`ESTTA552016
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`08/02/2013
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`92057122
`Plaintiff
`Neways, Inc.
`MATTHEW A BARLOW
`WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`1000 EAGLE GATE TOWER, 60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE
`SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111
`UNITED STATES
`mbarlow@wnlaw.com, tvuksinick@wnlaw.com, jstringham@wnlaw.com,
`rphillips@wnlaw.com
`Answer to Counterclaim
`Matthew A. Barlow
`mbarlow@wnlaw.com, vgarrett@wnlaw.com
`/Matthew A. Barlow/
`08/02/2013
`Neways Answer to Counterclaim.pdf(161959 bytes )
`
`Proceeding
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Submission
`Filer's Name
`Filer's e-mail
`Signature
`Date
`Attachments
`
`
`
`
`
`CANCELLATION PROCEEDING
`
`File No. 14564.127.1
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`In the matter of Trademark Registration No. 3,448,249
`Mark: NEW-WHEY
`Registered: June 17, 2008
`-and-
`Trademark Registration No. 4,214,663
`For the Mark: NEW WHEY NUTRITION
`Registered: September 25, 2012
`-and-
`Trademark Registration No. 4,172,454
`
`
`
`
`Cancellation No. 92057122
`
`
`
`
`
`RGVKVKQPGT"PGYC[U."KPE0ÓU"
`ANSWER TO REGISTRANT
`NEW WHEY NUTRITION,
`NNEÓU"EQWPVGTENCKO"HQT"
`PARTIAL CANCELLATION OF
`PGYC[UÓ"TGIKUVTCVKQPU
`
`For the Mark:
`
`Registered: July 10, 2012
`
`
`NEWAYS, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NEW WHEY NUTRITION, LLC, f/k/a
`TOPSPIN-IDS ACQUISITION, LLC
`
`Registrant.
`
`
`
`
`In response to the Counterclaim fqt"Rctvkcn"Ecpegnncvkqp"Qh"Pgyc{uÓ"Tgikuvtcvkqpu"hkngf"
`
`
`
`by registrant New Whey Nutrition, LLC, f/k/a Topspin-IDS Acquisition, LLC0"*ÐRegistrantÑ+"
`
`in New Whey Nutrition, LLEÓu" Cpuygt." Chhktocvkxg" Fghgpugu." cpf" Eqwpvgtenckou" vq"
`
`
`
`Rgvkvkqpgt" Pgyc{u." Kpe0Óu" Rgvkvkqp" vq" Ecpegn, dated Lwpg" 34." 4235" *Ðvjg" EqwpvgtenckoÑ+,
`
`Petitioner and Counterclaim Defendant Neways, Inc. *ÐNewaysÑ+"cpuygts as follows:
`
`Neways denies that Registrant iu"qt"yknn"dg"fcocigf"d{"vjg"Pgyc{uÓ"Tgikuvtcvkqpu"cu"
`
`alleged in the first unnumbered paragraph of the Counterclaim. To the extent that the
`
`remaining allegations of the first unnumbered paragraph of the Counterclaim constitute
`
`allegations of fact to which a response is required, Neways hereby denies the same.
`
`1.
`
`Neways is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the truth of the matters asserted paragraph 1 of the Counterclaim, and therefore denies same.
`
`2.
`
`Neways is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the truth of the matters asserted paragraph 2 of the Counterclaim, and therefore denies same.
`
`3.
`
`Neways is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the truth of the matters asserted paragraph 3 of the Counterclaim, and therefore denies same.
`
`4.
`
`Neways admits that a review of the Trademark Electronic Search System
`
`*ÐTESSÑ+ fcvcdcug"qh"vjg"Wpkvgf"Uvcvgu"Rcvgpv"cpf"Vtcfgoctm"Qhhkeg"*ÐRVQÑ+"ujqyu"vjcv"the
`
`application that eventually matured into U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3448249 for the
`
`octm"ÐPGY-YJG[Ñ"hqt"iqqfu"nkuvgf"cu"Ðpwvtkvkqpcnn{"hqtvkhkgf"dgxgtcigu"eqpvckpkpi"yjg{"
`
`rtqvgkpÑ"kp"kpvgtpcvkqpcn"encuu"227"ycu"hkngf"d{"Uwrrngogpv"U{pgti{."Kpe0"qp"Cwiwuv"36."4229"
`
`and was registered on June 39."422:"*Ðvjg"Ó46;"TgikuvtcvkqpÑ+0""Pgyc{u"hwtvjgt"cfokvu"vjcv"vjg"
`
`Ó46;"Tgikuvtcvkqp"enckou"c"fcvg"qh"hktuv"wug"cv"ngcuv"cu"gctn{"cu"Hgdtwct{"4:."4228"cpf"c"fcvg"qh"
`
`first use in commerce at least as early as March 31, 2006. Neways specifically denies the
`
`cnngicvkqp"ugv"hqtvj"kp"rctcitcrj"6"qh"vjg"Eqwpvgtencko"vjcv"vjg"Ó46;"Tgikuvtcvkqp"ycu"hkngf"
`
`Ð]k_p"4228Ñ."vjcv"vjg"Ó46;"Tgikuvtcvkqp"ycu"hkngf"d{"Pgy"Yjg{"Pwvtkvkqp."cpf"vjcv"vjg"Ó46;"
`
`Tgikuvtcvkqp"Ðocvwtgf"È"qp"Cwiwuv"36."4229]0_Ñ""Pgyc{u"hwtvjgt"cfokvu"vhat Topspin-IDS
`
`
`PGYC[UÓ"CPUYGT
`TO COUNTERCLAIM
`
`2
`
`
`
`Acquisition, LLC (which later changed its name to New Whey Nutrition, LLC) is the listed
`
`applicant of the trademark application that matured into U.S. Trademark Registration No.
`
`6436558"hqt"vjg"octm"PGY"YJG["PWVTKVKQP"hqt"iqqfu"nkuvgf"cu"Ðputritional supplement
`
`eqpvckpkpi"yjg{"rtqvgkpÑ"kp"kpvgtpcvkqpcn"encuu"227"*Ðvjg"Ó558"TgikuvtcvkqpÑ+0""Neways further
`
`admits that Topspin-IDS Acquisition, LLC is the listed applicant of the trademark application
`
`that matured into U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4172454 for the mark NEW WHEY
`
`PWVTKVKQP"*rnwu"fgukip+"hqt"iqqfu"nkuvgf"cu"Ðnutritional supplements containing whey
`
`proteinÑ"kp"kpvgtpcvkqpcn"encuu"227"*Ðvjg"Ó676"TgikuvtcvkqpÑ+0""Pgyc{u"fgpkgu"all remaining
`
`allegations of paragraph 4 of the Counterclaim.
`
`5.
`
`Neways admits that a review of the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval
`
`database of the PTO shows that the database does not identify an instance where any of
`
`Pgyc{uÓ"vtcfgoctm"tgikuvtcvkqpu"ygtg"ekvgf"cickpuv"vjg"Pgy"Yjg{"Pwvtkvkqp"Tgikuvtcvkqpu0""
`
`Neways further admits that Neways did not oppose the applications that matured into the New
`
`Whey Nutrition Registrations, nor did Neways contact New Whey Nutrition to object to the
`
`applications before they were registered. Neways denies all remaining allegations of
`
`paragraph 5 of the Counterclaim.
`
`6.
`
`Neways admits that on November 11, 2010, Topspin-IDS Acquisition, LLC
`
`filed with the PTO an application for registration of the mark NEW WHEY for goods listed as
`
`Ðnutritionally fortified beverages containing whey proteinÑ"kp"kpvgtpcvkqpcn"encuu"227."yjkej"
`
`was assigned Trademark Application Serial No. 85174478"*Ðvjg"Ó478"CrrnkecvkqpÑ+0""Pgyc{u"
`
`further admits that a review of the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval database of the
`
`PTO shows that the examiner did pqv"ekvg"cp{"qh"Pgyc{uÓ"tgikuvtcvkqpu"cickpuv"vjg"Ó478"
`
`
`PGYC[UÓ"CPUYGT
`TO COUNTERCLAIM
`
`3
`
`
`
`Crrnkecvkqp."cpf"vjcv"vjg"Ó478"Crrnkecvkqp"ycu"eventually published for opposition. Neways
`
`denies all remaining allegations of paragraph 6 of the Counterclaim.
`
`7.
`
`Neways admits that it filed an opposition cickpuv"vjg"Ó478"Crrnkecvkqp"qp"
`
`August 17, 2011, which was assigned Opposition No. 91201238 by the Trademark Trial and
`
`Appeal Board and which is currently pending. Neways further admits that as of August 17,
`
`2011, it had not petitioned to cancel any of the trademark registrations owned by New Whey
`
`Nutrition. Neways denies all remaining allegations of paragraph 7 of the Counterclaim.
`
`8.
`
`Neways admits that it is a privately held enterprise, and that it manufactures and
`
`distributes an extensive line of quality, safety-conscious personal care products, household
`
`products, and nutritional supplements. Neways further admits that it sells nutritional
`
`supplements under the NEWAYS mark that include Cleansing Tea, Feelin Good, and
`
`Digestamin products, among others. Neways further admits that it sells personal care products
`
`and household products identified on its website, also under its NEWAYS mark. The
`
`Wikipedia web page and the Neways web site referred to in paragraph 8 speak for themselves.
`
` Neways denies all remaining allegations of paragraph 8 of the Counterclaim.
`
`9.
`
`Neways admits that what purports to be a copy of the Wikipedia web page
`
`referenced in paragraph 9 is attached to the Counterclaim as Exhibit B. The referenced web
`
`page speaks for itself. Neways denies all remaining allegations of paragraph 9 of the
`
`Counterclaim.
`
`10.
`
`Neways admits that it does not distribute its products on Amazon.com. Neways
`
`further admits that retail customers that go directly to Neways website, as opposed to accessing
`
`Neways website from a distributor website, are required to identify a referring distributor to
`
`access and make purchases from the website, and that the referring distributor receives credit
`
`
`PGYC[UÓ"CPUYGT
`TO COUNTERCLAIM
`
`4
`
`
`
`for referred retail customer purchases. The referred-to exhibits speak for themselves.]
`
`Neways denies all remaining allegations of paragraph 10 of the Counterclaim.
`
`11.
`
`Neways admits that it has used its NEWAYS marks on its products since at
`
`least as early as 1992. Neways is without information and belief as to when New Whey
`
`Nutrition began using its NEW WHEY marks, and therefore denies the remaining allegations
`
`of paragraph 11 of the Counterclaim.
`
`12.
`
`Neways admits paragraph 12 of the Counterclaim sets forth a listing of
`
`registrations owned by Neways and identified in the Petition for Cancellation filed by Neways
`
`in the above-captioned action. The registrations speak for themselves. Neways further admits
`
`that Registration Nos. 2656486 and 2656490 were cancelled by the PTO. Neways denies any
`
`remaining allegations of paragraph 12 of the Counterclaim.
`
`13.
`
`The Petition for Cancellation speaks for itself. Neways denies all other
`
`allegations of paragraph 13 of the Counterclaim.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`Neways denies the allegations of paragraph 14 of the Counterclaim.
`
`Neways denies the allegations of paragraph 15 of the Counterclaim.
`
`Any allegation of the Counterclaim not specifically admitted is denied.
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`Without admitting or acknowledging that it bears the burden of proof as to any of the
`
`defenses set forth herein, Neways alleges the following as affirmative or additional defenses to
`
`the Counterclaim:
`
`FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`TgikuvtcpvÓu"Eqwpvgtencko"hcknu"vq"uvcvg"c"encko"wrqp"yjkej"tgnkgh"ecp"dg"itcpvgf0
`
`
`PGYC[UÓ"CPUYGT
`TO COUNTERCLAIM
`
`5
`
`
`
`SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Tgikuvtcpv"ku"pqv"nkmgn{"vq"dg"fcocigf"d{"cp{"qh"Pgyc{uÓ"vtcfgoctm"registrations and,
`
`therefore, lack standing to partially cancel Pgyc{uÓ"vtcfgoctm registrations.
`
`Neways reserves the right to amend or supplement its answers and defenses as more
`
`information becomes available during discovery in this matter.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`In view of the foregoing, Neways respectfully requests that the relief requested by
`
`Registrant be denied, that the Counterclaim be dismissed with prejudice, and that the
`
`registration of United States Registration Nos. Registration Nos. 2471380, 2389764, 2731042,
`
`2492629, 279001, 3006252, 3850494, 3709468, 3703119, 2454358, 2414219, 2779438,
`
`2943333, 2984458 be upheld.
`
`DATED this 2nd day of August, 2013.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Matthew A. Barlow/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`John C. Stringham, Reg. No. 40,831
`Thomas R. Vuksinick
`Matthew A. Barlow
`
`WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`60 East South Temple, Suite 1000
`Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
`Telephone:
`(801) 533-9800
`Facsimile:
`(801) 328-1707
`jstringham@wnlaw.com
`tvuksinick@wnlaw.com
`mbarlow@wnlaw.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER
`NEWAYS, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PGYC[UÓ"CPUYGT
`TO COUNTERCLAIM
`
`6
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing PETITIONER
`
`PGYC[U."KPE0ÓU"CPUYGT"VQ"REGISTRANT PGY"YJG["PWVTKVKQP."NNEÓU"
`
`EQWPVGTENCKO" HQT" RCTVKCN" ECPEGNNCVKQP" QH" PGYC[UÓ"
`
`REGISTRATIONS was served upon Applicant via U.S. Mail and is addressed to the counsel
`
`of record for Applicant:
`
`Peter M. Brody
`Nicole Rizzo Smith
`Meera Nair
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`One Metro Center
`700 12th Street NW, Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20005
`peter.brody@ropesgray.com
`nicole.smith@ropesgray.com
`meera.nair@ropesgray.com
`
`
`Dated this 2nd day of August, 2013.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /Matthew A. Barlow/ .
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4173766_1
`
`
`
`
`PGYC[UÓ"CPUYGT
`TO COUNTERCLAIM
`
`7



