`
`
`
`Ferrell
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`General Email: TTABInfo@uspto.gov
`
`November 30, 2023
`
`Concurrent Use No. 94003144
`
`Innovative Management Solutions, Inc.
`(Application Serial No. 97421883)
`
`v.
`
`Pamela Manley
`(Registration No. 5450906)
`
`
`
`By the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board:
`
`In its July 27, 2023, the Board provided time for the parties to clarify whether
`
`Innovative Management Solutions, Inc. (“Applicant”) is amending its application to
`
`seek a geographically unrestricted registration.1 On August 26, 2023, Applicant
`
`responded with its notice of “intent to amend” the application to seek a geographically
`
`unrestricted registration.2
`
`First, when a party to an inter partes proceeding before the Board files a
`
`submission required by 37 C.F.R.§ 2.119(a) to be served upon every other party to the
`
`
`1 5 TTABVUE 3. Citations to the Board record refer to TTABVUE, the Board’s online
`docketing system. See Turdin v. Trilobite, Ltd., 109 USPQ2d 1473, 1476 n.6 (TTAB 2014).
`Specifically, the number preceding “TTABVUE” corresponds to the docket entry number, and
`any number(s) following “TTABVUE” refer to the page number(s) of the docket entry where
`the cited materials appear.
`
`2 6 TTABVUE.
`
`
`
`
`
`Concurrent Use No. 94003144
`
`
`proceeding, the party filing the submission must include proof that the required
`
`service has been made and such proof ordinarily must be submitted before the filing
`
`will be considered by the Board. Occasionally, in order to expedite matters, the Board
`
`will provide a link to the database where a copy of the filing can be viewed. Applicant’s
`
`filing is not accompanied by a certificate of service. In this instance, and to expedite
`
`matters,the Board exercises its discretion and will consider the filing, however, strict
`
`compliance is required in all future submissions filed with the Board. 3
`
`Second, Applicant’s submission does not indicate Pamela Manley’s (“Registrant”)
`
`express consent to amendment of Applicant’s application to one seeking
`
`geographically unrestricted registration. 37 C.F.R. § 2.133(a); see also TBMP 514.01.
`
`While the parties did not explicitly include geographic restrictions in their
`
`“Concurrent Use and Co-Existence Agreement” (“Agreement”), the declarations
`
`attached to the Agreement each include the following statement: Applicant and
`
`Registrant “have used their respective marks in connection with substantially
`
`different geographic areas, as [Registrant] primarily operates in Georgia, whereas
`
`[Applicant] operates throughout the country and globally.” 4 Accordingly, without a
`
`statement of Registrant’s express consent, it is still unclear whether the parties have
`
`agreed to geographically restricted concurrent use registrations or to geographically
`
`unrestricted coexisting registrations.
`
`
`3 A copy of the filing can be viewed using TTABVUE at http://ttabvue.uspto.gov.
`
`4 3 TTABVUE 7-8.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Concurrent Use No. 94003144
`
`
`In view of the foregoing, the parties are allowed until THIRTY DAYS from the
`
`date of this order to inform the Board whether Registrant expressly consents to
`
`Applicant’s proposed amendment to its application to seek a geographically
`
`unrestricted registration.
`
`Proceedings otherwise remain suspended.
`
`
`
`3
`
`



