throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA1122661
`03/24/2021
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer Information
`
`Name
`
`Entity
`
`Address
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG
`
`Aktiengesellschaft
`
`Citizenship
`
`Switzerland
`
`SCHWARZWALDALLEE 215
`BASEL, 4058
`SWITZERLAND
`
`JOVAN N. JOVANOVIC
`THE WATSON IP GROUP, PLC
`3133 HIGHLAND DR.
`SUITE 200
`HUDSONVILLE, MI 49426
`UNITED STATES
`Primary Email: docketing@watson-ip.com
`Secondary Email(s): jjovanovic@watson-ip.com, sstumpo@watson-ip.com,
`global.trademarks@syngenta.com
`6167971000
`
`Docket Number
`
`IPA211552
`
`Applicant Information
`
`Application No.
`
`88874261
`
`Publication date
`
`02/23/2021
`
`Opposition Filing
`Date
`
`Applicant
`
`03/24/2021
`
`Opposition Peri-
`od Ends
`
`03/25/2021
`
`Bladerunner Farms, Inc.
`802 HOWARD ROAD
`POTEET, TX 78065
`UNITED STATES
`
`Goods/Services Affected by Opposition
`
`Class 031. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Sod
`
`Grounds for Opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d)
`
`Mark Cited by Opposer as Basis for Opposition
`
`U.S. Registration
`No.
`
`2777904
`
`Registration Date
`
`10/28/2003
`
`Application Date
`
`08/02/2002
`
`Foreign Priority
`Date
`
`NONE
`
`

`

`Word Mark
`
`Design Mark
`
`Description of
`Mark
`
`Goods/Services
`
`PRIMO MAXX
`
`NONE
`
`Class 001. First use: First Use: 1999/09/15 First Use In Commerce: 1999/09/15
`PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS FOR AGRICULTURAL USE, NAMELY TURF
`GROWTH REGULATOR
`Class 005. First use: First Use: 1999/09/15 First Use In Commerce: 1999/09/15
`FUNGICIDES FOR AGRICULTURAL AND DOMESTIC USE
`
`Attachments
`
`NoticeOfOppositionIPA211552.pdf(270314 bytes )
`
`Signature
`
`/s Jovan N. Jovanovic/
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`Jovan N. Jovanovic
`
`03/24/2021
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Syngenta Participations AG
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`Bladerunner Farms, Inc.
`
`
`
`Opposer,
`
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No.__________________
`
`Serial No.: 88/874,261
`
`Mark:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`
`
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`P.O. BOX 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`
`Dear Sir or Madam:
`
`
`
`Syngenta Participations AG (“Opposer”), a Aktiengesellschaft, organized under the laws
`
`of Switzerland, having an address of Schwarzwaldallee 215, Basel, 4058, Switzerland, believes it
`
`will be damaged by registration of U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88/874,261
`
`(“Application”) for the mark
`
`, hereinafter referred to as PRIMO ZOYSIA
`
`(“Applicant’s Mark”), filed on April 16, 2020, by Bladerunner Farms, Inc, a Texas Corporation
`
`having an address of 802 Howard Road, Poteet, Texas, United States, 78065 (“Applicant”) and
`
`hereby opposes the same.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`As grounds for opposition, it is alleged:
`
`1.
`
`By the Application filed on April 16, 2020, Applicant seeks to obtain registration
`
`on the Principal Register for the trademark PRIMO ZOYSIA for Sod in International Class 031.
`
`(“Applicant’s Goods”). The Application was filed based on Applicant’s bona fide intent to use
`
`the subject mark in commerce.
`
`2.
`
`Through entry of the disclaimer of “PRIMO ZOYSIA”, Applicant makes no claim
`
`to the exclusive right to use “PRIMO ZOYSIA” apart from the mark as shown.
`
`3.
`
`Opposer is a leading global agriculture company that helps improve global food
`
`security by enabling millions of farmers to make better use of available resources. Opposer’s
`
`goods support a broad array of applications, but not limited to, growth regulation for turf, crop
`
`protection, healthy soil and better vegetable availability on the shelf.
`
`4.
`
`Since at least as early as September 15, 1999, long before Applicant filed the
`
`Application, Opposer has provided and continues to provide its goods in connection with
`
`Opposer’s registered PRIMO MAXX (“Opposer’s Mark).
`
`5.
`
`Opposer through substantial use and promotion, has acquired significant goodwill
`
`and consumer recognition it its PRIMO MAXX mark. Opposer’s Mark is strong and well-
`
`known.
`
`6.
`
`To protect its substantial goodwill and investment in its PRIMO MAXX mark, in
`
`addition to any common law rights, Opposer is the owner of U.S. Registration No. 2777904 for
`
`Plant growth regulators for agricultural use, namely turf growth regulation in International
`
`Class 001 and Fungicides for agricultural and domestic use in International Class 005. Opposer
`
`first used the PRIMO MAXX Registration for over twenty-one and a half (21.5) years before
`
`Applicant filed the Application. True and correct copies of the specifics of the PRIMO MAXX
`
`

`

`Registration obtained from the PTO’s TESS database is attached hereto as Exhibit A and made
`
`of record.
`
`7.
`
`Hereinafter in the Notice of Opposition, the goods identified in Opposer’s Federal
`
`registration as specified in Paragraph 5 above are valid, subsisting, unrevoked, and uncancelled.
`
`As such, they constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the registered mark and of the
`
`registration thereof, Opposer’s ownership of the PRIMO MAXX mark shown therein, and
`
`Opposer’s exclusive right to use the registered mark in commerce in connection with the goods
`
`named therein, without condition or limitation. The Federal registration also constitutes notice to
`
`Applicant of Opposer’s claim of ownership of the PRIMO MAXX mark shown therein, all as
`
`provided in Sections 7(b), 22 and 33(a) of the Trademark Act, as amended.
`
`8.
`
`Further, Opposer’s Federal registration as specified in Paragraph 5 above is
`
`incontestable. Section 15 of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C § 1065. Therefore, the registration
`
`constitutes conclusive evidence of the validity of the registered mark and of the registration of
`
`the mark, of Opposer’s ownership of its mark, and of Opposer’s exclusive right to use the
`
`registered mark in commerce as provided in Section 33 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1115.
`
`9.
`
`Opposer’s first use date, filing date, and registration date for the Federal
`
`registration specified in Paragraph 5 substantially precede the Application’s filing date.
`
`Accordingly, Applicant knew or should have known of Opposer’s ownership, use and
`
`registration of the PRIMO MAXX mark prior to the filing date of the Application.
`
`10.
`
`In addition to the protection afforded to Opposer by its Federal trademark
`
`registration, Opposer has extensive common law rights in its PRIMO MAXX mark in connection
`
`with the goods with which Opposer uses the PRIMO MAXX mark, including without limitation,
`
`Opposer’s Goods, throughout the United States. Opposer has acquired such common law rights
`
`

`

`through long-standing, exclusive use of its PRIMO MAXX mark in interstate commerce for over
`
`twenty-one and half (21.5) years. Opposer’s common law rights in its PRIMO MAXX mark
`
`were established long before and predate the filing of the Application.
`
`11.
`
`Opposer additionally relies on the foregoing senior common law trademark rights
`
`in Opposer’s PRIMO MAXX mark as a ground for this Opposition.
`
`12.
`
`Applicant’s PRIMO ZOYSIA mark and Opposer’s PRIMO MAXX mark are
`
`highly similar in sight, sound, meaning and commercial impression.
`
`13.
`
`Applicant’s Goods are highly related to Opposer’s Goods.
`
`14.
`
`Applicant’s consumers and trademark channels are identical or overlapping with
`
`Opposer’s consumers and trade channels.
`
`15.
`
`Applicant’s use of the PRIMO ZOYSIA mark will result in confusion by third
`
`parties with Opposer’s PRIMO MAXX mark.
`
`16.
`
`In view of the above, it is alleged that Applicant’s PRIMO ZOYSIA mark so
`
`resembles Opposer’s PRIMO MAXX mark that Applicant’s mark will likely cause, and continue
`
`to cause, confusion or cause mistake or deceive under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15
`
`U.S.C. § 1052(d). In view of Opposer’s prior statutory and common law trademark rights,
`
`Applicant is not entitled to registration of Applicant’s mark subject to the Application for the
`
`identified Applicant’s Goods pursuant to Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. §
`
`1052(d).
`
`17.
`
`By reason of the foregoing, Opposer will be damaged by the Registration of U.S.
`
`Application Serial No. 88/874,261 for PRIMO ZOYSIA mark.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`WHEREFORE, Opposer requests that U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88/874,261
`
`be rejected and stricken, that no registration be issued thereon to Applicant, and that this opposition
`
`be sustained in favor of Opposer.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: March 24, 2021
`


`

`

`
`THE WATSON IP GROUP, PLC
`
`
`
`/s Jovan N. Jovanovic/
`
`Jovan N. Jovanovic (Reg. No. 40039)
`Samantha Stumpo
`3133 Highland Drive, Suite 200
`Hudsonville, Michigan 49426
`Tel: (616) 797-1000
`Fax: (866) 369-7391
`jjovanovic@watson-ip.com
`sstumpo@watson-ip.com
`
`Attorneys for Opposer
`Syngenta Participations AG
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`3/23/2021
`
`Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Home|Site Index|Search|FAQ|Glossary|Contacts|eBusiness|eBiz alerts|News
` Trademarks > Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
`
`TESS was last updated on Tue Mar 23 03:17:22 EDT 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Logout Please logout when you are done to release system resources allocated for you.
`Record 1 out of 1
`
`
`
`
`
` ( Use the "Back" button of the Internet Browser to return to
`
`TESS)
`
`Word Mark
`Goods and
`Services
`
`PRIMO MAXX
`IC 001. US 001 005 006 010 026 046. G & S: PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS FOR AGRICULTURAL USE,
`NAMELY TURF GROWTH REGULATOR. FIRST USE: 19990915. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19990915
`
`IC 005. US 006 018 044 046 051 052. G & S: FUNGICIDES FOR AGRICULTURAL AND DOMESTIC USE. FIRST
`USE: 19990915. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19990915
`
`(1) TYPED DRAWING
`
`78150165
`
`August 2, 2002
`1A
`
`2777904
`
`October 28, 2003
`
`Mark
`Drawing
`Code
`Serial
`Number
`Filing Date
`Current
`Basis
`Original
`Filing Basis 1A
`Published for
`August 5, 2003
`Opposition
`Registration
`Number
`Registration
`Date
`Owner
`
`(REGISTRANT) Syngenta Investment Corp. CORPORATION DELAWARE c/o Trademark Department 410 Swing
`Road Greensboro NORTH CAROLINA 27409
`
`(LAST LISTED OWNER) SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG CORPORATION SWITZERLAND Schwarzwaldallee
`215 Basel SWITZERLAND CH-4058
`ASSIGNMENT RECORDED
`
`Jovan N. Jovanovic
`
`Assignment
`Recorded
`Attorney of
`Record
`Prior
`Registrations 1742090
`Type of Mark TRADEMARK
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`Affidavit Text SECT 15. SECT 8 (6-YR). SECTION 8(10-YR) 20130126.
`Renewal
`1ST RENEWAL 20130126
`
`https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4808:9vway6.2.1
`
`1/2
`
`

`

`3/23/2021
`Live/Dead
`Indicator
`
`LIVE
`
`Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`|.HOME | SITE INDEX| SEARCH | eBUSINESS | HELP | PRIVACY POLICY
`
`https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4808:9vway6.2.1
`
`2/2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket