throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. https://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA1184085
`01/12/2022
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`Filing date:
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Notice of Opposition
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party opposes registration of the indicated application.
`
`Opposer information
`
`Name
`
`Entity
`
`Address
`
`Correspondence
`information
`
`PepsiCo, Inc.
`
`Corporation
`
`700 ANDERSON HILL ROAD
`PURCHASE, NY 10577
`UNITED STATES
`
`Citizenship
`
`North Carolina
`
`PAUL A. LEE
`SENIOR TRADEMARK COUNSEL
`PEPSICO, INC.
`700 ANDERSON HILL ROAD
`PURCHASE, NY 10577
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: trademarks@pepsico.com
`Secondary email(s): paul.lee@pepsico.com, donna.j.sanders@pepsico.com
`No phone number provided
`
`Applicant information
`
`Application no.
`
`90607986
`
`01/12/2022
`
`Opposition filing
`date
`
`Applicant
`
`Publication date
`
`12/14/2021
`
`Opposition period
`ends
`
`01/13/2022
`
`Freedman, Jessica L
`272 LEONARD STREET, APT #3
`BROOKLYN, NY 11211
`UNITED STATES
`
`Goods/services affected by opposition
`
`Class 032. First Use: 0 First Use In Commerce: 0
`All goods and services in the class are opposed, namely: Non-alcoholic mixes used in the prepara-
`tion of alcoholic cocktails
`
`Grounds for opposition
`
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d)
`
`Dilution by blurring
`
`Trademark Act Sections 2 and 43(c)
`
`Marks cited by opposer as basis for opposition
`
`U.S. registration
`no.
`
`824150
`
`Register
`
`Principal
`
`Application date
`
`09/09/1966
`
`Registration date
`
`02/14/1967
`
`Foreign priority
`
`NONE
`
`

`

`Word mark
`
`Design mark
`
`Description of
`mark
`
`Goods/services
`
`date
`
`PEPSI
`
`NONE
`
`Class 032. First use: First Use: 1911/11/21 First Use In Commerce: 1911/11/21
`SOFT DRINKS AND SYRUPS AND CONCENTRATESFOR THE PREPARA-
`TION THEREOF
`
`U.S. registration
`no.
`
`1317551
`
`Register
`
`Principal
`
`Registration date
`
`02/05/1985
`
`Application date
`
`09/29/1982
`
`Foreign priority
`date
`
`NONE
`
`Word mark
`
`Design mark
`
`Description of
`mark
`
`Goods/services
`
`PEPSI
`
`NONE
`
`Class 004. First use: First Use: 1981/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1981/00/00
`[ Candles ]
`Class 006. First use: First Use: 1981/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1981/00/00
`Key Chains
`Class 009. First use: First Use: 1977/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1977/00/00
`[ Radios and Can Shaped Telephones]
`Class 011. First use: First Use: 1981/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1981/00/00
`Electric Lamps [ and Charcoal Burning Barbecue Grills ]
`Class 014. First use: First Use: 1981/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1981/00/00
`Clocks
`Class 016. First use: First Use: 1981/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1981/00/00
`[ Pencil Cases and ] Pens
`Class 018. First use: First Use: 1979/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1979/00/00
`Umbrellas
`Class 020. First use: First Use: 1970/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1970/00/00
`[ Mirrors and Bean Bag Chairs ]
`Class 021. First use: First Use: 1972/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1972/00/00
`Drinking Glasses, [ Polyurethane Beverage Can Holders, Wastebaskets for Do-
`mestic Use, ] Insulated Bags for Food, Beverages and Ice
`Class 024. First use: First Use: 1974/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1974/00/00
`Beach Towels
`Class 025. First use: First Use: 1974/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1974/00/00
`T-Shirts, Sweatshirts, [ Jeans, Overalls, ] Baseball Caps [ , Knit Hats, Jackets,
`Aprons and Belts ]
`Class 026. First use: First Use: 1982/06/00 First Use In Commerce: 1982/06/00
`[ Embroidered Patches for Clothing ]
`Class 028. First use: First Use: 1975/00/00 First Use In Commerce: 1975/00/00
`[ Toy Can Banks, Toy Trucks, Toy Railroad Cars, Toy Soda Dispensers and Kal-
`eidoscopes ]
`
`U.S. registration
`
`1488547
`
`Application date
`
`12/04/1986
`
`

`

`no.
`
`Register
`
`Principal
`
`Registration date
`
`05/17/1988
`
`Foreign priority
`date
`
`NONE
`
`Word mark
`
`Design mark
`
`Description of
`mark
`
`Goods/services
`
`PEPSI
`
`NONE
`
`Class 025. First use: First Use: 1986/10/00 First Use In Commerce: 1986/10/00
`CLOTHING, NAMELY SWEATSHIRTS, SWEAT BOTTOMS, T-SHIRTS, [
`SHIRTS, JEANS, SUSPENDER JEANS, JACKETS, PULLOVERS ] AND JER-
`SEYS
`
`U.S. registration
`no.
`
`3659286
`
`Register
`
`Principal
`
`Registration date
`
`07/21/2009
`
`Word mark
`
`Design mark
`
`PEPSI
`
`Application date
`
`10/06/2008
`
`Foreign priority
`date
`
`NONE
`
`Description of
`mark
`
`Goods/services
`
`The mark consists of the word "PEPSI" in a stylized format.
`
`Class 032. First use: First Use: 2008/12/00 First Use In Commerce: 2008/12/00
`Concentrates, syrups or powders used inthe preparation of soft drinks; Soft
`drinks
`
`Attachments
`
`77586010#TMSN.png( bytes )
`noo pepsi v pepy pl sig.pdf(401815 bytes )
`
`Signature
`
`Name
`
`Date
`
`/Paul A. Lee/
`
`Paul A. Lee
`
`01/12/2022
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`: PEPY
`: Jessica L. Freedman
`: 90/607,986
`: March 28, 2021
`
`: December 14, 2021
`
`Opposition No.
`
`
`IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION:
`
`Mark
`
`Applicant
`Serial No.
`Filed
`
`Published in
`the Official Gazette
`
`_________________________________________ x
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`PEPSICO, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`Opposer,
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`JESSICA L. FREEDMAN,
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`Applicant.
`
`
`
`:
`_________________________________________ x
`
`
`NOTICE OF OPPOSITION
`
`Opposer, PepsiCo, Inc. ("PepsiCo" or "Opposer"), a North Carolina corporation having a
`
`place of business at 700 Anderson Hill Road, Purchase, New York 10577, believes that it will be
`
`damaged by the registration of United States Trademark Application Serial No. 90/607,986, filed
`
`on March 28, 2021, in the name of Jessica L. Freedman (hereinafter "Applicant") for the mark
`
`PEPY based on an intent to use the mark on or in connection with “Non-alcoholic mixes used in
`
`the preparation of alcoholic cocktails” in International Class 32, and, having been previously
`
`granted an extension of time to oppose, hereby opposes the foregoing application.
`
`The specific grounds for this opposition are as follows:
`
`1
`
`
`

`

`1.
`
`PepsiCo, through its predecessors-in-interest, has been engaged in the beverage
`
`business for over 100 years and has become well and favorably known to members of the public,
`
`as well as to members of the beverage industry, for quality beverage products and related services.
`
`It owns a portfolio of brands that identify carbonated soft drinks, juices and juice drinks, ready-to-
`
`drink teas and coffee drinks, isotonic sports drinks, bottled water and enhanced waters, and related
`
`products and services, as well as other consumer merchandise.
`
`2.
`
`For over a century, PepsiCo has used the PEPSI mark in connection with various
`
`beverages and other products, as well as advertising, marketing, sales and promotional services to
`
`authorized bottlers and independent distributors and retailers of those products.
`
`3.
`
`Since long prior to the filing date of the application-at-issue, PEPSI has been
`
`identified with Opposer and has appeared on a tremendous amount of product packaging,
`
`advertising, in-store display racks, signage and point-of purchase material.
`
`4.
`
`Opposer's products bearing the PEPSI mark are marketed and sold in vast quantities
`
`on a nationwide basis, supported by hundreds of millions of dollars of advertising and promotion
`
`each year. Opposer's products are sold in almost every supermarket in the United States as well as
`
`in mass merchandise stores, numerous convenience stores, vending machines, and other outlets.
`
`5.
`
`The extensive commercial acceptance and success of many of Opposer's products
`
`bearing the PEPSI mark for many decades is due in large measure to the substantial advertising
`
`and marketing efforts of PepsiCo. Such efforts have included the use of celebrities and artists to
`
`advance and promote the products. Opposer has, by virtue of such extensive usage, advertising
`
`and promotion, built up a very high level of consumer and trade recognition symbolized by its
`
`PEPSI mark. Retail sales of beverage products marketed under Opposer's PEPSI mark in the
`
`United States alone have exceeded many billions of dollars.
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`6.
`
`PepsiCo's use of the PEPSI mark also extends beyond beverages, per se, and
`
`includes other products and services. Indeed, for many decades now, PepsiCo has been marketing
`
`and selling clothing, baseball caps, umbrellas, drinking glasses, beach towels, clocks, pens, key
`
`chains, novelty items and other products under the PEPSI mark. The PEPSI mark is also used in
`
`various high-profile entertainment and promotional venues involving sports, popular culture and
`
`musical entertainment.
`
`7.
`
`PepsiCo also maintains a strong and innovative internet presence, through which it
`
`markets, advertises and promotes many of the foregoing products and services bearing the PEPSI
`
`mark, among others. PepsiCo’s websites include PEPSI.COM which is operational twenty-four
`
`hours a day, seven days a week. PepsiCo also maintains a Facebook page and YouTube Channel
`
`dedicated to promoting the PEPSI brand.
`
`8.
`
`Due to such extensive and continuous advertising, sale, use and promotion of soft
`
`drinks and related products and services under or in connection with Opposer’s PEPSI mark for
`
`many decades, these marks have not only acquired substantial public and consumer recognition
`
`throughout the United States, but have also enjoyed valuable goodwill, and become famous, solely
`
`signifying Opposer as the source of products and services of high quality.
`
`9.
`
`In addition to its prior common law rights in the PEPSI mark, Opposer is also the
`
`owner of numerous live United States trademark and service mark registrations, each of which
`
`incorporate the PEPSI mark or variants thereof, including, but not limited to, the following:
`
`MARK
`
`PEPSI
`
`REG. NO. REG. DATE FIRST
`USE
`DATE
`Feb. 14, 1967 November
`1911
`
`824150
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF
`GOODS
`
`Soft drinks and syrups and
`concentrates for the
`preparation thereof, in
`Class 32
`
`
`3
`
`
`

`

`PEPSI
`
`1317551
`
`Feb. 5, 1985
`
`1981
`1981
`1981
`1981
`1979
`1972
`
`
`
`1974
`1974
`
`
`PEPSI
`
`1488547
`
`May 17, 1988 October
`1986
`
`
`
`3659286
`
`Jul. 21, 2009 December
`2008
`
`Key chains, in Class 6
`Electric lamps, in Class 11
`Clocks, in Class 14
`Pens, in Class 16
`Umbrellas, in Class 18
`Drinking glasses,
`Insulated bags for food,
`beverages and ice, in
`Class 21
`Beach towels, in Class 24
`T-shirts, sweatshirts,
`baseball caps, in Class 25
`
`Clothing, namely
`sweatshirts, sweat
`bottoms, T-shirts and
`jerseys, in Class 25
`
`Concentrates, syrups or
`powders used in the
`preparation of soft drinks;
`Soft drinks, in Class 32
`
`
`
`10.
`
`Opposer's registrations for these marks are valid, subsisting, in full force and effect,
`
`uncancelled and unrevoked, and serve as evidence of Opposer's exclusive right to use such marks
`
`in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services identified in the registrations, as
`
`provided by Section 33(a) of the United States Trademark (Lanham) Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1115(a).
`
`Further, many of Opposer's registrations have become incontestable pursuant to Section 15 of the
`
`Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1065. Hereinafter PepsiCo's foregoing marks, including those registered
`
`and/or used in commerce, are referred to individually and/or collectively as the "PEPSI Marks",
`
`unless otherwise specified.
`
`11.
`
`Use of the PEPSI Marks has been continuous and they have not been abandoned.
`
`As a result of the long, extensive and widespread use, advertising, promotion and registration of
`
`the PEPSI Marks on and in association with PepsiCo's various goods and services, consumers have
`
`4
`
`
`

`

`become accustomed to associating marks consisting of or containing the term "PEPSI" with a
`
`single source, that is, PepsiCo.
`
`12.
`
`In view of such substantial usage, the PEPSI Marks, including PEPSI, became
`
`famous long prior to the filing date of the application at issue. Indeed, the PEPSI brand is one of
`
`the most renowned brands in the United States, representing assets of enormous goodwill and of
`
`inestimable value to PepsiCo.
`
`13.
`
`On information and belief, on March 28, 2021, Applicant Jessica L. Freedman, an
`
`individual having an address at 272 Leonard Street, Apt #3, Brooklyn, New York 11211, filed
`
`Application Serial No. 90/607,986 to register PEPY, based on an intent to use the mark on or in
`
`connection with “Non-alcoholic mixes used in the preparation of alcoholic cocktails” in
`
`International Class 32. Upon information and belief, at the time Applicant filed its application for
`
`the PEPY mark, it was or should have been fully aware of Opposer’s PEPSI Marks and its rights
`
`therein.
`
`14.
`
`Registration of Applicant’s alleged mark, which is the subject of the application-
`
`in-opposition, is barred by the provisions of Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act of 1946 because
`
`the said mark consists of or comprises a mark which so resembles Opposer's PEPSI Marks which
`
`have been in use and are also the subject of prior registrations or previously filed applications to
`
`register marks in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as to be likely, when used in
`
`connection with the alleged products of the Applicant to cause confusion, mistake or deception.
`
`15.
`
`Opposer has priority over Applicant because Opposer's use, application filing dates
`
`and/or registration dates for the PEPSI Marks precede the Applicant’s filing date for its application
`
`at issue and/or any alleged date of first use of Applicant’s purported mark which is the subject of
`
`the application-in-opposition.
`
`5
`
`
`

`

`16.
`
`Applicant’s alleged PEPY mark, which is the subject of the application-in-
`
`opposition, is near-identical in sound, appearance, and commercial impression to Opposer’s PEPSI
`
`Marks. In addition, the words PEPY and PEPSI each contain two syllables, including three of the
`
`same initial letters (PEP) making up the identical first syllable. The marks also share the same
`
`ending Y or I sound, making them sound-alikes. On information and belief, the products in
`
`connection with which Applicant’s alleged mark is used or applied for and the goods/services in
`
`connection with which Opposer's PEPSI Marks are registered and/or used are identical, similar,
`
`complementary and/or related.
`
`17.
`
`Accordingly, Applicant’s alleged mark shown in the application-in-opposition so
`
`resembles Opposer's foregoing and previously used and/or registered PEPSI Marks, including
`
`PEPSI, as to be likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake or to deceive with consequent injury to
`
`Opposer. The likelihood of confusion, mistake or deception that would also arise from concurrent
`
`use and registration of the applied for PEPY mark with Opposer's use and registration of its PEPSI
`
`Marks is that (a) persons are likely to believe that Applicant’s products have their source in
`
`Opposer, or (b) that Applicant and its products are a version of Opposer's marks or are in some
`
`way legitimately connected or affiliated with, sponsored, approved, endorsed or licensed by
`
`Opposer when, in fact, they are not.
`
`18.
`
`In view of the foregoing, registration of Applicant’s alleged PEPY mark, which is
`
`the subject of the application-in-opposition, is barred from registration because it consists of or
`
`comprises a mark which so resembles Opposer's previously used and/or registered PEPSI Marks,
`
`as to be likely, when used in connection with the alleged products of the Applicant, to cause
`
`confusion, mistake or deception.
`
`6
`
`
`

`

`19.
`
`Further, Opposer's inherently distinctive PEPSI Marks, including PEPSI, became
`
`famous prior to the filing date of Applicant’s application-in-opposition and/or any claimed date of
`
`first use by Applicant of the alleged mark shown in U.S. Application Serial No. 90/607,986.
`
`Registration and use of Applicant’s alleged mark would likely dilute Opposer's famous and
`
`inherently distinctive PEPSI Marks in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c). Accordingly, Applicant’s
`
`alleged PEPY mark is not entitled to registration under 15 U.S.C. § l052(f) and Section 13 of the
`
`Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1063.
`
`20.
`
`PepsiCo will be damaged by the issuance of a registration sought by Applicant
`
`within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 1063 because such registration would support and assist
`
`Applicant in the confusing, misleading, deceptive and/or dilutive use of Applicant’s alleged PEPY
`
`mark and would give color of exclusive statutory rights to Applicant in violation and derogation
`
`of the prior and superior rights of PepsiCo.
`
`WHEREFORE, Opposer prays that this opposition be sustained in its favor, that
`
`registration be denied to Applicant on its Application Serial No. 90/607,986 and that the Board
`
`grant all further relief to Opposer that is necessary and just in these circumstances.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January __, 2022
`
`12
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`PEPSICO, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paul A. Lee
`Attorney-for-Opposer
`700 Anderson Hill Road
`Purchase, NY 10577
`(914) 253-3443
`
`By:
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket