`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`Judge Robert W. Schroeder III
`
`UNILOC USA INC., et al
`
`
`
`§§
`
`V.
`
`§
`§
`AVG TECHNOLOGIES, USA, INC., et al §
`
`CIVIL NO. 2:16CV393
`
`
`§§
`
`UNILOC USA INC., et al
`
`
`
`V.
`
`§
`§
`§
`
`ADP, et al
`________________________________________________________________________
`MINUTES FOR MARKMAN HEARING
`HELD BEFORE JUDGE ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
`AUGUST 10, 2017
`
`CIVIL NO. 2:16CV741
`
`
`ADJOURN: 11:36 am
`OPEN: 9:04 am
`________________________________________________________________________
`ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS:
`See Attorney Sign In Sheet
`
`ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS: See Attorney Sign In Sheet
`
`LAW CLERK:
`
`David Mlaver
`
`COURTROOM DEPUTY:
`
`Shedera Combs
`
`Darlene May
`COURT REPORTER:
`______________________________________________________________________________
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`9:04 am
`
`9:08 am
`
`9:17 am
`
`9:20 am
`
`Case called, parties announced ready, Court welcomes parties; Preliminary
`constructions were provided earlier today; Court’s preference that arguments be
`term by term; Time limit 90 minutes per side.
`
`James Foster provides background
`
`Court questions Mr. Foster; Mr. Foster responds and continues.
`
`Court questions Mr. Foster; Mr. Foster responds and continues.
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 225 Filed 08/11/17 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 3900
`
`9:22 am
`
`9:39 am
`
`9:49 am
`
`10:07 am
`
`Mr. Foster argues claim term - application launcher program.
`
`Anthony Vecchione clarifies typographical error in slide; Mr. Foster continues.
`
`Matthew Moffa gives overview and argues claim term - application launcher
`program.
`
`Mr. Foster states upon review of preliminary construction he takes opposition to
`one stating indefinite for lack of antecedent basis in the independent claim and
`will rely on briefing rather argue orally; Court questions Mr. Foster; Mr. Foster
`responds.
`
`10:09 am
`
`Mr. Moffa responds and addresses term “the initiating execution step.”
`
`10:19 am
`
`Mr. Foster responds.
`
`10:21 am
`
`Mr. Moffa responds.
`
`10:23 am
`
`Mr. Foster responds; Court questions Mr. Foster; Mr. Foster responds and
`requests a 20 minute break.
`
`10:23 am
`
`Recess
`
`10:43 am
`
`Mr. Foster addresses disputed constructions.
`
`10:55 am
`
`Mr. Moffa responds.
`
`11:01 am
`
`Chris Bright addresses term application program.
`
`11:03 am
`
`Court would like to hear from Plaintiff; Mr. Foster states no objection.
`
`11:03 am
`
`Mr. Bright continues.
`
`11:08 am
`
`Mr. Foster responds.
`
`11:09 am
`
`Mr. Moffa addresses other issues and approaching deadlines.
`
`11:10 am
`
`Court asks if Plaintiff objects; Mr. Foster responds.
`
`11:11 am
`
`Court asks the parties to meet and confer.
`
`11:11 am
`
`Mike Nadel addresses motion to dismiss for improper venue on behalf of
`Blackboard; Court will hear preliminary comments and set additional hearing if
`necessary; Mr. Nadel responds.
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-00741-RWS Document 225 Filed 08/11/17 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 3901
`
`11:15 am
`
`Court questions Mr. Foster; Mr. Foster responds re venue.
`
`11:19 am
`
`Court asks Mr. Foster to review and notify Court of position re venue in 7 days;
`Mr. Foster responds.
`
`11:19 am
`
`Seth Herring responds on behalf of Box.
`
`11:20 am
`
`Mark Long responds on behalf of Ubisoft; Mr. Vecchione responds; Mr. Long
`responds.
`
`11:21 am
`
`Casey Kniser responds on behalf of Kaspersky Labs; Mr. Foster responds.
`
`11:23 am
`
`Kalpana Srinivasan responds.
`
`11:24 am
`
`Mr. Moffa addresses narrowing issues in the case and 101 issue.
`
`11:33 am
`
`Mr. Foster responds; Court questions Mr. Foster; Mr. Foster responds.
`
`11:36 am
`
`Recess
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
