`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`General Email: TTABInfo@uspto.gov
`
`May 13, 2025
`
`Opposition No. 91292039
`
`Oasis Medical, Inc.
`
`v.
`
`AG Ecommerce Inc.
`
`
`
`Ellen Yowell, Lead Paralegal Specialist:
`
`On May 12, 2025, Applicant’s attorneys filed a request to withdraw as Applicant’s
`
`counsel of record in this proceeding.1 The request to withdraw as counsel is in
`
`compliance with the requirements of Trademark Rules 2.19(b) and Patent and
`
`Trademark Rule 11.116, and is accordingly granted. Tuvia Rotberg, and the law firm
`
`of Tarter, Krinsky & Drogin LLP no longer represents Applicant in this proceeding.
`
`In view of the withdrawal of Applicant’s counsel, and in accordance with standard
`
`Board practice, proceedings are suspended, and Applicant is allowed until thirty days
`
`from the date of this order to appoint new counsel, or to file a paper stating that
`
`Applicant chooses to represent itself. If Applicant files no response, the Board may
`
`issue an order to show cause why default judgment should not be entered against
`
`Applicant based on Applicant’s apparent loss of interest in the proceeding.
`
`
`1 A copy of the Board’s order granting the request to withdraw is placed in the application
`involved in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91292039
`
`
`Proceedings are otherwise suspended pending response to this order.
`
`The parties will be notified by the Board when proceedings are resumed, and dates
`
`will be reset, as appropriate.
`
`A copy of this order has been sent to all persons listed below.
`
`cc:
`
`AG ECOMMERCE, INC.
`2 SONIA CT
`AIRMONT, NY 10901
`Arig4426@gmail.com
`
`TUVIA ROTBERG
`TARTER KRINSKY & DROGIN LLP
`1350 BROADWAY, 11TH FLOOR
`NEW YORK, NY 10018
`tmdocket@tarterkrinsky.com, trotberg@tarterkrinsky.com,
`manageddocket@docket.tarterkrinsky.com
`
`JONATHAN A. HYMAN
`KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP
`2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOOR
`IRVINE, CA 92614
`jonathan.hyman@knobbe.com, efiling@knobbe.com, Natalie.Reese@knobbe.com
`
`Information regarding legal representation
`
`1. Representation in general
`
`A party, if domiciled in the United States or its territories , may represent
`
`itself in an ex parte or inter partes proceeding before the Board, or the party may be
`
`represented by an attorney who is licensed to practice law in the United States.
`
`Patent and Trademark Rules 2.11 and 11.14(e). However, because the applicable
`
`authorities, governing practices and procedures in Board proceedings are quite
`
`technical and highly specialized, it is strongly advisable for any entity not acquainted
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91292039
`
`
`with the technicalities of the procedural and substantive law involved in inter partes
`
`proceedings before the Board to secure the services of an attorney who is familiar
`
`with such matters. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office cannot aid in the selection
`
`of an attorney. See TBMP § 114.02.
`
`2. Requirement for service of submissions on adverse party
`
`Trademark Rules 2.119(a) and (b) require that every submission filed in a
`
`proceeding before the Board must be served upon the other party or parties, and
`
`proper proof of such service must be made before the submission will be considered
`
`by the Board. Accordingly, all submissions filed in this proceeding must be
`
`accompanied by a statement, signed by the attorney or other authorized
`
`representative, attached to or appearing on the original submission when filed,
`
`clearly stating the date and manner in which service was made, the name of each
`
`party or person upon whom service was made, and the email address or address. See
`
`TBMP § 113.03. Service must be made by email unless otherwise stipulated, or unless
`
`the filing party has satisfied the requirements for another method of service as set
`
`forth in Trademark Rule 2.119(b). The statement will be accepted as prima facie proof
`
`of service, must be signed and dated, and should take the form of a Certificate of
`
`Service as follows:
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing (insert title of
`submission) has been served on (insert name of opposing counsel or party) by
`forwarding said copy on (insert date of mailing), via email (or insert other
`appropriate method of delivery) to: (set out name, address, and email address
`of opposing counsel or party).
`
`Signature________________
`Date_____________________
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91292039
`
`
`3. Electronic filing required: The Board’s electronic filing systems
`
`Submissions in a Board proceeding must be made via one of the Board’s electronic
`
`filing systems: TTAB Center or the Electronic System for Trademark Trials and
`
`Appeals (ESTTA). The submissions must be in compliance with Trademark Rules
`
`2.126(a) and (b). See TBMP § 110.01. Information about, and access to, TTAB Center
`
`is available at https://www.uspto.gov/systems-information/trademark-trial-and-
`
`appeal-board-ttab-center. The ESTTA user manual, ESTTA forms, and instructions
`
`for their use are available at https://estta.uspto.gov/.
`
`4. Other resources
`
`It is recommended that any party not represented by an attorney be familiar with
`
`the latest edition of Chapter 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which includes
`
`the Trademark Rules of Practice. Parties should also be familiar with the Trademark
`
`Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure
`
`(TBMP), available at
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/ttab, the TTABVUE system for viewing the record for all
`
`Board proceedings, available at https://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/, and the Standard
`
`Protective Order, available at https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks-application-
`
`process/appealing-trademark-decisions/standard-documents-and-guidelines-0.
`
`“Strict compliance with the Trademark Rules of Practice, and where applicable
`
`the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is required of all parties, whether or not they
`
`are represented by counsel.” Hole In 1 Drinks, Inc. v. Lajtay, 2020 USPQ2d 10020, at
`
`*1 (TTAB 2020); McDermott v. San Francisco Women’s Motorcycle Contingent, 81
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Opposition No. 91292039
`
`
`USPQ2d 1212, n.2 (TTAB 2006), aff’d unpub’d, 240 Fed. Appx.865 (Fed. Cir. 2007),
`
`cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1109 (2008).
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`



