`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`BEAUMONT DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.
`
` )
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES
`
`The United States of America (“United States”), by the authority of the Attorney General
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the
`STATE OF TEXAS,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.
`
`and
`
`THE CHEMOURS CO. FC, LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`of the United States, by and through the undersigned attorneys, acting at the request of the
`
`National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), and of the Fish and Wildlife
`
`Service of the United States Department of the Interior (“FWS”), and the State of Texas, on
`
`behalf of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”), the Texas General Land
`
`Office (“TGLO”), and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (“TPWD”) (collectively, the
`
`“State”), file this Complaint and allege as follows:
`
`STATEMENT OF THE CASE
`
`1.
`
`This is a civil action against E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. (“DuPont”) and
`
`The Chemours Co. FC, LLC (“Chemours”), pursuant to Section 107(a)(4)(C) of the
`
`Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4)(C), seeking recovery of damages for injury to, loss of, or destruction of
`
`natural resources, including recovery of the costs of assessing such injury and damages and the
`
`future costs of overseeing and monitoring restoration actions, as a result of releases of hazardous
`
`substances into the environment at or from the DuPont Beaumont Works Industrial Park
`
`Complex including the West Marsh, located at 5470 N. Twin City Highway, Nederland, Texas
`
`77627. The State of Texas also seeks relief under the Texas Water Code (“TWC”) §§ 26.261-
`
`267.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`2.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Parties and has jurisdiction over the
`
`subject matter of this action under Sections 107 and 113(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607 and
`
`9613(b), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345 and 2201.
`
`3.
`
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 and Section 113(b)
`
`of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(b) because the release or threatened release of hazardous
`
`substances that gives rise to the action occurred in this District.
`
`PARTIES
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`DuPont is a Delaware corporation registered to do business in the State of Texas.
`
`DuPont formerly owned and operated the DuPont Beaumont Works Industrial
`
`Park Complex including the West Marsh (the “Site”), located at 5470 N. Twin City Highway,
`
`Nederland, Texas, from 1954 through 2015.
`
`6.
`
`On July 1, 2015, DuPont created a new company, Chemours, for its Performance
`
`Chemicals Division. Chemours is a Delaware corporation registered to do business in the State
`
`of Texas.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 3
`
`
`
`7.
`
`In 2015, Chemours became the owner of the DuPont Beaumont Works Industrial
`
`Park Complex, located at 5470 N. Twin City Highway, Nederland, Texas, and the Site.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Collectively, DuPont and Chemours are the “Defendants.”
`
`Pursuant to Federal statutes, including Section 107(f)(2)(A) of CERCLA, 42
`
`U.S.C. § 9607(f)(2)(A), TCEQ, TGLO, TPWD, NOAA, and FWS are trustees for natural
`
`resources injured as a result of releases of hazardous substances caused by Defendants at the
`
`Site.
`
`CERCLA STATUTORY BACKGROUND
`
`10.
`
`Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), provides in pertinent part that:
`
`(1) the owner or operator of . . . a facility, (2) any person who at the time of
`disposal of any hazardous substance owned or operated any facility at which such
`hazardous substances were disposed of, . . . (4) . . . from which there is a release,
`or a threatened release which causes the incurrence of response costs, of a
`hazardous substance, shall be liable for – . . . (C) damages for injury to,
`destruction of, or loss of natural resources, including the reasonable costs of
`assessing such injury, destruction or loss resulting from such a release; . . . .
`
`The term “natural resources” as defined in CERCLA means “land, fish, wildlife,
`
`11.
`
`biota, air, water, groundwater, drinking water supplies, and other such resources belonging to,
`
`managed by, held in trust by, appertaining to, or otherwise controlled by the United States, . . .
`
`and any State or local government. . . .” 42 U.S.C. § 9601(16).
`
`GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`12.
`
`The Site (also known as the “West Marsh”) encompasses approximately 30 acres
`
`in the northwestern corner of the DuPont Beaumont Works Industrial Park Complex, bounded by
`
`the Neches River on the northeast, closed solid waste management units to the southeast, tank
`
`storage to the southwest, and a former canal on the northwest.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 4
`
`
`
`13.
`
`DuPont began operations at the Site in 1954, which included the production of
`
`plastics and other proprietary synthetic products commercially sold by DuPont. Chemours, a
`
`new company formed by DuPont became the owner of the Site in 2015.
`
`14.
`
`During the time that DuPont owned and operated the Site, hazardous substances
`
`including arsenic, chromium, lead, zinc, copper, mercury, and nickel were disposed of at the
`
`Site.
`
`15.
`
`Chemours is the current owner of the Site where hazardous substances have come
`
`to be located.
`
`16.
`
` Releases of hazardous substances from the Site have resulted in injuries to,
`
`destruction of, loss of, and the loss of use of natural resources and services from natural
`
`resources at the Site, including estuarine emergent wetland habitat and other resources.
`
`17.
`
`Under Section 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607, and 43 C.F.R. Part 11, the
`
`United States and the State of Texas (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), as natural resource trustees, are
`
`entitled to recover damages for injury to natural resources, including (1) the cost to restore,
`
`replace, or acquire the equivalent of such natural resources; (2) the compensable value of lost
`
`services resulting from the injury to resources; and (3) the reasonable cost of assessing injuries to
`
`natural resources and resulting damages.
`
`18.
`
`In 2007, DuPont entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with the federal and
`
`state natural resource trustees (collectively, “the Trustees”) to perform a cooperative, restoration-
`
`based assessment to address potential natural resource injuries at the Site. Chemours joined the
`
`cooperative assessment when it became the Site owner in 2015.
`
`19.
`
` The Trustees’ assessment of these injuries to natural resources, including the
`
`restoration project proposed to compensate for those losses, is identified in the “Final Damage
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`Assessment and NEPA Categorical Exclusion for DuPont Beaumont Works West Marsh,
`
`Jefferson County, Texas,” dated June 6, 2016.
`
`20.
`
`The Trustees determined that hazardous substances released at the Site have
`
`injured or potentially injured estuarine emergent wetland habitat and other resources.
`
`21.
`
`The primary hazardous substances at the Site include arsenic, chromium, lead,
`
`zinc, copper, mercury, and nickel.
`
`22.
`
`The Trustees have incurred costs in assessing the injury to natural resources
`
`which remain unreimbursed.
`
` FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`(The United States’ and the State of Texas’s Claim for Recovery of
`Natural Resource Damages Under CERCLA)
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 22 are re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`DuPont and Chemours are “persons” within the meaning of Section 101(21) of
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(21) and also within the meaning of Section 26.263(5) of the TWC.
`
`25.
`
`The Site is a “facility” within the meaning of Section 101(9) of CERCLA, 42
`
`U.S.C. § 9601(9).
`
`26.
`
`There was a “release” or a threatened “release” within the meaning of Section
`
`101(22) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(22), of “hazardous substances”, within the meaning of
`
`Section 101(14) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), into the environment at the Site.
`
`27.
`
`The release of hazardous substances at or to the Site caused injury to, destruction
`
`of, or loss of “natural resources” within the meaning of Sections 101(16) and 107(a)(4)(C) of
`
`CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601(16) and 9607(a)(4)(C).
`
`28.
`
`TCEQ, TGLO, TPWD, NOAA, and FWS are agencies that have been designated
`
`as natural resource trustees pursuant to Section 107(f) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(f).
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`29.
`
`TCEQ, TGLO, TPWD, NOAA, and FWS have incurred costs assessing such
`
`injury, destruction, or loss of natural resources.
`
`30.
`
`DuPont is within the class of liable persons described in Section 107(a)(2) of
`
`CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(2), because it owned and operated the Site during the time
`
`hazardous substances were disposed of at the Site.
`
`31.
`
`Chemours is within the class of liable persons described in Section 107(a)(1) of
`
`CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(1), because it currently owns the Site.
`
`32.
`
`Pursuant to Section 107(a)(4)(C) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4)(C),
`
`Defendants are liable to Plaintiffs for injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources,
`
`including the reasonable costs of assessing such injury, destruction, or loss resulting from actual
`
`releases of hazardous substances at or to the Site.
`
`SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`(The State of Texas’s State Law Claim TWC §§ 26.261-267)
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 32 are realleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`The Site is a “facility” within the meaning of Section 327.2 of Title 30 of the
`
`
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`Texas Administrative Code.
`
`35.
`
`Hazardous substances, within the meaning of Section 26.263(4) of the TWC, were
`
` discharged at the Site.
`
`36.
`
`Each Defendant is a “responsible person” within the meaning of Section
`
`26.263(6) of the TWC.
`
`37.
`
`There were “discharges or spills” within the meaning of Section 26.263(1) of the
`
`TWC at or to the Site.
`
`38.
`
`The discharge or spill at or to the Site has caused injury to, destruction of,
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 7
`
`
`
`and loss of land and aquatic resources held in trust or owned by the State of Texas, within the
`
`meaning of Section 26.265(d) of the TWC.
`
`39.
`
`The State has incurred and is continuing to incur costs related to determining the
`
`impacts of the spill on the environment and natural resources as well as for the restoration
`
`of land and aquatic resources held in trust or owned by the State of Texas, within the meaning of
`
`Section 26.265(d) of the TWC.
`
`40.
`
` Pursuant to Section 26.265(d) of the TWC, Defendants are liable to the State for
`
`the reasonable costs of conducting reasonable and necessary scientific studies to determine the
`
`impacts of the spill on the environment and natural resources and to determine the manner in
`
`which to respond to spill impacts, including the reasonable costs incurred in restoration of land
`
`and aquatic resources held in trust or owned by the State of Texas.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that this Court:
`
`1.
`
`Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants, jointly and
`
`
`
`
`
`severally, pursuant to Section 107(a)(4)(C) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4)(C), and Section
`
`26.265(d) of the TWC, for all damages for injury to, destruction of, and loss of natural resources
`
`within the trusteeship of the United States and the State of Texas resulting from the releases of
`
`hazardous substances at or to the Site, including the unreimbursed past, present, and future costs
`
`of assessing such damages, the cost of restoring, replacing, and/or acquiring the equivalent of
`
`those injured resources, and the past, present, and future diminution in value of those resources
`
`pending restoration or replacement;
`
`
`
`2.
`
`Enter a judgment in favor of Plaintiffs against Defendants for liability for all costs
`
`of this action, including attorneys’ fees; and
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 8
`
`3.
`
`Award Plaintiffs such other and further relief as this Court may deem appropriate.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
`
`
`
`Section Chief
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`U.S. Department of Justice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` s/ Samuel D. Blesi
`SAMUEL D. BLESI (DC Bar # 417818)
`Lead Attorney
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`U.S. Department of Justice
`
`P.O. Box 7611
`
`Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
`Telephone: 202-514-1466
`Sam.Blesi@usdoj.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STEPHEN J. COX
`United States Attorney
`Eastern District of Texas
`
`
`
`
`
`
` s/ James Gillingham
`JAMES GILLINGHAM (Tex. Bar No. 24065295)
`Assistant United States Attorney
`Eastern District of Texas
`101 N. College Avenue, Suite 700
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Email: james.gillingham@usdoj.gov
`Telephone: 903-510-9346
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KEN PAXTON
`Attorney General of Texas
`
`BRENT WEBSTER
`First Assistant Attorney General
`
`SHAWN COWLES
`Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation
`
`PRISCILLA M. HUBENAK
`Chief, Environmental Protection Division
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` s/ Ekaterina DeAngelo
`EKATERINA DEANGELO
`Assistant Attorney General
`Tex. Bar No. 24087398
`
`Office of the Attorney General
`Environmental Protection Division
`P.O. Box 12548, MC-066
`Austin, Texas 78711-2548
`Tel: (512) 463-2012
`Fax: (512) 320-0911
`Ekaterina.DeAngelo@oag.texas.gov
`
`COUNSEL FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS ON
`BEHALF OF THE TEXAS GENERAL LAND
`OFFICE, THE TEXAS PARK AND WILDLIFE
`DEPARTMENT, AND THE TEXAS
`COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL
`QUALITY
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that, on this day, I caused true and correct copies of the foregoing
`
`Complaint to be served by first class mail, postage prepaid, on the following:
`
`
`
`Patricia McGee
`Corporate Counsel
`E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
`974 Centre Road, CRP 735
`P.O. Box 2915
`Wilmington, Delaware 19805
`
`Todd Coomes
`Senior Counsel, Chemours Legal
`The Chemours Company
`1007 Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`
`
`Date: 12/29/2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` s/ Samuel D. Blesi
`SAMUEL D. BLESI
`Attorney
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`U.S. Department of Justice
`
`P.O. Box 7611
`
`Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
`Telephone: 202-514-1466
`Fax: 202-514-8865
`E-mail: Sam.Blesi@usdoj.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`