throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`ESTTA683981
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`07/16/2015
`
`Filing date:
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`Petition for Cancellation
`
`Notice is hereby given that the following party requests to cancel indicated registration.
`Petitioner Information
`
`Name
`Entity
`Address
`
`FABRIQ Technologies, Inc.
`Corporation
`3301 Arapahoe Ave. #208
`Boulder, CO 80303
`UNITED STATES
`
`Citizenship
`
`Delaware
`
`Attorney informa-
`tion
`
`James J. Aquilina
`Design IP, P.C.
`5050 W. Tilghman St. Suite 435
`Allentown, PA 18104
`UNITED STATES
`tm@designip.com Phone:610-395-4900
`Registration Subject to Cancellation
`
`Registration No
`Registrant
`
`Registration date
`3834274
`University of California San Francisco
`1500 Owens Street
`San Francisco, CA 94158
`UNITED STATES
`Goods/Services Subject to Cancellation
`
`08/17/2010
`
`Class 044. First Use: 2007/09/01 First Use In Commerce: 2008/07/22
`All goods and services in the class are cancelled, namely: Medical testing services, namely, fitness
`evaluation; Providing assistance, fitness evaluation and consultation to individuals to help them make
`health, wellness and nutritional changes in their daily living to improve health
`
`Grounds for Cancellation
`
`Abandonment
`The registration is being used by, or with the per-
`mission of, the registrant so as to misrepresent
`the source of the goods or services on or in con-
`nection with which the mark is used.
`
`Trademark Act section 14
`Trademark Act section 14
`
`Attachments
`
`Petition to Cancel_w exhibits_FINAL.pdf(1039638 bytes )
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of this paper has been served upon all parties, at their address
`record by First Class Mail on this date.
`
`

`
`Signature
`Name
`Date
`
`/James J. Aquilina/
`James J. Aquilina
`07/16/2015
`
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`In the matter of trademark Registration No.: 3,834,274
`
`For the mark: RUNSAFE (design plus words)
`
`Date registered: August 17, 2010
`
`FABRIQ Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`(Petitioner)
`
`v.
`
`University of California San Francisco
`
`(Registrant)
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITION TO CANCEL
`
`Petitioner FABRIQ Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation having a place of
`
`business at 3301 Arapahoe Ave. #208, Boulder, Colorado 80303, believes that it will be
`
`damaged by the above-identified registration, and hereby petitions to cancel the same. Petitioner
`
`is the owner of pending U.S. Trademark Serial No. 86659653 for the word mark RUNSAFE.
`
`To the best of Petitioner’s knowledge, the name and address of the current owner of the
`
`registration are: University of California San Francisco, 1500 Owens Street, San Francisco,
`
`California, 94158.
`
`The grounds for cancellation are as follows:
`
`1.) The registered mark has been abandoned. 15 U.S.C. § 1064(3).
`
`The registered mark is a stylized mark consisting “of a stylized green design of a running
`
`man facing the green stylized wording ‘RunSafe’”. The color green is claimed as a feature of the
`

`
`1 
`
`

`
`mark. Registration Certificate for U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,834,274. The mark
`
`drawing from the ‘274 Registration is reproduced below:
`
`(the “Registered Mark”)
`
`
`
`
`
`The registered mark has been abandoned due to discontinuation of its use for more than
`
`three years. The Lanham Act provides that a mark shall be deemed to be abandoned: “When its
`
`use has been discontinued with intent not to resume such use. Intent not to resume may be
`
`inferred from circumstances. Nonuse for 3 consecutive years shall be prima facie evidence of
`
`abandonment.” 15 U.S.C. § 1127.
`
`
`
`On information and belief, for more than the past three years, Registrant and its affiliated
`
`parties have exclusively used the following stylized mark (hereinafter the “Alternate Mark”) in
`
`connection with the services listed in the ‘274 Registration:
`
`(the “Alternate Mark”)
`
`
`
`
`
`A printout from http://www.archive.org showing Registrant’s website located at
`
`http://irunsafe.com as it existed on April 14, 2012 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. It is clear
`
`from Exhibit A that Registrant and its affiliated parties were exclusively using the Alternate
`
`Mark—but not the Registered Mark—in connection with the services listed in the ‘274
`

`
`2 
`
`

`
`Registration more than three years ago. Accordingly, it can be inferred from these circumstances
`
`that Registrant has intentionally abandoned the Registered Mark. 15 U.S.C. § 1127.
`
`
`
`Further, use of the Alternate Mark may not be used as evidence of continued use of the
`
`Registered Mark because the Alternate Mark creates a different commercial impression than the
`
`Registered Mark. A change in the form of a mark can be protected only if the distinctive
`
`characteristics of the mark before and after the alteration maintain the same, continuing
`
`commercial impression. See 3 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 17-26 (4th
`
`ed. 2012). As stated by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the case of Van
`
`Dyne-Crotty, Inc. v. Wear-Guard Corp.
`
`The previously used mark must be the legal equivalent of the mark in question or
`indistinguishable therefrom, and the consumer should consider both as the same
`mark. … [E]ven if the two marks are confusingly similar, they still may not be
`legal equivalents. Instead, the marks must create the same, continuing commercial
`impression and the later mark should not materially differ from or alter the
`character of the [first] mark.
`
`926 F.2d 1156, 1159 (1991) (internal citations and quotations omitted). See also Data Concepts,
`
`Inc. v. Digital Consulting, Inc., 150 F.3d 620 (6th Cir. 1998); Brookfield Communs., Inc. v.
`
`West Coast Entm't Corp., 174 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 1999); PBI Performance Prods. v. NorFab
`
`Corp., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58689, at *11-13 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 2, 2007).
`
`
`
`The Alternate Mark is not the legal equivalent of the Registered Mark and is clearly
`
`distinguishable from the Registered Mark. The Registered Mark contains a stylized green
`
`drawing of a running man on the left side of and facing the wording “RunSafe” in green letters.
`
`The Alternate Mark contains a blue, jagged line with a yellow circle above it on the left side of
`
`the wording “RunSafe” in black letters. Thus, the only similarity between the two marks is that
`
`they both contain the wording RunSafe. But this is not enough to create the same commercial
`
`impression between the marks. The Alternate Mark contains the colors blue, yellow, and black,
`

`
`3 
`
`

`
`whereas the Registered Mark contains only the color green. The Alternate Mark contains two
`
`stylized elements (the blue jagged line and yellow circle) that are not present in any form in the
`
`Registered Mark, and the Registered Mark contains a stylized element (the green running man)
`
`that is not present in any form in the Alternate Mark.
`
`
`
`In the PBI Performance case noted supra, the district court held that PBI’s use of a
`
`yellow checkered (grid) pattern did not create the same commercial impression as its trademark
`
`registration for a design of a black checkered (grid) pattern, and thereby held that PBI had
`
`abandoned its trademark registration. In the present case, the Alternate Mark creates a very
`
`different commercial impression from the Registered Mark due to the use of completely different
`
`stylistic elements and unique colors. Accordingly, the Alternate Mark may not be used as
`
`evidence of continued use of the Registered Mark, and due to Registrant’s intentional non-use of
`
`the Registered Mark for more than the past three years, the Registered Mark has been
`
`abandoned.1
`
`
`
`For the reasons set forth above, cancellation of the ‘274 Registration is believed in order
`
`and respectfully requested.
`
`2.) The registered mark is being used by the Registrant so as to misrepresent the source
`of the services in connection with which the mark is used. 15 U.S.C. § 1064(3).
`
`The official record of the ‘274 Registration as accessed through TSDR on July 15, 2015
`
`indicates that the current owner of the mark is “University of California San Francisco.”
`
`Attached as Exhibit B hereto is a copy of the specimen of use (“Specimen”) that was filed by
`
`Registrant on April 8, 2010 during prosecution of the application that matured into the ‘274
`
`                                                            
`1 It is worth noting that despite having the freedom in the past to attempt to register the word mark
`RUNSAFE, Registrant instead chose to register only the stylized Registered Mark. Having now
`recognized that its previous strategy limits the scope of its enforceable rights, it is telling that Registrant
`has recently filed two trademark applications (Serial Nos. 86666792 and 86671347) for the word mark
`RUNSAFE for various running-related goods and services. 
`

