`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
` DIVISION
`
`
`OYSTER OPTICS, LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-01302-JRG
`LEAD CASE
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-01297-JRG
`MEMBER CASE
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`Before the Court is Defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “ALU”)
`
`Unopposed Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Moot Two Motions: Dkt Nos. 868 and 875 (the
`
`“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 903). In the Motion, ALU represents that its Motion for a Finding of
`
`Exceptional Case and for Attorneys’ Fees (Dkt. No. 868) and Supplemental Contested Bill of Costs
`
`(Dkt. No. 875) are moot in light of a license agreement between ALU and Plaintiff Oyster Optics,
`
`LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Oyster”) (together with ALU, the “Parties”). (Id. at 1). ALU notes that its
`
`requested withdrawal has no effect on its continued pursuit of pending claims in Nokia of America
`
`Corp., et al. v. Oyster Optics, LLC, et al., Case No. 2:18-CV-00391-JRG (E.D. Tex.). (Id.).
`
`
`
`Having considered the Motion, and in light of its unopposed nature, the Court finds that it
`
`should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, ALU’s Motion for a Finding of Exceptional
`
`Case and for Attorneys’ Fees (Dkt. No. 868) and Supplemental Contested Bill of Costs (Dkt. No.
`
`875) are hereby WITHDRAWN.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:16-cv-01302-JRG Document 905 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 34919
`Case 2:16-cv-01302-JRG Document 905 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: 34919
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`