`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`SEAGEN INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`CASE NO. 2:20-cv-00337-JRG
`
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO P.R. 4-3
`
`Pursuant to Local Patent Rule (“P.R.”) 4-3 and the Court’s February 8, 2021, Docket
`
`Control Order (Dkt. No. 48), Plaintiff Seagen Inc. (“Seagen”) and Defendant Daiichi Sankyo
`
`Company, Limited (“Daiichi Sankyo Japan”) hereby submit the Parties’ Joint Claim
`
`Construction Statement.
`
`I. P.R. 4-3(a)(1) Agreed-Upon Claim Constructions
`
`The Parties have not agreed on any constructions for U.S. Patent No. 10,808,039 (“the
`
`’039 patent).
`
`II. P.R. 4-3(a)(2) Disputed Claim Constructions
`
`Pursuant to P.R. 4-3(a)(2), the chart attached as Exhibit A to this Joint Statement contains
`
`disputed patent claim terms, phrases, or clauses for which the parties propose different
`
`constructions and/or indefiniteness positions. Plaintiff and Defendant identify their evidence in
`
`Exhibits B and C, respectively.
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 106 Filed 06/04/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 4027
`
`
`
`III. P.R. 4-3(a)(3) Length of Claim Construction Hearing
`
`Pursuant to P.R. 4-3(a)(3), the Parties currently request 3 hours total, 1.5 hours per side,
`
`for the claim construction hearing. To the extent the Court’s schedule permits a longer hearing,
`
`Daiichi Sankyo Japan respectfully submits that the complexity of the technology and the number
`
`of issues currently presented could benefit from additional time. Seagen does not believe a
`
`longer hearing is required, and would be satisfied with a 2 hour hearing.
`
`IV. P.R. 4-3(a)(4) Live Witness Testimony at Claim Construction Hearing
`
`The parties do not intend to offer any live witness testimony at the claim construction
`
`hearing, unless the Court requests such testimony.
`
`V. P.R. 4-3(a)(5) Other Issues
`
`None.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 106 Filed 06/04/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 4028
`
`Dated: June 4, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Michael A. Jacobs
`MJacobs@mofo.com
`Matthew A. Chivvis
`MChivvis@mofo.com
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`425 Market Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: 415.268.7000
`Facsimile: 415.268.7522
`
`Bryan Wilson
`BWilson@mofo.com
`Pieter S. de Ganon
`PdeGanon@mofo.com
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`755 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, California 94304-1018
`Telephone: 650.813.5600
`Facsimile: 650.494.0792
`
`Melissa R. Smith
`Texas State Bar No. 24001351
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: 903.934.8450
`Facsimile: 903.934.9257
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`T. John Ward, Jr.
`Texas State Bar No. 00794818
`jw@wsfirm.com
`Charles Everingham IV
`Texas State Bar No. 00787447
`ce@wsfirm.com
`Andrea L. Fair
`Texas State Bar No. 24078488
`andrea@wsfirm.com
`WARD, SMITH & HILL, PLLC
`1507 Bill Owens Parkway
`Longview, Texas 75604
`Telephone: 903.757.6400
`Facsimile: 903.757.2323
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Seagen Inc.
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 106 Filed 06/04/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 4029
`
`
`
`Dated: June 4, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: _/s/ Preston K. Ratliff II
`Deron R. Dacus
`State Bar No. 00790553
`The Dacus Firm, P.C.
`821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430
`Tyler, Texas, 75701
`+1 (903) 705-1117
`+1 (903) 581-2543 facsimile
`ddacus@dacusfirm.com
`
`J. Mark Mann
`State Bar No. 12926150
`mark@themannfirm.com
`MANN | TINDEL | THOMPSON
`300 West Main Street
`Henderson, Texas 75652
`(903) 657-8540
`(903) 657-6003 (fax)
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daiichi
`Sankyo Company, Limited
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Preston K. Ratliff II
`Joseph M. O’Malley, Jr.
`Ashley N. Mays-Williams
`Paul Hastings LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`(212) 318-6000
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daiichi Sankyo
`Company, Limited
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00337-JRG Document 106 Filed 06/04/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 4030
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served, via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) upon all
`
`counsel of record on June 4, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Melissa R. Smith
`Melissa R. Smith
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