`
`4 
`
`

`
`Registration. The Specimen clearly indicates that UCSF is the party offering the listed services.
`
`Specifically, the Specimen indicates that the “RunSafe Healthy Runners Clinic” is located “At
`
`the UCSF Sports Medicine Clinic”, the URL “runsafe.ucsf.edu” is provided at the bottom left of
`
`the Specimen, and the same stylized green drawing of a running man is located to the left of the
`
`language “UCSF Medical Center Sports Medicine” at the bottom right of the Specimen. Nothing
`
`in the USPTO’s official record for the ‘274 Registration provides any indication that UCSF is
`
`not the source of the services provided in connection with the ‘274 Registration.
`
`A letter from UCSF’s in-house legal counsel to Petitioner’s legal counsel dated June 17,
`
`2015 is attached hereto as Exhibit C. The first sentence of the second paragraph of this letter
`
`reads “Prior to your client’s adoption of the mark, the University granted an exclusive license to
`
`its RUNSAFE trademark to one of our licensees, Sportzpeak, Inc.” (emphasis in original). A
`
`screen
`
`capture
`
`taken
`
`
`
`July
`
`15,
`
`2015
`
`from UCSF’s website
`
`located
`
`at:
`
`http://orthosurg.ucsf.edu/patient-care/divisions/human-performance-center/services/runsafe/
`
`is
`
`attached hereto as Exhibit D. Nothing on this site indicates or suggests that UCSF is not the
`
`source of the services that are provided in connection with the RunSafe Alternate Mark.
`
`Accordingly, Registrant is using the Registered Mark so as to misrepresent the source of
`
`the services in connection with which the mark is used. 15 U.S.C. § 1064(3). For the reasons set
`
`forth above, cancellation of the ‘274 Registration is believed in order and respectfully requested.
`
`By: _/James J. Aquilina/___
`Design IP, P.C.
`Commerce Corporate Center
`5050 W. Tilghman St., Suite 435
`Allentown, PA 18104
`tel.: 610-395-4900
`fax: 610-680-3312
`e-mail: tm@designip.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Date: July 16, 2015
`
`
`
`5 
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on July 16, 2015, a true and correct copy of the attached Petition to
`
`Cancel was served upon the following, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 2.119, by depositing
`
`same in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and properly addressed as follows:
`
`University of California San Francisco
`ATTN: Angus M. McDonald, Esq.
`1500 Owens Street
`San Francisco, CA 94158
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Design IP, P.C.
`By: ___/James J. Aquilina/___
`Commerce Corporate Center
`5050 W. Tilghman St., Suite 435
`Allentown, PA 18104
`tel.: 610-395-4900
`fax: 610-680-3312
`e-mail: tm@designip.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6 
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`

`
`Exhibit
`Exhibit
`A
`
`

`
`RunSafe | Sports Wellness
`
`http://irunsafe.com/
`
`Go
`
`18 captures
`27 Oct 11 - 26 Dec 14
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`FEB APR JUN
`
`14
`
`2011 2012 2013
`
`Close
`
`Help
`
`Program
`
`RunSafe Network
`
`Company
`
`Our Philosophy
`
`News
`
`FAQ
`
`Login
`
`• • • • •
`
`LikeLike
`
`413
`
`Tweet
`
`2
`
`Share
`Share
`
`About | Investors | Centers | Experts | Partners | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Support | Contact
`
`2011 - 2012 Sportzpeak, Inc
`
`https://web.archive.org/web/20120414104516/http://irunsafe.com/
`
`7/13/2015
`
`

`
`Exhibit
`Exhibit
`B
`
`

`
`can.3£2...2Emmmmh
`
`..w.s.w___...mmmumamhPEm:
`
`
`
`Hr’ru_ua._.rhfimumhuman.5QE...IQ
`
`
`
`
`
`£5.=1
`
`
`
`..£_n...uu:arenah.mu.....\...uL.»ouwexamEuuflsfi.9:Q..,..a...___....
`
`
`
`um.R.nnn.n:.
`
`
`
`
`
`aflemamqa£5.4.u :l.:a.a=!i.iE¥.ud
`
`
`
`
`
`I__onhi._.I._.__._l_uII___.._...EpI:.£..._...i._£._......_..._.
`
`..<
`
`
`
`15m1,_ahaemu:.o..nn::.___
`
`
`
`
`
`=u_=i_._.u:u..I._..i_._£1n..E...EE3...:.
`
`
`
`u£.nl..:.nu.n._._uE........:.
`
`
`
`
`
`...l._._I¢I¢_E...=u!..ufiuclaa-
`
`
`
`.___._.__...-:12.-a..u...!.u_.__£niu.-_:____..
`
`
`
`
`
`5:55.nEE§:...mu_E=uEuctat..E..._._.u__._.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Exhibit
`Exhibit
`C
`
`

`
`THE REGENTS OF THE TJNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
`OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COIJNSEL
`
`liii Franklin Street, 8th Floor • Oakland, California 94607-5200 • (510) 987-9800 • FAX (510) 987-9757
`
`Charles F. Robinson
`GENERAL COUNSEL AND VICE PRESIDENT - LEGAL AFFAIRS
`
`Writer’s direct line: (510) 987-9737
`E-mail: angus.niacdonald@ucop.edu
`
`June 17, 2015
`
`VIA EMAIL (darnonneagledesignip.corn)
`Damon A. Neagle
`DESIGN IP
`5050 W. Tilghrnan Street, Suite 435
`Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104
`
`Re:
`
`RUNSAFE Trademark
`
`Dear Mr. Neagle:
`
`I write in response to your March 11, 2015 letter to Darnele Wright regarding the RI.JNSAFE
`trademark owned by the University of California (the “University”). We have carefully
`considered your proposal for a co-existence agreement. We decline your invitation.
`
`Prior to your client’s adoption of the mark, the University granted an exclusive license to its
`RIJNSAFE trademark to one of our licensees, Sportzpeak, Inc. We spoke with Sportzpeak’s
`representatives, and given our exclusive licensing arrangement with them, the University cannot
`agree to permit the co-existence of another entity using RUNSAFE in connection with goods and
`services that are so similar to what our licensee is currently doing under the RUNSAFE mark.
`And contrary to your letter’s assertions, there is certainly a likelihood of confusion associated
`with your client’s use of RUNSAFE, which is identical to the University’s trademark. Based on
`the description in your letter as well as your client’s recent intent-to-use trademark application
`fur RUNSAFE (U.S. Ser. No. 86659653), your client will be using RUNSAFE in connection
`with software for tracking fitness activities and alerting runners of health or safety issues. This is
`nearly identical to what Sportzpeak is doing (and is licensed to do) under the University’s
`RUNSAFE mark. At the very least, your client’s use of the mark is sufficiently related to the
`goods and services provided by the University or our licensee for the past several years under the
`exact same mark.
`
`

`
`Damon A. Neagle
`June 17, 2015
`Page 2
`
`Given this likelihood of confusiOn and the University’s priority, we ask that you immediately
`withdraw all RUNSAFE trademark applications that you filed in all jurisdictions, including U.S.
`Ser. No. 86659653. If you refuse, we will take necessary steps to enforce the University’s rights.
`We wish to resolve this matter amicably and look forward to hearing from you soon about the
`matters set forth above. Nothing in this letter should be deemed a waiver, admission, or license
`by the University, which reserves all of its rights and remedies.
`
`Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property
`University of California, Office of the President
`
`cc:
`
`Darnele L. Wright, UCSF Deputy Campus Counsel
`Raffi V. Zero unian, Hanson Bridgett LLP
`
`

`
`Exhibit
`Exhibit
`D
`
`

`
` .t..
`r...
`ill
`r..
`.
`-l.
`5} . I v _'i g V Fagev Saiqyv Tools» g.u
`u-an Francisco [ About EJCSF | U(,. MedICi3|(,El1iEf | Orihoweb | Oiiliowiki University -
`Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
`Patient Care Research Education Outreach
`Facilities
`
`Home > Patient Care > Our Siieclailies > Human Perlurmance Center > Services > Runsale
`Search
`
`
`
`
`
`Q Search
`
`Human Performance Center
`
`Makeanfimpoint
`
`
`
`Support
`
`Contact
`
`sewices
`
`Research
`Rurisate
`
`23:’:-'fi:"'§°
`
`Clinics 8. Hospitals Resources
`
`Find an Expert
`
`Runsafe
`
`NEWS
`Human POITOITIIIIICI CONN? RISIIICIIIT
`HIIF warriun slllp rnoirway no an NBA
`Championship
`UCSF Human Ferlhnnance Center Research
`Fellow Chen Man begn nei...
`I-luriian Pcrtorrnanol center
`Snowasau in Digital Health
`Surniriur Summit
`The Human Penhnnance
`Center at Mission Bay was showcased in .
`
`Medicine Center is l'Ei1|.ll'Bd in INS...
`
`Increase in ‘sinnll lpurtlnir
`young alnlehs loans no more
`il‘i]l.ll'iOs
`Our Walnut Creek Sports
`
`/‘/Runsafe
`Runsafe is a sports wetlness program for ninners focusing on personalized health
`dvice, injury prevention, and peiforrnrioe enhancement. Using assessment and
`monitoring tools, along with a trusted network of experts, Runsafe provides runners
`with practical advice on the best practices to help runners achieve their individual
`goals.
`
`vinsos
`
`W
`Law We
`
`Runsafe engages runners into a comprehensive system for practical behavior
`change and continued motivation.
`
`The program was designed for running athletes of all levels, focusing on iniuiy
`prevention and biomechariicai analysis. Knowing how to prevent running injuries
`and practicing safe training methods are the best strategies to running effectively.
`
`signing up for I RunSaifa Assessment at UC SF is simple, and can be done in
`a few steps:
`
`1. Create an account www.i'runsafe.corn
`
`2. Complete your basic intoririation and verify your email address by clicking on the
`confirmation link in your email.
`
`3. L09 in 10 YOU?’ Rllflsflfe profile and click "register ‘for an assessment.‘ Enter your
`goals, and select UCSF as your Runsafe center
`
`ill
`Department at Orthopaedic Surgery l S!TEl.U\P
`
`HiPAA SIATEMENT i COF‘YRlG§-it 2015
`
`hltpc/lnnhu|ook.u¢fi.dId
`
`The Orthopaedic Institute
`1500 Owens Street

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket