, 2018
`
`TM Staff and Location Information
`
`TM Staff Information - None
`
`File Location
`
`Current Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE
`
`Date in Location: Apr. 12, 2018
`
`Proceeding
`Number
`
`59136
`
`59136
`
`59136
`
`75461
`
`75461
`
`88888
`
`62177
`
`

`

`Assignment Abstract Of Title Information
`
`Summary
`
`Total Assignments: 1
`
`Conveyance: ASSIGNS THE ENTIRE INTEREST
`
`Reel/Frame: 4714/0408
`
`Date Recorded: Feb. 09, 2012
`
`Supporting
`Documents:
`
`assignment-tm-4714-0408.pdf
`
`Assignment 1 of 1
`

`
`Registrant: KAY CHEMICAL COMPANY
`
`Pages: 4
`
`Name: KAY CHEMICAL COMPANY
`
`Execution Date: Feb. 08, 2012
`
`Assignor
`
`Legal Entity Type: CORPORATION
`
`Name: ECOLAB USA INC.
`
`Legal Entity Type: CORPORATION
`
`Address: 370 WABASHA STREET NORTH
`ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
`
`Correspondent
`Name:
`
`Correspondent
`Address:
`
`EDWARD R. COURTNEY, ESQ.
`
`370 WABASHA STREET NORTH
`ESC-F7
`ST. PAUL, MN 55102
`
`State or Country
`Where Organized:
`
`NORTH CAROLINA
`
`Assignee
`
`State or Country
`Where Organized:
`
`DELAWARE
`
`Correspondent
`
`Domestic Representative - Not Found
`
`

`

`Int. CL: 3
`
`Prior US. Cl.: 52
`
`Reg. No. 1,510,625
`United States Patent and Trademark Office Registered Nov. 1,1988
`
`TRADEMARK
`PRINCIPAL REGISTER
`
`ENIPIRE
`
`KAY CHEMICAL COMPANY (NORTH CAROLI-
`NA CORPORATION)
`PO. BOX 18407
`GREENSBORO, NC 27419
`
`FOR: OUTDOOR CLEANING PREPARATION
`FOR COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL
`USE IN CLEANING CONCRETE AND DRIVE-
`WAYS, IN CLASS 3 (US. CL. 52).
`
`FIRST USE
`10-0-1987.
`
`10—0—1987;
`
`IN COMMERCE
`
`SER. NO. 718,366, FILED 3—23-1988.
`
`HELEN ROBERTS WENDEL, EXAMINING AT-
`TORNEY
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket