throbber
Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 386 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 29173
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:15-CV-01274-JRG-RSP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD., AMERICAN
`HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., HONDA OF
`AMERICA MANUFACTURING, INC.,
`HONDA MANUFACTURING OF
`ALABAMA, LLC, HONDA
`MANUFACTURING OF INDIANA, LLC,
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For the reasons explained at the pretrial hearing on January 11, 2017, the following motions
`
`are resolved as follows:
`
`1. Dkt. No. 212: Defendants’ motion to strike portions of the rebuttal expert report of Joseph
`
`C. McAlexander III regarding validity of U.S. patent numbers 7,489,786 and 8,155,342:
`
`• GRANTED.
`
`2. Dkt. No. 237: Defendants Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. And Volkswagen Group
`
`of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC’s Motion to Exclude Certain Testimony Under Daubert
`
`and to Strike Certain Portions of the Reports of Joseph C. McAlexander III:
`
`• DENIED with the exception of the dispute about Mr. McAlexander’s doctrine of
`
`equivalents opinions, which the parties have resolved by agreement.
`
`

`

`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 386 Filed 01/12/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 29174
`
`3. Dkt. No. 253: Toyota’s Motion to Strike “Errata” To Expert Report of Joseph they have
`
`McAlexander On Infringement; Dkt. No. 369: Toyota’s Emergency Motion to Strike
`
`Supplemental Expert Report of Joseph C. McAlexander Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent
`
`Numbers 7,489,786 And 8,155,342:
`
`• DENIED. Toyota is given leave to depose Mr. McAlexander on his supplemental
`
`report and renew their Motion for Summary Judgment in light of that deposition.
`
`4. Dkt. No. 259: Nissan North America, Inc.’s, And Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.’s Opposed
`
`Emergency Motion to Strike New Expert Disclosures and Opposed Motion for Expedited Briefing:
`
`• DENIED. Nissan is given leave to serve a supplemental expert report by January
`
`23, 2017. Nissan is also given leave to submit supplemental briefing on its related Motion
`
`for Summary Judgment.
`
`5. Dkt. No. 352: Honda’s Motion to Strike Blitzsafe’s New Infringement Theory:
`
`• DENIED. The Court explained that the substance of Honda’s Motion will be dealt
`
`with on its related Motion for Summary Judgment.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket