`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA765784
`
`Filing date:
`
`08/22/2016
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`92063847
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Defendant
`James Arnim White
`
`JAMES ARNIM WHITE
`2214 STEPHANIE BROOKE
`WENATCHEE, WA 98801-1304
`UNITED STATES
`jim@applecapital.net
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's e-mail
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Answer
`
`James White
`
`jim@applecapital.net
`
`/James Arnim White/
`
`08/22/2016
`
`Attachments
`
`Answer to Petition to Cancel.pdf(27708 bytes )
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In Regard: Registration No. 4,380,453
`Filed October 11, 2009
`Registered: August 6, 2013
`Mark: VESTAL VIRGIN WINES
`
`VIRGIN ENTERPRISES, LIMITED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`JAMES ARNIM WHITE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respondent
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`Cancelation Number 92063847
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION FOR CANCELLATION
`
`Respondent James Arnim White, the owner and Registrant of Trademark
`
`Registration No. 4,380,453 for the mark VESTAL VIRGIN WINES, hereby answers the
`
`Petition for Cancellation filed June 9, 2016.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`1.
`
`The same allegations raised in Virgin Enterprises, Limited’s (VEL) present
`
`Petition to Cancel were previously raised in VEL’s September 13, 2010 Opposition No.
`
`91196447 and VEL’s July 1, 2011 Opposition No. 91200481 opposing Registrant’s
`
`trademark applications for Vestal Virgin Winery and Vestal Virgins, respectively,
`
`pertaining to wines made with grapes crushed by virgin women. Both of these Oppositions
`
`filed by VEL were dismissed with prejudice against VEL by the Trademark Trial and
`
`Appeal Board in December of 2013. It is important to note that none of Virgin Enterprises,
`
`Limited’s trademarks have anything to do with virgin, chaste or celibate women.
`
`Registrant’s Answer to Petition for Cancelation 1
`
`Cancelation Number 92063847
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`As evidenced by VEL’s other two opposition filings, VEL was well aware of
`
`Registrant’s October 11, 2009 trademark application for Vestal Virgin Wines, but chose
`
`not to timely file an Opposition as required by Section 13(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1063(a). VEL lack of diligence and activity to move forward with legal proceeding by
`
`filing an opposition to Registrant’s application constitutes estoppel by laches under Section
`
`19 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1069, and should preclude the Petitioner from raising
`
`these same counts in this Petition to Cancel at this late date.
`
`3.
`
`Registrant/Respondent has not abandoned his trademark and continues to use the
`
`Vestal Virgin Wines mark since it was issued.
`
`RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION TO CANCEL
`
`4.
`
`For the reasons stated in paragraphs 1 through 3 above, and for reasons further
`
`described in Respondent’s earlier TTAB filings to Petitioner’s unsuccessful Opposition
`
`No. 91196447 and Opposition No. 91200481 for Vestal Virgin Winery and Vestal
`
`Virgins, the Registrant/Respondent hereby denies the Petitioner’s assertions described in
`
`Counts I – Likelihood of Confusion, Count II – Dilution, and Count III – Abandonment,
`
`of their Petition to Cancel dated June 9, 2016.
`
`COUNTERCLAIM I: PETITIONER’S EXISTING TRADEMARK IS
`
`UNREGISTERABLE, 15 U.S.C. § 1052€
`
`5.
`
`Contrary to Section 2 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e), VEL’s existing
`
`trademark for “Virgin Wines” is deceptively misdescriptive because their wines are not
`
`produced from grapes crushed by virgins. This is in contrast to Vestal Virgin Wines, which
`
`are marketed as wine made from grapes crushed by virgin women.
`
`
`
`
`
`Registrant’s Answer to Petition for Cancelation 2
`
`Cancelation Number 92063847
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Registrant/Respondent prays that the current Petition to Cancel
`
`Vestal Virgin Wines be dismissed, and that the Registrant’s trademark be affirmed.
`
`Registrant/Respondent also prays that Petitioner be prohibited from claiming that their
`
`wine is made from grapes crushed by virgins unless agreed to by the Registrant.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`__/James Arnim White/______________________
`
`James Arnim White, Registrant/Respondent
`
`2214 Stephanie Brooke
`
`Wenatchee, Washington 98801
`
`RESPONDENT, Pro Se
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: August 21, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`Registrant’s Answer to Petition for Cancelation 3
`
`Cancelation Number 92063847
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing Respondent’s
`
`Answer to Petition to Cancel has been served on Petitioner’s counsel, Shyla N. Jones, by
`
`mailing said copy on this 21st day of August, 2016, via First Class U.S. Mail, postage
`
`prepaid to: Norvell IP LLC, P.O. Box 2461, Chicago, IL 60690.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`__/James Arnim White/_
`James Arnim White, Registrant/Respondent
`
`
`
`August 21, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date
`
`CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING
`
`I hereby certify that this correspondence is being transmitted by electronic mail to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board via
`
`ESTTA with any required fees on August 21, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
``
`
`__/James Arnim White/_
`James Arnim White, Registrant/Respondent
`
`
`
`August 22, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Registrant’s Answer to Petition for Cancelation 4
`
`Cancelation Number 92063847



