throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA992324
`
`Filing date:
`
`08/02/2019
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`91249045
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Plaintiff
`Chanel, Inc.
`
`BARBARA A. SOLOMON
`FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.
`151 WEST 42ND STREET, 17TH FLOOR
`NEW YORK, NY 10036
`UNITED STATES
`bsolomon@fzlz.com, ttabfiling@fzlz.com
`212-813-5900
`
`Request for Discovery Conference
`
`Barbara A. Solomon
`
`bsolomon@fzlz.com
`
`/Barbara A. Solomon/
`
`08/02/2019
`
`Attachments
`
`F3151133.pdf(144138 bytes )
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In re Application Ser. N0.: 88/ 161,135
`Trademark: CC COCO ACCOM
`
`Published in the Ojficial Gazette on May 28, 2019
`
`CHANEL, INC.,
`
`- V_ _
`
`COCO ACCOM,
`
`Opposer,
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91/249045
`
`REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION OF
`INTERLOCUTORY ATTORNEY IN DISCOVERY CONFERENCE
`
`Opposer Chanel, Inc. (“Chanel”), pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 2.120(a)(2), hereby requests
`
`that a Board Interlocutory Attorney or Administrative Trademark Judge participate in a
`
`discovery conference in the above matter. Issue has been joined with Applicant filing a response
`
`to the Notice of Opposition on July 30, 2019. Under the current scheduling order, the parties are
`
`required to hold their discovery conference by no later than September 2, 2019. Pursuant to 37
`
`C.F.R. § 2.120(a)(2), this request for Board participation in the discovery conference is timely.
`
`
`Status and Historv of the Opposition
`
`Chanel, owner of numerous federal trademark registrations for both the CC monogram
`
`and COCO marks, filed Opposition No. 91/249045 against Applicant’s Application Serial No.
`
`88/161,135 to register the mark CC COCO ACCOM. The basis for the opposition is that
`
`Applicant’s applied-for mark is likely to cause confusion with Chanel’s CC monogram and
`
`(F31507891 )
`
`

`

`COCO marks and is likely to dilute Chanel’s marks. The opposition was filed on June 24, 2019
`
`and proceedings were instituted on the same day.
`
`On July 30, 2019, a “Notice of Answer” was filed and served. The “Notice of Answer”
`
`appears to have been prepared and signed by Applicant. The “Notice of Answer” is in the nature
`
`of a narrative or explanation about the inspiration for Applicant’s mark and otherwise provides
`
`commentary on the Notice of Opposition filed by Chanel. There are no specific responses —
`
`whether admissions, denials, or statements of lack of knowledge information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of any allegations — to any of the 49 numbered paragraphs of the Notice of
`
`Opposition. While the email addresses for Applicant include i0efogel®lawfogel.com, Mr. Fogel
`
`has not entered an appearance in this matter and did not sign the response.
`
`Basis for Reg uest
`
`Applicant appears to be representing herself in these proceedings. The answer to the
`
`opposition was signed and submitted by Ms. Accom and contains references to “my birth right,”
`
`“my family name,” and uses “1” throughout, making it apparent that the response was prepared
`
`and filed by the individual Applicant. There is no indication that Ms. Accom is an attorney or
`
`has experience in Board proceedings.
`
`As noted in Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure § 401.01, where a
`
`party is acting pro se, Board participation “is encouraged.” Given the issues with the answer to
`
`the opposition and Applicant’s apparent lack of familiarity with Board proceedings, it is
`
`respectfully requested that the Board participate so as to “fill the educator’s role [that] would
`
`have to be filled by experienced counsel.” MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES TO TRADEMARK
`
`TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD RULES OF PRACTICE, 72 Fed. Reg. 42242, 42252 (August
`
`(F31507891 )
`
`2
`
`

`

`1, 2007). Further, having Board participation will ensure that all of the issues required to be
`
`addressed during the discovery conference are in fact addressed.
`
`Participants
`
`Barbara A. Solomon and/or Emily Weiss, counsel for Opposer, will appear on behalf of
`
`Opposer.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`August g, 2019
`
`FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.
`
`
`
`Emily Weiss
`151 West 42nd Street, 17th Floor
`New York, New York 10036
`Tel.: (212) 813-5900
`Fax: (212) 813-5901
`Email: bsolomon@lez.com, eweiss£c§lez.com
`
`Attorneysfor Opposer Chanel, Inc.
`
`{F3150789 l
`
`)
`
`3
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on thiséd day of August 2019, I caused a true and correct copy of
`the foregoing REQUEST FOR PARTICIPATION 0F INTERLOCUTORY ATTORNEY
`IN DISCOVERY CONFERENCE to be served by email on Applicant by sending the same to
`the email addresses cocoaccomgngailcom, c@cocoaccom.com, ameesh.b.shah@gmail.com. A
`courtesy copy was also sent on August 2, 2019 by first-class mail, postage pre-paid addressed
`to:
`
`COCO ACCOM
`
`9903 SANTA MONICA BLVD SUITE #227
`
`BEVERLY HILLS 90212
`
`
`
`(F31507891 ;
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket