throbber
Case 2:16-cv-00992-JRG Document 130 Filed 05/04/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 736
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`







`§ 2:16-cv-00992-JRG
`LEAD CASE
`§ 2:16-cv-00991-JRG
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNILOC USA, INC. ET AL,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,
`
`LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`Before the Court is the Parties Joint Motion to Consolidate Cases (Dkt. No. 42) (“the
`
`Motion”). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should be GRANTED.
`
`It is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case (Case No. 2:16-cv-991) be
`
`CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues (except venue) with the LEAD CASE (Case No. 2:16-
`
`cv-00992). All parties are instructed to file any future filings (except relating to venue) in the
`
`LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for venue determinations and trial.
`
`Defendants in Case No. 2:16-cv-00991-JRG shall be permitted, until May 8, 2017, to
`
`supplement the invalidity contentions already served in the Lead Case. All parties to the Lead
`
`Case are directed to meet and confer to determine whether the docket control order, proposed
`
`protective order, proposed discovery order, and/or appointment of mediator in the Lead Case
`
`warrant further amendment because of the new consolidation. Any proposed amendments to the
`
`docket control order, proposed protective order, proposed discovery order, or appointment of a
`
`mediator shall be filed within two weeks of this Order.
`
`The local rules’ page limitations for Markman briefs and other motions will apply to the
`
`

`

`Case 2:16-cv-00992-JRG Document 130 Filed 05/04/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 737
`
`consolidated case. To further promote judicial economy and to conserve the parties’ resources,
`
`the Court encourages the parties to file a notice with the Court in the event that there are other
`
`related cases currently pending on the Court’s docket that may also be appropriate for
`
`consolidation with this case.
`
`The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated defendants into the Lead Case and their
`
`corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance
`
`in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action.
`
`Counsel who has appeared pro hac vice in any member case may file a Notice of Appearance in
`
`the Lead Case without filing an additional application to appear pro hac vice in the Lead Case.
`
`Counsel who have not appeared in a member case at the point when it is consolidated into the Lead
`
`Case should file a Notice of Appearance only in the Lead Case, and such Notice should state the
`
`relevant member case.
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`SIGNED this 19th day of December, 2011.
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 4th day of May, 2017.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket