`ESTTA389762
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`01/24/2011
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`Petition for Cancellation
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party requests to cancel indicated registration.
`Petitioner Information
`
`Name
`Entity
`Address
`
`James P. Owen
`Citizenship
`Individual
`98 San Jacinto Blvd. FSR No. 1904
`Austin, TX 78701
`UNITED STATES
`
`UNITED STATES
`
`Correspondence
`information
`
`Christopher L. Graff
`Pirkey Barber LLP
`600 Congress Avenue Suite 2120
`Austin, TX 78701
`UNITED STATES
`cgraff@pirkeybarber.com, jmatthysse@pirkeybarber.com,
`kripperda@pirkeybarber.com, tmcentral@pirkeybarber.com Phone:5123225200
`Registration Subject to Cancellation
`
`Registration No
`Registrant
`
`3727964
`Paragon Foundation, Inc.
`1209 Michigan Avenue
`Alamogordo, NM 88310
`UNITED STATES
`Goods/Services Subject to Cancellation
`
`Registration date
`
`12/22/2009
`
`Class 016. First Use: 2007/12/01 First Use In Commerce: 2007/12/01
`All goods and services in the class are cancelled, namely: Magazines featuring western and rural
`culture
`
`Grounds for Cancellation
`
`Torres v. Cantine Torresella S.r.l.Fraud
`Abandonment
`Priority and likelihood of confusion
`
`808 F.2d 46, 1 USPQ2d 1483 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
`Trademark Act section 14
`Trademark Act section 2(d)
`
`Mark Cited by Petitioner as Basis for Cancellation
`
`U.S. Application/
`Registration No.
`Registration Date
`Word Mark
`Goods/Services
`
`NONE
`
`Application Date
`
`NONE
`
`NONE
`COWBOY ETHICS
`Motivational speaking and educational services; promotional products
`and materials, including printed materials.
`
`
`
`Attachments
`
`JPOX011 Petition For Cancellation CLG.pdf ( 6 pages )(25628 bytes )
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`record by First Class Mail on this date.
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`Signature
`Name
`Date
`
`/s/ Christopher L. Graff
`Christopher L. Graff
`01/24/2011
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In Re Registration No. 3,727,964
`Mark: LIVING COWBOY ETHICS
`Registrant: Paragon Foundation, Inc.
`Issued: December 22, 2009
`
`JAMES P. OWEN, §
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`
`
`Petitioner,
`
`
`§ Cancellation No. ___________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`PARAGON FOUNDATION, INC., §
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`
`
`Registrant.
`
`
`§
`
`
`PETITION FOR CANCELLATION
`
`Petitioner James P. Owen, an individual citizen of the United States, having a residence
`
`
`
`at 98 San Jacinto Blvd. FSR No. 1904, Austin, Texas 78701, believes that he is and will continue
`
`to be damaged by Registration No. 3,727,964 (the “Registration”), and hereby petitions to cancel
`
`the same under the provisions of 15 U.S.C. § 1064. As grounds for cancellation, Petitioner
`
`asserts the following:
`
`1.
`
`Since at least as early as 2005, Petitioner and/or his related entities have used his
`
`coined mark COWBOY ETHICS in connection with a wide variety of goods and services,
`
`including motivational speaking and educational services, as well as associated promotional
`
`products and materials, including printed materials. Petitioner’s COWBOY ETHICS goods and
`
`services celebrate the essence of traditional Western values, and the benefits of recapturing those
`
`values in today’s society. Petitioner’s book “Cowboy Ethics, What Wall Street Can Learn from the
`
`Code of the West” has been highly acclaimed since its first publication in 2004.
`
`
`
`2.
`
`Over the years, Petitioner has extensively used and promoted his COWBOY
`
`ETHICS mark. Additionally, Petitioner has expended considerable effort and expense in
`
`promoting his COWBOY ETHICS mark, and the goods and services offered thereunder. As a
`
`result of such use and promotion, the COWBOY ETHICS mark has acquired a favorable
`
`reputation to consumers as an identifier and symbol of Petitioner and his goods and services. As
`
`a result of Petitioner’s use and promotion, Petitioner has developed significant goodwill in the
`
`COWBOY ETHICS mark, and strong common law rights in that mark.
`
`3.
`
`On May 20, 2009, well after Petitioner began using his COWBOY ETHICS mark,
`
`Registrant filed an application to register the mark LIVING COWBOY ETHICS for “Magazines
`
`featuring western and rural culture” in Class 16 with a claimed first-use date of December 1,
`
`2007.
`
`4.
`
`There is no issue as to priority, as Petitioner’s use of his COWBOY ETHICS
`
`mark predates Registrant’s claimed first use date of December 1, 2007.
`
`5.
`
`The mark of the registration sought to be cancelled (LIVING COWBOY
`
`ETHICS) so nearly resembles Petitioner’s COWBOY ETHICS mark as to be likely, when used
`
`in connection with the identified goods of Registrant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or
`
`to deceive. Purchasers and prospective purchasers are likely to mistakenly believe that the
`
`products Registrant offers under Registrant’s LIVING COWBOY ETHICS mark are produced,
`
`sponsored, endorsed, or approved by Petitioner, or are in some way affiliated, connected, or
`
`associated with Petitioner or his products and services offered under the COWBOY ETHICS
`
`mark. Furthermore, any defect, objection, or fault found with Registrant’s goods offered under
`
`the mark LIVING COWBOY ETHICS would necessarily reflect upon and seriously injure the
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`reputation that Petitioner has established for his COWBOY ETHICS products and services. The
`
`Registration should therefore be cancelled under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1052(d) and 1064(1).
`
`6.
`
`If Registrant is permitted to continue to maintain the Registration sought to be
`
`cancelled, Registrant’s right to use the mark of the Registration may become incontestable, and
`
`in any event, the continued existence of the Registration casts a cloud upon Petitioner’s right to
`
`continue to use, register, and expand the use of his COWBOY ETHICS mark. Such Registration
`
`would thus be a source of damage and injury to Petitioner.
`
`7.
`
`Additionally, the Registration should be cancelled because the Registrant has
`
`abandoned use of the mark as registered. In 2009, Registrant changed the name of its magazine
`
`to THE COWBOY WAY. Thus, Registrant has discontinued use of the mark LIVING
`
`COWBOY ETHICS with intent not to resume such use. Accordingly, the Registration should be
`
`cancelled pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1064(3).
`
`8.
`
`Further, the Registration should be cancelled because the Registrant procured the
`
`Registration fraudulently.
`
`9.
`
`In its application filed on May 20, 2009, under notice of Section 1001 of Title 18
`
`of the United States Code, Registrant stated that it was the owner of the mark LIVING
`
`COWBOY ETHICS and that no other person, firm, corporation, or association had the right to
`
`use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance
`
`thereto as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other
`
`person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive. However, Registrant knew at the
`
`time of its application that Petitioner owned the mark COWBOY ETHICS, that Petitioner had
`
`the right to use COWBOY ETHICS, and that Registrant needed Petitioner’s consent to use the
`
`mark LIVING COWBOY ETHICS.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`10.
`
`On April 29, 2009 (three weeks before Registrant filed its application), Registrant
`
`emailed a “trademark letter” to Petitioner acknowledging Petitioner’s COWBOY ETHICS
`
`trademark, and further stating that Registrant had “been told by the auditors that we need the
`
`attached letter signed by you.” Petitioner denied his consent to Registrant’s request.
`
`11.
`
`Furthermore, Registrant has publicly acknowledged that it adopted the mark
`
`LIVING COWBOY ETHICS based upon Petitioner and his COWBOY ETHICS trademark.
`
`12.
`
`The statements in Registrant’s application were made by an authorized agent of
`
`Registrant with the knowledge and belief that those statements were false. Those false
`
`statements were made with the intent to induce authorized agents of the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office to grant Registrant’s application for registration, and, reasonably relying upon
`
`the truth of those false statements, the United States Patent and Trademark Office did, in fact,
`
`grant that registration to Registrant. Petitioner was damaged by those false statements, and the
`
`registration issued in reliance thereon, in that Petitioner has priority of rights for its trademark,
`
`and Petitioner’s continued and legal use of its mark will be impaired by the continued
`
`registration of Registrant’s purposed mark.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, Petitioner is or will be damaged by
`
`United States Registration No. 3,727,964 and petitions for cancellation thereof.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Christopher L. Graff
`Christopher L. Graff
`
`Jered E. Matthysse
`PIRKEY BARBER LLP
`600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2120
`Austin, Texas 78701
`512.322.5200
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR JAMES P. OWEN
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: January 24, 2011
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing PETITION FOR
`CANCELLATION has been served via First Class Mail, postage pre-paid, on Registrant at the
`address of record below, on January 24, 2011:
`
`Paragon Foundation, Inc.
`1209 Michigan Ave.
`Alamogordo, NM 88310
`
`with a courtesy copy to its attorney of record:
`
`Fernando Velez, Jr.
`Reicker Pfau Pyle & McRoy, LLP
`1421 State Street, Suite B
`Santa Barbara, CA 93101-2507
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Christopher L. Graff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6