throbber
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA765784
`
`Filing date:
`
`08/22/2016
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`92063847
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Defendant
`James Arnim White
`
`JAMES ARNIM WHITE
`2214 STEPHANIE BROOKE
`WENATCHEE, WA 98801-1304
`UNITED STATES
`jim@applecapital.net
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's e-mail
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Answer
`
`James White
`
`jim@applecapital.net
`
`/James Arnim White/
`
`08/22/2016
`
`Attachments
`
`Answer to Petition to Cancel.pdf(27708 bytes )
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In Regard: Registration No. 4,380,453
`Filed October 11, 2009
`Registered: August 6, 2013
`Mark: VESTAL VIRGIN WINES
`
`VIRGIN ENTERPRISES, LIMITED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`JAMES ARNIM WHITE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respondent
`
`
`










`
`
`
`
`Cancelation Number 92063847
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION FOR CANCELLATION
`
`Respondent James Arnim White, the owner and Registrant of Trademark
`
`Registration No. 4,380,453 for the mark VESTAL VIRGIN WINES, hereby answers the
`
`Petition for Cancellation filed June 9, 2016.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`1.
`
`The same allegations raised in Virgin Enterprises, Limited’s (VEL) present
`
`Petition to Cancel were previously raised in VEL’s September 13, 2010 Opposition No.
`
`91196447 and VEL’s July 1, 2011 Opposition No. 91200481 opposing Registrant’s
`
`trademark applications for Vestal Virgin Winery and Vestal Virgins, respectively,
`
`pertaining to wines made with grapes crushed by virgin women. Both of these Oppositions
`
`filed by VEL were dismissed with prejudice against VEL by the Trademark Trial and
`
`Appeal Board in December of 2013. It is important to note that none of Virgin Enterprises,
`
`Limited’s trademarks have anything to do with virgin, chaste or celibate women.
`
`Registrant’s Answer to Petition for Cancelation 1
`
`Cancelation Number 92063847
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`As evidenced by VEL’s other two opposition filings, VEL was well aware of
`
`Registrant’s October 11, 2009 trademark application for Vestal Virgin Wines, but chose
`
`not to timely file an Opposition as required by Section 13(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1063(a). VEL lack of diligence and activity to move forward with legal proceeding by
`
`filing an opposition to Registrant’s application constitutes estoppel by laches under Section
`
`19 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1069, and should preclude the Petitioner from raising
`
`these same counts in this Petition to Cancel at this late date.
`
`3.
`
`Registrant/Respondent has not abandoned his trademark and continues to use the
`
`Vestal Virgin Wines mark since it was issued.
`
`RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION TO CANCEL
`
`4.
`
`For the reasons stated in paragraphs 1 through 3 above, and for reasons further
`
`described in Respondent’s earlier TTAB filings to Petitioner’s unsuccessful Opposition
`
`No. 91196447 and Opposition No. 91200481 for Vestal Virgin Winery and Vestal
`
`Virgins, the Registrant/Respondent hereby denies the Petitioner’s assertions described in
`
`Counts I – Likelihood of Confusion, Count II – Dilution, and Count III – Abandonment,
`
`of their Petition to Cancel dated June 9, 2016.
`
`COUNTERCLAIM I: PETITIONER’S EXISTING TRADEMARK IS
`
`UNREGISTERABLE, 15 U.S.C. § 1052€
`
`5.
`
`Contrary to Section 2 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e), VEL’s existing
`
`trademark for “Virgin Wines” is deceptively misdescriptive because their wines are not
`
`produced from grapes crushed by virgins. This is in contrast to Vestal Virgin Wines, which
`
`are marketed as wine made from grapes crushed by virgin women.
`
`
`
`
`
`Registrant’s Answer to Petition for Cancelation 2
`
`Cancelation Number 92063847
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Registrant/Respondent prays that the current Petition to Cancel
`
`Vestal Virgin Wines be dismissed, and that the Registrant’s trademark be affirmed.
`
`Registrant/Respondent also prays that Petitioner be prohibited from claiming that their
`
`wine is made from grapes crushed by virgins unless agreed to by the Registrant.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`__/James Arnim White/______________________
`
`James Arnim White, Registrant/Respondent
`
`2214 Stephanie Brooke
`
`Wenatchee, Washington 98801
`
`RESPONDENT, Pro Se
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: August 21, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`Registrant’s Answer to Petition for Cancelation 3
`
`Cancelation Number 92063847
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing Respondent’s
`
`Answer to Petition to Cancel has been served on Petitioner’s counsel, Shyla N. Jones, by
`
`mailing said copy on this 21st day of August, 2016, via First Class U.S. Mail, postage
`
`prepaid to: Norvell IP LLC, P.O. Box 2461, Chicago, IL 60690.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`__/James Arnim White/_
`James Arnim White, Registrant/Respondent
`
`
`
`August 21, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date
`
`CERTIFICATE OF ELECTRONIC FILING
`
`I hereby certify that this correspondence is being transmitted by electronic mail to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board via
`
`ESTTA with any required fees on August 21, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
``
`
`__/James Arnim White/_
`James Arnim White, Registrant/Respondent
`
`
`
`August 22, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Registrant’s Answer to Petition for Cancelation 4
`
`Cancelation Number 92063847

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket