throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`BEAUMONT DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.
`
` )
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES
`
`The United States of America (“United States”), by the authority of the Attorney General
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the
`STATE OF TEXAS,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.
`
`and
`
`THE CHEMOURS CO. FC, LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`of the United States, by and through the undersigned attorneys, acting at the request of the
`
`National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), and of the Fish and Wildlife
`
`Service of the United States Department of the Interior (“FWS”), and the State of Texas, on
`
`behalf of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”), the Texas General Land
`
`Office (“TGLO”), and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (“TPWD”) (collectively, the
`
`“State”), file this Complaint and allege as follows:
`
`STATEMENT OF THE CASE
`
`1.
`
`This is a civil action against E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. (“DuPont”) and
`
`The Chemours Co. FC, LLC (“Chemours”), pursuant to Section 107(a)(4)(C) of the
`
`Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4)(C), seeking recovery of damages for injury to, loss of, or destruction of
`
`natural resources, including recovery of the costs of assessing such injury and damages and the
`
`future costs of overseeing and monitoring restoration actions, as a result of releases of hazardous
`
`substances into the environment at or from the DuPont Beaumont Works Industrial Park
`
`Complex including the West Marsh, located at 5470 N. Twin City Highway, Nederland, Texas
`
`77627. The State of Texas also seeks relief under the Texas Water Code (“TWC”) §§ 26.261-
`
`267.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`2.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Parties and has jurisdiction over the
`
`subject matter of this action under Sections 107 and 113(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607 and
`
`9613(b), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345 and 2201.
`
`3.
`
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 and Section 113(b)
`
`of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(b) because the release or threatened release of hazardous
`
`substances that gives rise to the action occurred in this District.
`
`PARTIES
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`DuPont is a Delaware corporation registered to do business in the State of Texas.
`
`DuPont formerly owned and operated the DuPont Beaumont Works Industrial
`
`Park Complex including the West Marsh (the “Site”), located at 5470 N. Twin City Highway,
`
`Nederland, Texas, from 1954 through 2015.
`
`6.
`
`On July 1, 2015, DuPont created a new company, Chemours, for its Performance
`
`Chemicals Division. Chemours is a Delaware corporation registered to do business in the State
`
`of Texas.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 3
`
`
`
`7.
`
`In 2015, Chemours became the owner of the DuPont Beaumont Works Industrial
`
`Park Complex, located at 5470 N. Twin City Highway, Nederland, Texas, and the Site.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Collectively, DuPont and Chemours are the “Defendants.”
`
`Pursuant to Federal statutes, including Section 107(f)(2)(A) of CERCLA, 42
`
`U.S.C. § 9607(f)(2)(A), TCEQ, TGLO, TPWD, NOAA, and FWS are trustees for natural
`
`resources injured as a result of releases of hazardous substances caused by Defendants at the
`
`Site.
`
`CERCLA STATUTORY BACKGROUND
`
`10.
`
`Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), provides in pertinent part that:
`
`(1) the owner or operator of . . . a facility, (2) any person who at the time of
`disposal of any hazardous substance owned or operated any facility at which such
`hazardous substances were disposed of, . . . (4) . . . from which there is a release,
`or a threatened release which causes the incurrence of response costs, of a
`hazardous substance, shall be liable for – . . . (C) damages for injury to,
`destruction of, or loss of natural resources, including the reasonable costs of
`assessing such injury, destruction or loss resulting from such a release; . . . .
`
`The term “natural resources” as defined in CERCLA means “land, fish, wildlife,
`
`11.
`
`biota, air, water, groundwater, drinking water supplies, and other such resources belonging to,
`
`managed by, held in trust by, appertaining to, or otherwise controlled by the United States, . . .
`
`and any State or local government. . . .” 42 U.S.C. § 9601(16).
`
`GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`12.
`
`The Site (also known as the “West Marsh”) encompasses approximately 30 acres
`
`in the northwestern corner of the DuPont Beaumont Works Industrial Park Complex, bounded by
`
`the Neches River on the northeast, closed solid waste management units to the southeast, tank
`
`storage to the southwest, and a former canal on the northwest.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 4
`
`
`
`13.
`
`DuPont began operations at the Site in 1954, which included the production of
`
`plastics and other proprietary synthetic products commercially sold by DuPont. Chemours, a
`
`new company formed by DuPont became the owner of the Site in 2015.
`
`14.
`
`During the time that DuPont owned and operated the Site, hazardous substances
`
`including arsenic, chromium, lead, zinc, copper, mercury, and nickel were disposed of at the
`
`Site.
`
`15.
`
`Chemours is the current owner of the Site where hazardous substances have come
`
`to be located.
`
`16.
`
` Releases of hazardous substances from the Site have resulted in injuries to,
`
`destruction of, loss of, and the loss of use of natural resources and services from natural
`
`resources at the Site, including estuarine emergent wetland habitat and other resources.
`
`17.
`
`Under Section 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607, and 43 C.F.R. Part 11, the
`
`United States and the State of Texas (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), as natural resource trustees, are
`
`entitled to recover damages for injury to natural resources, including (1) the cost to restore,
`
`replace, or acquire the equivalent of such natural resources; (2) the compensable value of lost
`
`services resulting from the injury to resources; and (3) the reasonable cost of assessing injuries to
`
`natural resources and resulting damages.
`
`18.
`
`In 2007, DuPont entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with the federal and
`
`state natural resource trustees (collectively, “the Trustees”) to perform a cooperative, restoration-
`
`based assessment to address potential natural resource injuries at the Site. Chemours joined the
`
`cooperative assessment when it became the Site owner in 2015.
`
`19.
`
` The Trustees’ assessment of these injuries to natural resources, including the
`
`restoration project proposed to compensate for those losses, is identified in the “Final Damage
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`Assessment and NEPA Categorical Exclusion for DuPont Beaumont Works West Marsh,
`
`Jefferson County, Texas,” dated June 6, 2016.
`
`20.
`
`The Trustees determined that hazardous substances released at the Site have
`
`injured or potentially injured estuarine emergent wetland habitat and other resources.
`
`21.
`
`The primary hazardous substances at the Site include arsenic, chromium, lead,
`
`zinc, copper, mercury, and nickel.
`
`22.
`
`The Trustees have incurred costs in assessing the injury to natural resources
`
`which remain unreimbursed.
`
` FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`(The United States’ and the State of Texas’s Claim for Recovery of
`Natural Resource Damages Under CERCLA)
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 22 are re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`DuPont and Chemours are “persons” within the meaning of Section 101(21) of
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(21) and also within the meaning of Section 26.263(5) of the TWC.
`
`25.
`
`The Site is a “facility” within the meaning of Section 101(9) of CERCLA, 42
`
`U.S.C. § 9601(9).
`
`26.
`
`There was a “release” or a threatened “release” within the meaning of Section
`
`101(22) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(22), of “hazardous substances”, within the meaning of
`
`Section 101(14) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), into the environment at the Site.
`
`27.
`
`The release of hazardous substances at or to the Site caused injury to, destruction
`
`of, or loss of “natural resources” within the meaning of Sections 101(16) and 107(a)(4)(C) of
`
`CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601(16) and 9607(a)(4)(C).
`
`28.
`
`TCEQ, TGLO, TPWD, NOAA, and FWS are agencies that have been designated
`
`as natural resource trustees pursuant to Section 107(f) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(f).
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`29.
`
`TCEQ, TGLO, TPWD, NOAA, and FWS have incurred costs assessing such
`
`injury, destruction, or loss of natural resources.
`
`30.
`
`DuPont is within the class of liable persons described in Section 107(a)(2) of
`
`CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(2), because it owned and operated the Site during the time
`
`hazardous substances were disposed of at the Site.
`
`31.
`
`Chemours is within the class of liable persons described in Section 107(a)(1) of
`
`CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(1), because it currently owns the Site.
`
`32.
`
`Pursuant to Section 107(a)(4)(C) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4)(C),
`
`Defendants are liable to Plaintiffs for injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources,
`
`including the reasonable costs of assessing such injury, destruction, or loss resulting from actual
`
`releases of hazardous substances at or to the Site.
`
`SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`(The State of Texas’s State Law Claim TWC §§ 26.261-267)
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 32 are realleged and incorporated herein by reference.
`
`The Site is a “facility” within the meaning of Section 327.2 of Title 30 of the
`
`
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`Texas Administrative Code.
`
`35.
`
`Hazardous substances, within the meaning of Section 26.263(4) of the TWC, were
`
` discharged at the Site.
`
`36.
`
`Each Defendant is a “responsible person” within the meaning of Section
`
`26.263(6) of the TWC.
`
`37.
`
`There were “discharges or spills” within the meaning of Section 26.263(1) of the
`
`TWC at or to the Site.
`
`38.
`
`The discharge or spill at or to the Site has caused injury to, destruction of,
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 7
`
`
`
`and loss of land and aquatic resources held in trust or owned by the State of Texas, within the
`
`meaning of Section 26.265(d) of the TWC.
`
`39.
`
`The State has incurred and is continuing to incur costs related to determining the
`
`impacts of the spill on the environment and natural resources as well as for the restoration
`
`of land and aquatic resources held in trust or owned by the State of Texas, within the meaning of
`
`Section 26.265(d) of the TWC.
`
`40.
`
` Pursuant to Section 26.265(d) of the TWC, Defendants are liable to the State for
`
`the reasonable costs of conducting reasonable and necessary scientific studies to determine the
`
`impacts of the spill on the environment and natural resources and to determine the manner in
`
`which to respond to spill impacts, including the reasonable costs incurred in restoration of land
`
`and aquatic resources held in trust or owned by the State of Texas.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray that this Court:
`
`1.
`
`Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants, jointly and
`
`
`
`
`
`severally, pursuant to Section 107(a)(4)(C) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4)(C), and Section
`
`26.265(d) of the TWC, for all damages for injury to, destruction of, and loss of natural resources
`
`within the trusteeship of the United States and the State of Texas resulting from the releases of
`
`hazardous substances at or to the Site, including the unreimbursed past, present, and future costs
`
`of assessing such damages, the cost of restoring, replacing, and/or acquiring the equivalent of
`
`those injured resources, and the past, present, and future diminution in value of those resources
`
`pending restoration or replacement;
`
`
`
`2.
`
`Enter a judgment in favor of Plaintiffs against Defendants for liability for all costs
`
`of this action, including attorneys’ fees; and
`
`7
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 8
`
`3.
`
`Award Plaintiffs such other and further relief as this Court may deem appropriate.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
`
`
`
`Section Chief
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`U.S. Department of Justice
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` s/ Samuel D. Blesi
`SAMUEL D. BLESI (DC Bar # 417818)
`Lead Attorney
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`U.S. Department of Justice
`
`P.O. Box 7611
`
`Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
`Telephone: 202-514-1466
`Sam.Blesi@usdoj.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STEPHEN J. COX
`United States Attorney
`Eastern District of Texas
`
`
`
`
`
`
` s/ James Gillingham
`JAMES GILLINGHAM (Tex. Bar No. 24065295)
`Assistant United States Attorney
`Eastern District of Texas
`101 N. College Avenue, Suite 700
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`Email: james.gillingham@usdoj.gov
`Telephone: 903-510-9346
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KEN PAXTON
`Attorney General of Texas
`
`BRENT WEBSTER
`First Assistant Attorney General
`
`SHAWN COWLES
`Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation
`
`PRISCILLA M. HUBENAK
`Chief, Environmental Protection Division
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` s/ Ekaterina DeAngelo
`EKATERINA DEANGELO
`Assistant Attorney General
`Tex. Bar No. 24087398
`
`Office of the Attorney General
`Environmental Protection Division
`P.O. Box 12548, MC-066
`Austin, Texas 78711-2548
`Tel: (512) 463-2012
`Fax: (512) 320-0911
`Ekaterina.DeAngelo@oag.texas.gov
`
`COUNSEL FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS ON
`BEHALF OF THE TEXAS GENERAL LAND
`OFFICE, THE TEXAS PARK AND WILDLIFE
`DEPARTMENT, AND THE TEXAS
`COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL
`QUALITY 
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-00556 Document 1 Filed 12/29/20 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that, on this day, I caused true and correct copies of the foregoing
`
`Complaint to be served by first class mail, postage prepaid, on the following:
`
`
`
`Patricia McGee
`Corporate Counsel
`E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
`974 Centre Road, CRP 735
`P.O. Box 2915
`Wilmington, Delaware 19805
`
`Todd Coomes
`Senior Counsel, Chemours Legal
`The Chemours Company
`1007 Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`
`
`Date: 12/29/2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` s/ Samuel D. Blesi
`SAMUEL D. BLESI
`Attorney
`Environmental Enforcement Section
`Environment and Natural Resources Division
`U.S. Department of Justice
`
`P.O. Box 7611
`
`Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
`Telephone: 202-514-1466
`Fax: 202-514-8865
`E-mail: Sam.Blesi@usdoj.gov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket